- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Coincidence point theorems for weak graph preserving multi-valued mapping
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 248 (2014)
Abstract
In this paper, we prove some coincidence and fixed point theorems for a new type of multi-valued weak G-contraction mapping with compact values. The results of this paper extend and generalize several known results from a complete metric space endowed with a graph. Some examples are given to illustrate the usability of our results.
MSC:47H04, 47H10.
1 Introduction
The classical contraction mapping principle of Banach states that if is a complete metric space and is a contraction mapping, i.e., for all , where , then f has a unique fixed point. Banach fixed point theorem plays an important role in several branches of mathematics. For instance, it has been used to study the existence of solutions of nonlinear integral equations, system of linear equations, nonlinear differential equations in Banach spaces and to prove the convergence of algorithms in computational mathematics. Because of its usefulness for mathematical theory, Banach fixed point theorem has been extended in many directions; see [1–11]. Several well-known fixed point theorems of single-valued mappings such as Banach and Schauder have been extended to multi-valued mappings in Banach spaces.
Fixed point theory of multi-valued mappings plays an important role in control theory, optimization, partial differential equations, economics, and applied science. For a metric space , we let and be the set of all nonempty closed bounded subsets and the set of all nonempty compact subsets of X, respectively. A point x in X is a fixed point of a multi-valued mapping if x is in Tx.
Nadler [12] has proved a multi-valued version of the Banach contraction principle which states that each closed and bounded value contraction map on a complete metric space has a fixed point. One of the most general fixed point theorems for multi-valued nonexpansive self-mappings was studied by Kirk and Massa in 1990 [13]. They proved the existence of fixed points in Banach spaces for which the asymptotic center of a bounded sequence in a closed convex subset is nonempty and compact.
The following theorem is the first well-known theorem of multi-valued contractions studied by Nadler in 1969 [12].
Theorem 1.1 Let be a complete metric space and . Assume that there exists such that
for all . Then there exists such that .
Reich [14] extended Nadler’s fixed point theorem as follows.
Theorem 1.2 Let be a complete metric space and . Assume that there exists a function such that
for each and
for all . Then there exists such that .
The multi-valued mapping T studied by Reich [14] in Theorem 1.2 has compact value, that is, Tx is a nonempty compact subset of X for all x in the spaces X. In 1989, Mizoguchi and Takahashi [15] relaxed the compactness assumption on the mapping to closed and bounded subsets of X. They proved the following theorem as a generalization of Nadler’s theorem.
Theorem 1.3 Let be a complete metric space and . Assume that there exists a function such that
for each and
for all . Then there exists such that .
In 2007, Berinde and Berinde [16] gave the definition of a multi-valued weak contraction stated as follows.
Definition 1.4 Let be a metric space and a multi-valued mapping. T is said to be a multi-valued weak contraction or a multi-valued -weak contraction if there exist two constants and such that
for all .
Then they extended Theorem 1.2 to the class of multi-valued weak contraction and showed that in a complete metric space, every multi-valued weak contraction has a fixed point. In the same paper, they also introduced a class of multi-valued mappings which is more general than that of weak contraction defined as follows.
Definition 1.5 Let be a metric space and a multi-valued mapping. T is said to be a generalized multi-valued -weak contraction if there exist a nonnegative number L and a function satisfying for each such that
for all .
They showed that in a complete metric space, every generalized multi-valued -weak contraction has a fixed point.
In 2008, Jachymski [17] introduced the concept of ‘contraction concerning a graph’, called G-contraction and proved some fixed point results of G-contraction in a complete metric space endowed with a graph.
Definition 1.6 Let be a metric space and a directed graph such that and contains all loops, i.e., . We say that a mapping is a G-contraction if f preserves edges of G, i.e., for every ,
and there exists such that ,
The mapping satisfying condition (1) is also called a graph-preserving mapping. Jachymski showed in [17] that under some properties on X, a G-contraction has a fixed point if and only if there exists such that .
Recently, Beg and Butt [18] introduced the concept of ‘G-contraction’ for a multi-valued mapping defined as follows.
Definition 1.7 Let be a multi-valued mapping. The mapping T is said to be a G-contraction if there exists such that
for all and if and are such that
for each , then .
