Skip to main content

An algorithm for treating asymptotically strict pseudocontractions and monotone operators

Abstract

In this paper, an algorithm for treating asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontractions and monotone operators is proposed. Convergence analysis of the algorithm is investigated in the framework of Hilbert spaces.

1 Introduction-preliminaries

In this paper, we are concerned with the problem of finding a common element in the intersection F(T) ( A + B ) 1 (0), where F(T) denotes the fixed point set of the mapping T and ( A + B ) 1 (0) denotes the zero point set of the sum of the operator A and the operator B.

The motivation for the common element problem is mainly due to its possible applications to mathematical modeling of concrete complex problems. The common element problems include mini-max problems, complementarity problems, equilibrium problems, common fixed point problems and variational inequalities as special cases; see, for example, [135] and the references therein.

Throughout the article, we always assume that H is a real Hilbert space with the inner product , and the norm , respectively. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H, and let Proj C be the metric projection from H onto C.

Let A:CH be a mapping. A 1 (0) stands for the zero point set of A; that is, A 1 (0):={xC:Ax=0}. Recall that A is said to be monotone iff

AxAy,xy0,x,yC.

A is said to be α-strongly monotone iff there exists a constant α>0 such that

AxAy,xyα x y 2 ,x,yC.

A is said to be α-inverse-strongly monotone iff there exists a constant α>0 such that

AxAy,xyα A x A y 2 ,x,yC.

It is not hard to see that α-inverse-strongly monotone mappings are Lipschitz continuous. Indeed, we have

α A x A y 2 AxAy,xyAxAyxy.

This shows that AxAy 1 α xy.

Recall that the classical variational inequality, denoted by VI(C,A), is to find uC such that

Au,vu0,vC.
(1.1)

One can see that the variational inequality (1.1) is equivalent to a fixed point problem of the mapping Proj C (IrA), where I is the identity and r is some positive real number. The element uC is a solution of the variational inequality (1.1) iff uC satisfies the equation u= P C (urAu). This alternative equivalent formulation has played a significant role in the studies of variational inequalities and related optimization problems.

A multivalued operator B:H 2 H with the domain D(B)={xH:Bx} and the range R(B)={Bx:xD(B)} is said to be monotone if for x 1 D(B), x 2 D(B), y 1 B x 1 and y 2 B x 2 , we have x 1 x 2 , y 1 y 2 0. A monotone operator B is said to be maximal if its graph G(B)={(x,y):yBx} is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone operator. Let I denote the identity operator on H and B:H 2 H be a maximal monotone operator. Then we can define, for each r>0, a nonexpansive single-valued mapping J r :HH by J r = ( I + r B ) 1 . It is called the resolvent of B. We know that B 1 0=F( J r ) for all r>0 and J r is firmly nonexpansive.

Let T:CC be a mapping. In this paper, we use F(T) to denote the fixed point set of T; that is, F(T):={xC:x=Tx}. Recall that T is said to be nonexpansive iff

TxTyxy,x,yC.

T is said to be asymptotically nonexpansive iff there exists a sequence { k n }[1,) such that

T n x T n y k n xy,x,yC,n1.

T is said to be a κ-strict pseudocontraction iff there exists a constant κ[0,1) such that

T x T y 2 x y 2 +κ ( x T x ) ( y T y ) 2 ,x,yC.

Note that the class of κ-strict pseudocontractions strictly includes the class of nonexpansive mappings as a special case. That is, T is nonexpansive iff the coefficient κ=0. T is said to be an asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontraction iff there exist a constant κ[0,1) and a sequence { k n } in [1,) such that

T n x T n y 2 k n x y 2 +κ ( x T n x ) ( y T n y ) 2 ,x,yC,n1.

Note that the class of asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontractions strictly includes the class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings as a special case. That is, T is asymptotically nonexpansive iff the coefficient κ=0.

