Open Access

Fixed point results for generalized mappings

  • Farhan Golkarmanesh1Email author,
  • Abdullah E Al-Mazrooei2,
  • Vahid Parvaneh3 and
  • Abdul Latif2
Fixed Point Theory and Applications20142014:217

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-217

Received: 28 April 2014

Accepted: 8 October 2014

Published: 22 October 2014

Abstract

In this paper, first we establish fixed point results for weak asymptotic pointwise contraction type mappings in metric spaces. Then we study the existence of fixed points for weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type mappings in C A T ( 0 ) spaces. Our results improve and extend some corresponding known results in the literature.

MSC:47H09, 47H10, 54H25.

Keywords

asymptotic centerasymptotic pointwise contraction typeconvexity structure T-stableweak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type C A T ( 0 ) space

1 Introduction

The notion of asymptotic pointwise contraction was introduced by Kirk [1] as follows.

Let ( M , d ) be a metric space. A mapping T : M M is called an asymptotic pointwise contraction if there exists a function α : M [ 0 , 1 ) such that, for each integer n 1 ,
d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) for each  x , y M ,

where α n α pointwise on M.

Moreover, Kirk and Xu [2] proved that if C be a weakly compact convex subset of a Banach space E and T : C C an asymptotic pointwise contraction, then T has a unique fixed point v C and for each x C the sequence of Picard iterates { T n x } converges in norm to v.

Rakotch [3] proved that if M be a complete metric space and f : M M satisfies d ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) α ( d ( x , y ) ) d ( x , y ) , for all x , y M , where α : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , 1 ) is monotonically decreasing, then f has a unique fixed point z and { f n ( x ) } converges to z, for each x M .

Boyd and Wong [4] proved that if M be a complete metric space and f : M M satisfies d ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) ψ ( d ( x , y ) ) d ( x , y ) , for all x , y M , where ψ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) is upper semicontinuous from the right and satisfies 0 ψ ( t ) < t for t > 0 , then f has a unique fixed point z and { f n ( x ) } converges to z, for each x M .

Using the diameter of an orbit, Walter [5] obtained a result that may be stated as follows:

Let ( M , d ) be a complete metric space and let T : M M be a mapping with bounded orbits. If there exists a continuous, increasing function φ : R + R + for which φ ( r ) < r for every r > 0 and
d ( T x , T y ) φ ( diam ( O T ( x , y ) ) ) for every  x , y M ,

where O T ( x , y ) = { T n x } { T n y } , then T has a unique fixed point x 0 . Moreover, { T n x } converges to x 0 , for each x M .

In [6], the authors proved coincidence results for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings. Kirk [7], proved that if M be a complete metric space and T : M M satisfies d ( T n x , T n y ) ϕ n ( d ( x , y ) ) , for all x , y M , where ϕ n : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) , ϕ n ϕ uniformly on the range of d and ϕ is continuous with ϕ ( s ) < s for all s > 0 , then T has a unique fixed point z and { T n ( x ) } converges to z, for each x M .

References [3, 4, 611] present simple and elegant proofs of fixed point results for pointwise contraction, asymptotic pointwise contraction, and asymptotic nonexpansive mappings.

Very recently, Saeidi [11] introduced the concept of (weak) asymptotic pointwise contraction type mappings.

Let ( M , d ) be a metric space. A mapping T : M M is said to be of asymptotic pointwise contraction type (resp. of weak asymptotic pointwise contraction type) if T N is continuous for some integer N 1 and there exists a function α : M [ 0 , 1 ) such that, for each x in M,
lim sup n sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } 0
(1.1)
( resp.  lim inf n sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } 0 ) ,
(1.2)
where α n α pointwise on M. Taking
r n ( x ) = sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } R + { }
it can easily be seen from (1.1) (resp. (1.2)) that
lim n r n ( x ) = 0
(1.3)
( resp.  lim inf n r n ( x ) 0 )
(1.4)
for all x M and
d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) + r n ( x ) .
(1.5)

It is easy to see that the class of asymptotic pointwise contraction type mappings contains the class of an asymptotic pointwise contraction mappings, but the converse is not true [11]. Furthermore, if C is a nonempty weakly compact subset of a Banach space E and T : C C a mapping of weak asymptotic pointwise contraction type, then T has a unique fixed point v C and, for each x C , the sequence of Picard iterates { T n x } converges in norm to v (see [11]). Golkarmanesh and Saeidi [12] obtained some results for this mappings in modular spaces.

