Axiom of Infinite Choice, transversal ordered spring spaces and fixed points
- Milan R. Tasković^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-018-0635-2
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 7 April 2017
Accepted: 6 February 2018
Published: 2 April 2018
Abstract
This paper continues the study of the Axiom of Infinite Choice on transversal ordered spring spaces in terms of fixed point and increasing inductive sets. These principles unify a number of diverse results (about three thousand papers) in fixed point theory, especially recently published. Applications in partially ordered spaces and fixed point theory are also considered.
Keywords
MSC
1 Introduction and history
Call a poset (:= partially ordered set) P increasing inductive (increasing chain complete) when every increasing sequence has an upper bound (the least upper bound, i.e., supremum) in P.
Lemma 1
(Increasing inductiveness, Tasković [1])
If P is an increasing inductive partially ordered set, then P has at least countable or finite maximal elements.
A brief proof of a special case of this fact may be found in Tasković [1]. This statement is de facto an equivalent of Lemma of Infinite Maximality by Tasković [2].
Theorem 1
(Axiom of Infinite Choice, Tasković [2])
- (a)
(Lemma of Infinite Maximality, Tasković [2].) Let P be an inductive partially ordered set. Then P has at least countable or finite maximal elements.
- (b)(Local form, Tasković [1].) Let P be an increasing inductive poset and f be an increasing mapping from P into P such thatthen f has at least countable or finite fixed points in P.$$ a\preccurlyeq f(a)\quad \textit{for some } a\in P, $$(T)
- (c)(Tasković [3].) Let P be an increasing inductive poset and f be a mapping from P into P such thatthen f has at least countable or finite fixed points in P.$$ x\preccurlyeq f(x) \quad \textit{for all } x\in P, $$(M)
We note that a brief proof of this statement based on the Axiom of Infinite Choice may be found in Tasković [2].
Based on Lemma 1 and Theorem 1 above, we are now in a position to formulate the following new statements and facts as direct consequences of the Axiom of Infinite Choice.
Corollary 1
(Tasković [4, p. 244])
Let \(P:=(P,\preccurlyeq )\) be a partially ordered set and f be an increasing mapping from P into P. If the following set \(P(\preccurlyeq f):=\{x\in P:x\preccurlyeq f(x)\}\) is nonempty such that there exists the supremum \(s:=\sup P(\preccurlyeq f)\), then f has at least countable or finite fixed points in P.
We notice that this result is a direct consequence of an application of the Axiom of Infinite Choice on the set \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\). In 1980 Tasković proved that f has at least one fixed point for the preceding case of Corollary 1.
Corollary 2
Proof
Let us consider the subset \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) of P given by \(P(\preccurlyeq f):=\{ x\in P:x\preccurlyeq f(x)\}\). By the hypothesis, we see that \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) is a nonempty poset. Since \(x\preccurlyeq f(x)\) implies \(f(x)\preccurlyeq f(f(x))\), we see that f maps \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) into \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\).
On the other hand, if \(\mu_{k}\notin M_{k}\), then the chain \(M_{k}\cup\{f^{n}(\mu_{k})\mid n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}\}\) properly contains \(M_{k}\) and satisfies (SC) in contradiction to the maximality of \(M_{k}\). Therefore, \(\mu_{k}\in M_{k}\) and also \(f(\mu_{k})\in M_{k}\), hence \(f(\mu_{k})\preccurlyeq \mu_{k}\). This makes \(\mu_{k}\) a fixed point of f, i.e., \(f(\mu_{k})=\mu_{k}\). The proof is complete. □
Annotation
From the above it follows that \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) is a nonempty poset with the property that each nonempty increasing chain of \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) has an upper bound, i.e., \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) is an increasing inductive set, and f maps \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\) into \(P(\preccurlyeq f)\), and thus, by (c) of Theorem 1, we see that f has at least countable or finite fixed points as desired.
2 Preliminaries and main results
The function \(A: X\times X\to[a, b)\subset P\) for \(a\prec b\) is called an upper spring ordered transverse (or upper spring ordered transversal) on a nonempty set X iff \(A(x, y)=a\) if and only if \(x=y\) for all \(x, y\in X\).
An upper spring ordered transversal space is a nonempty partially ordered set X (with ordering ) together with a given upper spring ordered transverse A on X, where every decreasing sequence \(\{u_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) of elements in \([a, b)\) has a unique element \(u\in[a, b)\) as limit (in notation \(u_{n}\to u\) \((n\to\infty)\)). The element \(a\in[a, b) \subset P\) is called spring of space X (cf. [5]).
In 1986 we investigated the concept of upper spring ordered TCS-convergence in a space X, i.e., an upper spring ordered transversal space \(X:=(X, A)\) satisfies the condition of upper spring ordered TCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and if \(A(T^{n} (x), T^{n+1}(x)) \to a\) \((n\to\infty)\) implies that \(\{T^{n} (x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) has a convergent subsequence in X, see Tasković [6].