In [24], Kamimura and Takahashi investigated the problem of finding zero points of a maximal monotone operator based on the following iterative algorithm:

x 1 H, x n + 1 = α n x+(1 α n ) J r n x n ,n1,
(1.2)

where { α n } is a sequence in (0,1), { r n } is a positive real number sequence, B:H 2 H is maximal monotone and J r n = ( I + r n B ) 1 . It is proved that the sequence { x n } generated in (1.2) converges strongly to some z B 1 (0) provided that the control sequence satisfies some restrictions. Further, using this result, they also investigated the case that B=f, where f:H(,] is a proper lower semicontinuous convex function. Convergence theorems are established in the framework of real Hilbert spaces; for more details, see [24].

Recently, Takahashi et al. studied zero point problems of the sum of two monotone mappings and fixed point problems of a nonexpansive mapping based on the following iterative algorithm:

{ x 1 C , y n = α n x + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) T y n , n 1 ,
(1.3)

where { α n } and { β n } are real number sequences in (0,1), { r n } is a positive sequence, T:CC is a nonexpansive mapping and A:CH is an inverse-strongly monotone mapping. It is proved that the sequence { x n } generated in (1.3) converges strongly to some z ( A + B ) 1 (0)F(S) provided that the control sequence satisfies some restrictions; for more details, see [2].

Motivated by the above results, we investigate fixed point problems of asymptotically strict pseudocontractions and zero point problems of the sum of two monotone mappings.

In order to state our main results, we need the following tools.

Recall that a space is said to satisfy Opial’s condition [36] if, for any sequence { x n }H with x n x, where denotes the weak convergence, the inequality

lim inf n x n x< lim inf n x n y

holds for every yH with yx. Indeed, the above inequality is equivalent to the following:

lim sup n x n x< lim sup n x n y.

Lemma 1.1 [2]

Let { x n } and { y n } be bounded sequences in a Banach space X, and let β n be a sequence in [0,1] with 0< lim inf n β n lim sup n β n <1. Suppose that x n + 1 =(1 β n ) y n + β n x n for all integers n0 and

lim sup n ( y n + 1 y n x n + 1 x n ) 0.

Then lim n y n x n =0.

Lemma 1.2 [37]

Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of H, let A:CH be a mapping, and let B:HH be a maximal monotone operator. Then F( J r (IrA))= ( A + B ) 1 (0).

Lemma 1.3 [38]

Assume that { α n } is a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that

α n + 1 (1 γ n ) α n + δ n ,

where { γ n } is a sequence in (0,1) and { δ n } is a sequence such that

  1. (i)

    n = 1 γ n =;

  2. (ii)

    lim sup n δ n / γ n 0 or n = 1 | δ n |<.

Then lim n α n =0.

Lemma 1.4 [39]

Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically strict pseudocontraction. Then T is Lipschitz continuous and IT is demiclosed at zero.

2 Main results

Theorem 2.1 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontraction. Let A:CH be an α-inverse-strongly monotone mapping, and let B be a maximal monotone operator on H. Assume that F(T) ( A + B ) 1 (0). Let { α n }, { β n } and { γ n } be real number sequences in (0,1). Let J r n = ( I + r n B ) 1 , where { r n } is a positive real number sequence. Let { x n } be a sequence in C generated by: x 1 C is chosen arbitrarily and

{ z n = Proj C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) ) , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) ( γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n ) , n 1 .

Assume that the sequences { α n }, { β n }, { γ n } and { r n } satisfy the following restrictions:

  1. (a)

    0<a r n b<2α, lim n | r n + 1 r n |=0;

  2. (b)

    lim n α n =0, n = 1 α n =;

  3. (c)

    0<c β n d<1;

  4. (d)

    κ γ n e<1, lim n | γ n + 1 γ n |=0,

where a, b, c, d and e are some real numbers. If T is asymptotically regular, then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to some point x ¯ , where x ¯ = P F ( T ) ( A + B ) 1 ( 0 ) u.