In this paper, motivated by [1, 911], we combine the above results and obtain fixed point results for classes of mappings that extend the notions of asymptotic contraction and asymptotic pointwise contraction introduced by Kirk [1] and Saeidi [11].

2 Preliminaries

Let M be a metric space and a family of subsets of M. We say that defines a convexity structure of M if it contains the closed ball and is stable by intersection. For instance A ( M ) , the class of the admissable subsets of M, defines a convexity structure on any metric space M. Recall that a subset of M is admissable if it is a nonempty intersection of closed balls.

At this point we introduce some notation which will be used throughout the remainder of this work. For a subset A of a metric space M, set:

r x ( A ) = sup { d ( x , y ) : y A } ;

R ( A ) = inf { r x ( A ) : x A } ;

diam ( A ) = sup { d ( x , y ) : x , y A } ;

C A ( A ) = { x A : r x ( A ) = R ( A ) } ;

cov ( A ) = { B : B  is a closed ball and  B A } .

diam ( A ) is called the diameter of A, R ( A ) is called the Chebyshev radius of A, C A ( A ) is called the Chebyshev center of A and cov ( A ) is called the cover of A.

Definition 1 ([9])

Let be a convexity structure on M.
  1. (i)

    We will say that is compact if any family ( A α ) α Γ of elements of , has a nonempty intersection provided α F A α for any finite subset F Γ .

     
  2. (ii)

    We will say that is normal if for any A F , not reduced to one point, we have R ( A ) < diam ( A ) .

     
  3. (iii)

    We will say that is uniformly normal if there exists c ( 0 , 1 ) such that, for any A F , not reduced to one point, we have R ( A ) c ( diam ( A ) ) . It is easy to check that c 1 / 2 .

     
Let M be a metric space and a convexity structure. We will say that a function Φ : M M is -convex if { x : Φ ( x ) r } F for any r 0 . Also we define a type to be a function Φ : M [ 0 , ] such that
Φ ( u ) = lim sup n d ( x n , u ) ,

where ( x n ) is a bounded sequence in M. Types are very useful in the study of the geometry of Banach spaces and the existence of fixed point of mappings. We will say that a convexity structure on M is T-stable if types are -convex. We have the following lemma.

Lemma 1 ([9])

Let M be a metric space and a compact convexity structure on M which is T-stable. Then, for any type Φ, there exists x 0 M such that
Φ ( x 0 ) = inf { Φ ( x ) : x M } .

Hussain and Khamsi [9] and Nicolae [10] proved the following results in metric spaces.

Theorem 1 ([9])

Let M be a bounded metric space. Assume that there exists a convexity structure which is compact and T-stable. T : M M be an asymptotic pointwise contraction. Then T has a unique fixed point x 0 . Moreover, the orbit { T n x } converges to x 0 for each x M .

Theorem 2 ([10])

Let M be a bounded metric space, T : M M and suppose that there exists a convexity structure which is compact and T-stable. Assume that
d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) r x ( O T ( y ) ) for every  x , y M ,

where α n : M R for each n N and the sequence { α n } n N converges pointwise to a function α : M [ 0 , 1 ) . Then T has a unique fixed point x 0 . Moreover, the orbit { T n x } converges to x 0 , for each x M .

3 Fixed point results for asymptotic pointwise contractive type mappings in metric spaces

In this section, we generalize the results obtained by Hussain and Khamsi [9] and Nicolae [10] for the wider class of weak asymptotic pointwise contraction type mappings.

Theorem 3 Let ( M , d ) be a bounded metric space. Assume that there exists a convexity structure which is compact and T-stable. Let T : M M be a weak asymptotic pointwise contraction type mapping. Then T has a unique fixed point x 0 . Moreover, the orbit { T n x } converges to x 0 for each x M .

