- Research
- Open Access
- Published:

# New algorithms for approximating zeros of inverse strongly monotone maps and *J*-fixed points

*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*
**volume 2020**, Article number: 3 (2020)

## Abstract

Let *E* be a real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\). A new class of *relatively weak**J-nonexpansive maps*, \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\), is introduced and studied. An algorithm to approximate a common element of *J*-fixed points for a countable family of relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive maps and zeros of a countable family of inverse strongly monotone maps in a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space is constructed. Furthermore, assuming existence, the sequence of the algorithm is proved to converge strongly. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the convergence of the sequence generated by the algorithm.

## Introduction

Let *E* be a real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\). A mapping \(J:E\rightarrow2^{E^{*}}\) defined by \(J(x):= \{x^{*}\in E^{*}: \langle x,x^{*} \rangle=\Vert x \Vert^{2}, \Vert x^{*} \Vert=\Vert x\Vert, \forall x\in E \}\), is called the *normalized duality map* on *E*, where \(\langle\cdot,\cdot \rangle\) denotes the duality pairing between the elements of *E* and \(E^{*}\). A mapping \(A: E\to E\) is said to be *accretive* if for each \(x,y\in E\), there exists \(j(x-y)\in J(x-y)\) such that the following inequality holds: \(\langle Ax-Ay,j(x-y)\rangle\geq0\). A mapping \(A:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) is said to be *monotone* if for each \(x,y\in E\), the following inequality holds: \(\langle x- y,Ax - Ay \rangle\geq0\). In a real Hilbert space, accretive operators are called *monotone*.

It is known that many physically significant problems can be modeled in the form of the following evolution equation: \(\frac{du}{dt} + Au = 0\), where \(A: E\to E\) is an *accretive-type map*. This equation describes any system that generates energy over time. Observe that at equilibrium, *u* is independent of time so that the equation reduces to

whose solutions correspond to the equilibrium state of the system described by equation \(\frac{du}{dt} + Au = 0\).

Approximation of solutions of Eq. (1.1) has been studied extensively by various authors (see, e.g., Aoyama *et al.* [4], Blum and Oettli [6], Censor, Gibali, Reich and Sabach [12], Censor, Gibali and Reich [9–11], Chidume [14], Chidume *et al.* [15, 16, 18, 23, 25, 26], Gibali, Reich and Zalas [27], Iiduka and Takahashi [29], Iiduka *et al.* [31], Kassay, Reich and Sabach [33], Kinderlehrer and Stampacchia [34], Lions and Stampacchia [36], Liu [37], Liu and Nashed [38], Ofoedu and Malonza [43], Osilike *et al.* [44], Reich and Sabach [48], Reich [46], Rockafellar [49], Su and Xu [51], Zegeye *et al.* [58], Zegeye and Shahzad [57], and the references therein).

For approximating a solution of Eq. (1.1) in a real Hilbert space H, where \(A:H\rightarrow H\) is *monotone*, assuming existence, Browder [7] introduced an operator \(T:=I-A\), where *I* is the identity map on *H*. He called such an operator a *pseudocontraction*. It is trivial to observe that zeros of *A* correspond to fixed points of *T*. Interest in *pseudocontractive-type map* stems mainly from this firm connection with the *accretive-type maps*. Hence, approximating fixed points of pseudocontractive maps has become a flourishing area of interest to researchers in nonlinear operator theory (see, e.g., the monographs of Alber [1], Berinde [5], Chidume [14], Goebel and Reich [28], and the references therein).

Let a function \(f: E\to \mathbb{ R}\cup\{\infty\}\) be convex and proper. The *subdifferential* of *f*, \(\partial f:E \to2^{E^{*}}\), is defined for each \(x\in E\) by

It is known that *∂f* is a monotone map on *E*, and \(0\in \partial f(v)\) if and only if *v* is a minimizer of *f*. In general, if \(A:=\partial f:E\rightarrow2^{E^{*}}\) is a *monotone-type map* defined on an appropriate real normed space *E*, *solutions of equation*

in this case *where**A**is of monotone type, correspond to minimizers of some convex functional defined on**E*. This is one of the motivations for studying the equation \(Au=0\), where \(A:E \to E^{*}\) is monotone.

Clearly, Browder’s fixed point technique for the equation \(Au=0\), where \(A:E \to E\)*is of accretive-type*, is not applicable to the equation \(Au=0\), where \(A:E \to E^{*}\) is monotone, for an arbitrary real normed space *E* more general than Hilbert spaces.

As has been rightly observed by Hazewinkle, a Series Editor of Kluwer Academic Publishers,

“…many, and probably most, mathematical objects and models do not naturally live in Hilbert space.”

They live generally in real Banach spaces more general than Hilbert spaces.

Let *E* be a smooth real normed space, and let \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) be a map. If \(J:E\rightarrow{E^{*}}\) is the normalized duality map, then \(x\in E\) is called a *J*-*fixed point* of *T* if \(Tx=Jx\) (see, e.g., Chidume *et al.* [23–25] and Chidume and Idu [20]). This concept was introduced by Zegeye [55] in 2008, who called such a fixed point *a semi-fixed point*. The concept was later, in 2012, called *duality fixed point* by Cheng *et al.* [13], Liu [37], and Su and Xu [51]. The notion of *J*-fixed point has been found to have numerous applications, and provides for monotone maps \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) the analog of Browder’s pseudocontractive maps for accretive maps, \(T:E\rightarrow E\). For more on *J*-fixed points, the reader may consult any of the following references: Chidume and Monday [21, 22].

A map \(A:E\to E^{*}\) is called *inverse strongly monotone* if there exists \(\alpha>0\) such that

Chidume *et al.* [23] called a map \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\)*strictly**J-pseudocontractive* if for every \(x,y\in E\), there exists \(\alpha>0\) such that the following inequality holds:

### Remark 1

Liu [37] called this concept *α*-strongly duality.

By setting \(A:=J-T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\), where *E* is a real normed space with dual space \(E^{*}\) and *T* is a strictly *J*-pseudocontractive map, we list some properties of *A* and *T* (Chidume *et al.* [23]):

- (i)
\(x\in E\) is a

*J*-fixed point of*T*if and only if*x*is a zero of*A*, - (ii)
*A*is*inverse strongly monotone*if and only if*T*is strictly*J*-pseudocontractive.

We recall the following definitions.