In connection with the above, we shall introduce the concept of upper MCS-convergence, i.e., an upper spring ordered transversal space satisfies the condition of upper MCS-convergence (i.e., upper MSC-completeness) iff \(x\in X\) and if \(A(f^{n}(x),f^{n+1}(x))\to a\) \((n\to\infty)\) implies that \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) is bounded in X.
An upper spring ordered transversal space is called upper complete (or upper spring complete) if any upper fundamental sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) in X is upper convergent (to a point of X, of course).
On the other hand, in this paper we shall introduce the concept of upper MBV-convergence, i.e., an upper spring ordered transversal space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,A)\) satisfies the condition of upper MBV-convergence (i.e., upper MBV-completeness) if every increasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\} _{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) is bounded in X.
An immediate direct consequence of the preceding Corollary 2 is the following new result for upper spring ordered transversal spaces.
Corollary 3
The proof of this statement is an elementary fact because the condition of upper MBV-completeness implies that every increasing sequence of iterates is bounded in Corollary 2.
As an immediate application of Corollary 3 directly, we obtain the following new consequence on upper spring ordered transversal spaces.
Corollary 4
Proof
Because \(a\preccurlyeq f(a)\) and f is isotone, we find \(\{f^{n}(a)\}_{n\in\Bbb {N}\cup\{0\}}\) is an increasing sequence of iterates which is upper fundamental, i.e., bounded in X. It is easy to see that X satisfies all the required hypotheses in Corollary 3. Applying Corollary 3 to this case, we obtain this statement. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 5
(Partially ordered metric spaces)
Proof
Since an ordered metric space is an example of an upper spring ordered transversal space, thus this statement follows directly from Corollary 4. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 6
(Upper spring ordered transversal spaces)
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs of Corollaries 2 and 3. Thus we omit it.
Corollary 7
(Partially ordered metric spaces)
Let f be an increasing mapping of an ordered metric space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,\rho)\) into itself, where every increasing and decreasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) in X is a Cauchy sequence. If (M) or (N) holds, then f has at least countable or finite fixed points in X.
This result is an example for Corollary 6. Thus we omit the proof.
3 Applications on partially ordered metric and other spaces
This section is mainly devoted to some applications on partially ordered metric and other spaces. Some sufficient conditions for the upper MBV-completeness are given, which has a direct consequence on the Cauchyness of sequences in partially ordered metric spaces. On the other hand, every increasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) in X is also a Cauchy sequence in \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,A)\). This fact (in this sense) includes (unifies) at least three thousand papers published recently. We note that a partially ordered metric space directly is an example of upper spring ordered transversal spaces.
Diametral φ-contraction on metric spaces. In 1980 I proved the following result of a fixed point on metric space, which is one of the most known sufficient conditions (linear and nonlinear) for the existence of a unique fixed point, cf. Tasković [7, 8], and [9]. This result generalizes a great number of known results.
Theorem 2
(Tasković [7, p. 250, Theorem 1])
In connection with this result, we notice that this statement is well known as “the finest theorem of nonlinear functional analysis” for metric spaces.
In the context of Theorem 2, applying Corollary 5 to this case directly, we obtain the following result for diametral φ-contractions, i.e., for mappings with properties (J) and (Iφ).
Corollary 8
Let T be an increasing mapping of an ordered metric space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,\rho)\) into itself. Suppose that there exists a function \(\varphi:\Bbb{R}_{+}^{0}\to\Bbb{R}_{+}^{0}\) satisfying (Iφ) such that (J). If \(a\preccurlyeq T(a)\) for some \(a\in X\) and if for every \(x\in X\), then T has a unique fixed point \(\xi\in X\) and \(\{T^{n}(b)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) converges to ξ for arbitrary \(b\in X\).
Annotation
An upper edges transversal space (or upper edges space) is a set X together with a given upper edges transverse on X. The function \(\psi: [a,b]^{2}\to[a,b]\) in (A) is called an upper bisection function.
Example 1
(Metric spaces)
Example 2
(The extended real line \(\overline{\Bbb {R}}\))
The function f defined in \(\Bbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=x/(1+|x|)\) is a bijection on \(\Bbb{R}\) on the open interval \((-1, 1)\subset\Bbb{R}\), and the inverse mapping g being defined by \(g(x)=x/(1-|x|)\) for \(|x|<1\). Let \(\overline{\Bbb{R}}\) be the set which is the union of \(\Bbb{R}\) and two new elements written +∞ and −∞ (points at infinity); then we extend f to a bijection of \(\overline{\Bbb{R}}\) onto \([-1, 1]\) by putting \(f(+\infty)=1\), \(f(-\infty)=-1\), and write again g for the inverse mapping.
Example 3
(Transversal upper edges r-spaces)
A fundamental third example of a transversal upper edges space is a transversal upper edges r-space for \(r\ge1\). Indeed, in 1998 this space was known as a transversal upper space. For \(\psi(s,t):=rs+rt\) (\(r\ge1\)), we obtain directly in this case the transversal upper edges r-space. This space is well known for \(r\ge1\) as an r-metric space (or as almost metric space) introduced in 1989 by Bakhtin [14]. Also see Czerwik [15].