Proof First, we show that the mapping I r n A is nonexpansive. Indeed, we have

( I r n A ) x ( I r n A ) y 2 = x y 2 2 r n x y , A x A y + r n 2 A x A y 2 x y 2 r n ( 2 α r n ) A x A y 2 .

It follows from Restriction (a) that I r n A is nonexpansive. Put y n = γ n z n +(1 γ n ) T n z n and fix pF(T) ( A + B ) 1 (0). It follows from Lemma 1.2 that

z n p = Proj C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) ) p α n u p + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) p α n u p + ( 1 α n ) x n p .
(2.1)

In view of Restriction (d), we find that

y n p 2 γ n ( z n p ) + ( 1 γ n ) ( T n z n T n p ) 2 = γ n z n p 2 + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n T n p 2 γ n ( 1 γ n ) ( z n p ) ( T n z n T n p ) 2 γ n z n p 2 + ( 1 γ n ) ( z n p 2 + κ ( z n p ) ( T n z n T n p ) 2 ) γ n ( 1 γ n ) ( z n p ) ( T n z n T n p ) 2 = z n p 2 ( 1 γ n ) ( γ n κ ) ( z n p ) ( T n z n T n p ) 2 z n p 2 .
(2.2)

Substituting (2.1) into (2.2), we obtain that

x n + 1 p β n x n p + ( 1 β n ) y n p β n x n p + ( 1 β n ) ( α n u p + ( 1 α n ) x n p ) ( 1 α n ( 1 β n ) ) x n p + α n ( 1 β n ) u p .

Putting M=max{ x 1 p,up}, we find that x n pM for all n1. Indeed, it is clear that x 1 pM. Suppose that x m pM for some positive integer m. It follows that

x m + 1 p ( 1 α m ( 1 β m ) ) x m p + α m ( 1 β m ) u p ( 1 α m ( 1 β m ) ) M + α m ( 1 β n ) M = M .

This finds that { x n } is bounded. Putting ρ n = J r n ( x n r n A x n ), we find that

ρ n + 1 ρ n J r n + 1 ( x n + 1 r n + 1 A x n + 1 ) J r n + 1 ( x n r n A x n ) + J r n + 1 ( x n r n A x n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) ( x n + 1 r n + 1 A x n + 1 ) ( x n r n A x n ) + J r n + 1 ( x n r n A x n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) x n + 1 x n + | r n + 1 r n | A x n + J r n + 1 ( x n r n A x n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) .
(2.3)

On the other hand, we have

z n + 1 z n ( α n + 1 u + ( 1 α n + 1 ) ρ n + 1 ) ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) ρ n ) ( 1 α n + 1 ) ρ n + 1 ρ n + | α n + 1 α n | ρ n u .
(2.4)

Substituting (2.3) into (2.4), we find that

z n + 1 z n ( α n + 1 u + ( 1 α n + 1 ) ρ n + 1 ) ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) ρ n ) ( 1 α n + 1 ) x n + 1 x n + | r n + 1 r n | A x n + | α n + 1 α n | ρ n u + ( 1 α n + 1 ) J r n + 1 ( x n r n A x n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) .
(2.5)

Put ξ n = x n r n A x n . Since B is monotone, we find that

J r n + 1 ξ n J r n ξ n , ξ n J r n + 1 ξ n r n + 1 ξ n J r n ξ n r n 0.