### Definition 1.1

Let *C* be a nonempty closed and convex subset of *E*; let \(T:C\to E\) be a map. A point \(x^{*} \in C\) is called a *fixed point* of *T* if \(Tx^{*} = x^{*}\). The set of fixed points of *T* is denoted by \(F(T)\). We say that \((I-T)\) is *demiclosed at zero* whenever a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\) in *C* converges *weakly* to *x* and \(\{ x_{n} - Tx_{n}\}\) converges *strongly* to 0, then \(x \in F(T)\). A point \(p\in C\) is said to be an *asymptotic fixed point* of *T* if *C* contains a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) which converges *weakly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Vert Tx_{n} - x_{n}\Vert= 0\). The set of asymptotic fixed points of *T* is denoted by \(\widehat{F}(T)\).

### Definition 1.2

(Chidume and Idu [20])

Let *E* be a smooth real normed space with dual space \(E^{*}\). Let \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) be any map. A point \(x\in E\) is called a *J*-*fixed point* of *T* if \(Tx=Jx\).

The set of *J*-fixed point of a map *T* is denoted by \(F_{J}(T)=\{ x\in E: Tx=Jx \}\). We now give some examples of *J*-fixed points.

### Example 1

Let *H* be a real Hilbert space; let \(T:H\to H\) be any map with \(F(T):=\{x \in H:Tx=x\} \neq\emptyset\). Then, \(F(T)=F_{J}(T)\).

### Example 2

(Chidume and Idu [20])

It is known that in \(l_{p}\) spaces, \(1< p<\infty\),

for any \(x=(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots)\in l_{p}\) (see, e.g., Alber [3], p. 36). For \(1< q< p\), we set \(\gamma_{p}:=(1+\frac{1}{2^{p}})^{\frac{2-p}{p}}\) and define \(T:l_{p}\to l_{q} \) (\(\subset l_{p}\)) by

For any \(\lambda\in \mathbb{ R}\), let \(x_{\lambda}=(\lambda,\frac{\lambda }{2},0,0,\ldots)\). Then, \(x_{\lambda}\in F_{J}(T)\).

Let *E* be a smooth real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\). A function \(\phi:E\times E\to\mathbb{R}\), defined by

where *J* is the normalized duality mapping from *E* into \(E^{*}\) will play a central role in what follows. It was introduced by Alber and has been studied by Alber and Ryazantseva [3], Alber and Guerre-Delabriere [2], Chidume *et al.* [16, 17, 23], Chidume and Idu [20], Kamimura and Takahashi [32], Reich [47], Takahashi and Zembayashi [53, 54], Zegeye [55], and a host of other authors.

If \(E=H\), a real Hilbert space, Eq. (1.4) reduces to \(\phi(x,y)=\Vert x-y\Vert^{2}\), \(\forall x,y\in H\).

### Definition 1.3

A map \(T:C\rightarrow E\) is said to be *relatively nonexpansive* if the following conditions hold (see, e.g., Matsushita and Takahashi [40] and Reich [45]):

- (1)
\(F(T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in C\) and \(p\in F(T)\),

- (3)
\(\widehat{F}(T) = F(T)\).

### Definition 1.4

A point \(p\in C\) is said to be a *strong asymptotic fixed point* of *T* if *C* contains a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) which converges *strongly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Vert Tx_{n} - x_{n}\Vert= 0\) (see, e.g., Reich [45]). The set of *strongly* asymptotic fixed points of *T* is denoted by \(\widetilde{F}(T)\).

### Definition 1.5

A map \(T:C\rightarrow E\) is said to be *relatively weak nonexpansive* if the following conditions hold (see, e.g., Liu [39] and Zegeye and Shahzad [56]):

- (1)
\(F(T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in C\) and \(p\in F(T)\),

- (3)
\(\widetilde{F}(T) = F(T)\).

If *E* is a strictly convex and reflexive real Banach space and \(A: E\rightarrow E^{*}\) is a continuous monotone map with \(A^{-1}(0) \neq\varnothing\), it is known that \(J_{r} := (J + rA)^{-1}J\), for \(r>0\), is relatively weak nonexpansive (see, e.g., Kohasaka [35]). Clearly, every relatively nonexpansive map is relatively weak nonexpansive. Let \(T:C\rightarrow E\) be a map; we have that \(F(T)\subset\widetilde{F}(T) \subset\widehat{F}(T)\). It follows that \(F(T)= \widetilde {F}(T) = \widehat{F}(T)\) for any relatively nonexpansive map.

An example of a relatively weak nonexpansive map which is not a relatively nonexpansive map is given in Zhang *et al.* [59]. In the following definitions, we assume that the space *E* is reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\).

### Definition 1.6

(Chidume *et al.* [15])

Let \(T:E\to E^{*}\) be a map. A point \(x^{*}\in E\) is called an *asymptotic**J-fixed point of**T* if there exists a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\subset E\) such that \(x_{n}\rightharpoonup x^{*}\) and \(\|Jx_{n}-Tx_{n}\| \to0\) as \(n \to\infty\). We shall denote the set of asymptotic *J*-fixed points of *T* by \(\widehat{F}_{J}(T)\).

### Definition 1.7

(Chidume *et al.* [15])

A map \(T:E\to E^{*}\) is said to be *relatively**J-nonexpansive* if

- (i)
\(\widehat{F}_{J}(T)=F_{J}(T) \neq\emptyset\),

- (ii)
\(\phi(p,J^{-1}Tx)\leq\phi(p,x)\), \(\forall x\in E\), \(p\in F_{J}(T)\).

In 2008, Iiduka and Takahashi [30] introduced an iterative algorithm for finding a zero of an inverse strongly monotone map *A* in a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space. They proved a strong convergence theorem to some element of \(A^{-1}(0)\).

For appropriating zeros of inverse strongly monotone maps and fixed points of *relatively weak nonexpansive maps*, Zegeye and Shahzad [56] in 2009 introduced a generalized projection algorithm and proved that the sequence generated by their algorithm converges strongly to a common element of the sets of zeros for inverse strongly monotone maps and fixed points of relatively weak nonexpansive maps

For finding an element in the set of solutions of zeros for an inverse strongly monotone map and fixed points for a *countable family of relatively weak nonexpansive maps* in a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space, Chidume *et al.* [19] proved the following theorem.

