- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Fixed points for modified fuzzy ψ-contractive set-valued mappings in fuzzy metric spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 12 (2014)
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a new concept of fuzzy α-ψ-contractive type set-valued mappings and establish fixed-point theorems for such mappings in complete fuzzy metric spaces. Starting from the fuzzy version of the Banach contraction principle, the presented theorems extend, generalize and improve many existing results in the literature. Moreover, the results are supported by examples.
1 Introduction
In metric fixed-point theory, the contractive conditions on underlying functions play an important role for ensuring the existence of fixed points. The Banach contraction principle is a remarkable result in metric fixed-point theory. Recently Gregori and Sapena [1] have extended the Banach contraction principle to fuzzy contractive mappings on complete fuzzy metric spaces in some sense. Over the years, it has been generalized in different directions by several mathematicians (see [2–14]). In particular, Mihet [2] introduced the concepts of fuzzy ψ-contractive mappings which enlarge the class of fuzzy contractions in [1], that is, the following implication takes place for the single-valued mapping T:
for any and , where ψ is a function whose definition is given in Section 3. Moreover, some authors established fixed-point theorems for such mappings in complete fuzzy metric spaces. Afterwards, Hong and Peng [14] modified the notion of the fuzzy ψ-contraction via a so-called fw-distance instead of the fuzzy metric M and provided the sufficient conditions for the existence of fixed points for such contraction set-valued mappings.
Motivated by the works mentioned above, in this paper we will further modify the type of the ψ-contraction and establish fixed-point theorems for such set-valued mappings on certain complete fuzzy metric spaces. Specifically, the main purpose is to extend the inequality to a general functional inequality and introduce therefrom a new called fuzzy α-ψ-contraction which extends and improves the fuzzy ψ-contraction of set-valued mappings; moreover, to formulate the conditions guaranteeing the convergence of fuzzy α-ψ-contractive sequences and the existence of fixed points of such a set-valued mapping. The present fixed-point theorem and a comprehensive set of its corollaries turn out to be generalizations of those of [1, 2, 5]. Some examples are given here to illustrate the usability of the results obtained.
Finally, the idea of present paper has originated from the study of an analogous problem examined by Salimi et al. [15] and Samet et al. [16] for single-valued contractive mappings and Hussain et al. [17] for set-valued contractive mappings on complete determinacy metric spaces.
2 Preliminaries
Let us recall [18] that a continuous t-norm is a binary operation such that is an ordered Abelian topological monoid with unit 1. In the sequel, we always assume for all .
For examples of a t-norm satisfying the above conditions, we enumerate , and for , respectively.
Definition 2.1 [19]
A fuzzy metric space is an ordered triple such that X is a (nonempty) set, ∗ is a continuous t-norm and M is a fuzzy set on that satisfies the following conditions, for all :
(F1) , for all ,
(F2) , for all , and for some implies ,
(F3) , for all ,
(F4) for all and
(F5) is continuous.
Following the definition of Kramosil and Michálek [20], M is a fuzzy set on that satisfies (F3) and (F4), while (F1), (F2), (F5) are replaced by (K1), (K2), (K5), respectively, as follows:
(K1) ;
(K2) for all if and only if ;
(K5) is left continuous.
We refer to these spaces as KM-spaces and refer to the spaces given as in Definition 2.1 as GV-spaces. In addition, when X is called a fuzzy metric space, it means it may be a GV-space or KM-space.
In these senses, M is called a fuzzy metric on X. Some simple but useful facts are that
-
(I)
is a continuous function on for and
-
(II)
is nondecreasing for all .
Indeed, let and be two sequences of X with and . Then, for any and , we have
In view of Lemma 2.2, for any , we have and for large enough n and any . Hence,
Let ; combining the arbitrariness of ε and the left continuity of , it follows that
By taking the limit when , we obtain . By an analogous inference, we have . Consequently, , i.e., the first fact is valid. To prove the second fact, by (F4) we notice that for with .
Let be a fuzzy metric space. For and , the open ball with center is defined by
A subset is called open if for each , there exist and such that . Let denote the family of all open subsets of X. Then is a topology on X induced by the fuzzy metric M. This topology is metrizable [21]. Therefore, a closed subset B of X is equivalent to if and only if there exists a sequence such that topologically converges to x. In fact, the topologically convergence of sequences can be indicated by the fuzzy metric as follows.
Lemma 2.2 A sequence in X is said to be convergent to a point , denoted by , if for any .
Definition 2.3 [19]
Let be a fuzzy metric space.
-
(i)
A sequence in X is called Cauchy sequence if for each and , there exists such that for any .
-
(ii)
A fuzzy metric space in which every Cauchy sequence is convergent is said to be complete.
There exist two fuzzy versions of Cauchy sequences and completeness, i.e., besides the so-called M-Cauchy sequence and M-completeness in the sense of Definition 2.3, the G-Cauchy sequence defined by for all and the corresponding G-completeness introduced by [22]. In [23] the authors have pointed out that a G-Cauchy sequence is not a M-Cauchy in general. It is clear that a M-Cauchy sequence is G-Cauchy and hence a fuzzy metric space is M-complete if it is G-complete. From now on, by a Cauchy sequence and completeness we mean an M-Cauchy sequence and M-completeness.