Proof Fix x M and define a function f by
f ( u ) = lim sup n d ( T n x , u ) , u M .
Since is compact and T-stable, there exists x 0 M such that
f ( x 0 ) = inf { f ( x ) ; x M } .
Let us show that f ( x 0 ) = 0 . Indeed, for any m 1 we have
f ( T m x 0 ) = lim sup n d ( T n x , T m x 0 ) = lim sup n d ( T m + n x , T m x 0 ) = lim sup n d ( T m ( T n x ) , T m x 0 ) lim sup n α m ( x 0 ) d ( T n x , x 0 ) + r m ( x 0 ) = α m ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) + r m ( x 0 ) ,
which implies
f ( x 0 ) = inf { f ( x ) ; x C } f ( T m x 0 ) α m ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) + r m ( x 0 ) .
(3.1)
Now, by (1.3) and (3.1), we obtain
f ( x 0 ) lim inf m [ α m ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) + r m ( x 0 ) ] = α ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) ,
which forces f ( x 0 ) = 0 as α ( x 0 ) < 1 . Hence, d ( T n x , x 0 ) 0 as n . From this and the continuity of T N , for some N 1 , it follows that
T N x 0 = T N ( lim n T n x ) = lim n T n + N x = x 0 ,
namely, x 0 is a fixed point of T N . Now, repeating the above proof for x 0 instead of x, we deduce that { T n x 0 } is convergent to an element of M. But T k N x 0 = x 0 for all k 1 . Hence, T n x 0 x 0 . We show that T x 0 = x 0 . For this purpose, consider an arbitrary ϵ > 0 . Then there exists a k 0 > 0 such that d ( T n x 0 , x 0 ) < ϵ for all n > k 0 . So, choosing a natural number k > k 0 / N , we obtain
d ( T x 0 , x 0 ) = d ( T ( T k N x 0 ) , x 0 ) = d ( T k N + 1 x 0 , x 0 ) < ϵ .

Since the choice of ϵ > 0 is arbitrary, we get T x 0 = x 0 .

It is easy to verify that T has only one fixed point. Indeed, if a , b M are two fixed points of T, then we have
d ( a , b ) = d ( T n a , T n b ) α n ( a ) d ( a , b ) + r n ( a ) .

Taking lim inf in the above inequality, it follows that d ( a , b ) α ( a ) d ( a , b ) . Since α ( a ) < 1 , we immediately get a = b . □

In the following, we present an example in a bounded metric space which shows that a mapping of asymptotic pointwise contraction type is not necessary an asymptotic pointwise contraction.

Example 1 Let M = i = 1 n I i ( I i = [ 0 , 1 ] ), equipped with the Euclidean norm. Then M is a bounded metric space. For each ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) M , define
T ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = ( f ( x 2 ) , f ( x 3 ) , , f ( x n ) , 0 ) ,

where f : [ 0 , 1 ] [ 0 , 1 ] is some discontinuous function with f ( 0 ) = 0 . We deduce that T is discontinuous, and then it would not be an asymptotic pointwise contraction. But we see that T n x = 0 for all x M , and so T is of asymptotic pointwise contraction type.

Theorem 4 Let ( M , d ) be a bounded metric space, T : M M and suppose there exists a convexity structure which is compact and T-stable and T N is continuous for some integer N 1 . Assume
lim inf n sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) r x ( O T ( y ) ) } 0 for every  x , y M ,

where α n : M R for each n N and the sequence { α n } converges pointwise to a function α : M [ 0 , 1 ) . Then T has a unique fixed point z. Moreover, the orbit { T n x } converges to z for each x M .