### Theorem 1.8

*Let**E**be a* 2-*uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(A:E\to E^{*}\)*be an**α*-*inverse strongly monotone map*, *and let*
\(T_{i}:E\rightarrow E\), \(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of relatively weak nonexpansive maps*. *Assume that*
\(W:= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }F(T_{i})\cap A^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\), *where*
\(A^{-1}0=\{u \in E: Au=0\}\neq\emptyset\). *For arbitrary*
\(x_{1} \in E\), *let the sequence*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*be iteratively defined by*

*where*
\(J: E \rightarrow E^{*}\)*is the normalized duality map*, \(\lambda \in (0,\frac{\alpha}{2L} )\), \(L>0\)*denotes the Lipschitz constant of*
\(J^{-1}\), *and*
\(\{\alpha_{i}\} _{i=1}^{\infty}\)*is a sequence in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{i}=1\). *Then*, *the sequences*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*converge strongly to some*
\(x^{*}\in W:= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(T_{i})\cap A^{-1}0\).

### Remark 2

This theorem is a significant improvement on the result of Zegeye and Shahzad [56]. We observe that the *relatively weak nonexpansive maps* studied in Zegeye and Shahzad [56] and Chidume *et al.* [19] are maps *from a real normed space to itself*.

It is our purpose in this paper to introduce a new class of maps called *relatively weak J-nonexpansive* maps *from a real normed space**E**to its dual space*
\(E^{*}\). We first give some properties of this class of maps, and we then construct an algorithm to approximate a common element of *J*-fixed points for a countable family of relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive maps and zeros of a countable family of inverse strongly monotone maps in a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space. We prove a strong convergence theorem. Finally, we give a numerical example to illustrate the convergence of the sequence generated by the algorithm.

## Preliminaries

It is obvious from the definition of the function *ϕ* that

### Remark 3

It is known that if *E* is a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth real Banach space, then, for all \(x,y\in E\), \(\phi(x,y)=0\) if and only if \(x=y\) (see, e.g., Zhou *et al.* [60]).

Define a map \(V:E\times E^{*}\to\mathbb{R}\) by \(V(x,x^{*})=\Vert x\Vert^{2}-2\langle x,x^{*}\rangle+\Vert x^{*}\Vert^{2}\). Then, it is easy to see that \(V(x,x^{*})=\phi(x,J^{-1}(x^{*}))\), \(\forall x\in E\), \(x^{*}\in E^{*}\). Let *C* be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive real Banach space *E*. The *generalized projection* map introduced by Alber [1], is a map \(\varPi_{C}:E\rightarrow C\) such that, for any \(x\in E\), there corresponds a unique element \(x_{0}:=\varPi_{C} (x) \in C\) such that \(\phi(x_{0},x)= \min_{y\in C}\phi(y,x)\). We note that the existence and uniqueness of the generalized projection map \(\varPi_{C}\) follows from the strict monotonicity and properties of the Lyapunov functional *ϕ* (see, e.g., Takahashi [52], Alber [1], and Alber and Ryazantseva [3]). If *E* is a real Hilbert space, we remark that the generalized projection \(\varPi_{C}\) coincides with the metric projection from *E* onto *C*.

The following lemmas are needed in the sequel.

### Lemma 2.1

(Matsushita and Takahashi [41])

*Let**E**be a strictly convex and smooth Banach space*; *let**C**be a closed convex subset of**E*, *and let**T**be a relatively nonexpansive mapping from**C**into itself*. *Then*, \(F(T )\)*is a closed convex subset of**C*.

### Lemma 2.2

(Schu [50])

*Let**E**be a uniformly convex Banach space and**C**be a nonempty closed convex subset of**E*. *Let**T**be a nonexpansive mapping of**C**into itself*. *Then*, \((I-T)\)*is demiclosed at zero*.

### Lemma 2.3

(Chidume *et al.* [19])

*Let**C**be a closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space**E*, *and let*
\(T_{i}:C\rightarrow E\), \(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of relatively weak nonexpansive maps*. *Assume that*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(T_{i})\neq\emptyset\)*and*
\(\{\alpha_{i}\} _{i=1}^{\infty}\)*is a sequence in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{i}=1\). *Let the map*
\(T:C\rightarrow E\)*be defined by*
\(Tx=J^{-1} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{i} JT_{i}x )\)*for each*
\(x\in C\). *Then*, *T**is relatively weak nonexpansive and*
\(F(T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(T_{i})\).

### Lemma 2.4

(Bruck [8])

*Suppose**E**is strictly convex and*
\(\{T_{n}\}\)*is a sequence of nonexpansive mappings*
\(T_{n}:C\rightarrow E\). *Then there exists a nonexpansive mapping*
\(T:C\rightarrow E\)*such that*
\(F(T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(T_{i})\).

### Remark 4

It was proved in Bruck [8] that the map \(T:C\rightarrow E\) defined by \(Tx= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{i} T_{i}x\), for each \(x\in C\), where \(\{\alpha_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{i}=1\), is nonexpansive.

## Main results

### Definition 3.1

Let *E* be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\). Let \(T:E\to E^{*}\) be a map. A point \(p\in E\) will be called a *strong asymptotic**J-fixed point* of *T* if *E* contains a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) which converges *strongly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\Vert Tx_{n} - Jx_{n}\Vert= 0\). The set of *strongly* asymptotic *J*-fixed points of *T* will be denoted by \(\widetilde{F_{J}}(T)\).

### Definition 3.2

Let *E* be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth real Banach space with dual space \(E^{*}\). A map \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) will be called *relatively weak**J-nonexpansive* if the following conditions hold:

- (1)
\(F_{J}(T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, J^{-1}Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in E\) and \(p\in F_{J}(T)\),

- (3)
\(\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) = F_{J}(T)\).

An example of a relatively *weak**J*-nonexpansive map that is *not* relatively *J*-nonexpansive (see Zhang *et al.* [59]). In addition, we provide the following example.

### Example 3

Let \(\ell_{p}(\mathbb{R})\) be the sequence space, for \(1< p<\infty\). Let the sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\in\ell_{p}(\mathbb{R})\) be defined by \(x_{0} = (1,0,0,0,\ldots)\), \(x_{1} = (1,1,0,0,0,\ldots)\), \(x_{2} = (1,0,1,0,0,0,\ldots)\), \(x_{3} = (1,0,0,1,0,0,0,\ldots)\), …, \(x_{n} = (\zeta_{n,1},\zeta_{n,2},\zeta_{n,3},\ldots,\zeta _{n,k+1},0, \ldots)\), …, where

Let \(T:\ell_{p}(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow\ell_{q}(\mathbb{R})\) be a map defined as follows:

where \(J:\ell_{p}(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow\ell_{q}(\mathbb{R})\) is the single valued normalized duality map and \(\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q}=1\). It is easy to see that the sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converges weakly to \(x_{0}\).

