- Research
- Open Access

# On the Ishikawa iteration processes for multivalued mappings in some $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces

- Bancha Panyanak
^{1}Email author

**2014**:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-1

© Panyanak; licensee Springer. 2014

**Received:**4 July 2013**Accepted:**9 October 2013**Published:**2 January 2014

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to prove the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration processes for some generalized multivalued nonexpansive mappings in the framework of CAT(1) spaces. Our results extend the corresponding results given by Shahzad and Zegeye (Nonlinear Anal. 71:838-844, 2009), Puttasontiphot (Appl. Math. Sci. 4:3005-3018, 2010), Song and Cho (Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 48:575-584, 2011) and many others.

## Keywords

- fixed point
- multivalued mapping
- strong convergence
- Ishikawa iteration
- $CAT(\kappa )$ space

## 1 Introduction

Roughly speaking, a $CAT(\kappa )$ space is a geodesic space of bounded curvature. The precise definition is given below. Here CAT means the initials of three mathematician’s names (E Cartan, AD Alexandrov and A Toponogov) who have made important contributions to the understanding of curvature via inequalities for the distance function, and *κ* is a real number that we impose as the curvature bound of the space.

Fixed point theory in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces was first studied by Kirk [1, 2]. His works were followed by a series of new works by many authors (see, *e.g.*, [3–12]) mainly focusing on CAT(0) spaces. Since any $CAT(\kappa )$ space is a $CAT({\kappa}^{\prime})$ space for ${\kappa}^{\prime}\ge \kappa $ (see [[13], p.165]), all results for CAT(0) spaces immediately apply to any $CAT(\kappa )$ space with $\kappa \le 0$. Notice also that all $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces (with appropriate sizes) are uniformly convex metric spaces in the sense of [14]. Thus, the results in [14] concerning uniformly convex metric spaces also hold in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces as well.

*t*on a Hilbert space

*H*by

where $\{{\alpha}_{n}\}$ and $\{{\beta}_{n}\}$ are sequences in $[0,1]$ satisfying some certain restrictions. For more details and literature on the convergence of the Ishikawa iteration process for single-valued mappings, see, *e.g.*, [16–28].

The first result concerning the convergence of an Ishikawa iteration process for multivalued mappings was proved by Sastry and Babu [29] in a Hilbert space. Panyanak [30] extended the result of Sastry and Babu to a uniformly convex Banach space. Since then the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration processes for multivalued mappings has been rapidly developed and many of papers have appeared (see, *e.g.*, [31–36]). Among other things, Shahzad and Zegeye [37] defined two types of Ishikawa iteration processes as follows.

*E*be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space

*X*, $\{{\alpha}_{n}\},\{{\beta}_{n}\}\subset [0,1]$, and $T:E\to {2}^{E}$ be a multivalued mapping whose values are nonempty proximinal subsets of

*E*. For each $x\in E$, let ${P}_{T}:E\to {2}^{E}$ be a multivalued mapping defined by

where ${z}_{n}^{\prime}\in T({y}_{n})$.

where ${z}_{n}^{\prime}\in {P}_{T}({y}_{n})$.

They proved, under some suitable assumptions, that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ defined by (A) and (B) converges strongly to a fixed point of *T*. In 2010, Puttasontiphot [38] gave analogous results to those of Shahzad and Zegeye in complete CAT(0) spaces.

In this paper, we extend Puttasontiphot’s results to the setting of $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces with $\kappa \ge 0$.

## 2 Preliminaries

*distance*from

*x*to

*E*is defined by

*diameter*of

*E*is defined by

*E*is called

*proximinal*if for each $x\in X$, there exists an element $y\in E$ such that $d(x,y)=dist(x,E)$. We shall denote by ${2}^{E}$ the family of nonempty subsets of

*E*, by $\mathcal{P}(E)$ the family of nonempty proximinal subsets of

*E*and by $\mathcal{C}(E)$ the family of nonempty closed subsets of

*E*. Let $H(\cdot ,\cdot )$ be the Hausdorff (generalized) distance on ${2}^{E}$,