Proof Taking
γ n ( x ) = sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) r x ( O T ( y ) ) } R ,
it can easily be seen that
lim inf n γ n ( x ) 0 ,
(3.2)
for all x M , and
d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) r x ( O T ( y ) ) + γ n ( x ) .
(3.3)
Fix x M and define a function f by
f ( u ) = lim sup n d ( T n x , u ) , u M .
Since is compact and T-stable, there exists z M such that
f ( z ) = inf { f ( x ) : x M } .
Let us prove that f ( z ) = 0 . Indeed, for any m 1 we have
f ( T m z ) = lim sup n d ( T n x , T m z ) = lim sup n d ( T m + n x , T m z ) = lim sup n d ( T m ( T n x ) , T m z ) lim sup n α m ( z ) r z ( O T ( T n x ) ) + γ m ( z ) = α m ( z ) lim sup n r z ( O T ( T n x ) ) + γ m ( z ) ,
which implies
f ( z ) = inf { f ( x ) ; x C } f ( T m z ) α m ( z ) lim sup n r z ( O T ( T n x ) ) + γ m ( z ) .
(3.4)
By (3.2) we have lim inf n γ m ( z ) 0 , thus, for the subsequence { γ m k ( z ) } of { γ m ( z ) } , we have
lim k γ m k ( z ) 0 .
(3.5)
Now, by (3.4) and (3.5) we obtain
f ( z ) lim inf k [ α m k ( z ) lim sup n r z ( O T ( T n x ) ) + γ m k ( z ) ] = α ( z ) f ( z ) ,
which forces f ( z ) = 0 as α ( z ) < 1 . Hence, d ( T n x , z ) 0 as n . From this and the continuity of T N , for some N 1 , it follows that
T N z = T N ( lim n T n x ) = lim n T n + N x = z ;
namely, z is a fixed point of T N . Now, repeating the above proof for z instead of x, we deduce that T n z is convergent to a member of M. But T k N z = z for all k 1 . Hence, T n z z . We show that T z = z ; for this purpose, consider an arbitrary ϵ > 0 . Then there exists a k 0 > 0 such that d ( T n z , z ) < ϵ for all n > k 0 . So, by choosing a natural number k > k 0 / N , we obtain
d ( T z , z ) = d ( T ( T k N x 0 ) , z ) = d ( T k N + 1 z , z ) < ϵ .

Since ϵ > 0 is arbitrary, we get T z = z .

Assume that T has two fixed points a , b M , then, for each n N ,
d ( a , b ) = d ( T n a , T n b ) α n ( a ) r a ( O T ( b ) ) + γ n ( a ) = α n ( a ) d ( a , b ) + γ n ( a ) .
Taking the lim inf in the above inequality, it follows that
d ( a , b ) α ( a ) d ( a , b ) .

Since α ( a ) < 1 , we immediately get a = b . □

4 Fixed point results for weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type mappings in metric spaces

In this section we introduce weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type mappings in metric spaces and we extend the results found of [9].

Definition 2 Let ( M , d ) be a metric space. A mapping T : M M is said to be of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type (resp. weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type) if T N is continuous for some integer N 1 and there exists a sequence α n : M [ 0 , + ) such that
lim sup n sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } 0
(4.1)
( resp.  lim inf n sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } 0 ) .
(4.2)
where lim sup n α n ( x ) 1 . Taking
r n ( x ) = sup y M { d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) } R + { }
it can easily be seen from (4.1) (resp. (4.2)) that
lim n r n ( x ) = 0
(4.3)
( resp.  lim inf n r n ( x ) 0 )
(4.4)
for all x M and
d ( T n x , T n y ) α n ( x ) d ( x , y ) + r n ( x ) .
(4.5)

A metric space ( M , d ) is said to be a length space if each two points of M are joined by a rectifiable path (that is, a path of finite length) and the distance between any two points is taken to be the infimum of the lengh of all rectifiable paths joining them. In this case, d is said to be a length metric (otherwise, known an inner metric or intrinsic metric). In the case that there is no rectifiable path joins two points of the space, the distance between them is said to be ∞.

A geodesic path joining x M to y M (or, more briefly, a geodesic from x to y) is a map c from a closed interval [ 0 , l ] R to M such that c ( 0 ) = x , c ( l ) = y , and d ( c ( t ) , c ( t ) ) = | t t | for all t , t [ 0 , l ] . In particular, c is an isometry and d ( x , y ) = l . The image α of c is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining x and y. ( M , d ) is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of ( M , d ) are joined by a geodesic. M is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining x and y for each x , y M , which we will denote by [ x , y ] , called the segment joining x to y.