Let \(f=(\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\ldots,\alpha_{n+1},\ldots)\in\ell _{q}(\mathbb{R})\), for \(1< q<\infty\); we have that \(f(x_{n}-x_{0})=\langle f,x_{n}-x_{0}\rangle=\alpha_{n+1} \rightarrow0\) as \(n \rightarrow\infty\). Therefore, \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converges weakly to \(x_{0}\). Clearly, \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) is not Cauchy since \(\Vert x_{n} - x_{m}\Vert=\sqrt{2}\), for \(n\neq m\), and the *J*-fixed point of *T* is zero, i.e., \(F_{J}(T)=\{0\}\). Since \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converges weakly to \(x_{0}\) and

we see that \(\widehat{F_{J}}(T)=\{x_{0}\}\), i.e., \(x_{0}\) is an asymptotic *J*-fixed point of *T*. Hence, \(\widehat{F_{J}}(T)\neq {F_{J}}(T)\), i.e., *T* is not a relatively *J*-nonexpansive map.

We now show that zero is a unique strong asymptotic *J*-fixed point of *T*. Let \(\{y_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }\in\ell_{p}(\mathbb{R})\) such that \(y_{n} \rightarrow y^{*}\) and \(\Vert Ty_{n} - Jy_{n}\Vert\rightarrow0\) as \(n \rightarrow\infty\). Since \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) is not Cauchy, there exists sufficiently large *N* such that \(y_{n}\neq x_{m}\), for \(n, m >N\). Now, \(Ty_{n}= - Jy_{n}\), for \(n>N\); this implies that \(Ty_{n}-Jy_{n}= - 2Jy_{n}\), for \(n>N\). It follows that \(\Vert Ty_{n} - Jy_{n}\Vert=2\Vert Jy_{n} \Vert\rightarrow0\), and thus, \(y_{n} \rightarrow y^{*}=0\). Consequently, \(\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) = F_{J}(T)\).

We now show that *T* is a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map. Based on the definition of *T*, we obtain

It follows that *T* is a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map. Hence, the map *T* is an example of a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map, which is not a relatively *J*-nonexpansive map.

### Lemma 3.3

*Let**E**be a reflexive*, *strictly convex*, *and smooth real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(T:E\to E^{*}\)*be a map*. *Then*, \(F_{J}(T)\subset\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) \subset\widehat{F_{J}}(T)\).

### Proof

Let \(p\in F_{J}(T)\). Then, \(T(p)=Jp\). Set \(x_{n}=p\), \(\forall n\geq1\), so \(Tx_{n}=Tp=Jp\). Therefore, \(F_{J}(T)\subset\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) \). Clearly, \(\widetilde {F_{J}}(T) \subset\widehat{F_{J}}(T)\). Hence, \(F_{J}(T)\subset\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) \subset\widehat{F_{J}}(T)\). □

### Theorem 3.4

*Let**E**be a reflexive*, *strictly convex*, *and smooth real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(T:E\to E^{*}\)*be a relatively**J*-*nonexpansive map*. *Then*, *T**is relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive*.

### Proof

Since *T* is a relatively *J*-nonexpansive map, we get that

- (1)
\(\widehat{F_{J}}(T) = F_{J}(T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, J^{-1}Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in E\) and \(p\in F_{J}(T)\).

Using Lemma 3.3 and the fact that \(\widehat{F_{J}}(T) = F_{J}(T)\), we see that \(F_{J}(T)\subset\widetilde{F_{J}}(T) \subset\widehat{F_{J}}(T) = F_{J}(T)\). This implies that \(F_{J}(T)=\widetilde{F_{J}}(T)=\widehat{F_{J}}(T)\). Therefore, *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive. □

### Theorem 3.5

*Let**E**be a reflexive*, *strictly convex*, *and smooth real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(T:E\to E^{*}\)*be a relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive map*. *Then*, *the**J*-*fixed point set of**T*, \(F_{J}(T)\), *is closed and convex*.

### Proof

We first show that \(F_{J}(T)\) is closed. Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) be any sequence in \(F_{J}(T)\) such that \(x_{n} \rightarrow x \in E\) as \(n\rightarrow\infty\). Using the fact that *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive and definition of *ϕ*, we see that \(\phi(x_{n}, J^{-1}Tx) \leq\phi(x_{n}, x)\rightarrow0\) as \(n\rightarrow\infty\). Thus, \(\phi(x_{n}, J^{-1}Tx)\rightarrow0\). We observe that \(\phi(x_{n}, J^{-1}Tx)=\Vert x_{n} \Vert^{2}-2\langle x_{n},J(J^{-1}Tx)\rangle+\Vert JJ^{-1}Tx \Vert^{2}\), and so \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\phi(x_{n}, J^{-1}Tx) = \phi(x, J^{-1}Tx)=0\). From Remark 3, this implies that \(J^{-1}Tx=x\), so \(Tx=Jx\). Therefore, \(x\in F_{J}(T)\). It follows that \(F_{J}(T)\) is closed.

We now show that the set \(F_{J}(T)\) is convex. Let \(x_{1}, x_{2} \in F_{J}(T)\), \(t\in(0,1)\), and set \(x_{3}=tx_{1}+(1-t)x_{2}\); we show that \(x_{3} \in F_{J}(T)\). From the definition of *ϕ* and the fact that *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive, we see that

so \(\phi(x_{3},J^{-1}Tx_{3})=0\). Therefore, we see that \(J^{-1}Tx_{3}=x_{3}\) from Remark 3, and this implies that \(Tx_{3}=Jx_{3}\), *i.e.*, \(x_{3} \in F_{J}(T)\). Therefore, \(F_{J}(T)\) is convex. Hence, the *J*-fixed point set of *T*, \(F_{J}(T)\), is closed and convex. □

### Lemma 3.6

*Let**E**be a uniformly smooth and uniformly convex real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Then*, *the map*
\(T:E\to E^{*}\)*is relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive map if and only if the map*
\(J^{-1}T:E\to E\)*is relatively weak nonexpansive map*. *Moreover*, \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\)*and*
\(\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T)=\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\).