It follows that J r n + 1 ξ n J r n ξ n ,(1 r n + 1 r n )( ξ n J r n ξ n ) J r n + 1 ξ n J r n ξ n 2 . This yields that | r n + 1 r n | ξ n J r n ξ n r n J r n + 1 ξ n J r n ξ n . This combines with (2.5) to yield that

z n + 1 z n ( 1 α n + 1 ) x n + 1 x n + | r n + 1 r n | A x n + | α n + 1 α n | ρ n u + | r n + 1 r n | r n ξ n J r n ξ n .
(2.6)

On the other hand, we have

y n + 1 y n γ n + 1 z n + 1 z n + | γ n + 1 γ n | z n T n z n + ( 1 γ n + 1 ) T n + 1 z n + 1 T n z n .
(2.7)

Substituting (2.6) into (2.7), we find that

y n + 1 y n x n + 1 x n | r n + 1 r n | A x n + | α n + 1 α n | ρ n u + | r n + 1 r n | r n ξ n J r n ξ n + | γ n + 1 γ n | z n T n z n + ( 1 γ n + 1 ) T n + 1 z n + 1 T n z n .

It follows from Restrictions (a), (c) and (d) that

lim sup n ( y n + 1 y n x n + 1 x n ) 0.

It follows from Lemma 1.1 that lim n y n x n =0. Since x n + 1 x n =(1 β n )( y n x n ), we find that lim n x n + 1 x n =0. Notice that

J r n ( I r n A ) x n J r n ( I r n A ) p 2 = ( x n p ) r n ( A x n A p ) 2 = x n p 2 2 r n x n p , A x n A p + r n 2 A x n A p 2 x n p 2 r n ( 2 α r n ) A x n A p 2 .
(2.8)

Since the norm is convex, we see from (2.2) and (2.8) that

x n + 1 p 2 β n x n p 2 + ( 1 β n ) y n p 2 β n x n p 2 + ( 1 β n ) z n p 2 β n x n p 2 + ( 1 β n ) α n ( u p ) + ( 1 α n ) ( J r n ( x n r n A x n ) p ) 2 β n x n p 2 + α n ( 1 β n ) u p 2 + ( 1 α n ) ( 1 β n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) p 2 x n p 2 + α n u p 2 r n ( 2 α r n ) ( 1 α n ) ( 1 β n ) A x n A p 2 .
(2.9)

This yields that

r n ( 2 α r n ) ( 1 α n ) ( 1 β n ) A x n A p 2 x n p 2 + α n u p 2 x n + 1 p 2 ( x n p + x n + 1 p ) x n + 1 x n + α n u p 2 .

In view of Restrictions (a), (b) and (c), we obtain that

lim n A x n Ap=0.
(2.10)

Notice that

ρ n p 2 = J r n ( x n r n A x n ) J r n ( p r n A p ) 2 ( x n r n A x n ) ( p r n A p ) , ρ n p = 1 2 ( ( x n r n A x n ) ( p r n A p ) 2 + ρ n p 2 ( x n r n A x n ) ( p r n A p ) ( ρ n p ) 2 ) 1 2 ( x n p 2 + ρ n p 2 x n ρ n r n ( A x n A p ) 2 ) 1 2 ( x n p 2 + ρ n p 2 x n ρ n 2 r n 2 A x n A p 2 + 2 r n x n ρ n A x n A p ) 1 2 ( x n p 2 + ρ n p 2 x n ρ n 2 + 2 r n x n ρ n A x n A p ) .

It follows that

ρ n p 2 x n p 2 x n ρ n 2 +2 r n x n ρ n A x n Ap.
(2.11)

This yields that

z n p 2 α n u p 2 + ( 1 α n ) ρ n p 2 α n u p 2 + x n p 2 ( 1 α n ) x n ρ n 2 + 2 r n x n ρ n A x n A p .

It follows from (2.2) that

x n + 1 p 2 β n x n p 2 + ( 1 β n ) y n p 2 β n x n p 2 + ( 1 β n ) z n p 2 x n p 2 + α n u p 2 ( 1 α n ) ( 1 β n ) x n ρ n 2 + 2 r n ( 1 β n ) x n ρ n A x n A p .

We therefore obtain that

( 1 α n ) ( 1 β n ) x n ρ n 2 x n p 2 + α n u p 2 x n + 1 p 2 + 2 r n ( 1 β n ) x n ρ n A x n A p ( x n p + x n + 1 p ) x n x n + 1 + α n u p 2 + 2 r n ( 1 β n ) x n ρ n A x n A p .