A geodesic metric space Δ ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) in a geodesic metric space ( M , d ) consists of three points in M (the vertices of Δ) and a geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the edges of Δ). A comparison triangle Δ ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) in ( M , d ) is a triangle Δ ¯ ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) : = Δ ( x ¯ 1 , x ¯ 2 , x ¯ 3 ) in M k 2 such that d R 2 ( x ¯ i , x ¯ j ) = d ( x i , x j ) for i , j { 1 , 2 , 3 } . If k > 0 it is further assumed that perimeter of Δ ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) is less than 2 D k , where D k denotes the diameter of  M k 2 . Such a triangle always exists.

A geodesic metric space is said to be a C A T ( k ) space if all geodesic triangles of appropriate size satisfy the following C A T ( k ) comparison axiom.

C A T ( k ) : Let Δ be a geodesic triangle in M and Δ ¯ M k 2 be a comparison triangle for Δ. Then Δ is said to satisfy the C A T ( k ) inequality if for all x , y Δ and all comparison points x ¯ , y ¯ Δ ¯ ,
d ( x , y ) d ( x ¯ , y ¯ ) .

Complete C A T ( 0 ) spaces are often called Hadamard spaces. These spaces are of particular relevance to this study.

Finally, we observe that if x, y 1 , y 2 are points of a C A T ( 0 ) space and if y 0 is the midpoint of the segment [ y 1 , y 2 ] , which we denote by y 1 y 2 2 , then the C A T ( 0 ) inequality implies
d ( x , y 1 y 2 2 ) 2 1 2 d ( x , y 1 ) 2 + 1 2 d ( x , y 2 ) 2 1 4 d ( y 1 , y 2 ) 2 .
Let M be a complete C A T ( 0 ) space and x , y M , then for any α [ 0 , 1 ] there exists a unique point α x ( 1 α ) y [ x , y ] such that
d ( z , α x ( 1 α ) y ) α d ( z , x ) + ( 1 α ) d ( z , y ) ,
(4.6)

for any z M .

Let M be a complete C A T ( 0 ) space. A subset C M is convex if for any x , y C we have [ x , y ] C . Any type function achieves its infimum, i.e., for any bounded sequence { x n } in a C A T ( 0 ) space M, there exists ω M such that f ( ω ) = inf { f ( x ) : x M } , where
f ( x ) = lim sup n d ( x n , x ) .

Theorem 5 Let M be a complete C A T ( 0 ) metric space. Let C be a bounded closed nonempty convex subset of M. If T : C C is a weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type, then the fixed point set Fix ( T ) is closed and convex.

Proof Fix x C and define a function f by
f ( u ) = lim sup n d ( T n x , u ) , u C .
Let x 0 C be such that f ( x 0 ) = inf { f ( x ) ; x M } = f 0 . According to the proof of Theorem 3 we have f ( T n x 0 ) α n ( x 0 ) f 0 + r n ( x 0 ) , for any n 1 . The C A T ( 0 ) inequality implies
d ( T n ( x ) , T m x 0 T h x 0 2 ) 2 1 2 d ( T n x , T m x 0 ) 2 + 1 2 d ( T n x , T h x 0 ) 2 1 4 d ( T m x 0 , T h x 0 ) 2 .
If we let n go to infinity, we get
f 0 2 f ( T m x 0 T h x 0 2 ) 1 2 f ( T m x 0 ) 2 + 1 2 f ( T h x 0 ) 2 1 4 d ( T m x 0 , T h x 0 ) 2 ,
which implies
d ( T m x 0 , T h x 0 ) f 0 2 ( 2 α m 2 ( x 0 ) + 2 α h 2 ( x 0 ) 4 ) + 2 r n 2 ( x 0 ) + 2 r h 2 ( x 0 ) + 4 f 0 ( α m ( x 0 ) r m ( x 0 ) + α h ( x 0 ) r h ( x 0 ) ) .
Since T is of weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type, we get
lim sup m , h d ( T m x 0 , T h x 0 ) 0 ,
which implies { T n x 0 } is a Cauchy sequence. Let v = lim n T n x 0 . By the proof of Theorem 3 T v = v and Fix ( T ) is closed. In order to prove that Fix ( T ) is convex, it is enough to prove x y 2 Fix ( T ) , whenever x , y Fix ( T ) . Let z = x y 2 . The C A T ( 0 ) inequality implies
d ( T n z , z ) 2 1 2 d ( x , T n z ) 2 + 1 2 d ( y , T n z ) 2 1 4 d ( x , y ) 2
for any n 1 . Since
d ( x , T n z ) 2 = d ( T n x , T n z ) 2 ( α n ( z ) d ( z , x ) + r n ( z ) ) 2 = ( α n ( z ) d ( x , y ) 2 + r n ( z ) ) 2
and
d ( y , T n z ) 2 = d ( T n y , T n z ) 2 ( α n ( z ) d ( z , y ) + r n ( z ) ) 2 = ( α n ( z ) d ( x , y ) 2 + r n ( z ) ) 2
we get
d ( T n z , z ) 2 1 4 ( α n 2 ( z ) 1 ) d ( x , y ) 2 + r n 2 ( z ) + 2 α n ( z ) r n ( z ) d ( x , y )

for any n 1 . Since T is of weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type, we get lim n T n z = z , which implies that T ( z ) = z , i.e., z Fix ( T ) . □

Before we state the next and final result of this work, we need the following notation:
{ x n } z if and only if f ( z ) = inf x C f ( x ) ,

where C is a closed convex subset which contains the bounded sequence { x n } and f ( x ) = lim sup n d ( x n , x ) .

Theorem 6 Let M be a complete C A T ( 0 ) metric space. Let C be a bounded closed nonempty convex subset of M. Let T : C C be a weak asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive type. Let { x n } C be an approximate fixed point sequence, i.e., lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 and { x n } z . Then we have T z = z .

Proof Since { x n } is an approximate fixed point sequence, we have
f ( x ) = lim sup n d ( T m x n , x ) ,
for any m 1 . Hence f ( T m x ) α m ( x ) f ( x ) + r m ( x ) (see the proof of Theorem 3). In particular, lim n f ( T m z ) = f ( z ) . The C A T ( 0 ) inequality implies
d ( x n , z T n z 2 ) 2 1 2 d ( x n , z ) 2 + 1 2 d ( x n , T m z ) 2 1 4 d ( z , T m z ) 2 ,
for any m , n 1 . If n , we will get
f ( z T n z 2 ) 2 1 2 f ( z ) 2 + 1 2 f ( T m z ) 2 1 4 d ( z , T m z ) 2 ,
for any m 1 . The definition of z implies
f ( z ) 2 1 2 f ( z ) 2 + 1 2 f ( T m z ) 2 1 4 d ( z , T m z ) 2
for any m 1 , or
d ( z , T m z ) 2 2 f ( T m z ) 2 2 f ( z ) 2 2 ( α m ( z ) f ( z ) + r m ( z ) ) 2 2 f ( z ) 2 .

Letting m , we will get lim n d ( z , T m z ) = 0 . The rest of the proof is similar to the one used for Theorem 3. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This article was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks the DSR for technical and financial support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
(2)
Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
(3)
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

References

  1. Kirk WA: Asymptotic pointwise contraction, plenary lecture. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications 2007. Chiang Mai University, Thailand, July 16–22Google Scholar
  2. Kirk WA, Xu H-K: Asymptotic pointwise contractions. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 4706–4712. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.023View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Rakotch E: A note on contractive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1962, 13: 459–465. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1962-0148046-1View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd D, Wong JSW: On nonlinear contraction. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1969, 20: 458–464. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1969-0239559-9View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Walter W: Remarks on a paper F. Browder about contraction. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 1981, 5(1):21–25. 10.1016/0362-546X(81)90066-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Espínloa R, Hussain N: Common fixed points for multimaps metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 204981Google Scholar
  7. Kirk WA: Fixed points asymptotic contractions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2003, 277(2):645–650. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00612-1View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirk WA: Contraction mappings and extensions. In A Handbook of Metric Fixed Point Theory. Edited by: Kirk WA, Sims B. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2001:1–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hussain N, Khamsi MA: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 4423–4429. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.126View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicolae A: Generalized asymptotic pointwise contractions and nonexpansive mappings involving orbits. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 458265Google Scholar
  11. Saeidi, S: Mapping under asymptotic contractive type conditions. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Golkarmanesh F, Saeidi S: Asymptotic pointwise contractive type in modular function spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 101Google Scholar

Copyright

© Golkarmanesh et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.