On the other hand, a fundamental fourth example of a transversal upper edges space is a transversal upper edges r-max space (for \(r\ge1\)), known as r-max edges space. Indeed, in 1998 this space was known as a transversal r-max edges space. For \(\psi(s,t)=r\max\{s,t\}\) for \(r\ge1\), we obtain directly in this case the transversal upper edges r-space.
Annotation
We notice that the set (class) of all well-known b-metric spaces \((b\ge1)\) can be a proper subset (subclass) of the set (class) all transversal r-max edges space for \(r\ge1\). See Tasković [16].
For any nonempty set Y in the upper edges transversal space X, the diameter of Y is defined as \(\operatorname {diam}(Y):=\sup \{\rho(x, y): x, y \in Y \}\); it is a real number in \([a,b]\), \(A\subset B\) implies \(\operatorname {diam}(A)\le \operatorname {diam}(B)\). The relation \(\operatorname {diam}(Y)=a\) holds if and only if Y is a one-point set.
The convergence \(x_{n}\to x\) as \(n\to\infty\) in the upper edges transversal space \((X, \rho)\) means that \(\rho(x_{n}, x)\to a\) as \(n\to\infty\), or equivalently, for every \(\varepsilon>0\) there exists an integer \(n_{0}\) such that the relation \(n\ge n_{0}\) implies \(\rho(x_{n}, x)< a+\varepsilon\).
In this sense, an upper edges transversal space is called upper complete iff every transversal sequence converges. Also, a space \((X, \rho)\) is said to be upper orbitally complete (or upper T-orbitally complete) iff every transversal sequence which is contained in for some \(x \in X\) converges in X.
For further facts on upper edges transversal spaces, see Tasković [6]. A function T mapping X into the reals is T-orbitally lower semicontinuous at \(p \in X\) if \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a sequence in and \(x_{n}\to p\) (\(n\to\infty\)) implies that \(T(p)\le \operatorname {lim.inf}T(x_{n})\).
A typical first example of an upper edges continuous mapping is the upper edges contraction on the upper edges transversal space \((X, \rho)\). For further facts on the upper edges continuous mappings, see Tasković [6].
Proposition 1
Proof
We see that a partially ordered transversal upper edges space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,\rho)\) is an example of an upper spring ordered transversal space. From (Cu) it follows \(\rho(f^{n}(x), f^{n+1}(x))\to a\) (\(n\to\infty\)), hence by upper MCS-completeness we obtain that every increasing sequence of iterates in the form \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) is bounded in X, i.e., X satisfies the condition of upper MBV-completeness. It is easy to see that f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 3, thus f has at least countable or finite fixed points in X. The proof is complete. □
Proposition 2
Proof
Let \(y=f(x)\) in (Lc), then it is easy to see that f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Proposition 1. Uniqueness follows immediately from condition (Lc). The proof is complete. □
We are now in a position to formulate the following statement, which is a roof for a great number of known results on metric spaces in the fixed point theory.
Proposition 3
Proof
We begin the proof with the following lemma (as a well-known lemma) which is essential in the following context.
Lemma 2
(Tasković [13])
A brief first proof of this statement may be found in Tasković [6]. We can see other brief proofs for this in Tasković [7, 8], and [13].
Proof of Proposition 3
Thus f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 4. Uniqueness follows immediately from (B). The proof is complete. □
As an immediate consequence of the preceding Proposition 3, we obtain directly the following interesting cases of (B):
In connection with the preceding facts, we are now in a position to formulate a localization of Proposition 3 in the following form.
Proposition 4
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proof of Proposition 3. Thus we omit it.
Corollary 9
(Non-complete partially ordered metric spaces)
Proof
From (1) it follows that the sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) is a sequence of bounded variation, i.e., it is a Cauchy sequence. Applying Corollary 5 to this case, we obtain this statement. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 10
(Non-complete partially ordered metric spaces)
Proof
Let \(y=f(x)\) in (2), then it is easy to see that f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 9. Uniqueness follows immediately from condition (2). The proof is complete. □
On the other hand, in this paper we shall introduce the concept of spring sup MCS-convergence, i.e., an upper spring ordered transversal space satisfies the condition of spring sup MCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and if \(\sup_{i, j\ge n} A(T^{i}(x), T^{j}(x))\) or \(\sup_{i, j\ge2n} A(T^{i} (x), T^{j}(x))\) or \(\sup_{i, j\ge2n+1} A(T^{i} (x), T^{j}(x))\) converges to \(u, v, c\in[a, b)\) respectively implies that \(\{T^{n} (x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n+1}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a bounded sequence in X, respectively.
