- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying the ordered contractive condition on noncommutative spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 30 (2014)
Abstract
In the paper, we introduce noncommutative Banach spaces which generalize the concept of Banach spaces, and the k-ordered contractive condition; we then discuss an ordered structure and several properties on noncommutative Banach spaces. Moreover, some fixed-point theorems for mappings with the k-ordered contractive condition on noncommutative Banach spaces are presented. In addition, we investigate the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for an integral equation of Fredholm type.
MSC:47H10.
1 Introduction
The well-known fixed-point theorem of Banach [1] is a very important tool for solving existence problems in many branches of mathematics and physics. There are a large number of generalizations of the Banach contraction principle in the literature (see [2–14] and others). The theorem has been generalized in two directions. On the one side, the usual contractive condition is replaced by weakly contractive conditions. On the other side, the action spaces are replaced by metric spaces endowed with an ordered or partially ordered structure. In particular, there is much interest in obtaining the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for self-maps by altering the action spaces. In this direction, Dhage et al. [8] addressed a new category of fixed-point problems for a self-map with the help of ordered Banach spaces. Further improvements in those spaces were found in [14]. In recent years, Ran and Reurings [13], O’Regan and Petruşel [12] and others started the investigations concerning a fixed-point theory in ordered metric spaces. Later, many authors followed this concept by introducing and investigating the different types of contractive mappings, e.g., in [6] Caballero et al. considered contractive-like mappings in ordered metric spaces and applied their results in ordinary differential equations. Some interesting fixed-point theorems concerning partially ordered metric spaces can also be found in [3, 5].
The results obtained by Huang and Zhang [9] have become of interest for many scholars. They reconsidered the Banach contraction principle by initiating a new concept of cone metric spaces. Recently, also, the existence of fixed points for the given contractive type mappings in partially ordered cone metric spaces was investigated (see [4, 10]).
The purpose of this paper is to present some fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying the ordered contractive condition in the context of noncommutative metric spaces which are noncommutative sense of those in [9].
The paper is organized as follows: we firstly introduce a noncommutative Banach space and the k-ordered contractive condition, and then discuss the ordered structure and several properties on noncommutative Banach spaces. Moreover, some fixed-point theorems on this space are established. Finally, we investigate the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for integral equation of Fredholm type.
Throughout this paper, the letters ℝ, , ℕ will denote the sets of all real numbers, nonnegative real numbers and natural numbers, respectively.
To begin with, we introduce some definitions and properties which will be used later.
Definition 1.1 Let E be a group with a unit e and suppose that there exists a metric d on E such that is a complete metric space. E is said to be a noncommutative Banach space if the following conditions hold:
-
(1)
for any , we have ;
-
(2)
there exists a binary continuous operation
such that is exactly the inverse of x in the group E and is the unit in the group E, and that
for , ;
-
(3)
for any , there exists a constant such that
In particular, if there exists a constant such that for , , then E is said to be uniformly bounded.
Let E be a uniformly bounded noncommutative Banach space. Taking , we conclude that , which together with the triangular inequality yields . This shows E is bounded.
Example 1.1 All Banach spaces are noncommutative Banach spaces. Let be a Banach space, then is a group with a unit θ, and there exists a metric d induced by the norm such that is a complete metric space. Firstly, the metric d satisfies for . Secondly, there exists a binary continuous mapping , satisfying the condition (2) in Definition 1.1. Finally, for any , there exists a constant such that , . According to the definition, X is a noncommutative Banach space.
Example 1.2 Let be the standard n-dimensional vector space over ℝ. Define
for . Clearly, is a complete metric space. In order to verify that is a noncommutative Banach space. It suffices to show that for any , there exists a constant such that , for , where θ is unit in . Indeed, choose , and we get .
Example 1.3 Suppose that H is a Hilbert space and is the unitary group of H. Put
then is a complete metric space as a subset of , where denotes the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H. Moreover, for any and , set
where means the spectral measure associated with the operator T. Notice that
for . Then is a uniformly bounded noncommutative Banach space.
Definition 1.2 Let E be a noncommutative Banach space. P is a subset of E satisfying the following conditions:
-
(1)
P is nonempty, closed, and ;
-
(2)
and implies ;
-
(3)
where .
Then P is called a cone in E.
Given a cone P in a noncommutative Banach space E, a relation can be introduced as follows:
One can show that ‘≲’ is a partial ordering in E with respect to P. In fact:
-
(i)
For , for all . This implies that .
-
(ii)
If and , then and for all . By , we get , which implies that .
-
(iii)
If and , then and for all , which together with the condition (2) in Definition 1.2 can infer . This shows that .