In view of Restrictions (a), (b) and (c), we find from (2.10) that

lim n x n ρ n =0.
(2.12)

Next, we show that lim sup n u x ¯ , ρ n x ¯ 0, where x ¯ = P F ( T ) ( A + B ) 1 ( 0 ) u. To show it, we can choose a subsequence { ρ n i } of { ρ n } such that

lim sup n u x ¯ , ρ n x ¯ = lim i u x ¯ , ρ n i x ¯ .

Since ρ n i is bounded, we can choose a subsequence { ρ n i j } of { ρ n i } which converges weakly to some point x. We may assume, without loss of generality, that ρ n i converges weakly to x. Since ρ n = J r n ( x n r n A x n ), we find that x n ρ n r n A x n B ρ n . Since B is monotone, we get, for any (μ,ν)B, that ρ n μ, x n ρ n r n A x n ν0. Replacing n by n i and letting i, we obtain from (2.12) that xμ,Axν0. This means AxBx, that is, 0(A+B)(x). Hence we get x ( A + B ) 1 (0). Next, we show that xF(T). Notice that

z n x n Proj C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) ) x n α n u x n + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) x n .

In view of Restriction (a), we find from (2.12) that lim n z n x n =0. Note that

( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) x n ( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) ( γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n ) + ( γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n ) x n γ n x n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n T n z n + ( γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n ) x n L x n z n + y n x n .

It follows from (2.8) that

lim n ( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) x n =0.
(2.13)

Note that

T n x n x n T n x n ( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) + ( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) x n γ n T n x n x n + ( γ n x n + ( 1 γ n ) T n x n ) x n .

It follows that (1 γ n ) T n x n x n ( γ n x n +(1 γ n ) T n x n ) x n . This implies from Restriction (d) and (2.13) that lim n T n x n x n =0. Since T is uniformly L-Lipschitz continuous, we can obtain that lim n T x n x n =0. In view of Lemma 1.4, we find that xF(T). This implies that

lim sup n u x ¯ , ρ n x ¯ =u x ¯ ,x x ¯ 0.

On the other hand, we have

x n + 1 x ¯ 2 β n x n x ¯ 2 + ( 1 β n ) y n x ¯ 2 β n x n x 2 + ( 1 β n ) z n x ¯ 2 β n x n x 2 + ( 1 β n ) α n ( u n x ¯ ) + ( 1 α n ) ( ρ n x ¯ ) 2 β n x n x 2 + ( 1 α n ) 2 ( 1 β n ) ρ n x 2 + 2 α n ( 1 β n ) u x ¯ , ρ n x ( 1 α n ( 1 β n ) ) x n x ¯ 2 + 2 α n ( 1 β n ) u x ¯ , ρ n x ¯ .

From Lemma 1.3, we find that lim n x n x ¯ =0. This completes the proof. □

If T is asymptotically nonexpansive, then we find the following result.

Corollary 2.2 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Let A:CH be an α-inverse-strongly monotone mapping, and let B be a maximal monotone operator on H. Assume that F(T) ( A + B ) 1 (0). Let { α n } and { β n } be real number sequences in (0,1). Let J r n = ( I + r n B ) 1 , where { r n } is a positive real number sequence. Let { x n } be a sequence in C generated by: x 1 C is chosen arbitrarily and

{ z n = P C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) J r n ( x n r n A x n ) ) , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) T n z n , n 1 .

Assume that the sequences { α n }, { γ n } and { r n } satisfy the following restrictions:

  1. (a)

    0<a r n b<2α, lim n | r n + 1 r n |=0;

  2. (b)

    lim n α n =0, n = 1 α n =;

  3. (c)

    0<c β n d<1,

where a, b, c and d are some real numbers. If T is asymptotically regular, then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to some point x ¯ , where x ¯ = P F ( T ) ( A + B ) 1 ( 0 ) u.