Also, if \(T:X\to X\), then a function \(x\mapsto A(x,T(x))\) is ordered T-orbitally lower semicontinuous at \(\xi\in X\) if \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a sequence in \(\sigma(x,y,\infty):= \{x,y,T(x),T(y),T^{2}(x),T^{2}(y),\ldots\}\) and \(x_{n}\to\xi(n\to\infty)\) implies that \(A(\xi,T(\xi))\preccurlyeq \lim_{n\to\infty} A(T^{n}(x), T^{n+1}(x))\).
Theorem 3
(Monotone principle of fixed point)
Let be a partially ordered (with ordering ) topological space and \(T:X\to X\), where \(M: X\to [a,b)\subset P\) for \(a\prec b\). In this part (by Tasković [5]), we shall introduce the concept of local sup MCS-convergence in a space X, i.e., a topological space X satisfies the condition of local spring sup MCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and \(\sup_{i\ge n} M(T^{i}(x))\) or \(\sup_{i\ge2n} M(T^{i} (x))\) or \(\sup_{i\ge2n+1} M(T^{i}(x))\) converges to \(u, v, c\succcurlyeq a\) respectively implies that \(\{T^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{ T^{2n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n+1}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a bounded sequence in X, respectively.
We are now in a position to formulate the following theorem on partially ordered (with ordering ) topological spaces with non-numerical transverses.
Theorem 4
(Localization monotone principle)
An immediate consequence of the preceding statement is the following result.
Corollary 11
The proof of this statement is an elementary fact because condition (D′) implies condition (D).
Proof of Theorem 4
In the cases of other two sequences, in local spring sup MCS-convergence, the proof is a total analogy. Hence we omit the proof in these cases. Also, from [5] we obtain that every partially ordered topological space is a spring ordered transversal space. It is easy to see that T and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 3, thus T has at least countable or finite fixed points in X. The proof is complete. □
Proof of Theorem 3
Let \(M(x):=A(x,T(x))\) and \(N(x):=B(x,T(x))\), then it is easy to see that A, B, and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Theorem 4. Uniqueness follows immediately from conditions (3) and (3′). The proof is complete. □
In 1976 Tasković proved a localization theorem on a Cartesian product of metric spaces as a solution of Kuratowski’s problem of 1932, see Brown [18], Reny George and Brian Fisher [19], Tasković [5], etc. In this context the following result holds.
We are now in a position to formulate the following statement for mappings of Cartesian product topological spaces.
Let for \(x:=(x_{1},\ldots, x_{k})\) and \(T:X^{k}\to X\) (\(k\in\Bbb{N}\) is a fixed number). Also, . A function \(t\mapsto A(t,T(t,\ldots,t))\) is T-orbital lower semicontinuous at \(p\in X\) iff \(T^{n}(x)\to p\) \((n\to\infty)\) implies that \(A(p,T(p,\ldots,p))\leqslant\liminf_{n\to\infty} A(T^{n}(x),T(T^{n}(x),\ldots,T^{n+k-1}(x)))\).
In the following, we consider an increasing function \(T:X^{k}\to X\) (for fixed \(k\in\Bbb{N}\)) on the partially ordered set X with ordering , i.e., if \((i=1,\ldots, k)\) implies that .
Corollary 12
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the former proof of Corollary 3. Thus we omit it.
Further, a mapping \(M:\Bbb{R}\to[a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}_{+}^{0}\) for \(a< b\) is called an upper (distribution) function if it is nonincreasing, left-continuous with \(\inf M=a\), and \(\sup M=b\). We will denote by the set of all upper (distribution) functions.
Obviously, every metric space may be regarded as an upper statistical space of a special kind. One has only to set \(M_{u,v}(x)=A(x-d(u,v))\) for every pair of points \((u,v)\) in the metric space \((X,d)\). Also, \(M_{u,v}(x)\) may be interpreted as the “measure” that the distance between u and v is less than x.
A very characteristic example, for further work, of the transversal upper edges spaces is the following space in the following form.
A transversal upper edges T-space is a pair \((X,\rho)\), where X is a transversal upper edges space and where the upper (edges) transverse \(\rho[u,v]=M_{u,v}(x)\) satisfies \(M_{u,v}=M_{v,u}\), \(M_{u,v}(c)=b\) for some \(c\in\Bbb{R}\) and (Eq).
Next, the concept of a neighborhood can be introduced and defined with the aid of the upper edges transverse. In fact, neighborhoods in transversal upper edges spaces may be defined in several nonequivalent ways. Here, we shall consider only one of these.
Corollary 13
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs as consequences of the main statements. Thus we omit it.
In connection with the above, applying our general principle of transpose for non-numerical transverses (see Tasković [5, p. 89]) to Corollary 13, we get an extended and generalized version of this result in the following sense.
Indeed, let be a totally ordered set. A mapping for \(a\prec b\), where \(P:=(P,\preccurlyeq )\) is a partially ordered set is called an upper ordered (distribution) function if it is nonincreasing with \(\inf M=a\) and \(\sup M=b\). We will denote by the set of all upper ordered (distribution) functions.