Definition 1.3 A cone is called normal if there is a number such that
The least positive number N satisfying the above is called the normal constant of P. It is clear that .
Remark 1.1 Let , , then the following relation holds:
Indeed, for any , if , then since P is a cone, thus we can get ; if , then , which means .
Definition 1.4 For , if either or holds, we say that u and v are comparable, denoted
From the above definitions, we have the following properties.
Lemma 1.1 Suppose that P is a cone in E. For , we have:
-
(1)
Set , then holds for any .
-
(2)
If u and v are comparable, then and are comparable, and furthermore .
-
(3)
If u and v are comparable, then .
-
(4)
(compatibility) Let , and be comparable for all . If , , then and are comparable.
Proof (1) Let , we have for all . Since for any , we see , which implies that .
(2) Without loss of generality, one can suppose that , which means . Using Remark 1.1, one can see . Furthermore for all , which implies , and therefore .
(3) Assume that , then . It follows immediately from Definition 1.1 that
(4) Since and are comparable for all n, we can suppose that there exist two subsequences and such that for all k. Note that for all
It follows directly that
As P is closed, one obtains . This says that . □
2 Fixed-point theorems on noncommutative Banach spaces
From now on, we always suppose that E is a noncommutative Banach space with a partial ordering ≲ induced by a normal cone P with the normal constant N. And some fixed-point theorems for mappings on E satisfying the ordered contractive condition will be presented. Let us begin with the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1 Let be a continuous mapping and suppose that the following two assertions hold.
-
(1)
There exists a constant such that for all , if u and v are comparable, then Au and Av are comparable and furthermore
In this case, we say A satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition.
-
(2)
There exists such that and are comparable.
Then A has a fixed point which is unique in the comparable sense. Namely, if and and are comparable, then . Moreover,
Proof Define a sequence by the formula , . The proof can be divided into three steps.
Step I. is a Cauchy sequence.
Now, since and are comparable, and A satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition, we obtain and , and , … , and are comparable. Notice
Inductively the following holds:
By the above for all and Lemma 1.1(1), we obtain
From the above it is easy to conclude that
which together with Definition 1.1 yields
Finally, by Lemma 1.1(3), this implies
which shows is a Cauchy sequence. The completeness of E implies that there exists such that .
Step II. is a fixed point of A.
Suppose that , which together with A is continuous, we get
which shows is a fixed point of A.
Step III. The uniqueness of the fixed point of A in the comparable sense.
Let us consider , and let and be comparable. Without loss of generality, set , which shows . By the condition (1),
That is
In addition, we know . Then , which implies . On the other hand, we have . Now, from the definition of a cone, we have , and then .
Furthermore,
□
Remark 2.1 Assume in addition that E satisfies the condition:
-
(3)
For , if they are not comparable, then there exists such that u and w, v and w are comparable, respectively.
Then A has a unique fixed point. Note that condition (3) is always valid if E is a lattice.
It suffices to show the uniqueness of the fixed point of A. Suppose that , are fixed points of A. Claim that and are comparable. If not, there exists such that and z, and z are comparable, respectively. Since A satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition, then and , and are comparable for any , respectively. Also,
and
Then
and similarly
The triangular inequality tells us that
as , which implies . This is a contradiction. Therefore, and are comparable. By Theorem 2.1, .
Corollary 2.1 Let E be a uniformly bounded noncommutative Banach space, P a normal cone with the normal constant N. For , , set . Suppose that a continuous mapping satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition and . Also, and are comparable. Then there exists a unique fixed point in in the comparable sense.
Proof It suffices to show that for any .
For any , the triangular inequality gives
By Lemma 1.1(3),
Since A satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition, we have
and then
Hence we get
from which one deduces that
□
Corollary 2.2 Let be a continuous mapping and suppose that the following two assertions hold:
-
(1)
there exist and such that for all , if u and v are comparable, then Au and Av are comparable and furthermore
-
(2)
there exists such that and are comparable.
Then A admits a unique fixed point in the comparable sense.
Proof By Theorem 2.1, we know has a unique fixed point in the comparable sense. Notice that
which means is also a fixed point of . Again, since and are comparable, then and are comparable, which implies . Since the fixed point of A is also the fixed point of , the fixed point of A is unique in the comparable sense. □
Theorem 2.2 Let be a mapping and suppose that the following two assertions hold:
-
(1)
there exists a constant such that for all , if u and v are comparable, then Au and Av, Au and u, Av and v are comparable, and furthermore
-
(2)
A is continuous.
Then A admits a unique fixed point in the comparable sense, and for each , . Moreover,
Proof By the reflexivity of the partial ordering ‘≲’ in E, . And since A satisfies the condition (1), then and , and , … , and are comparable. Put . Then for each integer , from the condition (1), we get
By the definition of partial ordering in E with respect to P, one has
That is
From Lemma 1.1(1), one can obtain
As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, is a Cauchy sequence and there exists such that . Also, is a fixed point of A.