3 Applications

In this section, we shall consider equilibrium problems and variational inequalities.

Let F be a bifunction of C×C into , where denotes the set of real numbers. Recall the following equilibrium problem:

Find xC such that F(x,y)0,yC.

In this work, we use EP(F) to denote the solution set of the equilibrium problem.

To study the equilibrium problems, we may assume that F satisfies the following conditions:

(A1) F(x,x)=0 for all xC;

(A2) F is monotone, i.e., F(x,y)+F(y,x)0 for all x,yC;

(A3) for each x,y,zC,

lim sup t 0 F ( t z + ( 1 t ) x , y ) F(x,y);

(A4) for each xC, yF(x,y) is convex and weakly lower semi-continuous.

Putting F(x,y)=Ax,yx for every x,yC, we see that the equilibrium problem is reduced to the variational inequality (1.1).

The following lemma can be found in [40].

Lemma 3.1 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H, and let F:C×CR be a bifunction satisfying (A1)-(A4). Then, for any r>0 and xH, there exists zC such that

F(z,y)+ 1 r yz,zx0,yC.

Further, define

T r x= { z C : F ( z , y ) + 1 r y z , z x 0 , y C }
(3.1)

for all r>0 and xH. Then the following hold:

  1. (a)

    T r is single-valued;

  2. (b)

    T r is firmly nonexpansive, i.e., for any x,yH,

    T r x T r y 2 T r x T r y,xy;
  3. (c)

    F( T r )=EP(F);

  4. (d)

    EP(F) is closed and convex.

Lemma 3.2 [2]

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H, let F be a bifunction from C×C to which satisfies (A1)-(A4), and let A F be a multivalued mapping of H into itself defined by

A F x={ { z H : F ( x , y ) y x , z , y C } , x C , , x C .
(3.2)

Then A F is a maximal monotone operator with the domain D( A F )C, EP(F)= A F 1 (0) and

T r x= ( I + r A F ) 1 x,xH,r>0,

where T r is defined as in (3.1).

The following result is not derived based on Theorem 2.1 and Lemma 3.2.

Theorem 3.3 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontraction. Let F be a bifunction from C×C to which satisfies (A1)-(A4). Assume that F(T)EP(F). Let { α n }, { β n } and { γ n } be real number sequences in (0,1). Let { x n } be a sequence in C generated by: x 1 C is chosen arbitrarily and

{ w n C  such that  F B ( w n , u ) + 1 r n u w n , w n x n 0 , u C , z n = P C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) w n ) , y n = γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) y n , n 1 .

Assume that the sequences { α n }, { β n }, { γ n } and { r n } satisfy the following restrictions:

  1. (a)

    0<a r n b<2α, lim n | r n + 1 r n |=0;

  2. (b)

    lim n α n =0, n = 1 α n =;

  3. (c)

    0<c β n d<1;

  4. (d)

    κ γ n e<1, lim n | γ n + 1 γ n |=0,

where a, b, c, d and e are some real numbers. If T is asymptotically regular, then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to some point x ¯ , where x ¯ = P F ( T ) E P ( F ) u.

If T is asymptotically nonexpansive, then Theorem 3.3 is reduced to the following.

Corollary 3.4 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. Let F be a bifunction from C×C to which satisfies (A1)-(A4). Assume that F(T)EP(F). Let { α n } and { β n } be real number sequences in (0,1). Let { x n } be a sequence in C generated by: x 1 C is chosen arbitrarily and

{ w n C  such that  F B ( w n , u ) + 1 r n u w n , w n x n 0 , u C , z n = P C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) w n ) , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) T n z n , n 1 .

Assume that the sequences { α n }, { β n }, { γ n } and { r n } satisfy the following restrictions:

  1. (a)

    0<a r n b<2α, lim n | r n + 1 r n |=0;

  2. (b)

    lim n α n =0, n = 1 α n =;

  3. (c)

    0<c β n d<1,

where a, b, c and d are some real numbers. If T is asymptotically regular, then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to some point x ¯ , where x ¯ = P F ( T ) E P ( F ) u.