In view of the condition \(M_{u,v}(c)=b\), which evidently implies that \(M_{u,v}(x)=b\) for every \(x\preccurlyeq c\), condition (Eq) is equivalent to the statement \(u=v\) if and only if \(M_{u,v}(x)=A(x)\), where \(A(x)=b\) if \(x\preccurlyeq c\) and \(A(x)=a\) if \(x\succ c\). See Fig. 2.
Also, \(M_{u,v}(x)\) may be interpreted as the “measure” that the distance between u and v is less than .
A very characteristic example, for further work, of the transversal ordered upper edges spaces is the following space in the following form.
A transversal upper ordered edges T-space is a pair \((X,\rho)\), where X is a transversal upper ordered edges space and where the upper ordered (edges) transverse \(\rho(u,v)=M_{u,v}(x)\) satisfies \(M_{u,v}=M_{v,u}\), \(M_{u,v}(c)=b\) for some , and (Eq).
Applying our general principle of transpose for partially ordered sets to Corollary 13 and to upper spring ordered transversal space for \(A(u,v):=M_{u,v}(x)\) directly, we get an extended and generalized version of Corollary 13 in the following form.
Corollary 14
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs as consequences of the main statements. Thus we omit it.
Corollary 15
(Tasković [6, p. 549])
We notice that in 2001 Tasković proved a special case of this statement on a transversal upper edges T-space \(X:=(X,M_{u,v}(t))\). Also, in 1998 Tasković introduced the concept of upper, lower, and middle transversal edges spaces.
In the context of this statement the following conditions are special cases of condition :
Corollary 16
(Tasković [6, p. 558])
Proof
Applying the general principle of transpose for posets to Corollary 15, we get a directly extended and generalized version of a result given in Corollary 15. The proof is complete. □
Annotations
The results of Corollaries 15 and 16 are two immediate consequences of Corollary 3. Uniqueness follows immediately from the conditions of given inequalities.
The function \(A: X\times X\to(a, b]\subset P\) for \(a\prec b\) is called a lower spring ordered transverse (or lower spring ordered transversal) on a nonempty set X iff \(A(x, y)=b\) if and only if \(x=y\) for all \(x, y\in X\).
A lower spring ordered transversal space is a nonempty partially ordered set X (with ordering ) together with a given lower spring ordered transverse A on X, where every increasing sequence \(\{u_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) of elements in \((a, b]\) has a unique element u in \((a, b]\) as limit (in notation \(u_{n}\to u\) \((n\to\infty)\)). The element \(b\in(a, b] \subset P\) is called spring of space X (cf. [5]).
In 1986 we investigated the concept of lower spring ordered TCS-convergence in a space X, i.e., a lower spring ordered transversal space \(X:=(X, A)\) satisfies the condition of lower spring ordered TCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and if \(A(T^{n} (x), T^{n+1}(x)) \to b\) \((n\to\infty)\) implies that \(\{T^{n} (x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) has a convergent subsequence in X, see Tasković [5].
In connection with the above, we shall introduce the concept of lower MCS-convergence, i.e., a lower spring ordered transversal space satisfies the condition of lower MCS-convergence (i.e., lower MSC-completeness) iff \(x\in X\) and if \(A(f^{n}(x),f^{n+1}(x))\to b\) \((n\to\infty)\) implies that \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) is bounded X.
A lower spring ordered transversal space is called lower complete (or lower spring complete) if any lower fundamental sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) in X is lower convergent (to a point of X, of course).
In connection with the preceding facts, based on Lemma 1 and Theorem 1, we are now in a position to formulate the following new statements as direct consequences of the Axiom of Infinite Choice.
Corollary 17
(Tasković [4, p. 244])
Let \(P:=(P,\preccurlyeq )\) be a partially ordered set and f be an increasing mapping from P into P. If the following set \(P(f\preccurlyeq ):=\{x\in P:f(x)\preccurlyeq x\}\) is nonempty such that there exists the infimum \(I:=\inf P(f\preccurlyeq )\), then f has at least countable or finite fixed points.
For the first time, in 1980 Tasković proved that f has at least one fixed point for the preceding case of Corollary 17. Further application of the Axiom of Infinite Choice follows Corollary 17, which is a dual form of Corollary 1. The proof is a total analogy with the proof of Corollary 2.
Corollary 18
This statement is a dual form of Corollary 2. Thus we omit the proof of Corollary 18.
Lower spring ordered transversal spaces. In this paper we shall introduce the concept of lower MBV-convergence, i.e., a lower spring ordered transversal space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,A)\) satisfies the condition of lower MBV-convergence (i.e., lower MBV-completeness) if every decreasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) in X is bounded.
As an immediate direct consequence of the preceding Corollary 18, we give the following new result for lower spring ordered transversal spaces.
Corollary 19
The proof of this statement is an elementary fact because the condition of lower MBV-completeness implies that every decreasing sequence of iterates is bounded in Corollary 18.