### Proof

We first show that \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\). \(y^{*}\in F_{J}(T)\) iff \(Ty^{*}=Jy^{*}\) iff \(J^{-1}Ty^{*}=y^{*}\) iff \(y^{*}\in F(J^{-1}T)\). Therefore, \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\). We now show that \(\widetilde {F}(J^{-1}T)=\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\). \(p\in\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\) if and only if there exists a sequence \(\{ x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\subseteq E\) which converges *strongly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Vert Tx_{n} - Jx_{n}\Vert= 0\) if and only if there exists a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\subseteq E\) which converges *strongly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Vert J^{-1}Tx_{n} - x_{n}\Vert= 0\) if and only if \(p\in\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T)\).

Therefore, \(\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T)=\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\).

Now, *T* is a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map if

- (1)
\(\widetilde{F}_{J}(T) = F_{J}(T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, J^{-1}Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in E\) and \(p\in F_{J}(T)\).

In addition, \(J^{-1}T\) is a relatively weak nonexpansive map if

- (1)
\(\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T) = F(J^{-1}T)\neq\emptyset\),

- (2)
\(\phi(p, J^{-1}Tx) \leq\phi(p, x)\), \(\forall x\in E\) and \(p\in F(J^{-1}T)\).

To show that \(T:E\to E^{*}\) is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map if and only if the map \(J^{-1}T:E\to E\) is relatively weak nonexpansive map, it suffices to show from the definitions above that \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\) and \(\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T)=\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\). Moreover, we have already shown that \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\) and \(\widetilde{F}(J^{-1}T)=\widetilde{F}_{J}(T)\). Hence, \(T:E\to E^{*}\) is a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map if and only if the map \(J^{-1}T:E\to E\) is relatively weak nonexpansive. □

We now prove the following lemma.

### Lemma 3.7

*Let**E**be a uniformly smooth and* 2-*uniformly convex real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(A:E\to E^{*}\)*be an**α*-*inverse strongly monotone map*, *and let*
\(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\)*be a relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive map*. *Assume that*
\(W:=F_{J}(T)\cap A^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). *For arbitrary*
\(x_{1} \in C_{1}\), *let the sequence*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*be iteratively defined by*

*where*
\(J: E \rightarrow E^{*}\)*is the normalized duality map*, \(\lambda \in (0,\frac{\alpha}{ 2L} )\)*and*
\(L>0\)*denotes a Lipschitz constant of*
\(J^{-1}\). *Then*, *the sequences*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*converge strongly to some*
\(x^{*}\in W\).

### Proof

Since *T* is a relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive map, it follows from Lemma 3.6 that \(J^{-1}T\) is relatively weak nonexpansive and \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)\). Using Theorem 1.8, we have that the sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) and \(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converge strongly to some \(x^{*}\in W\). □

## Strong convergence theorems for countable families of maps

### Lemma 4.1

*Let**E**be a uniformly smooth and uniformly convex real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(T_{i}:E\rightarrow E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive maps such that*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\neq\emptyset\). *Let a map*
\(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\)*be defined by*
\(Tx= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i}x\), *for each*
\(x\in E\), *where*
\(\{ \delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*is a sequence in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\). *Then*, *T**is relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive and*
\(F_{J}(T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\).

### Proof

Given that the map *T* is defined by \(Tx= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta _{i} T_{i}x\), for each \(x\in E\). This implies that \(J^{-1}Tx=J^{-1} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} J(J^{-1}T_{i})x )\). Using the fact that \(T_{i}\) is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive for each *i*, it follows from Lemma 3.6 that \(J^{-1}T_{i}\), for each *i*, is relatively weak nonexpansive and \(F_{J}(T_{i})=F(J^{-1}T_{i})\). By applying Lemma 2.3, we obtain that \(J^{-1}T\) is relatively weak nonexpansive and \(F(J^{-1}T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }F(J^{-1}T_{i})\). It follows from Lemma 3.6 that *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive, and \(F_{J}(T)=F(J^{-1}T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(J^{-1}T_{i})= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\). □

### Lemma 4.2

*Let**E**be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(A_{i}:E\to E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of*
\(\alpha_{i}\)-*inverse strongly monotone maps such that*
\(\alpha:= \inf_{i\geq1}\alpha_{i}>0\)*and*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }A_{i}^{-1}(0)\neq\emptyset\). *Let a map*
\(A:E\rightarrow E^{*}\)*be defined by*
\(Ax= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i}x\), *for each*
\(x\in E\), *where*
\(\{\beta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*is a sequence in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\). *Then*, (i) *A**is well defined*, (ii) *A**is**α*-*inverse strongly monotone*, (iii) \(A^{-1}(0)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\).

### Proof

(i) Let \(x\in E\) and \(x^{*}\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). Since \(A_{i}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), is Lipschitz, we obtain \(\Vert\beta_{i} A_{i}x \Vert=\Vert\beta_{i}(A_{i}x-A_{i}x^{*}) \Vert\leq \frac{1}{\alpha}\Vert x-x^{*} \Vert\). Hence, for each \(x\in E\), the series \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i}x\) converges absolutely. This shows that the map *A* is well defined.

(ii) Let \(x,y\in E\). Then, using the fact that \(A_{i}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), is \(\alpha_{i}\)-inverse strongly monotone and a result of Nilsrakoo and Saejung [42], we have that

This yields that *A* is *α*-inverse strongly monotone.

(iii) It is obvious that \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\subseteq A^{-1}(0)\). We now show that \(A^{-1}(0)\subseteq\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). Let \(x\in A^{-1}(0)\). We show that \(x\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). Let \(y_{0}\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). This implies that \(y_{0}\in A^{-1}(0)\). From the definition of *A*, we get

By applying the fact that \(A_{i}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), is monotone and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\), it follows from Eq. (4.1) that

Using the fact that \(A_{i}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), is \(\alpha _{i}\)-inverse strongly monotone and \(y_{0}\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\), we obtain

This implies that \(A_{i}x=0\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), so \(x\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). Thus, \(A^{-1}(0)\subseteq\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). Hence, \(A^{-1}(0)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). This completes the proof. □

We now prove the following theorem.

