- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type common fixed point theorems without T-weakly commuting condition and invariant approximations
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 112 (2014)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a concept of -orbitally lower semi-continuous mappings which is more general than the concept of T-orbitally lower semi-continuous mappings and continuous mappings and also prove Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type coincidence point theorems by using this concept. Moreover, we show that the existence of common fixed points for Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type multi-valued mappings do not require the condition of T-weakly commuting mappings. Finally, some invariant approximation results are obtained as applications. Our results unify, extend, and complement several well-known results.
MSC:47H10, 54H25.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Throughout this paper, we denote by ℕ the set of all positive integers, by ℝ the set of all real numbers, and by the set of all nonnegative real numbers.
Let be a metric space. We denote by the class of all nonempty subsets of X, by the class of all nonempty compact subsets of X, by the class of all nonempty closed subsets of X, by the class of all nonempty closed bounded subsets of X. A functional is said to be the Pompeiu-Hausdorff generalized metric induced by d is given by
for all , where is the distance from a to .
Remark 1.1 The following properties of the Pompeiu-Hausdorff generalized metric induced by d are well known:
-
(1)
H is a metric on .
-
(2)
If and , then, for all , there exists such that .
-
(3)
is a complete metric space provided is a complete metric space.
Definition 1.1 Let be a metric space, and be mappings.
-
(1)
A point is said to be a fixed point of f (resp., T) if (resp., ). The set of all fixed points of f (resp., T) is denoted by (resp., ).
-
(2)
A point is said to be a coincidence point of f and T if . The set of all coincidence points of f and T is denoted by .
-
(3)
A point is said to be a common fixed point of f and T if . The set of all common fixed points of f and T is denoted by .
Definition 1.2 Let be a metric space, and be mappings.
-
(1)
If, for any , there exists a sequence in X such that for all , then is said to be an orbit of T.
-
(2)
If, for any , there exists a sequence in such that for all , then is said to be an f-orbit of T.
In 1969, Nadler [1] extended the Banach contraction principle to multi-valued mappings as follows.
Theorem 1.1 (Nadler [1])
Let be a complete metric space and such that
for all , where . Then T has at least one fixed point.
Since the theory of multi-valued mappings has many applications in many areas, a number of authors have focused on the topic and have published some interesting fixed point theorems in this frame. Following this trend, in 1972, Reich [2] extended Theorem 1.1 in the following way.
Theorem 1.2 (Reich [2])
Let be a complete metric space and be a mapping satisfying
for all , where is R-function, that is,
for all . Then T has at least one fixed point.
Furthermore, Reich [2] also raised the following question in his work:
Can the range of T, that is, , be replaced by or ?
In 1989, Mizoguchi and Takahashi [3] gave the positive answer for the conjecture of Reich [2], when the inequality holds also for , as follows.
Theorem 1.3 (Mizoguchi and Takahashi [3])
Let be a complete metric space and . Assume that
for all , where is MT-function, that is,
for all . Then T has at least one fixed point.
Remark 1.2 It is well known that, if is a nondecreasing function or a nonincreasing function, then α is a MT-function. Therefore, the class of MT-functions is a rich class and so this class has been investigated heavily by many authors.
In 2007, Eldred et al. [4] claimed that Theorem 1.3 is equivalent to Theorem 1.1 in the following sense:
If a mapping satisfies (1.3), then there exists a nonempty complete subset M of X satisfying the following:
-
(1)
M is T-invariant, that is, for all .
-
(2)
T satisfies (1.1) for all .
In the same year, Suzuki [5] produced an example which shows that Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem for multi-valued mappings is a real generalization of Nadler’s contraction principle. Since the primitive proof of Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem is quite difficult, Suzuki gave a very simple proof of Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s theorem. Several authors devoted their attention to investigate its generalizations in various different directions of the Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem (see [6–14] and references therein).
In 2009, Kamran [15] extended the result of Mizoguchi and Takahashi [3] for closed multi-valued mappings and proved a fixed point theorem by using the concept of T-orbitally lower semi-continuous mappings as follows:
Definition 1.3 ([16])
Let be a metric space, be a mapping multi-valued, and let .
-
(1)
A mapping is said to be lower semi-continuous at ξ if, for any sequence in X such that as ,
-
(2)
A mapping is said to be T-orbitally lower semi-continuous at ξ if, for any sequence in such that and as ,
The following result is a main result of Kamran [15].
Theorem 1.4 (Kamran [15])
Let be a complete metric space and be a mapping satisfying
for all and , where is MT-function. Then:
(K1) For each , there exist an orbit of T and such that .
(K2) ξ is a fixed point of T if and only if the function defined by for all is T-orbitally lower semi-continuous at ξ.
Recently, Ali [17] extended the above result to common fixed point theorem by using the concept of T-weakly commuting as follows:
Definition 1.4 ([18])
Let be a metric space, and be mappings. The mapping f is said to be T-weakly commuting at if .
The following result is a main result of Ali [17].
Theorem 1.5 (Ali [17])
Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all and , where is MT-function. If is a complete metric space, then
(A1) For any , there exists an f-orbit of T and such that .
(A2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is lower semi-continuous at ξ.
(A3) If and f is T-weakly commuting at ξ, then f and T have a common fixed point.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of -orbitally lower semi-continuous mappings and, using this concept, prove Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type coincidence point theorems. Also, we show that the condition of ‘T-weakly commuting of f’ can be omit to prove Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type common fixed point theorems. By the same procedure, we can improve Theorem 1.5 by dropping the condition of ‘f is T-weakly commuting at ξ’ in (A3). As applications, we derive the invariant approximation results.
2 Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type coincidence and common fixed point theorems
In this section, we start with the following concept.
Definition 2.1 Let be a metric space, , be mappings, and let .
-
(1)
A mapping is said to be lower semi-continuous at fξ if, for any sequence in such that as ,
-
(2)
A mapping is said to be -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ if, for any sequence in such that as ,
Next, we apply the following useful lemma due to Haghi et al. [19] and Theorem 1.4 to obtain new Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type common fixed point theorem.
Lemma 2.1 ([19])
Let X be a nonempty set and be a mapping. Then there exists a subset E of X such that and is one-to-one.
The following result is a main result in this paper.
Theorem 2.2 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all and , where is MT-function. If is a complete metric space, then
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one.
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
Proof Let be a mapping. Using Lemma 2.1, there exists such that and is one-to-one. Now, we can define a mapping by
for all . Since is one-to-one, it follows that G is well defined. Since T satisfies the contractive condition (2.1), we have
for all and . By the construction of G, we get
for all and . This implies that G is satisfies the contractive condition (1.4). From (S1), it follows that, for each , there exist an orbit of G and such that . This implies that (K1) in Theorem 1.4 holds.
Again, by the construction of G, it follows that (S2) is equivalent to the following condition:
‘fξ is a fixed point of G, that is, if and only if the function defined by for all is G-orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ.’
Thus (S2) holds. Let ξ is a coincidence point of f and T, that is, . Next, we suppose that . Let and so . Since , it follows from the contractive condition (2.1) that
which shows that . Therefore, , that is, z is a common fixed point of f and T. This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.1 Theorem 2.2 generalizes many results in the following sense:
-
(1)
The inequality (2.1) is weaker than some kinds of the contractive conditions such as Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s contractive condition [3], Nadler’s contractive condition [1], Kamran’s contractive condition [15], etc.
-
(2)
The range of T is which is more general than .
-
(3)
For the existence of coincidence point, we merely require that the condition in (S2), whereas other result demands stronger than this condition.
-
(4)
For the existence of common fixed point, we only requires the condition , whereas Theorem 1.5 requires both of this condition and the ‘T-weakly commuting at ξ’ condition.
Consequently, Theorem 2.2 extends and improves Nadler’s contraction principle [1], Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s theorem [3], Theorem 2.1 of Kamran [15], Theorem 2.2 of Ali [17], and several results in the literature. Moreover, for the single-valued case, Theorem 2.2 also unifies Banach’s contraction principle [20] and many well-known results.
Corollary 2.3 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all and , where is an MT-function. If is a complete metric space, then
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one.
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
Proof Since for all , it follows from the contractive condition (2.5) that the inequality (2.1) holds. Therefore, we get the result. □
Corollary 2.4 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all , where is an MT-function. If is a complete metric space, then:
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one.
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
Proof Since the condition (2.6) implies the condition (2.5), we get the result. □
If we take for all , where k is constant number with , then we get the following result.
Corollary 2.5 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and satisfying
for each and , where . If is a complete metric space, then:
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one.
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
Corollary 2.6 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all and , where . If is a complete metric space, then:
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that ;
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one;
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
Corollary 2.7 Let be a metric space, and be two mappings such that and
for all , where . If is a complete metric space, then:
(S1) For each , there exist an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) ξ is a coincidence point of f and T if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ, where and is one-to-one.
(S3) If ξ is a coincidence point of f and T such that , then f and T have a common fixed point.
3 Invariant approximation results
Several problems concerning invariant approximations for self-mappings were obtained as applications of fixed point, coincidence point, and common fixed point results (see [21–27] and references therein). Also, Kamran [18], Latif and Bano [28], and O’Regan and Shahzad [29, 30] obtained invariant approximation results for multi-valued mappings.
In this section, we study invariant approximation results for nonlinear single-valued mapping and multi-valued mapping as applications of main results in Section 2.
Let M be a subset of a normed space E and . The set
is called the set of best M-approximants to out of M, where .
Here, we derive some invariant approximation results.
Theorem 3.1 Let M be subset of normed space , , be a mapping and be a multi-valued mappings such that
for each and , where is an MT-function. Suppose that the following conditions hold:
-
(1)
.
-
(2)
is a complete subspace of M.
-
(3)
is one-to-one.
-
(4)
for all .
Then we have the following:
(S1) For each , there exists an f-orbit of T and such that .
(S2) if and only if the function defined by for all is -orbitally lower semi-continuous at fξ.
(S3) If such that , then .
Proof From the assumption, it follows that is a single-valued mapping from to . Now, we show that is a multi-valued mapping from to . First, we claim that for all . Let and . Since , we have and hence .
Now, we obtain
This implies that and thus . Therefore, for all . Since Tx is closed for all , it follows that Tx is closed for all . Hence is a multi-valued mapping from to . It is easy to obtain that
Thus the result follows from Theorem 2.2 with . This completes the proof. □
Theorem 3.2 Let M be subset of normed space , , and be a multi-valued mapping such that
for all and , where is an MT-function. Suppose that the following conditions hold:
-
(1)
;
-
(2)
is complete subspace of M;
-
(3)
for all .
Then we have the following:
(S1) For each , there exists an orbit of T and such that ;
(S2) if and only if the function , defined by for all , is T-orbitally lower semi-continuous at ξ.
Proof Take f as the identity mapping from M into M in Theorem 3.1, we get the result. □
References
Nadler SB Jr.: Multi-valued contraction mappings. Pac. J. Math. 1969, 30: 475–488. 10.2140/pjm.1969.30.475
Reich S: Fixed points of contractive functions. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 1972, 4(5):26–32.
Mizoguchi N, Takahashi W: Fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings on complete metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1989, 141: 177–188. 10.1016/0022-247X(89)90214-X
Eldred AA, Anuradha J, Veeramani P: On equivalence of generalized multi-valued contractions and Nadler’s fixed point theorem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 336: 751–757. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.087
Suzuki T: Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem is a real generalization of Nadler’s. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 340: 752–755. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.08.022
Ali MU, Kamran T: Hybrid generalized contractions. Math. Sci. 2013., 7: Article ID 29
Du W-S: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions satisfied Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s condition in quasiordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 876372
Du W-S: On coincidence point and fixed point theorems for nonlinear multivalued maps. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159: 49–56. 10.1016/j.topol.2011.07.021
Kamran T: Fixed point theorems for hybrid mappings satisfying an integral type contractive condition. Georgian Math. J. 2012, 19: 117–125.
Lin I-J, Chen T-H: New existence theorems of coincidence points approach to generalizations of Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 156
Shatanawi W, Ćojbašic Rajić V, Radenović S, Al-Rawashdeh A: Mizoguch-Takahashi-type theorems in tvs-cone metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 106
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P:Weak condition for generalized multi-valued -weak contraction mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 460–465. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.10.042
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Common fixed point theorems for hybrid generalized multi-valued contraction mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 52–57. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.047
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Common fixed point theorem for cyclic generalized multi-valued contraction mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 1849–1855. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.02.045
Kamran T: Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type fixed point theorem. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 57: 507–511. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.075
Hicks TL, Rhoades BE: A Banach type fixed point theorem. Math. Jpn. 1979, 24: 327–330.
Ali, MU: Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type common fixed point theorem. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. (2013, in press)
Kamran T: Coincidence and fixed points for hybrid strict contractions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 299: 235–241. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.06.047
Haghi RH, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some fixed point generalizations are not real generalizations. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 1799–1803. 10.1016/j.na.2010.10.052
Banach S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leurs applications aux équations intégrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.
Al-Thagafi MA: Common fixed points and best approximation. J. Approx. Theory 1996, 85: 318–323. 10.1006/jath.1996.0045
Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N: Noncommuting selfmaps and invariant approximations. Nonlinear Anal. 2006, 64: 2778–2786. 10.1016/j.na.2005.09.015
Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N: Coincidence points, generalized I -nonexpansive multimaps and applications. Nonlinear Anal. 2007, 67: 2180–2188. 10.1016/j.na.2006.08.042
Shahzad N: A result on best approximation. Tamkang J. Math. 1998, 29: 223–226. Corrections: Tamkang J. Math. 30, 165 (1999)
Shahzad N: Invariant approximation and R -subweakly commuting maps. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2001, 257: 39–45. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7274
Shahzad N: Invariant approximations, generalized I -contractions and R -subweakly commuting maps. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2005, 1: 79–86.
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Coincidence and common fixed points for hybrid strict contractions without the weakly commuting condition. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 1877–1881. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.07.015
Latif A, Bano A: A result on invariant approximation. Tamkang J. Math. 2002, 33: 89–102.
O’Regan D, Shahzad N: Coincidence points and best proximity pair results for R -subweakly commuting multimaps. Demonstr. Math. 2006, 39: 845–854.
O’Regan D, Shahzad N: Coincidence points and invariant approximation results for multimaps. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2007, 23: 1601–1610. 10.1007/s10114-005-0768-1
Acknowledgements
The third author was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (KRF-2013053358).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sintunavarat, W., Lee, D.M. & Cho, Y.J. Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s type common fixed point theorems without T-weakly commuting condition and invariant approximations. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-112
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-112