They showed that if is a complete metric space and has Property A [18], then G-contraction mapping has a fixed point if and only if there exist and such that .
In 2011, Nicolae, O’Regan, and Petrusel [19] extended the notion of multi-valued contraction on a metric space with a graph in considering the fixed point shown below.
Theorem 1.8 Let be a multi-valued map with nonempty closed values. Assume that
-
(1)
there exists such that for all ;
-
(2)
for each , each and satisfying for some , holds;
-
(3)
X has Property A.
If there exist such that , then F has a fixed point.
In 2013, Dinevari and Frigon [20] introduced a concept of ‘G-contraction’ which is weaker than that of Beg and Butt [18] and weaker than that of Nicolae, O’Regan, and Petrusel [19].
Definition 1.9 Let be a map with nonempty values. We say that T is a G-contraction (in the sense of Dinevari and Frigon) if there exists such that for all and all , there exists such that and .
They showed that under some properties, weaker than Property A, on a metric space a multi-valued G-contraction with the closed value has a fixed point.
Most recently, Tiammee and Suantai [21] introduced the concept of ‘graph preserving’ for multi-valued mappings and proved their fixed point theorem in a complete metric space endowed with a graph.
Definition 1.10 [21]
Let X be a nonempty set, a directed graph such that , and . T is said to be graph preserving if
for all and .
Definition 1.11 [21]
Let X be a nonempty set, a directed graph such that , , and . T is said to be g-graph preserving if for any , such that
for all and .
Definition 1.12 Let be a metric space, a directed graph such that , , and . T is said to be a multi-valued weak G-contraction with respect to g or a -G-contraction if there exists a function satisfying
for every and a nonnegative number L with
for all such that .
Theorem 1.13 [21]
Let be a complete metric space, a directed graph such that , and a surjective mapping. If is a multi-valued mapping satisfying the following properties:
-
(1)
T is a g-graph preserving mapping;
-
(2)
there exists such that for some ;
-
(3)
X has Property A;
-
(4)
T is a -G-contraction,
then there exists such that .
The condition of T in Definition 1.11 to be g-graph preserving requires all pairs where and have connecting edges whenever . With some modification, we are interested in proposing the new concept of ‘g-graph preserving’ for multi-valued mappings in a complete metric space endowed with a graph and the fixed point theorem is also determined.
2 Preliminaries
Let be a metric space. For and , define
For each , define
Each element in is called a projection point of a into B. Note that if B is compact, then is always a nonempty set. Also, define
The mapping H is said to be a Hausdorff metric induced by d. The next two lemmas will play central roles in our main results.
Lemma 2.1 [12]
Let be a metric space. If (or ) and , then for each , there is such that
Lemma 2.2 [15]
Let be a metric space, (or ), a sequence in X such that , and a function satisfying for every . Suppose that is a non-increasing sequence such that
where is an increasing sequence and . Then is a Cauchy sequence in X.
Next we will give notions and examples of new types of multi-valued mapping with compact value which are weaker than that of Tiammee and Suantai [21].
Definition 2.3 Let X be a nonempty set and be a directed graph such that , and . T is said to be weak graph preserving if it satisfies the following:
for each , if , then for each there is such that .
In Example 2.4, we illustrate a mapping T which is weak graph preserving but not graph preserving.
Example 2.4 Let â„• be a metric space with the usual metric and where
Define by
We will show that T is weak graph preserving. If where , then and . We can see that and .
If where , then and . We can see that and . It is easy to see that and so T is not graph preserving.
Next we will give an another example of a weak graph-preserving mapping that is not a G-contraction in the sense of Dinevari and Frigon [20].
Example 2.5 Let be a metric space with the usual metric and where
Define by
We will show that T is weak graph preserving. If then and . We can see that , and .
If then and . We can see that , , and .
If or then and . We can see that and .
If or then and . We can see that and .
So, T is weak graph preserving but it is not a G-contraction in the sense of Dinevari and Frigon since for each and with , for all .
Definition 2.6 Let X be a nonempty set, a directed graph such that , , and . T is said to be weak g-graph preserving if it satisfies the following:
for each , if , then for each there is such that .
Example 2.7 Let â„• be a metric space with the usual metric, where
Define by
and by
We will show that T is weak g-graph preserving.