Corollary 20
Proof
Since \(f(a)\preccurlyeq a\) and f is isotone, we find \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb {N}\cup\{0\}}\) is a decreasing sequence of iterates which is lower fundamental, i.e., bounded in X. It is easy to see that X satisfies all the required hypotheses in Corollary 19. Applying Corollary 19 to this case, we obtain this statement. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 21
(Partially ordered metric spaces)
Proof
Since an ordered metric space is an example of a lower spring ordered transversal space, thus this statement follows directly from Corollary 20. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 22
(Lower spring ordered transversal spaces)
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs of Corollaries 2 and 3 (because Corollary 22 is a dual form of Corollary 6). Thus we omit it.
Corollary 23
(Partially ordered metric spaces)
Let f be an increasing mapping of an ordered metric space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq ,\rho)\) into itself, where every increasing and decreasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) in X is a Cauchy sequence. If (R) or (E) holds, then f has at least countable or finite fixed points in X.
This result is an example for Corollary 22. Also, Corollary 23 is a dual form of Corollary 7. Thus we omit the proof.
A lower edges transversal space (or lower edges space) is a set X together with a given lower edges transverse on X. The function \(d:[a,b]^{2}\to[a,b]\) in (Ca) is called a lower bisection function.
Example 4
(Metric spaces)
Example 5
(Lower probabilistic spaces)
A mapping \(F: \Bbb{R}\to\Bbb{R}_{+}^{0}\) is called a distribution function if it is nondecreasing, left-continuous with \(\inf F=0\) and \(\sup F=1\). We will denote by the set of all distribution functions. We shall denote the distribution function by \(F_{p, q}(x)\), whence \(F_{p, q}(x)\) will denote the value of \(F_{p, q}\) at \(x\in\Bbb{R}\).
Example 6
(Transversal lower edges r-spaces)
A fundamental example of a transversal lower edges space is a transversal lower edges r-space (for \(0< r\le1\)). In 1998 this space was known as a transversal lower space. For \(d(s,t):=r\min\{s,t\}\) and \(0< r\le1\), we obtain directly in this case the transversal lower edges r-space. This space is known for \(0< r\le1\) as a transversal lower edges r-min space or only as an r-min edges space. For this, see Tasković [16].
For any nonempty set S in the lower edges transversal space X, the diameter of S is defined as \(\operatorname {diam}(S):=\inf \{\rho(x, y): x, y \in S \}\); it is a real number in \([a,b]\), \(A\subset B\) implies \(\operatorname {diam}(B)\le \operatorname {diam}(A)\). The relation \(\operatorname {diam}(S)=b\) holds if and only if S is a one-point set.
The convergence \(x_{n}\to x\) as \(n\to\infty\) in the lower edges transversal space \((X, \rho)\) means that \(\rho(x_{n}, x)\to b\) as \(n\to\infty\); or equivalently, for every \(\varepsilon>0\), there exists an integer \(n_{0}\) such that the relation \(n\ge n_{0}\) implies \(\rho(x_{n}, x)>b-\varepsilon\).
In this sense, a lower edges transversal space is called lower complete iff every transversal sequence converges.
Also, a space \((X, \rho)\) is said to be lower orbitally complete (or lower T-orbitally complete) iff every transversal sequence which is contained in for some \(x \in X\) converges in X.
A function T mapping X into the reals is T-orbitally upper semicontinuous at \(p \in X\) iff \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a sequence in and \(x_{n}\to p\) (\(n\to\infty\)) implies that \(T(p)\ge \operatorname {lim.sup}T(x_{n})\).
Let \((X, \rho_{X})\) and \((Y, \rho_{Y})\) be two lower edges transversal spaces, and let \(T: X\to Y\).
A typical first example of a lower edges continuous mapping is the lower edges contraction on the lower edges transversal space \((X, \rho)\). For further facts on the lower edges continuous mappings, see Tasković [6].
In connection with the preceding facts, we are now in a position to formulate a localization for lower edges contractions in the following form.
Proposition 5
Proof
We notice that a partially ordered transversal lower edges space \(X:=(X,\preccurlyeq , \rho)\) is an example of a lower spring ordered transversal space. From (Cl) it follows \(\rho(f^{n}(x), f^{n+1}(x))\to b\) \((n\to\infty)\), hence by lower MCS-completeness, we obtain that every decreasing sequence of iterates \(\{f^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}\cup\{0\}}\) in X is bounded, i.e., X satisfies the condition of lower MBV-completeness. It is easy to see that f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 19, thus f has at least countable or finite fixed points in X. The proof is complete. □
Proposition 6
Proof
Let \(y=f(x)\) in (Ld), then it is easy to see that f and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Proposition 5. Uniqueness follows immediately from condition (Ld). The proof is complete. □
Proposition 7
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs of Propositions 5 and 6. Thus we omit it.
A brief proof of this statement may be found in Tasković [6] with application of the following context.