Let H be a Hilbert space and f:H(,+] be a proper convex lower semicontinuous function. Then the subdifferential ∂f of f is defined as follows:

f(x)= { y H : f ( z ) f ( x ) + z x , y , z H } ,xH.

From Rockafellar [41], we find that ∂f is maximal monotone. It is easy to verify that 0f(x) if and only if f(x)= min y H f(y). Let I C be the indicator function of C, i.e.,

I C (x)={ 0 , x C , + , x C .

Since I C is a proper lower semicontinuous convex function on H, we see that the subdifferential I C of I C is a maximal monotone operator.

Lemma 3.5 [2]

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H, Proj C the metric projection from H onto C, I C the subdifferential of I C , where I C is defined above and J λ = ( I + λ I C ) 1 . Then

y= J λ xy= Proj C x,xH,yC.

Now, we consider a variation inequality problem.

Theorem 3.6 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let T:CC be an asymptotically κ-strict pseudocontraction. Let A:CH be an α-inverse-strongly monotone mapping. Assume that F(T)VI(C,A). Let { α n }, { β n } and { γ n } be real number sequences in (0,1). Let { x n } be a sequence in C generated by: x 1 C is chosen arbitrarily and

{ z n = P C ( α n u + ( 1 α n ) P C ( x n r n A x n ) ) , y n = γ n z n + ( 1 γ n ) T n z n , x n + 1 = β n x n + ( 1 β n ) y n , n 1 .

Assume that the sequences { α n }, { β n }, { γ n } and { r n } satisfy the following restrictions:

  1. (a)

    0<a r n b<2α, lim n | r n + 1 r n |=0;

  2. (b)

    lim n α n =0, n = 1 α n =;

  3. (c)

    0<c β n d<1;

  4. (d)

    κ γ n e<1, lim n | γ n + 1 γ n |=0,

where a, b, c, d and e are some real numbers. If T is asymptotically regular, then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to some point x ¯ , where x ¯ = P F ( T ) V I ( C , A ) u.

Proof Put Bx= I C . Next, we show that VI(C,A)= ( A + I C ) 1 (0). Notice that

x ( A + I C ) 1 ( 0 ) 0 A x + I C x A x I C x A x , y x 0 x V I ( C , A ) .

From Lemma 3.5, we can conclude the desired conclusion immediately. □

References

  1. Cho SY, Qin X, Kang SM: Iterative processes for common fixed points of two different families of mappings with applications. J. Glob. Optim. 2013, 57: 1429–1446. 10.1007/s10898-012-0017-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi S, Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Strong convergence theorems for maximal monotone operators with nonlinear mappings in Hilbert spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2010, 147: 27–41. 10.1007/s10957-010-9713-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Park S:A review of the KKM theory on ϕ A -space or GFC-spaces. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2013, 3: 355–382.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Strong convergence theorem for a common point of solution of variational inequality and fixed point problem. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 374–397.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JK: Strong convergence theorems by hybrid projection methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of the asymptotically quasi- ϕ -nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang M: Iterative algorithms for common elements in fixed point sets and zero point sets with applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang M: Strong convergence of a viscosity iterative algorithm in Hilbert spaces. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2014., 2014: Article ID 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Convergence theorems of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 225: 20–30. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.06.011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z, Lou W: A new iterative algorithm of common solutions to quasi-variational inclusion and fixed point problems. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2013, 3: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cho SY, Li W, Kang SM: Convergence analysis of an iterative algorithm for monotone operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu C, Liu A: Strong convergence of a hybrid projection iterative algorithm for common solutions of operator equations and of inclusion problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noor MA, Noor KI, Waseem M: Decomposition method for solving system of linear equations. Eng. Math. Lett. 2012, 2: 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of common solutions of variational inequalities via strict pseudocontractions. Acta Math. Sci. 2012, 32: 1607–1618. 10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60127-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He RH: Coincidence theorem and existence theorems of solutions for a system of Ky Fan type minimax inequalities in FC-spaces. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qin X, Su Y: Strong convergence theorems for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space. Nonlinear Anal. 2007, 67: 1958–1965. 10.1016/j.na.2006.08.021