If , then and and . We can see that and .
If , then and and . We can see that and .
If where , then and and . We can see that and .
If where , then and and . We can see that and . Hence T is weak g-graph preserving.
3 Main results
We first recall Property A before the main theorem is proved.
Property A For any sequence in X, if and for , then there is a subsequence such that for .
Theorem 3.1 Let be a complete metric space, a directed graph such that , and a surjective map. If is a multi-valued mapping satisfying the following properties:
-
(1)
T is weak g-graph preserving;
-
(2)
;
-
(3)
X has Property A;
-
(4)
T is a -G-contraction,
then there exists such that .
Proof By (2), let . Then there exists such that . Since g is surjective, there exists such that . Thus we have . Since , there exists such that
Since is compact, it follows that . Since T is weak g-graph preserving, there exists such that and . Again since g is surjective, there is such that . By Lemma 2.1, there is such that
It follows that
Since T is a -G-contraction and , we have
Next, since , there exists such that and
Since is compact, it follows that . Since T is weak g-graph preserving, there exists such that and . Again since g is surjective, there is such that . By Lemma 2.1, there is such that
It follows that
Since T is a -G-contraction and , we have
Continuing in this process, we produce a sequence in X and an increasing sequence in â„• such that for each , , ,
and
We note that
Hence, and so is a non-increasing sequence. By Lemma 2.2, is a Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, the sequence converges to a point for some . By Property A in (3), there is a subsequence such that for any . Claim that . Note that for each ,
Since converges to as , it follows that . Since Tu is compact, we conclude that , completing the proof. □
Remark 3.2 Theorem 3.1 is an extension of Theorem 1.13 in the case of a mapping having compact values.
A partial order is a binary relation ≤ over the set X which satisfies the following conditions:
-
(1)
(reflexivity);
-
(2)
if and , then (antisymmetry);
-
(3)
if and , then (transitivity),
for all . A set with a partial order ≤ is called a partially ordered set. We write if and .
Definition 3.3 Let be a partially ordered set. For each , if for any , .
Definition 3.4 [21]
Let be a metric space endowed with a partial order ≤, a surjective map, and . T is said to be g-increasing if for any ,
In the case g is the identity map, the mapping T is called an increasing mapping.
Corollary 3.5 Let be a metric space endowed with a partial order ≤, a surjective map and a multi-valued mapping. Suppose that
-
(1)
T is g-increasing;
-
(2)
there exist and such that ;
-
(3)
for each sequence such that for all and converges to for some , then for all ;
-
(4)
there exist a function satisfying for every and a nonnegative number L with
for all such that ;
-
(5)
the metric d is complete.
Then there exists such that .
Proof Define where and . Let be such that . Then so by (1) it implies that . For each , , . Since Ty is compact, it follows that and for all . Thus for all and all . That is, T is weak g-graph preserving. By assumption (2), there exist and such that . So and hence the condition (2) in Theorem 3.1 is satisfied. Moreover, the conditions (3) and (4) in Theorem 3.1 are also satisfied. Therefore the result of this corollary is followed by Theorem 3.1. □
Theorem 3.6 Let be a metric space endowed with a partial order ≤ and a multi-valued mapping. Suppose that
-
(1)
T is increasing;
-
(2)
there exist and such that ;
-
(3)
for each sequence such that for all and converges to x for some , then for all ;
-
(4)
there exist a function satisfying for every and a nonnegative number L with
for all with ;
-
(5)
the metric d is complete.
Then there exists such that . Furthermore, if and , then T has a unique fixed point.
Proof Setting , by Corollary 3.5 we have . With conditions and , we will show that T has a unique fixed point. Let . Suppose to a contrary that . Without loss of generality, assume that . By the condition (4), we have
Since , this yields , a contradiction. Therefore , which implies that T has a unique fixed point. □
Next we give an example such that T has a unique fixed point but T is neither a graph-preserving nor a multi-valued G-contraction in the sense of Nicolae, O’Regan, and Petrusel [19].
Example 3.7 Let be a metric space with the usual metric d. Consider the directed graph defined by and
where Δ is the diagonal in . Let be defined by
Then:
-
(1)
T has a fixed point;
-
(2)
T is not graph preserving as defined by Tiammee and Suantai [21];
-
(3)
T is not a G-contraction in the sense of Nicolae, O’Regan, and Petrusel [19].