It remains to be shown that is a unique fixed point of A.
Suppose that there exists , , such that . Due to the condition (1), we have
That is
Since . Then , which implies . Now, applying Definition 1.2, we obtain the desired result.
Similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1, one can verify
Let , and . By from now on we denote the order interval . Finally, we consider the fixed-point theorem in the order interval. □
Theorem 2.3 Let be the order interval in E. If satisfies the conditions in Theorem 2.2, then A has a unique fixed point in the comparable sense.
Proof Consider sequences and defined by and , respectively. Then . Since A satisfies Theorem 2.2(1), then for any , and are comparable, and
Notice that P is a normal cone,
Again , hence for all , and are comparable. Then
from which one deduces
Hence, we conclude that is a Cauchy sequence with a limit point for any .
Similarly, is a Cauchy sequence with a limit point for any .
Now, as
then .
The rest of the proof is analogue to that in Theorem 2.2. □
If one checks the proof of Theorem 2.3, then one can easily obtain the following result.
Corollary 2.3 Let be the order interval in E. If the continuous mapping satisfies the k-ordered contractive condition, then A admits a unique fixed point in the comparable sense.
3 Examples
We give some examples to illustrate the main result of this paper in the following.
Example 3.1 Consider the space given in Example 1.2. Let be a normal cone. The partial ordering in E with respect to P is given by
then E is a lattice. It is known that the operators on are in one-to-one correspondence with the matrices. Consider a matrix
where , . Choose such that . Clearly, Ax and Ay are comparable if x and y are comparable. Moreover, if , then . By Theorem 2.1 and Remark 2.1, we know that A has a unique fixed point.
Example 3.2 Consider the integral equation of Fredholm type
Assume that
-
(1)
and are continuous;
-
(2)
is monotonous for ;
-
(3)
there exist a continuous function and such that
for , .
-
(4)
;
-
(5)
there exists such that for any , or .
Then the integral equation has a unique solution in .
In fact, let with the metric induced by the supremum norm, i.e.,
for , and be a normal cone in . The partial ordering in E induced by P is given as follows:
Define by
From the condition (2), A is monotonous. The monotonicity condition implies that Ax and Ay are comparable if x and y are comparable. Observe that for , if x and y are comparable, then
for , which implies that . Thus, A is continuous. Again, E is a lattice, by Theorem 2.1 and Remark 2.1, the integral equation has a unique solution in .
Observe that the functions satisfying the conditions in Example 3.2 do exist. For example,
for and .
Notice that the examples given above are in linear spaces. As to the noncommutative case, it is under consideration now.
References
Banach S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.
Abbas M, Rhoades BE, Nazir T: Common fixed points for four maps in cone metric spaces. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 216: 80–86. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.01.003
Agarwal RP, El-Gebeily MA, O’Regan D: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Appl. Anal. 2008, 87(1):109–116. 10.1080/00036810701556151
Altun I, Damnjanović B, Djorić D: Fixed point and common fixed point theorems on ordered cone metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 310–316. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.016
Amini-Harandi A, Emami H: A fixed point theorem for contraction type maps in partially ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72(5):2238–2242. 10.1016/j.na.2009.10.023
Caballero J, Harjani J, Sadarangani K: Contractive-like mapping principles in ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 916064
Cho YJ, Saadati R, Wang SH: Common fixed point theorems on generalized distance in ordered cone metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 1254–1260. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.01.004
Dhage BC, O’Regan D, Agrawal RP: Common fixed point theorems for a pair of countably condensing mapping in ordered Banach spaces. J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 1977, 62(2):344–348.
Huang LG, Zhang X: Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 33(2):1468–1476.
Kadelburg Z, Pavlović M, Radenović S: Common fixed point theorems for ordered contractions and quasicontractions in ordered cone metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59: 3148–3159. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.02.039
Klim D, Wardowski D: Dynamic processes and fixed points of set-valued nonlinear contractions in cone metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 5170–5175. 10.1016/j.na.2009.04.001
O’Regan D, Petruşel A: Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions in ordered metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 341(2):1241–1252. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.11.026
Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07220-4
Wang JG: Fixed points of increasing operators in ordered Banach spaces. Acta Math. Sin. Chin. Ser. 2000, 43: 43–48.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees for their many valuable suggestions that have greatly contributed to improve the quality of this paper. This work is supported financially by the NSFC (10971011, 11371222).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Xin, Q., Jiang, L. Fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying the ordered contractive condition on noncommutative spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-30
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-30