### Theorem 4.3

*Let**E**be a uniformly smooth and* 2-*uniformly convex real Banach space with dual space*
\(E^{*}\). *Let*
\(A_{i}:E\to E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of*
\(\alpha_{i}\)-*inverse strongly monotone maps such that*
\(\alpha:= \inf_{i\geq1}\alpha_{i}>0\)*and*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }A_{i}^{-1}(0)\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(T_{i}:E\rightarrow E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive maps such that*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(\{\beta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{\delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*be sequences in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\), \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\), *and*
\(W:=F_{J} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i} )\cap ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i} )^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). *For arbitrary*
\(x_{1} \in C_{1}\), *let the sequence*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*be iteratively defined by*

*where*
\(J: E \rightarrow E^{*}\)*is the normalized duality map*, \(\lambda \in (0,\frac{\alpha}{ 2L} )\), *and*
\(L>0\)*denotes a Lipschitz constant of*
\(J^{-1}\). *Then*, *the sequences*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*converge strongly to some*
\(x^{*}\in W\).

### Proof

We observe from Lemma 4.1 that the map \(T:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) defined by \(Tx:= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i}x\), for each \(x\in E\), where \(\{\delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\), is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive and \(F_{J}(T)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\). Also, consider the map \(A:E\rightarrow E^{*}\) defined by \(Ax= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta _{i} A_{i}x\), for each \(x\in E\) where \(\{\beta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\). Then, we have the following by Lemma 4.2: (i) *A* is well defined, (ii) *A* is *α*-inverse strongly monotone, (iii) \(A^{-1}(0)= \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}^{-1}(0)\). It follows by Lemma 3.7 that the sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) and \(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converge strongly to some \(x^{*}\in W:=F_{J} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i} )\cap ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i} )^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). □

### Corollary 4.4

*Let*
\(E=L_{p}, \ell_{p}, \textit{ and } W_{m}^{p}\), \(1< p\leq2\). *Let*
\(A_{i}:E\to E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of*
\(\alpha_{i}\)-*inverse strongly monotone maps such that*
\(\alpha:= \inf_{i\geq1}\alpha_{i}>0\)*and*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }A_{i}^{-1}(0)\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(T_{i}:E\rightarrow E^{*}\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of relatively weak**J*-*nonexpansive maps such that*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F_{J}(T_{i})\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(\{\beta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{\delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*be sequences in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\), \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\), *and*
\(W:=F_{J} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i} )\cap ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i} )^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). *For arbitrary*
\(x_{1} \in C_{1}\), *let the sequence*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*be iteratively defined by*

*where*
\(J: E \rightarrow E^{*}\)*is the normalized duality map*, \(\lambda\in (0,\frac{\alpha}{ 2L} )\), *and*
\(L>0\)*denotes a Lipschitz constant of*
\(J^{-1}\). *Then*, *the sequences*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*converge strongly to some*
\(x^{*}\in W\).

### Proof

We observe that *E* is a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space. It follows from Theorem 4.3 that the sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) and \(\{u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converge strongly to some \(x^{*}\in W:=F_{J} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i} )\cap ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i} )^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). □

### Corollary 4.5

*Let*
\(E=H\)*be a real Hilbert space*. *Let*
\(A_{i}:H\to H\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of*
\(\alpha_{i}\)-*inverse strongly monotone maps such that*
\(\alpha:= \inf_{i\geq1}\alpha_{i}>0\)*and*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty }A_{i}^{-1}(0)\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(T_{i}:H\rightarrow H\), *for each*
\(i=1,2,\dots\), *be a countable family of nonexpansive maps such that*
\(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}F(T_{i})\neq\emptyset\). *Let*
\(\{\beta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{\delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\)*be sequences in*
\((0,1)\)*such that*
\(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\), \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\), *and*
\(W:=F_{J} ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i} )\cap ( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i} )^{-1}0\neq\emptyset\). *For arbitrary*
\(x_{1} \in C_{1}\), *let the sequence*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*be iteratively defined by*

*where*
\(\lambda\in (0,\frac{\alpha}{ 2} )\)*and*
\(P_{C_{n+1}}\)*denotes the projection map from**H**onto*
\(C_{n+1}\). *Then*, *the sequences*
\(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\)*and*
\(\{u_{n}\} _{n=1}^{\infty}\)*converge strongly to some*
\(x^{*}\in W\).

### Proof

The map \(T:H\rightarrow H\) defined by \(Tx= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta _{i} T_{i}x\), for each \(x\in H\), where \(\{\delta_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\), is nonexpansive by Remark 4. It suffices to show that if *T* is nonexpansive in a Hilbert space, then *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive. We only need to show that \(\widehat{F}(T)\subset F(T)\) since for any map, *T*, \(F(T)\subset\widetilde{F}(T) \subset\widehat{F}(T)\). Let \(p\in \widehat{F}(T)\). Then, *E* contains a sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) which converges *weakly* to *p* and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Vert Tx_{n} - x_{n}\Vert= 0\). The fact that *T* is nonexpansive map gives by Lemma 2.2 that \((I-T)\) is demiclosed at zero. Thus, we obtain \(Tp=p\), i.e., \(p\in F(T)\). Thus, \(\widehat{F}(T)\subset F(T)\). Since *H* is a real Hilbert space and the map *T* is nonexpansive, it follows that \(\phi(Tx,Ty)\leq\phi(x,y)\), for all \(x,y \in H\). Hence, *T* is a relatively nonexpansive map, so *T* is a relatively weak nonexpansive map. This implies that *T* is relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive. It follows by Theorem 4.3 that the sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) and \(\{ u_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) converge strongly to some \(x^{*}\in W\). □

## Numerical illustration

We now present a numerical example to illustrate the convergence of the sequence generated by our algorithm in Theorem 4.3.

### Example 4

Let \(E=\mathbb{R}\) and \(C=[a,b]\), for \(a,b \in\mathbb{R}\). Let \(A_{i}:\mathbb {R} \rightarrow\mathbb{R}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), be defined by \(A_{i}x=2x\). Let a map \(A:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb {R}\) be defined by \(Ax= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i} A_{i}x=2x\), for each \(x\in\mathbb {R}\), where \(\beta_{i}=\frac{1}{2^{i}}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\beta_{i}=1\). Let \(T_{i}:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow\mathbb{R}\), for each \(i=1,2,\dots\), be defined by \(T_{i}x=\frac{4}{7}x\). Let a map \(T:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be defined by \(Tx= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i} T_{i}x=\frac{4}{7}x\), for each \(x\in \mathbb{R}\), where \(\delta_{i}=\frac{1}{2^{i}}\) is a sequence in \((0,1)\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\delta_{i}=1\). It is clear that *A* is \(\frac{1}{2}\)-inverse strongly monotone map and *T* is nonexpansive map with zero as its unique fixed point, so *T* is relatively nonexpansive map. We observe that the intersection of the set of zeros of *A* and the fixed points of *T* is zero. We consider two different initial values \(x_{1}=1.8\) and \(x_{1}=-1.8\) with \(\lambda=\frac{1}{8}\) and define a map

where \(P_{C}\) denotes the projection map from *H* onto *C*. It follows by Theorem 4.3 that the sequence generated by algorithm (3.2) converges to zero. The sketch of the numerical example is given in Figs. 1 and 2, where the *y*-axis represents the value of \(x_{n}-0\), while the *x*-axis represents the number of iterations *n*.