Proof (1) We will show that T is a -G-contraction with , , and . Let .
If , then , , and
If , then , , and
If for all , then and . It is easy to check that
If for all , then and . We have
If and , then which obviously implies that . So,
Hence T is a -G-contraction. Next, we will show that T is weak graph preserving. Let .
If , then , , and and .
If , then , , and and .
If for all , then and . It is easy to see that , , and .
If for all , then and . We have , , and .
If then . We have , , and .
If , then which obviously implies that , and . So, T is weak graph preserving. Next, we can see that and . So the condition (2) of Theorem 3.1 is satisfied. Also, it is obvious that the condition (3) of Theorem 3.1 is satisfied. Thus all conditions of Theorem 3.1 are obtained. Therefore we can conclude that T has a fixed point and the fixed point set .
(2) T is not graph preserving since , but .
(3) T is not a multi-valued contraction in the sense of Nicolae, O’Regan, and Petrusel since , , and with but . □
Remark 3.8 As a consequence of Example 3.7, we can neither use Theorem 1.13 nor Theorem 1.8 to check whether or not T has a fixed point.
References
Bojor F: Fixed point theorems for Reich type contraction on metric spaces with a graph. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 3895–3901. 10.1016/j.na.2012.02.009
Branciari A: A fixed point theorem for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 29: 531–536.
Browder FE: The fixed point theory of multi-valued mapping in topological spaces. Math. Ann. 1968, 177: 283–301. 10.1007/BF01350721
Du WS: New cone fixed point theorems for nonlinear multi-valued maps with applications. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24(2):172–178. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.040
Feng Y, Liu S: Fixed point theorems for multi-valued contractive mappings and multi-valued Caristi type mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 317: 103–112. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.004
Khaojasten F, Abbas M, Costache S: Two new types of fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014., 2014: Article ID 325840
Laza T, Mot G, Petrusel G, Szentesi S: The theory of Reich’s fixed point theorem for multi-valued operators. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010. 10.1155/2010/178421
Minak G, Acar O, Altun I: Multi-valued pseudo-Picard operators and fixed point results. J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 827458
Petrusel A, Petrusel G: Selection theorems for multi-valued generalized contractions. Math. Morav. 2005, 9: 43–52.
Sitthithakerngkiet K, Plubtieng S: Existence solutions of vector equilibrium problems and fixed point of multi-valued mappings. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 952021
Ume JS, Lee BS, Cho SJ: Some results on fixed point theorems for multi-valued mappings in complete metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2002, 30(6):319–325. 10.1155/S0161171202110350
Nadler SB: Multi-valued contraction mappings. Pac. J. Math. 1969, 30: 475–488. 10.2140/pjm.1969.30.475
Kirk WA, Massa S: Remarks on asymptotic and Chebyshev centers. Houst. J. Math. 1990, 16: 465–468.
Reich S: Fixed points of contractive functions. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 1972, 5: 26–42.
Mizoguchi N, Takahashi W: Fixed point theorems for multi-valued mapping on complete metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1989, 141: 177–188. 10.1016/0022-247X(89)90214-X
Berinde M, Berinde V: On a general class multi-valued weakly Picard mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 326: 772–782. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.03.016
Jachymski J: Fixed the contraction principle for mappings on a metric with a graph. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2008, 139: 1359–1373.
Beg I, Butt AR: Fixed point for set valued mappings satisfying an implicit relation in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 3699–3704. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.027
Nicolae A, O’Regan D, Petrusel A: Fixed point theorems for single-valued and multi-valued generalized contractions in metric spaces endowed with a graph. Georgian Math. J. 2011, 18: 307–327.
Dinevari T, Frigon T: Fixed point results for multi-valued contractions on a metric space with a graph. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 405: 507–517. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.04.014
Tiammee J, Suantai S: Coincidence point theorems for graph-preserving multi-valued mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2014. 10.1186/1687-1812-2014-70
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the Faculty of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Phon-on, A., Sama-Ae, A., Makaje, N. et al. Coincidence point theorems for weak graph preserving multi-valued mapping. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-248
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-248