By we denote the collection consisting of all nonempty closed subsets of X (obviously, every closed subset of X is bounded in the sense of fuzzy metric spaces). Motivated by [24], we define a function on as follows:
for any and , where .
On the collection consisting of compact sunsets of X, in [24] the authors have shown that satisfies the conditions (F1)-(F5) given as in Definition 2.1. Clearly, for all and .
Lemma 2.4 If , then if and only if for .
We end this section by the following notion which plays an important role in our main results.
Definition 2.5 Let be a fuzzy metric space. A subset is said to be approximative if the set-valued mapping
has nonempty values. The set-valued mapping is said to have approximative values if is approximative for each .
It is clear that F has approximative values if it has compact values.
3 Fixed-point theorems
Let be a fuzzy metric space and be a set-valued mapping. An element is called a fixed point of T if .
Definition 3.1 Let be a set-valued function, and let be two functions, where α is bounded. We say that T is an --admissible mapping if
where and .
The following collection Ψ of functions is described in [2], that is, implies that ψ from into itself is continuous, nondecreasing, and for each .
Lemma 3.2 Let . For every , if and only if uniformly for , where is the nth iterate of ψ.
Proof Necessity. Since ψ is nondecreasing, the sequence is also nondecreasing and hence its limit exists. Let . Thus . If , then from the continuity of ψ it follows that
a contradiction. Therefore, .
On the other hand, if the limit is not uniform, then there exists such that, for every , we can find and with satisfying
We can assume that for . In fact, if , then, by means of our assumptions, we have . Without loss of generality, we put . Inductively, let for . If for some , then we have . In this case, we put . Consequently, the sequence is nonincreasing and hence is convergent. Denoting , we easily see that . This shows that . From it follows that . Hence, there exists such that , for all , that is,
a contradiction. Therefore, uniformly for .
Sufficiency. Assume that there exists such that . Then for all since ψ is nondecreasing. Thus , a contradiction. □
Definition 3.3 Let . The set-valued mapping T is called a fuzzy α-ψ-contractive mapping if the following implication takes place:
where and
Theorem 3.4 Let be a complete fuzzy metric space and be a fuzzy α-ψ-contractive and --admissible set-valued mapping. Suppose that the following assertions hold:
-
(i)
there exist and such that for each ;
-
(ii)
for any sequence converging to and , for all and , we have for all .
Then T has a fixed point.
Proof Our assumptions guarantee that there exist and such that and for each . By the contractive condition (1) we have
for all . Noting that T is an --admissible mapping, we have
For , there exists such that . Applying again the contractive condition (1) we have
Continuing this process, we can define a sequence in X by satisfying, for all and ,
If for some , then is a fixed point of T and the result is proved. Hence, we suppose that , i.e., for all . From equation (5) and the definition of it follows that
for all and . By means of equation (3) we have
On the other hand, by equation (5) we get
By equation (6), this implies that
for all and . We claim that
Suppose the contrary; then
By virtue of the properties of ψ, for all and , we get
a contradiction. Hence equation (7) is valid. Moreover, in view of the monotonicity of ψ one has
for all and . Repeating this procedure, we have
for all and . Now, for all , and , we can write
where () and . In the light of Lemma 3.2, we can assume that when i is large enough. Note that the series is convergent, and the infinite product is convergent, too. Hence, . This implies that is an M-Cauchy sequence.
In view of the completeness of , there exists such that as . By means of (ii), we have for all and . From the contractive condition it follows that
We observe that , so by Lemma 2.4. If , then
Therefore, for and . Moreover, by equation (5) we obtain
Noting that , , we have as . By taking the limit as in the above inequality, we obtain
This is a contradiction. Therefore, . From Lemma 2.4 it follows that , i.e. y is a fixed point of T. □
We present the following interesting corollaries.
Corollary 3.5 Let be a complete fuzzy metric space and let T be an --admissible set-valued mapping with . Assume that the following assertions hold:
-
(i)
for , and ,
-
(ii)
there exist and such that for each ;
-
(iii)
for any sequence converging to and , for all and , we have for all and .
Then T has a fixed point.
Remark 3.6 Let . Then the assumptions (i) and (ii) of Corollary 3.5 hold and for all and . Thus for all and with (here T is called a fuzzy ψ-contractive set-valued mapping). Therefore, T has a fixed point in X. This result includes Theorem 3.1 in [2] and Theorem 3 in [5], and also the corresponding results of [1, 4] in complete GV-spaces.
Corollary 3.7 Let all hypotheses of Corollary 3.5 hold except (i) changed into one of the following conditions:
-
(I)
for , and ,
-
(II)
for , and ,
-
(III)
for , and ,
Then T has a fixed point.
Corollary 3.8 Let be a complete fuzzy metric space and let T be an --admissible set-valued mapping with . Assume that the following assertions hold:
-
(i)
for , and ,
-
(ii)
there exist and such that for each ;
-
(iii)
for any sequence converging to and , for all and , we have for all .
Then T has a fixed point.