*Conclusion.* It is obvious that our algorithm (3.2) can be implemented from Figs. 1 and 2 and that the sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\) converges to the solution we desire.

### Analytical representations of duality maps in \(L_{p}\), \(l_{p}\), and \(W^{p}_{m}\) spaces, \(1< p<\infty\)

The analytical representations of duality maps are known in a number of Banach spaces. In particular, they are known in \(L_{p}\), \(l_{p}\), and \(W^{p}_{m}\), \(1< p<\infty\), (see, e.g., Alber and Ryazantseva [3], page 36).

## Conclusion

In this paper, we introduced and studied a new class of maps called *relatively weak J-nonexpansive* maps *from a real normed space**E**to its dual space*
\(E^{*}\). An algorithm was constructed to approximate a common element of *J*-fixed points for a countable family of relatively weak *J*-nonexpansive maps and zeros of a countable family of inverse strongly monotone maps in a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space. We proved a strong convergence theorem and gave a numerical example to illustrate the convergence of the sequence generated by the algorithm.

## References

- 1.
Alber, Y.: Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and applications. In: Kartsatos, A.G. (ed.) Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type. Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., vol. 178, pp. 15–50. Dekker, New York (1996)

- 2.
Alber, Y., Guerre-Delabriere, S.: On the projection methods for fixed point problems. Analysis (Munich)

**21**(1), 17–39 (2001) - 3.
Alber, Y., Ryazantseva, I.: Nonlinear Ill Posed Problems of Monotone Type. Springer, London (2006)

- 4.
Aoyama, K., Iiduka, H., Takahashi, W.: Weak convergence of an iterative sequence for accretive operators in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2006**, Article ID 35390 (2006) - 5.
Berinde, V.: Iterative Approximation of Fixed Points. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, London (2007)

- 6.
Blum, E., Oettli, W.: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. Math. Stud.

**63**, 123–145 (1994) - 7.
Browder, F.E.: Nonlinear mappings of nonexpansive and accretive-type in Banach spaces. Bull. Am. Math. Soc.

**73**, 875–882 (1967) - 8.
Bruck Jr., R.E.: Properties of fixed-point sets of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.

**179**, 251–262 (1973) - 9.
Censor, Y., Gibali, A., Reich, S.: Two extensions of Korpelevich’s extragradient method for solving the variational inequality problem in Euclidean space. Technical report (2010)

- 10.
Censor, Y., Gibali, A., Reich, S.: The subgradient extragradient method for solving variational inequalities in Hilbert space. J. Optim. Theory Appl.

**148**(2), 318–335 (2011) - 10.
Censor, Y., Gibali, A., Reich, S.: Algorithms for the split variational inequality problem. Numer. Algorithms

**59**, 301–323 (2012) - 12.
Censor, Y., Gibali, A., Reich, S., Sabach, S.: The common variational inequality point problem. Set-Valued Var. Anal.

**20**, 229–247 (2012) - 13.
Cheng, Q., Su, Y., Zhang, J.: Duality fixed point and zero point theorems and applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal.

**2012**, Article ID 391301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/391301 - 14.
Chidume, C.E.: Geometric Properties of Banach Spaces and Nonlinear Iterations. Lectures Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1965. Springer, London (2009)

- 15.
Chidume, C.E., Adamu, A., Okereke, L.C.: Strong convergence theorem for some nonexpansive-type mappings in certain Banach spaces (submitted)

- 16.
Chidume, C.E., Bello, A.U., Usman, B.: Iterative algorithms for zeros strongly monotone Lipschitz maps in classical Banach spaces. SpringerPlus

**4**, Article ID 297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1044-1 - 17.
Chidume, C.E., Chidume, C.O., Bello, A.U.: An algorithm for computing zeros of generalized phi-strongly monotone and bounded maps in classical Banach spaces. Optimization

**65**(4), 827–839 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2015.1074686 - 18.
Chidume, C.E., Ezea, C.G., Otubo, E.E.: Strong convergence of generalized projection algorithm for variational inequality problems, with applications. Adv. Nonlinear Var. Inequal.

**20**(2), 42–57 (2017) - 19.
Chidume, C.E., Ezea, C.G., Otubo, E.E.: A new algorithm for variational inequality problems with alpha-inverse strongly monotone maps and common fixed points for a countable family of relatively weak nonexpansive maps, with applications. Adv. Fixed Point Theory

**9**(3), 214–238 (2019) - 20.
Chidume, C.E., Idu, K.O.: Approximation of zeros of bounded maximal monotone mappings, solutions of Hammerstein integral equations and convex minimization problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-016-0582-8

- 21.
Chidume, C.E., Nnakwe, O.M.: A new Halpern-type algorithm for a generalized mixed equilibrium problem and a countable family of generalized-J-nonexpansive maps, with applications. Carpath. J. Math.

**34**(2), 191–198 (2018) - 22.
Chidume, C.E., Nnakwe, O.M.: Convergence theorems of subgradient extragradient algorithm for solving variational inequalities and a convex feasibility problem. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2018**, Article ID 16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-018-06414 - 23.
Chidume, C.E., Nnyaba, U.V., Romanus, O.M., Ezea, C.G.: Convergence theorems for strictly

*J*-pseudocontractions with application to zeros of gamma-inverse strongly monotone maps. Panam. Math. J.**26**(4), 57–76 (2016) - 24.
Chidume, C.E., Otubo, E.E., Ezea, C.G., Uba, M.O.: A new monotone hybrid algorithm for a convex feasibility problem for an infinite family of nonexpansive-type maps, with applications. Adv. Fixed Point Theory

**7**(3), 413–431 (2017) - 25.
Chidume, C.E., Romanus, O.M., Nnyaba, U.V.: Strong convergence theorems for a common zero of an infinite family of gamma-inverse strongly monotone maps with applications. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

**14**, Article ID 9 (2017) - 26.
Chidume, C.E., Uba, M.O., Uzochukwu, M.I., Otubo, E.E., Idu, K.O.: A strong convergence theorem for zeros of maximal monotone maps with applications to convex minimization and variational inequality problems. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.