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu C: Mann iteration for zero theorems of accretive operators. J. Fixed Point Theory 2013., 2013: Article ID 3

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hecai Y: On weak convergence of an iterative algorithm for common solutions of inclusion problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 155

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of fixed points of pseudocontraction semigroups based on a viscosity iterative process. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 224–228. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.09.008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lv S:Generalized systems of variational inclusions involving (A,η)-monotone mappings. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2011, 1: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: Iterative algorithms for variational inequality and equilibrium problems with applications. J. Glob. Optim. 2010, 48: 423–445. 10.1007/s10898-009-9498-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hecai Y: On solutions of inclusion problems and fixed point problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng P, Wu H: Strong convergence theorems for common solutions of a family of nonexpansive mappings and an accretive operator. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 172

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: Convergence of an iterative algorithm for systems of variational inequalities and nonexpansive mappings with applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 233: 231–240. 10.1016/j.cam.2009.07.018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamimura S, Takahashi W: Approximating solutions of maximal monotone operators in Hilbert spaces. J. Approx. Theory 2000, 106: 226–240. 10.1006/jath.2000.3493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang S: Zero theorems of accretive operators in reflexive Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 2

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cho SY, Qin X, Kang SM: Hybrid projection algorithms for treating common fixed points of a family of demicontinuous pseudocontractions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 854–857. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.031

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan Q: Some results on asymptotically quasi- ϕ -nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense. J. Fixed Point Theory 2012., 2012: Article ID 1

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cho SY, Kang SM: Zero point theorems for m -accretive operators in a Banach space. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 13: 49–58.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu C: Convergence of algorithms for an infinite family nonexpansive mappings and relaxed cocoercive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2014, 4: 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kangtunyakarn A: Iterative algorithms for finding a common solution of system of the set of variational inclusion problems and the set of fixed point problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 38

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang S: Zero theorems of accretive operators in reflexive Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JK, Chandok S: Coupled common fixed point theorems for generalized nonlinear contraction mappings with the mixed monotone property in partially ordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 307

    Google Scholar 

  33. Qin X, Agarwal RP: Shrinking projection methods for a pair of asymptotically quasi- ϕ -nonexpansive mappings. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2010, 31: 1072–1089. 10.1080/01630563.2010.501643

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Luo H, Wang Y: Iterative approximation for the common solutions of a infinite variational inequality system for inverse-strongly accretive mappings. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 2: 1660–1670.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho SY: Approximation of solutions of a generalized variational inequality problem based on iterative methods. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2010, 25: 207–214. 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.2.207

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Opial Z: Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximation for nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 73: 591–597. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11761-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Cho SY: Strong convergence of an iterative algorithm for sums of two monotone operators. J. Fixed Point Theory 2013., 2013: Article ID 6

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu L: Ishikawa-type and Mann-type iterative processes with errors for constructing solutions of nonlinear equations involving m -accretive operators in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 1998, 34: 307–317. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00579-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Sahu DR, Xu HK, Yao JC: Asymptotically strict pseudocontractive mappings in the intermediate sense. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 3502–3511. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. Math. Stud. 1994, 63: 123–145.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Rockafellar RT: Characterization of the subdifferentials of convex functions. Pac. J. Math. 1966, 17: 497–510. 10.2140/pjm.1966.17.497

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the referees for useful suggestions which improved the contents of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingliang Zhang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, M. An algorithm for treating asymptotically strict pseudocontractions and monotone operators. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 52 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-52

Keywords