Lemma 3
(Tasković [6])
A brief first proof of this statement may be found in Tasković [6]. We notice that Lemma 3 is a dual form of Lemma 2.
As an immediate consequence of the preceding Proposition 7, we obtain directly the following interesting cases of (D):
In connection with the preceding facts, we are now in a position to formulate a localization of Proposition 7 in the following form.
Proposition 8
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proof of Proposition 7. Thus we omit it.
A lower spring ordered transversal space is called lower complete (or lower spring complete) if any lower fundamental sequence \(\{x_{n}\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) in X is lower convergent (to a point of X, of course).
On the other hand, in this paper we shall introduce the concept of spring inf MCS-convergence, i.e., a lower spring ordered transversal space satisfies the condition of spring inf MCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and if \(\inf_{i, j\ge n} A(T^{i}(x), T^{j}(x))\) or \(\inf_{i, j\ge2n} A(T^{i} (x), T^{j}(x))\) or \(\inf_{i, j\ge2n+1} A(T^{i} (x), T^{j}(x))\) converges to \(u, v, c\in(a, b]\) respectively implies that \(\{T^{n} (x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n+1}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a bounded sequence in X, respectively.
Theorem 5
(Monotone principle of fixed point)
If additionally \(A(t, t)\succcurlyeq \inf\{A(s, t), A(t, s)\}\) for all \(s, t\in X\), then T has a unique fixed point in X.
Let be a partially ordered with ordering topological space and \(T:X\to X\), where \(M: X\to (a,b]\subset P\) for \(a\prec b\). In this part, we shall introduce the concept of local spring inf MCS-convergence in a space X, i.e., a topological space X satisfies the condition of local spring inf MCS-convergence iff \(x\in X\) and \(\inf_{i\ge n} M(T^{i} (x))\) or \(\inf_{i\ge2n} M(T^{i} (x))\) or \(\inf_{i\ge2n+1} M(T^{i}(x))\) converges to \(u, v, c\preccurlyeq b\) respectively implies that \(\{T^{n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{ T^{2n}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) or \(\{T^{2n+1}(x)\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}\) is a bounded sequence in X, respectively.
We are now in a position to formulate the following theorem on partially ordered (with ordering ) topological spaces with non-numerical transverses.
Theorem 6
(Localization monotone principle)
An immediate consequence of the preceding statement is the following result.
Corollary 24
The proof of this statement is an elementary fact because condition (D′) implies condition (D).
Proof of Theorem 6
In the cases of other two sequences, in local spring inf MCS-convergence, the proof is a total analogy. Hence we omit the proof in these cases. It is easy to see that T and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Corollary 19, thus T has at least countable or finite fixed points in X. The proof is complete. □
Proof of Theorem 5
Let \(M(x):=A(x,T(x))\) and \(N(x):=B(x,T(x))\), then it is easy to see that A, B, and X satisfy all the required hypotheses in Theorem 6. Uniqueness follows immediately from conditions (8) and (8′). The proof is complete. □
Corollary 25
Otherwise, a transversal edges space (or a middle transversal edges space) is an upper and a lower transversal edges space simultaneously.
As an important example of transversal lower edges spaces, we have Menger’s (probabilistic) space. Karl Menger introduced the notion of probabilistic metric space in 1942.
In this sense, a mapping \(N:\Bbb{R}\to[a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}_{+}^{0}\) for \(a< b\) is called a lower (distribution) function if it is nondecreasing, left-continuous with \(\inf N=a\) and \(\sup N=b\). We will denote by \(\mathcal{L}\) the set of all lower (distribution) functions.
Every metric space may be regarded as a statistical lower space of a special kind. One has only to set \(N_{p,q}(x)=H(x-\rho(p,q))\) for every pair of points \((p,q)\) in the metric space \((X,\rho)\).
In connection with the above, a transversal lower edges T-space is a pair \((X,\rho)\), where X is a transversal lower edges space and where the lower (edges) transverse \(\rho[u,v]=N_{u,v}(x)\) satisfies \(N_{u,v}=N_{v,u}\), \(N_{u,v}(c)=a\) for some \(c\in\Bbb{R}\) and (Em). This space is a very characteristic example of transversal lower edges spaces for further work. Every Menger’s space is also a lower edges space.
Corollary 26
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs as consequences of the main statements. Thus we omit it.
In connection with the above, applying our general principle of transpose for non-numerical transverses (see Tasković [5, p. 89]) to Corollary 26, we get an extended and generalized version of this result in the following sense.
Indeed, let be a totally ordered set. A mapping for \(a\prec b\), where \(P:=(P,\preccurlyeq )\) is a partially ordered set, is called a lower ordered (distribution) function if it is nonincreasing with \(\inf N=a\) and \(\sup N=b\). We will denote by the set of all lower ordered (distribution) functions.