4 Examples
In this section, we conclude the paper with several examples to illustrate the usability of the obtained results.
Example 4.1 Let , for any and for and . Then, for given , the set-valued mapping , where
has a fixed point in X.
Proof Using similar arguments to the ones in [[25], Theorem 16], one shows that is a complete GV-space. Let for . Then . Let
Then implies that . For any and , we consider the following cases.
Case 1. . In this case, we have, for any , and . Similarly, . Consequently, we obtain
Case 2. . We get and . Consequently,
Case 3. or . We get and . Consequently,
This shows that α and T satisfy Corollary 3.5(i). Notice that and ; that is, Corollary 3.5(ii) is satisfied.
Now, if is a sequence in X such that , for all and , and as , then , which implies that . This guarantees that for all and and hence Corollary 3.5(iii) holds. Thus all conditions of Corollary 3.5 are satisfied. The conclusion is that T has a fixed point. □
Remark 4.2 We observe that T in Example 4.1 is not fuzzy ψ-contractive. Hence there exists a mapping which is fuzzy α-ψ-contractive but not fuzzy ψ-contractive, although every fuzzy ψ-contractive mapping is obviously fuzzy α-ψ-contractive.
In fact, set and take , in Example 4.1; we have , . Note that
and we have . This shows that T is not fuzzy ψ-contractive.
Example 4.3 Let be endowed with the fuzzy metric for all and . Let the single-valued mappings be defined by
Define and by ,
and for , respectively. We prove that Corollary 3.8 can be applied to T. But the fuzzy ψ-contraction cannot be applied to T.
Proof Clearly, is a complete GV-space. We show that T is an α-η-admissible mapping. Let and ; if , then . On the other hand, for all , we have . It follows that . Also, .
Now, if is a sequence in X such that , for all and as , then and hence . This implies that for all and . Let . Then . We get
That is,
Then all conditions of Corollary 3.8 hold. Hence, T has a fixed point.
Let , and . Then , and
This shows that the ψ-contraction introduced in [2] cannot be applied to T. □
References
Gregori V, Sapena A: On fixed-point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2002, 125: 245–252. 10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00088-9
Mihet D: Fuzzy ψ -contractive mappings in non-Archimedean fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2008, 159: 739–744. 10.1016/j.fss.2007.07.006
Ćirić LB: Some new results for Banach contractions and Edelstein contractive mappings on fuzzy metric spaces. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 42: 146–154. 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.11.010
Radu V: Some remarks on the probabilistic contractions on fuzzy Menger spaces. Autom. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 11: 125–131. In: The Eighth International Conference on Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., Cluj-Napoca, 2002
Wang S: Answers to some open questions on fuzzy ψ -contractions in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2013, 222: 115–119.
Wardowski D: Fuzzy contractive mappings and fixed points in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2013, 222: 108–114.
Vetro C: Fixed points in weak non-Archimedean fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011, 162: 84–90. 10.1016/j.fss.2010.09.018
Zhu X-H, Xiao J-Z: Note on ‘Coupled fixed point theorems for contractions in fuzzy metric spaces’. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 5475–5479. 10.1016/j.na.2011.05.034
Xiao J, Zhu X, Jin X: Fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in Kaleva-Seikkala’s type fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2012, 200: 65–83.
Marudai M, Srinivasan PS: Some remarks on Heilpern’s generalization of Nadler’s fixed point theorem. J. Fuzzy Math. 2004, 12: 137–146.
Rezapour S, Samei M: Fixed points of some new contractions on intuitionistic fuzzy metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 168
Razani A: A contraction theorem in fuzzy metric space. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2005, 25: 257–265.
Qiu Z, Hong SH: Coupled fixed points for multivalued mappings in fuzzy metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 162
Hong SH, Peng Y: Fixed points of fuzzy contractive set-valued mappings and fuzzy metric completeness. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 276
Salimi P, Latif A, Hussain N: Modified α - ψ -contractive mappings with applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 151
Samet B, Vetro C, Vetro P: Fixed point theorem for α - ψ -contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 2154–2165. 10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014
Hussain N, Salimi P, Latif A: Fixed point results for single and set-valued α - η - ψ -contractive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 212
Hadžić O, Pap E: Fixed Point Theory in Probabilistic Metric Space. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2001.
George A, Veeramani P: On some results in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994, 64: 395–399. 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90162-7
Kramosil I, Michálek J: Fuzzy metrics and statistical metric spaces. Kybernetika 1975, 11: 326–334.
Gregori V, Romaguera S: Some properties of fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000, 115: 485–498. 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00281-4
Grabiec M: Fixed points in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1989, 27: 385–389.
Vasuki R, Veeramani P: Fixed point theorems and Cauchy sequences in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2003, 135: 415–417. 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00132-X
Rodríguez-Lôpez J, Romaguera S: The Hausdorff fuzzy metric on compact sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2004, 147: 273–283. 10.1016/j.fss.2003.09.007
Gregori V, Minana J, Morillas S: Some questions in fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2012, 204: 71–85.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY12A01002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, S. Fixed points for modified fuzzy ψ-contractive set-valued mappings in fuzzy metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 12 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-12
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-12