*i.e.*,

**Definition 2.1**Let

*E*be a nonempty subset of a metric space $(X,d)$ and $T:E\to {2}^{E}$. Then

*T*is said to

- (i)
be

*nonexpansive*if $H(T(x),T(y))\le d(x,y)$ for all $x,y\in E$; - (ii)be
*quasi-nonexpansive*if $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and$H(T(x),T(p))\le d(x,p)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{for all}x\in E\text{and}p\in Fix(T);$ - (iii)satisfy
*condition*(I) if there is a nondecreasing function $f:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty})$ with $f(0)=0$, $f(r)>0$ for $r\in (0,\mathrm{\infty})$ such that$dist(x,T(x))\ge f(dist(x,Fix(T)))\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{for all}x\in E;$ - (iv)be
*hemicompact*if for any sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ in*E*such that$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{lim}dist({x}_{n},T({x}_{n}))=0,$

there exists a subsequence $\{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\}$ of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ and $q\in E$ such that ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{{n}_{k}}=q$.

A point $x\in E$ is called a *fixed point* of *T* if $x\in T(x)$. We denote by $Fix(T)$ the set of all fixed points of *T*.

The following lemma can be found in [39]. We observe that the boundedness of the images of *T* is superfluous.

**Lemma 2.2**

*Let*

*E*

*be a nonempty subset of a metric space*$(X,d)$

*and*$T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$

*be a multivalued mapping*.

*Then*

- (i)
$dist(x,T(x))=dist(x,{P}_{T}(x))$

*for all*$x\in E$; - (ii)
$x\in Fix(T)\u27fax\in Fix({P}_{T})\u27fa{P}_{T}(x)=\{x\}$;

- (iii)
$Fix(T)=Fix({P}_{T})$.

*geodesic path*joining $x\in X$ to $y\in X$ (or, more briefly, a

*geodesic*from

*x*to

*y*) is a map

*c*from a closed interval $[0,l]\subset R$ to

*X*such that $c(0)=x$, $c(l)=y$, and $d(c(t),c({t}^{\prime}))=|t-{t}^{\prime}|$ for all $t,{t}^{\prime}\in [0,l]$. In particular,

*c*is an isometry and $d(x,y)=l$. The image $c([0,l])$ of

*c*is called a

*geodesic*(or

*metric*)

*segment*joining

*x*and

*y*. When it is unique, this geodesic segment is denoted by $[x,y]$. This means that $z\in [x,y]$ if and only if there exists $\alpha \in [0,1]$ such that

In this case, we write $z=\alpha x\oplus (1-\alpha )y$. The space $(X,d)$ is said to be a *geodesic space* if every two points of *X* are joined by a geodesic, and *X* is said to be *uniquely geodesic* if there is exactly one geodesic joining *x* and *y* for each $x,y\in X$. A subset *E* of *X* is said to be *convex* if *E* includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.

*convex*if for any $x,y,z\in X$ and $\alpha \in [0,1]$, one has

Let $D\in (0,\mathrm{\infty}]$, then $(X,d)$ is called a *D*-*geodesic space* if any two points of *X* with their distance smaller than *D* are joined by a geodesic segment. Notice that $(X,d)$ is a geodesic space if and only if it is a *D*-geodesic space.

*n*-dimensional sphere defined by

with metric $d(x,y)=arccos\u3008x|y\u3009$, $x,y\in {S}^{n}$ (see [[13], Proposition 2.1]).

- (i)
if $\kappa =0$ then ${M}_{0}^{n}$ is the Euclidean space ${R}^{n}$;

- (ii)
if $\kappa >0$ then ${M}_{\kappa}^{n}$ is obtained from ${S}^{n}$ by multiplying the distance function by the constant $1/\sqrt{\kappa}$.

*geodesic triangle*$\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in the metric space $(X,d)$ consists of three points

*x*,

*y*,

*z*in

*X*(the

*vertices*of △) and three geodesic segments between each pair of vertices (the

*edges*of △). We write $p\in \mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ when $p\in [x,y]\cup [y,z]\cup [z,x]$. For $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in a geodesic space

*X*satisfying $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$, there exist points $\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z}\in {M}_{\kappa}^{2}$ such that

(see [[13], Lemma 2.14]). We call the triangle having vertices $\overline{x}$, $\overline{y}$, $\overline{z}$ in ${M}_{\kappa}^{2}$ a *comparison triangle* of $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$. Notice that it is unique up to an isometry of ${M}_{\kappa}^{2}$, and we denote it by $\overline{\mathrm{\u25b3}}(\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z})$. A point $\overline{p}\in [\overline{x},\overline{y}]$ is called a *comparison point* for $p\in [x,y]$ if $d(x,p)={d}_{{M}_{\kappa}^{2}}(\overline{x},\overline{p})$.

*X*with $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$ is said to satisfy the $CAT(\kappa )$

*inequality*if for any $p,q\in \mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ and for their comparison points $\overline{p},\overline{q}\in \overline{\mathrm{\u25b3}}(\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z})$, one has

**Definition 2.3** A metric space $(X,d)$ is called a $CAT(\kappa )$ *space* if it is ${D}_{\kappa}$-geodesic and any geodesic triangle $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in *X* with $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$ satisfies the $CAT(\kappa )$ inequality.

It follows from [[13], Proposition 1.4] that $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces are uniquely geodesic spaces. In this paper, we consider $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces with $\kappa \ge 0$. Since most of the results for such spaces are easily deduced from those for CAT(1) spaces, in what follows, we mainly focus on CAT(1) spaces. The following lemma is a consequence of Proposition 3.1 in [40].

**Lemma 2.4**

*If*$(X,d)$

*is a CAT*(1)

*space with*$diam(X)<\pi /2$,

*then there is a constant*$K>0$

*such that*

*for any* $\alpha \in [0,1]$ *and any points* $x,y,z\in X$.

The following lemma is also needed.

**Lemma 2.5** [30]

*Let*$\{{\alpha}_{n}\}$, $\{{\beta}_{n}\}$

*be two real sequences such that*

- (i)
$0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$;

- (ii)
${\beta}_{n}\to 0$

*as*$n\to \mathrm{\infty}$; - (iii)
$\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$.

*Let* $\{{\gamma}_{n}\}$ *be a nonnegative real sequence such that* ${\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}(1-{\beta}_{n}){\gamma}_{n}$ *is bounded*. *Then* $\{{\gamma}_{n}\}$ *has a subsequence which converges to zero*.

## 3 Main results

We begin this section by proving a crucial lemma.

**Lemma 3.1** *Let* $(X,d)$ *be a CAT*(1) *space with convex metric*, *E* *be a nonempty closed convex subset of* *X*, *and* $T:E\to {2}^{E}$ *be a quasi*-*nonexpansive mapping with* $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ *and* $T(p)=\{p\}$ *for each* $p\in Fix(T)$. *Let* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by* (A) (*replacing *+ *with* ⊕). *Then* ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},p)$ *exists for each* $p\in Fix(T)$.

*Proof*Let $p\in Fix(T)$. For each $n\ge 1$, we have

This shows that the sequence $\{d({x}_{n},p)\}$ is decreasing and bounded below. Thus ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},p)$ exists for any $p\in Fix(T)$. □

Now, we prove the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration process defined by (A).

**Theorem 3.2** *Let* $(X,d)$ *be a complete CAT*(1) *space with convex metric and* $diam(X)<\pi /2$, *E* *be a nonempty closed convex subset of* *X*, *and* $T:E\to \mathcal{C}(E)$ *be a quasi*-*nonexpansive mapping with* $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ *and* $T(p)=\{p\}$ *for each* $p\in Fix(T)$. *Let* ${\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}\in [a,b]\subset (0,1)$ *and* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by* (A) (*replacing* + *with* ⊕). *If* *T* *satisfies condition* (I), *then* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *converges strongly to a fixed point of* *T*.

*Proof*Let $p\in Fix(T)$. By using Lemma 2.4, we have

Thus, ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},{z}_{n})=0$. Also, $dist({x}_{n},T({x}_{n}))\le d({x}_{n},{z}_{n})\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$. Since *T* satisfies condition (I), we have ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}dist({x}_{n},Fix(T))=0$. The proof of the remaining part follows the proof of Theorem 3.2 in [38], therefore we omit it. □

**Theorem 3.3** *Let* $(X,d)$ *be a complete CAT*(1) *space with convex metric and* $diam(X)<\pi /2$, *E* *be a nonempty closed convex subset of* *X*, *and* $T:E\to \mathcal{C}(E)$ *be a quasi*-*nonexpansive mapping with* $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ *and* $T(p)=\{p\}$ *for each* $p\in Fix(T)$. *Assume that* (i) $0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$; (ii) ${\beta}_{n}\to 0$; (iii) $\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$, *and let* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by* (A) (*replacing* + *with* ⊕). *If* *T* *is hemicompact and continuous*, *then* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *converges strongly to a fixed point of* *T*.

*Proof*Let $p\in Fix(T)$. By (1) we have

*T*is hemicompact, by passing through a subsequence, we may assume that ${x}_{{n}_{k}}\to q$ for some $q\in E$. Since

*T*is continuous,

This implies that $q\in Fix(T)$ since $T(q)$ is closed. Thus ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},q)$ exists by Lemma 3.1 and hence *q* is the limit of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ itself. □

To avoid the restriction of *T*, that is, $T(p)=\{p\}$ for $p\in Fix(T)$, we use the iteration process defined by (B).

**Theorem 3.4** *Let* $(X,d)$ *be a complete CAT*(1) *space with convex metric and* $diam(X)<\pi /2$, *E* *be a nonempty closed convex subset of* *X*, *and* $T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$ *be a multivalued mapping with* $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ *and* ${P}_{T}$ *is quasi*-*nonexpansive*. *Let* ${\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}\in [a,b]\subset (0,1)$ *and* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by* (B) (*replacing* + *with* ⊕). *If* *T* *satisfies condition* (I), *then* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *converges strongly to a fixed point of* *T*.

*Proof*It follows from Lemma 2.2 that $dist(x,{P}_{T}(x))=dist(x,T(x))$ for all $x\in E$,

*T*satisfies condition (I), for each $x\in E$ we have

It follows that $d(x,y)=dist(x,T(x))$ and this implies $y\in {P}_{T}(x)$. Applying Theorem 3.2 to the map ${P}_{T}$, we can conclude that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ defined by (B) converges to a point $z\in Fix({P}_{T})=Fix(T)$. This completes the proof. □

The following theorem is an analogue of Theorem 3 in [39].

**Theorem 3.5** *Let* $(X,d)$ *be a complete CAT*(1) *space with convex metric and* $diam(X)<\pi /2$, *E* *be a nonempty closed convex subset of* *X*, *and* $T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$ *be a hemicompact mapping with* $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ *and* ${P}_{T}$ *is quasi*-*nonexpansive and continuous*. *Assume that* (i) $0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$; (ii) ${\beta}_{n}\to 0$; (iii) $\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$, *and let* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by* (B) (*replacing* + *with* ⊕). *Then* $\{{x}_{n}\}$ *converges strongly to a fixed point of T*.

*Proof*As in the proof of Theorem 3.4, we have

The hemicompactness of ${P}_{T}$ follows from that of *T*. The conclusion follows from Theorem 3.3. □

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The author thanks Chiang Mai University for financial support.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. Colecc. Abierta 64. In
*Seminar of Mathematical Analysis*(Malaga/Seville, 2002/2003). Univ. Sevilla Secr. Publ., Seville; 2003:195–225.Google Scholar - Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory II. In
*International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Applications*. Yokohama Publ., Yokohama; 2004:113–142.Google Scholar - Dhompongsa S, Kaewkhao A, Panyanak B: Lim’s theorems for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2005, 312: 478–487. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.055View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Chaoha P, Phon-on A: A note on fixed point sets in CAT(0) spaces.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2006, 320: 983–987. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.08.006View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Leustean L: A quadratic rate of asymptotic regularity for CAT(0)-spaces.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2007, 325: 386–399. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.081View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Shahzad N, Markin J: Invariant approximations for commuting mappings in CAT(0) and hyperconvex spaces.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2008, 337: 1457–1464. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.04.041View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Espinola R, Fernandez-Leon A:$CAT(\kappa )$-spaces, weak convergence and fixed points.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2009, 353: 410–427. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.12.015View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Khan AR, Khamsi MA, Fukhar-ud-din H: Strong convergence of a general iteration scheme in CAT(0) spaces.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2011, 74: 783–791. 10.1016/j.na.2010.09.029View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Abkar A, Eslamian M: Common fixed point results in CAT(0) spaces.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2011, 74: 1835–1840. 10.1016/j.na.2010.10.056View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Piatek B:Halpern iteration in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces.
*Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser.*2011, 27: 635–646. 10.1007/s10114-011-9312-7View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - He JS, Fang DH, Lopez G, Li C:Mann’s algorithm for nonexpansive mappings in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2012, 75: 445–452. 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.070View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kimura Y, Sato K: Convergence of subsets of a complete geodesic space with curvature bounded above.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2012, 75: 5079–5085. 10.1016/j.na.2012.04.024View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Bridson M, Haefliger A:
*Metric Spaces of Non-positive Curvature*. Springer, Berlin; 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Espinola R, Lorenzo P, Nicolae A: Fixed points, selections and common fixed points for nonexpansive-type mappings.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2011, 382: 503–515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.039View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Ishikawa S: Fixed points by a new iteration method.
*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*1974, 44: 147–150. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Ishikawa S: Fixed points and iteration of a nonexpansive mapping in a Banach space.
*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*1976, 59: 65–71. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1976-0412909-XView ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Chidume CE: On the Ishikawa fixed points iterations for quasicontractive mappings.
*J. Niger. Math. Soc.*1985, 4: 1–11.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kalinde AK, Rhoades BE: Fixed point Ishikawa iterations.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1992, 170: 600–606. 10.1016/0022-247X(92)90040-KView ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Tan KK, Xu HK: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iteration process.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1993, 178: 301–308. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1309View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Ghosh MK, Debnath L: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates of quasi-nonexpansive mappings.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1997, 207: 96–103. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5268View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Takahashi W, Kim GE: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.
*Math. Jpn.*1998, 48: 1–9.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Osilike MO: Strong and weak convergence of the Ishikawa iteration method for a class of nonlinear equations.
*Bull. Korean Math. Soc.*2000, 37: 153–169.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Liu Z, Kim JK, Ume JS: Characterizations for the convergence of Ishikawa iterative processes with errors in normed linear spaces.
*J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.*2002, 3: 59–66.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Sahu DR: On generalized Ishikawa iteration process and nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.
*Demonstr. Math.*2003, 36: 721–734.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kim GE, Kiuchi H, Takahashi W: Weak and strong convergences of Ishikawa iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense.
*Sci. Math. Jpn.*2004, 60: 95–106.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Cho YJ, Li J, Huang NJ: Random Ishikawa iterative sequence with errors for approximating random fixed points.
*Taiwan. J. Math.*2008, 12: 51–61.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Peng JW, Yao JC: Ishikawa iterative algorithms for a generalized equilibrium problem and fixed point problems of a pseudo-contraction mapping.
*J. Glob. Optim.*2010, 46: 331–345. 10.1007/s10898-009-9428-9View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Zegeye H, Shahzad N, Alghamdi MA: Convergence of Ishikawa’s iteration method for pseudocontractive mappings.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2011, 74: 7304–7311. 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.048View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Sastry KPR, Babu GVR: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates for a multi-valued mapping with a fixed point.
*Czechoslov. Math. J.*2005, 55: 817–826. 10.1007/s10587-005-0068-zView ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Panyanak B: Mann and Ishikawa iterative processes for multivalued mappings in Banach spaces.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2007, 54: 872–877. 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.03.012View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Song Y, Wang H: Erratum to “Mann and Ishikawa iterative processes for multivalued mappings in Banach spaces”.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2008, 52: 2999–3002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shahzad N, Zegeye H: Strong convergence results for nonself multimaps in Banach spaces.
*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*2008, 136: 539–548.View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Laowang W, Panyanak B: Strong and Δ convergence theorems for multivalued mapping in CAT(0) spaces.
*J. Inequal. Appl.*2009., 2009: Article ID 730132Google Scholar - Sokhuma K, Kaewkhao A: Ishikawa iterative process for a pair of single-valued and multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2010., 2010: Article ID 618767Google Scholar - Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive multimaps in Banach spaces.
*Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser.*2010, 26: 1165–1176. 10.1007/s10114-010-7521-0View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Cholamjiak W, Suantai S: Approximation of common fixed points of two quasi-nonexpansive multi-valued maps in Banach spaces.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2011, 61: 941–949. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.042View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Shahzad N, Zegeye H: On Mann and Ishikawa iteration schemes for multi-valued maps in Banach spaces.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2009, 71: 838–844. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.112View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Puttasontiphot T: Mann and Ishikawa iteration schemes for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces.
*Appl. Math. Sci.*2010, 4: 3005–3018.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Song Y, Cho YJ: Some notes on Ishikawa iteration for multi-valued mappings.
*Bull. Korean Math. Soc.*2011, 48: 575–584. 10.4134/BKMS.2011.48.3.575View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Ohta S: Convexities of metric spaces.
*Geom. Dedic.*2007, 125: 225–250. 10.1007/s10711-007-9159-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.