**62**, 241–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091518000366 - 27.
Gibali, A., Reich, S., Zalas, R.: Iterative methods for solving variational inequalities in Euclidean space. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**17**(4), 775–811 (2015) - 28.
Goebel, K., Reich, S.: Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, and Nonexpansive Mappings. Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 83. Dekker, New York (1984)

- 29.
Iiduka, H., Takahashi, W.: Weak convergence of a projection algorithm for variational inequalities in a Banach space. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

**339**, 668–679 (2008) - 30.
Iiduka, H., Takahashi, W.: Strong convergence studied by a hybrid type method for monotone operators in a Banach space. Nonlinear Anal.

**68**, 3679–3688 (2008) - 31.
Iiduka, H., Takahashi, W., Toyoda, M.: Approximation of solutions of variational inequalities for monotone mappings. Panam. Math. J.

**14**, 49–61 (2004) - 32.
Kamimura, S., Takahashi, W.: Strong convergence of a proximal-type algorithm in a Banach space. SIAM J. Optim.

**13**(3), 938–945 (2002) - 33.
Kassay, G., Reich, S., Sabach, S.: Iterative methods for solving systems of variational inequalities in reflexive Banach spaces. SIAM J. Optim.

**21**, 1319–1344 (2011) - 34.
Kinderlehrer, D., Stampacchia, G.: An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York (1980)

- 35.
Kohasaka, F.: Strong convergence of an iterative sequence for maximal monotone operators in Banach spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal.

**3**, 239–249 (2004) - 36.
Lions, J.L., Stampacchia, G.: Variational inequalities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.

**20**, 493–517 (1967) - 37.
Liu, B.: Fixed point of strong duality pseudocontractive mappings and applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal.

**2012**, Article ID 623625 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/623625 - 38.
Liu, F., Nashed, M.Z.: Regularization of nonlinear ill-posed variational inequalities and convergence rates. Set-Valued Anal.

**6**, 313–344 (1998) - 39.
Liu, Y.: Strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mapping and inverse-strongly monotone mapping in a Banach space. Appl. Math. Mech.

**30**(7), 925–932 (2009) - 40.
Matsushita, S., Takahashi, W.: Weak and strong convergence theorems for relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2004**(1), 37–47 (2004) - 40.
Matsushita, S., Takahashi, W.: A strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space. J. Approx. Theory

**134**, 257–266 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jat.2005.02.007 - 42.
Nilsrakoo, W., Saejung, S.: On the fixed-point set of relatively nonexpansive and generalized nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2010**, Article ID 414232 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/414232 - 43.
Ofoedu, E.U., Malonza, D.M.: Hybrid approximation of solutions of nonlinear operator equations and application to equation of Hammerstein type. Appl. Math. Comput.

**13**, 6019–6030 (2011) - 44.
Osilike, M.O., Ofoedu, E.U., Attah, F.U.: The hybrid steepest decent method for solutions of equlibrium problems and other problems in fixed point theory. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2014**, Article ID 156 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-156 - 45.
Reich, S.: Constructive techniques for accretive and monotone operators. In: Applied Nonlinear Analysis: Proceedings of an International Conference on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, pp. 335–345. Academic Press, New York (1978)

- 46.
Reich, S.: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

**67**, 274–276 (1979) - 47.
Reich, S.: A weak convergence theorem for the alternating methods with Bergman distance. In: Kartsatos, A.G. (ed.) Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type. Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., vol. 178, pp. 313–318. Dekker, New York (1996)

- 48.
Reich, S., Sabach, S.: Three strong convergence theorems for iterative methods for solving equilibrium problems in reflexive Banach spaces. In: Optimization Theory and Related Topics. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 568, pp. 225–240. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2012)

- 49.
Rockafellar, R.T.: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.

**149**, 75–88 (1970) - 50.
Schu, J.: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.

**43**(1), 153–159 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700028884 - 51.
Su, Y., Xu, H.K.: A duality fixed point theorem and applications. Fixed Point Theory

**13**(1), 259–265 (2012) - 52.
Takahashi, W.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama (2000)

- 53.
Takahashi, W., Zembayashi, K.: Strong convergence theorem by a new hybrid method for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl.

**2008**, Article ID 528476 (2008) - 54.
Takahashi, W., Zembayashi, K.: Strong and weak convergence theorems for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal.

**70**, 45–57 (2009) - 55.
Zegeye, H.: Strong convergence theorems for maximal monotone mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

**343**, 663–671 (2008) - 56.
Zegeye, H., Shahzad, N.: Strong convergence theorems for monotone mappings and relatively weak nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal.

**70**(7), 2707–2716 (2009) - 57.
Zegeye, H., Shahzad, N.: A hybrid scheme for finite families of equilibrium, variational inequality and fixed point problems. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl.

**74**(1), 263–272 (2011) - 58.
Zegeye, H., Shahzad, N., Alghamdi, M.A.: Minimum-norm fixed point of pseudocontractive mappings. Abstr. Appl. Anal.

**2012**, Article ID 926017 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/926017 - 59.
Zhang, X., Su, Y., Kang, J.: New hybrid algorithm for weak relatively nonexpansive mapping and inverse-strongly monotone mapping in Banach space. Appl. Math. Inform.

**29**(1–2), 87–102 (2011) - 60.
Zhou, H., Gao, G., Gao, X.: A modified projective algorithm of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces. Math. Commun.

**17**, 35–48 (2012)

### Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank AfDB for their support. We are also grateful to the referees, whose comments and suggestions have improved the final version of this paper.

### Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

## Funding

This work is supported by AfDB Research Grant Funds to AUST.

## Author information

### Affiliations

### Contributions

The two authors equally contributed, read, and approved the final manuscript.

### Corresponding author

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Additional information

### Abbreviations

Not applicable.

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Chidume, C.E., Ezea, C.G. New algorithms for approximating zeros of inverse strongly monotone maps and *J*-fixed points.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl* **2020, **3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-019-0668-1

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

### MSC

- 47H06
- 47H09
- 47J05
- 47J25

### Keywords

- Strictly
*J*-pseudocontractive *J*-Fixed point- Zeros of inverse strongly monotone map
- Relatively weak
*J*-nonexpansive map - 2-Uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space