In view of the condition \(N_{u,v}(c)=a\), for some , which evidently implies that \(N_{u,v}(x)=a\) for every \(x\preccurlyeq c\), condition (Em) is equivalent to the statement: \(u=v\) if and only if \(N_{u,v}(x)=H(x)\), where \(H(x)=a\) if \(x\preccurlyeq c\) and \(H(x)=b\) if \(x\succ c\). See Fig. 3.
Also, \(N_{u,v}(x)\) may be interpreted as the “measure” that the distance between u and v is less than .
A very characteristic example, for further work, of the transversal lower ordered edges spaces is the following space in the following form.
A transversal lower ordered edges T-space is a pair \((X,\rho)\), where X is a transversal lower ordered edges space and where the lower ordered (edges) transverse \(\rho(u,v)=N_{u,v}(x)\) satisfies \(N_{u,v}=N_{v,u}\), \(N_{u,v}(c)=a\) for some and (Em).
Furthermore, the concept of a neighborhood can be introduced and defined with the aid of the lower ordered edges transverse. In fact, neighborhoods in transversal lower ordered edges spaces may be defined in several nonequivalent ways. Here, we shall consider only one of these.
Applying our general principle of transpose for partially ordered sets to Corollary 26 and to lower spring ordered transversal space for \(A(u,v):=N_{u,v}(x)\) directly, we get an extended and generalized version of Corollary 26 in the following form.
Corollary 27
The proof of this statement is a total analogy with the preceding proofs as consequences of the main statements. Thus we omit it.
Corollary 28
(Tasković [6, p. 607])
We notice that in 2001 Tasković proved a special case of this statement on a transversal lower edges T-space \(X:=(X,M_{u,v}(t))\). Also, in 1998 Tasković introduced the concept of upper, lower, and middle transversal edges spaces. Also see: [20–22] and [23].
In context of this statement, the following conditions are special cases of condition \((F)\):
Corollary 29
(Tasković [6, p. 616])
4 Conclusions
This paper presents new consequences of the Axiom of Infinite Choice in terms of ordered spring spaces and increasing mappings. Applications in nonlinear functional analysis and fixed point theory are also considered.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the referees and the editor for their comments and suggestions which have been useful for the improvement of the paper.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author’s contributions
The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Tasković, M.R.: The axiom of choice, fixed point theorems, and inductive ordered sets. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 116, 897–904 (1992) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: The axiom of infinite choice. Math. Morav. 16, 77–94 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Characterizations of inductive posets with applications. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 104, 650–659 (1988) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Partially ordered sets and some fixed point theorems. Publ. Inst. Math. 41, 241–247 (1980) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Transversal theory of fixed point, fixed apices, and forked points. Math. Morav. 14(1), 19–97 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Theory of Transversal Point, Spaces and Forks. Monographs of a New Mathematical Theory (2005). VIZ-Beograd (in Serbian), 1054 pages. English summary: 1001–1022 Google Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Some results in the fixed point theory—II. Publ. Inst. Math. 41, 249–258 (1980) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Some new principles in fixed point theory. Math. Jpn. 35, 645–666 (1990) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Some theorems on fixed point and its applications. Ann. Soc. Math. Pol., Ser. I, Comment. Math. Prace. Math. 24, 323–334 (1984) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: On some mappings of contraction type. In: Balkan Math. Congress, Istanbul, p. 103 (1971). Abstracts, 4 th. Google Scholar
- Kurepa, Ð.R.: Some cases in the fixed point theory. In: Topology and Its Applications, Budva, pp. 144–153 (1972) Google Scholar
- Ohta, M., Nikaido, G.: Remarks on fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces. Math. Jpn. 39, 287–290 (1994) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: A generalization of Banach’s contraction principle. Publ. Inst. Math. (Belgr.) 37, 179–191 (1978) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bakhtin, I.A.: Contraction mapping principle in almost metric spaces. Funct. Anal., Gos. Ped. Inst. Unianowsk 30, 26–37 (1989) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Czerwik, S.: Contractions mappings in b-metric spaces. Acta Math. Inform. Univ. Ostrav. 1, 5–11 (1993) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Transversal spaces. Math. Morav. 2, 133–142 (1998) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Fixed points on transversal edges spaces. Math. Morav. 7, 175–186 (2003) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Brown, R.F.: The fixed point property and Cartesian product. Am. Math. Mon. 89, 654–678 (1982) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Reny, G., Fisher, B.: Some generalized results of fixed points in cone b-metric spaces. Math. Morav. 17(2), 39–50 (2013) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kwapisz, M.: Some generalizations of an abstract contraction mapping principle. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 3, 293–302 (1979) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Fixed Point Theory. Fundamental Elements and Applications, vol. 2. Belgrade University, Beograd (2007). Monographs, 577 pages. https://payhip.com/milanrtaskovic Google Scholar
- Tasković, M.R.: Forks Theory. Fundamental Elements and Applications, vol. 3. Belgrade University, Beograd (2008). Monographs, 635 pages. https://payhip.com/milanrtaskovic Google Scholar
- Zorn, M.: A remark on method in transfinite algebra. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 41, 667–670 (1935) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar