 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
A new iterative scheme for numerical reckoning fixed points of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2016, Article number: 83 (2016)
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new iterative algorithm to approximate fixed points of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. We also provide two examples to illustrate the convergence behavior of the proposed algorithm and numerically compare the convergence of the proposed iteration scheme with the existing schemes.
Introduction and basic definitions
Let \((X, d)\) be a metric space. A geodesic path joining \(x \in X\) to \(y \in X\) (or, more briefly, a geodesic from x to y) is a mapping \(c:[0, l] \subseteq\mathbb{R} \rightarrow X\) such that \(c(0) = x\), \(c(l) = y\) and \(d(c(a), c(b)) = a  b\) for all \(a,b \in[0, l]\). It is easy to see that c is an isometry and \(d(x, y) = l\). The image \(c([0,l])\) is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining x and y and is denoted by \([x, y]\) if it is unique.
The metric space \((X, d)\) is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of X are joined by a geodesic, and X is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining x and y for each \(x, y \in X\). A subset C of X is said to be convex if C includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its point.
A geodesic triangle \(\triangle(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})\) in a geodesic metric space \((X, d)\) consists of three points \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3} \in X\) (the vertices of △) and a geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the edges of △). A comparison triangle for the geodesic triangle \(\triangle(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})\) in \((X, d)\) is a triangle \(\overline{\triangle}(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) := \triangle(\overline{x}_{1}, \overline{x}_{2}, \overline{x}_{3})\) in the Euclidean plane \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\) such that \(d_{\mathbb{R}^{2}} (\overline{x}_{i}, \overline{x}_{j}) = d(x_{i}, x_{j})\) for all \(i, j \in\{1, 2, 3\}\). Bridson and Haefliger [1] have shown that such a triangle always exists.
A geodesic space is called a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space if all geodesic triangles of appropriate size satisfy the following \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) comparison axiom:

Let △ be a geodesic triangle in X and let \(\overline {\triangle} \subseteq\mathbb{R}^{2}\) be a comparison triangle for △. Then △ is said to satisfy the \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) inequality if for all \(x, y \in\triangle\) and all comparison points \(\overline{x}, \overline{y} \in\overline{\triangle}\),
$$ d(x,y)\leq d_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}(\overline{x},\overline{y}). $$(1.1)
Complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces are often called Hadamard spaces (see [2]).
If x, \(y_{1}\), \(y_{2}\) are points in a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space and if \(y_{0}\) is the midpoint of the segment \([y_{1}, y_{2}]\), which is a unique point with
then the \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) inequality (1.1) implies
This inequality is called the (CN) inequality which due to Bruhat and Titz [3].
In fact (see [3], p.163), a geodesic metric space \((X,d)\) is a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space if and only if it satisfies the (CN) inequality. If \((X,d)\) is a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space and \(x, y \in X\), then for each \(t\in[0, 1]\), there exists a unique point \(z\in[x,y]\) such that
For convenience, from now on we will use the notation \((1 t)x \oplus ty\) for the unique point z satisfying (1.4).
Definition 1.1
Let \(\{x_{n}\}\) be a bounded sequence in a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\).

1.
The asymptotic radius \(r(\{x_{n}\})\) of \(\{x_{n}\}\) is given by
$$r\bigl(\{x_{n}\}\bigr) := \inf_{x\in X}\bigl\{ r\bigl(x, \{x_{n}\}\bigr)\bigr\} , $$where \(r(x,\{x_{n}\}) :=\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty} d(x,x_{n})\).

2.
The asymptotic center \(A(\{x_{n}\})\) of \(\{x_{n}\}\) is the set
$$A\bigl(\{x_{n}\}\bigr) := \bigl\{ x\in X : r\bigl(x,\{x_{n}\} \bigr) = r\bigl(\{x_{n}\}\bigr)\bigr\} . $$
In 2006, Dhompongsa et al. [4] showed that \(A(\{ x_{n}\})\) consists of exactly one point for each bounded sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\) in a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space (see Proposition 7 in [4])).
Next, we give the concept of Δconvergent sequence in a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces.
Definition 1.2
Let \((X,d)\) be a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space. A sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\) in X is said to Δconverge to \(x\in X\) if and only if x is the unique asymptotic center of all subsequences of \(\{x_{n}\}\). In this case, we write \(\Delta\mbox{}\!\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} x_{n} = x\) and x is called the Δlimit of \(\{x_{n}\}\).
Let us recall some basics for nonlinear mappings on \(\operatorname {CAT}(0)\) spaces.
Definition 1.3
Let C be a nonempty subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T : C\rightarrow C\) is said to be nonexpansive if
for all \(x,y\in C\).
Definition 1.4
([5])
Let C be a nonempty subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T : C\rightarrow C\) is said to be asymptotically nonexpansive if there exists a sequences \(\{k_{n}\}\subseteq[1,\infty)\) with \(k_{n} \rightarrow1\) as \(n\rightarrow\infty\) such that
for all \(x,y\in C\) and \(n\in\mathbb{N}\).
Definition 1.5
Let C be a nonempty subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T : C\rightarrow C\) is said to be uniformly LLipschitzian if there exists a constant \(L\geq0\) such that
for all \(x,y\in C\) and \(n\in\mathbb{N}\).
Definition 1.6
([6])
Let C be a nonempty subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T : C\rightarrow C\) is said to be \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\}, \zeta )\)total asymptotically nonexpansive (briefly, total asymptotically nonexpansive) if there exist nonnegative sequences \(\{v_{n}\}\) and \(\{u_{n}\}\) with \(v_{n} \rightarrow0\), \(u_{n} \rightarrow0\) and a strictly increasing continuous function \(\zeta: [0,\infty) \rightarrow [0,\infty)\) with \(\zeta(0) = 0\) such that
for all \(x,y\in C\) and \(n\in\mathbb{N}\).
Remark 1.7
From Definitions 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, we note that each nonexpansive mapping is an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with a sequence \(\{k_{n}:=1\}\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) and each asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is a \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\}, \zeta )\)total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with two sequences \(\{v_{n}:=k_{n}1\}\) and \(\{u_{n}:=0\}\) for all \(n\in\mathbb {N}\) and ζ is an identity mapping. Also, we see that each asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is a uniformly LLipschitzian mapping with \(L:=\sup_{n\in\mathbb {N}} \{k_{n}\}\).
Lemma 1.8
([7], Theorem 2.8)
Let C be a closed convex subset of a complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(T : C \rightarrow C\) be a total asymptotically nonexpansive and uniformly LLipschitzian mapping. If \(\{x_{n}\}\) is a bounded sequence in C such that \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} d(x_{n},Tx_{n}) = 0 \) and \(\Delta\mbox{}\!\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} x_{n} =p\), then \(Tp = p\).
In 2014, Panyanak [8] gave the following existence result of fixed points for total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces which is also need in our main results.
Theorem 1.9
([8], Corollary 3.2)
Let C be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(T : C \rightarrow C\) be a continuous total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Then T has a fixed point.
Recently, Thakur et al. [9] introduced the modified PicardMann hybrid iteration process \(\{x_{n}\}\), which is given by
for all \(n \in\mathbb{N}\), where C is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\), \(\{\alpha_{n}\} \) is real sequence in the interval \([0,1]\) and \(T:X\rightarrow X\) is a total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. By using the iteration process (1.9) and Panyanak’s fixed point result (Theorem 1.9), they proved Δconvergence and strong convergence theorems for total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings on \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. They also compare the convergence of the modified PicardMann hybrid iteration process (1.9) with the modified Mann iteration process \(\{x_{n}\}\), which is given by
for all \(n \in\mathbb{N}\), where C is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\), \(\{\alpha_{n}\} \) is real sequence in the interval \([0,1]\) and \(T:X\rightarrow X\) is a total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. The original idea of the modified Mann iteration process was introduced by Alber et al. [6].
Motivated by the above recorded studies, in this work, we introduce a new iterative algorithm called ‘modified PicardIshikawa hybrid’ to approximate fixed points of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings on \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. Our results are refinements and generalizations of many recent results from the current literature. We also provide two numerical examples to illustrate the convergence behavior of the proposed algorithm.
Before we show our main results in the next section, let us recall some useful lemmas.
Lemma 1.10
([10], Lemma 2)
Let \(\{a_{n}\}\), \(\{\lambda_{n}\}\) and \(\{c_{n}\}\) be the sequences of nonnegative numbers such that
If \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda_{n} < \infty\) and \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_{n} < \infty\), then \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a_{n}\) exists. Moreover, if there exists a subsequence \(\{a_{n_{i}}\} \subseteq\{a_{n}\}\) such that \(a_{n_{i}} \rightarrow0\) as \(i\rightarrow\infty\), then \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a_{n} = 0\).
Lemma 1.11
Let \((X,d)\) be a complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space. Then the following assertions hold:
 (C_{1}):

every bounded sequence in X always has a Δconvergent subsequence [11], p.3690;
 (C_{2}):

if \(\{x_{n}\}\) is a bounded sequence in a closed convex subset C of X, then the asymptotic center of \(\{x_{n}\}\) is in C [12], Proposition 2.1;
 (C_{3}):

if \(\{x_{n}\}\) is a bounded sequence in X with \(A(\{x_{n}\} ) = \{p\}\), \(\{u_{n}\}\) is a subsequence of \(\{x_{n}\}\) with \(A(\{u_{n}\}) = \{u\}\) and the sequence \(\{d(x_{n},u)\}\) converges, then \(p = u\) [13], Lemma 2.8.
Lemma 1.12
([14], Lemma 4.5)
Let x be a given point in a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(\{t_{n}\}\) be a sequence in a closed interval \([a, b]\) with \(0 < a \leq b < 1\) and \(0 < a(1b) \leq\frac{1}{2}\). Suppose that \(\{x_{n}\}\) and \(\{y_{n}\}\) be two sequences in X such that
for some \(r \geq0\). Then \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} d(x_{n},y_{n}) = 0 \).
Main results
In this section, we begin with the Δconvergence theorem for a total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping T on a nonempty closed convex subset C of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space through the modified PicardIshikawa hybrid iteration process as follows:
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), where \(\{\alpha_{n}\}\) and \(\{\beta_{n}\}\) are real control sequences in the interval \([0,1]\).
Theorem 2.1
Let C be a bounded closed convex subset of a complete \(\operatorname {CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(T : C\rightarrow C\) be a uniformly LLipschitzian and \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\},\zeta)\)total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
 (S_{1}):

\(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} v_{n} < \infty\) and \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} u_{n} < \infty\);
 (S_{2}):

there exist constants \(a, b\) with \(0 < a\leq\alpha_{n} \leq b < 1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(0< a(1b) \leq\frac{1}{2}\);
 (S_{3}):

there exists a constant \(M^{*}\) such that \(\zeta(r) \leq M^{*}r\) for all \(r\geq0\).
Proof
Since T is uniformly LLipschitzian, we have T is continuous. By using Theorem 1.9, we get \(F(T)\neq\emptyset\). Next, we will divide the proof into three steps.
Step 1: First, we will prove that \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty } d(x_{n},p) \) exists for each \(p\in F(T)\), where \(\{x_{n}\}\) is defined by (2.1). Assume that \(\{x_{n}\}\) is defined by (2.1) and let \(p\in F(T)\). Then we obtain
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). Also, we have
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). From (2.1), (2.2), and (2.3), for each \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), we get
where \(\lambda_{n} := 3v_{n}M^{*}+3(v_{n}M^{*})^{2}+(v_{n}M^{*})^{3} \) and \(c_{n} := [ 3+ 3v_{n}M^{*}+(v_{n}M^{*})^{2} ] u_{n}\). The assumption (S_{1}) yields
By using Lemma 1.10 with assertions (2.4) and (2.5), we see that \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} d(x_{n},p) \) exists.
Step 2: In this step, we will prove that \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} d(x_{n},Tx_{n}) =0\). Without loss of generality, we may assume that
From (2.2), we have
It follows from T being a \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\},\zeta)\)total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping that
Similarly, we get
Since
we obtain
which implies that
From (2.7) and (2.12), we can conclude that
By using Lemma 1.12 with (2.6), (2.10), and (2.13), we get
Combining (2.11) and (2.15), we get
Again, by using Lemma 1.12 with (2.7), (2.9), and (2.16), we get
By using condition (1.8), we have
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). From (2.14), we get
Also, we have
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). From (2.17) and (2.20), we obtain
By using the triangle inequality, we have
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). Taking the limit \(n\rightarrow\infty\) in the above inequality with (2.14), (2.19), and (2.21), we conclude that
By using the triangle inequality with (2.14) and (2.22), we have
So Step 2 is proved.
Step 3: Now to claim that the sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\) Δconverges to a fixed point of T, we prove that
and \(W_{\Delta}(x_{n})\) consists of exactly one point. Assume that \(w \in W_{\Delta}(x_{n})\). From the definition of \(W_{\Delta}(x_{n})\), there is a subsequence \(\{w_{n}\}\) of \(\{x_{n}\}\) such that \(A(\{w_{n}\}) = \{w\}\). By Lemma 1.11(C_{1}), there exists a subsequence \(\{z_{n}\}\) of \(\{w_{n}\}\) such that \(\Delta\mbox{}\!\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} z_{n} = z \in C\). Using Lemma 1.8, we get \(z \in F(T)\). Since \(\{d(w_{n}, z)\}\) converges, by Lemma 1.11(C_{2}), we obtain \(w = z\). It yields \(W_{\Delta}(x_{n}) \subseteq F(T)\). Finally, we show that \(W_{\Delta}(x_{n})\) consists of exactly one point. Let \(\{w_{n}\}\) be a subsequence of \(\{x_{n}\}\) with \(A(\{w_{n}\}) = \{w\}\) and let \(A(\{x_{n}\}) = \{x\}\). We have already seen that \(w = z \in F(T)\). Since \(\{d(x_{n}, z)\}\) converges, by Lemma 1.11 (C_{3}), we have \(x = z \in F(T)\), that is, \(W_{\Delta}(x_{n}) = \{x\}\).
This completes the proof. □
By using the conclusion in Step 1 of Theorem 2.1 and the same technique as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 of Thakur et al. [9], we get the strong convergence result (Theorem 2.2). Then, in order to avoid repetition, the details are omitted.
Theorem 2.2
Let C be a bounded closed convex subset of a complete \(\operatorname {CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(T : C\rightarrow C\) be a uniformly LLipschitzian and \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\},\zeta)\)total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
 (S_{1}):

\(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} v_{n} < \infty\) and \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} u_{n} < \infty\);
 (S_{2}):

there exist constants \(a, b\) with \(0 < a\leq\alpha_{n} \leq b < 1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(0< a(1b) \leq\frac{1}{2}\);
 (S_{3}):

there exists a constant \(M^{*}\) such that \(\zeta(r) \leq M^{*}r\) for all \(r\geq0\).
where \(d(x, F(T)) := \inf\{d(x, p) : p \in F(T)\}\).
In [15], Senter and Dotson introduced the concept of special self mapping as follows.
Definition 2.3
([15])
Let C be a nonempty subset of a \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T:C\rightarrow C\) with \(F(T) \neq\emptyset\) is said to satisfy condition (I) if there is a nondecreasing function \(f:[0,\infty) \rightarrow[0,\infty) \) with \(f(0)=0\) and \(f(t) > 0\) for all \(t>0\) such that
for all \(x\in C\).
Using the result in Step 2 of Theorem 2.1 with Condition (I) and the same technique as in the proof of Theorem 3.3 of Thakur et al. [9], we now state the following strong convergence result for total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings without the proof.
Theorem 2.4
Let C be a bounded closed convex subset of a complete \(\operatorname {CAT}(0)\) space \((X,d)\) and \(T : C\rightarrow C\) be a uniformly LLipschitzian and \((\{v_{n}\}, \{u_{n}\},\zeta)\)total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
 (S_{1}):

\(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} v_{n} < \infty\) and \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} u_{n} < \infty\);
 (S_{2}):

there exist constants a, b with \(0 < a\leq\alpha_{n} \leq b < 1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(0< a(1b) \leq\frac{1}{2}\);
 (S_{3}):

there exists a constant \(M^{*}\) such that \(\zeta(r) \leq M^{*}r\) for all \(r\geq0\);
 (S_{4}):

T satisfies Condition (I).
Numerical example
In this section, using Example 3.1, we will compare the convergence of the modified PicardIshikawa hybrid iteration process (2.1) with the modified Mann iteration process (1.10) and the modified PicardMann hybrid iteration process (1.9).
Example 3.1
Let \(X:=\mathbb{R}\) be a usual metric space with the metric d, which is also a complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space, and \(C:=[0,2]\). We see that C is a bounded closed convex subset of X. Define a mapping \(T:C\rightarrow C\) by
Recently, Kim [16] showed that T is a continuous uniformly LLipschitzian and total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with \(F(T) = \{1\}\). Also, he claimed that T is not Lipschitzian and then it is not an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping.
Let \(\alpha_{n} := \frac{n}{n+1}\) and \(\beta_{n} := 1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). By using MATLAB, we computed the iterates of (1.10), (1.9), and (2.1) for two different initial points \(x_{1}=1.5\) and \(x_{1} = 1.9\). The numerical experiments of all iterations for approximating the fixed point 1 are given in Tables 1 and 2. Moreover, the convergence behavior of all iteration is shown in Figure 1.
In Figures 2 and 3, we give the convergence behavior of the iterates of (1.10), (1.9), and (2.1) for some initial point under the different control conditions.
Next, we will give an example to show the nontrivial difference between the rate of convergence of the modified PicardIshikawa hybrid iteration process (2.1) with the modified PicardMann hybrid iteration process (1.9).
Example 3.2
Let \(X:=\mathbb{R}\) be a usual metric space with the metric d, which is also a complete \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) space, and \(C:=[1,999]\). We see that C is a bounded closed convex subset of X. Define a mapping \(T:C\rightarrow C\) by
It is easy to see that T is a continuous uniformly LLipschitzian and a total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with \(F(T) = \{5\}\).
Let \(\alpha_{n} := \frac{n}{n+1}\) and \(\beta_{n} := 1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). By using MATLAB, we computed the iterates of (1.10), (1.9), and (2.1) for an initial point \(x_{1}=999\). The convergence behavior of all iterations for approximating the fixed point 5 are given in Figure 4.
In Figures 5 and 6, we give the convergence behavior of the iterates of (1.10), (1.9), and (2.1) for some initial point under the different control conditions.
References
 1.
Bridson, M, Haefliger, A: Metric Spaces of NonPositive Curvature. Springer, Berlin (1999)
 2.
Kirk, WA: A fixed point theorem in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces and Rtrees. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2004(4), 309316 (2004)
 3.
Bruhat, F, Tits, J: Groupes réductifs sur un corps local. I. Données radicielles valuées. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 41, 5251 (1972)
 4.
Dhompongsa, S, Kirk, WA, Sims, B: Fixed points of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 65(4), 762772 (2006)
 5.
Goebel, K, Kirk, WA: A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 35, 171174 (1972)
 6.
Alber, YI, Chidume, CE, Zegeye, H: Approximating fixed points of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2006, Article ID 10673 (2006)
 7.
Chang, SS, Wang, L, Lee, HWJ, Chan, CK, Yang, L: Demiclosed principle and Δconvergence theorems for total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(5), 26112617 (2012)
 8.
Panyanak, B: On total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in \(\operatorname{CAT}(\kappa)\) spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, Article ID 336 (2014)
 9.
Thakur, BS, Thakur, D, Postolache, M: Modified PicardMann hybrid iteration process for total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2015, Article ID 140 (2015)
 10.
Qihou, L: Iterative sequences for asymptotically quasinonexpansive mappings with error member. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 259(1), 1824 (2001)
 11.
Kirk, WA, Panyanak, B: A concept of convergence in geodesic spaces. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 68(12), 36893696 (2008)
 12.
Dhompongsa, S, Kirk, WA, Panyanak, B: Nonexpansive setvalued mappings in metric and Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 8(1), 3545 (2007)
 13.
Dhompongsa, S, Panyanak, B: On Δconvergence theorems in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 56(10), 25722579 (2008)
 14.
Nanjaras, B, Panyanak, B: Demiclosed principle for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in \(\operatorname{CAT}(0)\) spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010, Article ID 268780 (2010)
 15.
Senter, HF, Dotson, WG: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 44, 375380 (1974)
 16.
Kim, GE: Strong convergence to fixed point of a total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013, Article ID 302 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Thammasat University Research Fund under the TU Research Scholar, Contract No. 2/10/2559.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pansuwan, A., Sintunavarat, W. A new iterative scheme for numerical reckoning fixed points of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2016, 83 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366301605739
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
MSC
 47H09
 47H10
Keywords
 modified PicardIshikawa hybrid iteration
 modified PicardMann hybrid iteration
 total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings