 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
On the Ishikawa iteration processes for multivalued mappings in some $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 1 (2014)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to prove the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration processes for some generalized multivalued nonexpansive mappings in the framework of CAT(1) spaces. Our results extend the corresponding results given by Shahzad and Zegeye (Nonlinear Anal. 71:838844, 2009), Puttasontiphot (Appl. Math. Sci. 4:30053018, 2010), Song and Cho (Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 48:575584, 2011) and many others.
1 Introduction
Roughly speaking, a $CAT(\kappa )$ space is a geodesic space of bounded curvature. The precise definition is given below. Here CAT means the initials of three mathematician’s names (E Cartan, AD Alexandrov and A Toponogov) who have made important contributions to the understanding of curvature via inequalities for the distance function, and κ is a real number that we impose as the curvature bound of the space.
Fixed point theory in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces was first studied by Kirk [1, 2]. His works were followed by a series of new works by many authors (see, e.g., [3–12]) mainly focusing on CAT(0) spaces. Since any $CAT(\kappa )$ space is a $CAT({\kappa}^{\prime})$ space for ${\kappa}^{\prime}\ge \kappa $ (see [[13], p.165]), all results for CAT(0) spaces immediately apply to any $CAT(\kappa )$ space with $\kappa \le 0$. Notice also that all $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces (with appropriate sizes) are uniformly convex metric spaces in the sense of [14]. Thus, the results in [14] concerning uniformly convex metric spaces also hold in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces as well.
In 1974, Ishikawa [15] introduced an iteration process for approximating fixed points of a singlevalued mapping t on a Hilbert space H by
where $\{{\alpha}_{n}\}$ and $\{{\beta}_{n}\}$ are sequences in $[0,1]$ satisfying some certain restrictions. For more details and literature on the convergence of the Ishikawa iteration process for singlevalued mappings, see, e.g., [16–28].
The first result concerning the convergence of an Ishikawa iteration process for multivalued mappings was proved by Sastry and Babu [29] in a Hilbert space. Panyanak [30] extended the result of Sastry and Babu to a uniformly convex Banach space. Since then the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration processes for multivalued mappings has been rapidly developed and many of papers have appeared (see, e.g., [31–36]). Among other things, Shahzad and Zegeye [37] defined two types of Ishikawa iteration processes as follows.
Let E be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space X, $\{{\alpha}_{n}\},\{{\beta}_{n}\}\subset [0,1]$, and $T:E\to {2}^{E}$ be a multivalued mapping whose values are nonempty proximinal subsets of E. For each $x\in E$, let ${P}_{T}:E\to {2}^{E}$ be a multivalued mapping defined by
(A): The sequence of Ishikawa iterates is defined by ${x}_{1}\in E$,
where ${z}_{n}\in T({x}_{n})$, and
where ${z}_{n}^{\prime}\in T({y}_{n})$.
(B): The sequence of Ishikawa iterates is defined by ${x}_{1}\in E$,
where ${z}_{n}\in {P}_{T}({x}_{n})$, and
where ${z}_{n}^{\prime}\in {P}_{T}({y}_{n})$.
They proved, under some suitable assumptions, that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ defined by (A) and (B) converges strongly to a fixed point of T. In 2010, Puttasontiphot [38] gave analogous results to those of Shahzad and Zegeye in complete CAT(0) spaces.
In this paper, we extend Puttasontiphot’s results to the setting of $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces with $\kappa \ge 0$.
2 Preliminaries
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space, and let $x\in X$, $E\subseteq X$. The distance from x to E is defined by
The diameter of E is defined by
The set E is called proximinal if for each $x\in X$, there exists an element $y\in E$ such that $d(x,y)=dist(x,E)$. We shall denote by ${2}^{E}$ the family of nonempty subsets of E, by $\mathcal{P}(E)$ the family of nonempty proximinal subsets of E and by $\mathcal{C}(E)$ the family of nonempty closed subsets of E. Let $H(\cdot ,\cdot )$ be the Hausdorff (generalized) distance on ${2}^{E}$, i.e.,
Definition 2.1 Let E be a nonempty subset of a metric space $(X,d)$ and $T:E\to {2}^{E}$. Then T is said to

(i)
be nonexpansive if $H(T(x),T(y))\le d(x,y)$ for all $x,y\in E$;

(ii)
be quasinonexpansive if $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and
$$H(T(x),T(p))\le d(x,p)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{for all}x\in E\text{and}p\in Fix(T);$$ 
(iii)
satisfy condition (I) if there is a nondecreasing function $f:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty})$ with $f(0)=0$, $f(r)>0$ for $r\in (0,\mathrm{\infty})$ such that
$$dist(x,T(x))\ge f(dist(x,Fix(T)))\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{for all}x\in E;$$ 
(iv)
be hemicompact if for any sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ in E such that
$$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{lim}dist({x}_{n},T({x}_{n}))=0,$$
there exists a subsequence $\{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\}$ of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ and $q\in E$ such that ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{{n}_{k}}=q$.
A point $x\in E$ is called a fixed point of T if $x\in T(x)$. We denote by $Fix(T)$ the set of all fixed points of T.
The following lemma can be found in [39]. We observe that the boundedness of the images of T is superfluous.
Lemma 2.2 Let E be a nonempty subset of a metric space $(X,d)$ and $T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$ be a multivalued mapping. Then

(i)
$dist(x,T(x))=dist(x,{P}_{T}(x))$ for all $x\in E$;

(ii)
$x\in Fix(T)\u27fax\in Fix({P}_{T})\u27fa{P}_{T}(x)=\{x\}$;

(iii)
$Fix(T)=Fix({P}_{T})$.
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. A geodesic path joining $x\in X$ to $y\in X$ (or, more briefly, a geodesic from x to y) is a map c from a closed interval $[0,l]\subset R$ to X such that $c(0)=x$, $c(l)=y$, and $d(c(t),c({t}^{\prime}))=t{t}^{\prime}$ for all $t,{t}^{\prime}\in [0,l]$. In particular, c is an isometry and $d(x,y)=l$. The image $c([0,l])$ of c is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining x and y. When it is unique, this geodesic segment is denoted by $[x,y]$. This means that $z\in [x,y]$ if and only if there exists $\alpha \in [0,1]$ such that
In this case, we write $z=\alpha x\oplus (1\alpha )y$. The space $(X,d)$ is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of X are joined by a geodesic, and X is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining x and y for each $x,y\in X$. A subset E of X is said to be convex if E includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.
In a geodesic space $(X,d)$, the metric $d:X\times X\to R$ is convex if for any $x,y,z\in X$ and $\alpha \in [0,1]$, one has
Let $D\in (0,\mathrm{\infty}]$, then $(X,d)$ is called a Dgeodesic space if any two points of X with their distance smaller than D are joined by a geodesic segment. Notice that $(X,d)$ is a geodesic space if and only if it is a Dgeodesic space.
Let $n\in N$, we denote by $\u3008\cdot \cdot \u3009$ the Euclidean scalar product in ${R}^{n}$, that is,
Let ${S}^{n}$ denote the ndimensional sphere defined by
with metric $d(x,y)=arccos\u3008xy\u3009$, $x,y\in {S}^{n}$ (see [[13], Proposition 2.1]).
From now on, we assume that $\kappa \ge 0$ and define
We denote by ${M}_{\kappa}^{n}$ the following metric spaces:

(i)
if $\kappa =0$ then ${M}_{0}^{n}$ is the Euclidean space ${R}^{n}$;

(ii)
if $\kappa >0$ then ${M}_{\kappa}^{n}$ is obtained from ${S}^{n}$ by multiplying the distance function by the constant $1/\sqrt{\kappa}$.
A geodesic triangle $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in the metric space $(X,d)$ consists of three points x, y, z in X (the vertices of △) and three geodesic segments between each pair of vertices (the edges of △). We write $p\in \mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ when $p\in [x,y]\cup [y,z]\cup [z,x]$. For $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in a geodesic space X satisfying $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$, there exist points $\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z}\in {M}_{\kappa}^{2}$ such that
(see [[13], Lemma 2.14]). We call the triangle having vertices $\overline{x}$, $\overline{y}$, $\overline{z}$ in ${M}_{\kappa}^{2}$ a comparison triangle of $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$. Notice that it is unique up to an isometry of ${M}_{\kappa}^{2}$, and we denote it by $\overline{\mathrm{\u25b3}}(\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z})$. A point $\overline{p}\in [\overline{x},\overline{y}]$ is called a comparison point for $p\in [x,y]$ if $d(x,p)={d}_{{M}_{\kappa}^{2}}(\overline{x},\overline{p})$.
A geodesic triangle $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in X with $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$ is said to satisfy the $CAT(\kappa )$ inequality if for any $p,q\in \mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ and for their comparison points $\overline{p},\overline{q}\in \overline{\mathrm{\u25b3}}(\overline{x},\overline{y},\overline{z})$, one has
Definition 2.3 A metric space $(X,d)$ is called a $CAT(\kappa )$ space if it is ${D}_{\kappa}$geodesic and any geodesic triangle $\mathrm{\u25b3}(x,y,z)$ in X with $d(x,y)+d(y,z)+d(z,x)<2{D}_{\kappa}$ satisfies the $CAT(\kappa )$ inequality.
It follows from [[13], Proposition 1.4] that $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces are uniquely geodesic spaces. In this paper, we consider $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces with $\kappa \ge 0$. Since most of the results for such spaces are easily deduced from those for CAT(1) spaces, in what follows, we mainly focus on CAT(1) spaces. The following lemma is a consequence of Proposition 3.1 in [40].
Lemma 2.4 If $(X,d)$ is a CAT(1) space with $diam(X)<\pi /2$, then there is a constant $K>0$ such that
for any $\alpha \in [0,1]$ and any points $x,y,z\in X$.
The following lemma is also needed.
Lemma 2.5 [30]
Let $\{{\alpha}_{n}\}$, $\{{\beta}_{n}\}$ be two real sequences such that

(i)
$0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$;

(ii)
${\beta}_{n}\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$;

(iii)
$\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$.
Let $\{{\gamma}_{n}\}$ be a nonnegative real sequence such that ${\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}(1{\beta}_{n}){\gamma}_{n}$ is bounded. Then $\{{\gamma}_{n}\}$ has a subsequence which converges to zero.
3 Main results
We begin this section by proving a crucial lemma.
Lemma 3.1 Let $(X,d)$ be a CAT(1) space with convex metric, E be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and $T:E\to {2}^{E}$ be a quasinonexpansive mapping with $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and $T(p)=\{p\}$ for each $p\in Fix(T)$. Let $\{{x}_{n}\}$ be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by (A) (replacing + with ⊕). Then ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},p)$ exists for each $p\in Fix(T)$.
Proof Let $p\in Fix(T)$. For each $n\ge 1$, we have
and
This shows that the sequence $\{d({x}_{n},p)\}$ is decreasing and bounded below. Thus ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},p)$ exists for any $p\in Fix(T)$. □
Now, we prove the strong convergence of the Ishikawa iteration process defined by (A).
Theorem 3.2 Let $(X,d)$ be a complete CAT(1) space with convex metric and $diam(X)<\pi /2$, E be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and $T:E\to \mathcal{C}(E)$ be a quasinonexpansive mapping with $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and $T(p)=\{p\}$ for each $p\in Fix(T)$. Let ${\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}\in [a,b]\subset (0,1)$ and $\{{x}_{n}\}$ be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by (A) (replacing + with ⊕). If T satisfies condition (I), then $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to a fixed point of T.
Proof Let $p\in Fix(T)$. By using Lemma 2.4, we have
and
So that
This implies that
and so
Thus, ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},{z}_{n})=0$. Also, $dist({x}_{n},T({x}_{n}))\le d({x}_{n},{z}_{n})\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$. Since T satisfies condition (I), we have ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}dist({x}_{n},Fix(T))=0$. The proof of the remaining part follows the proof of Theorem 3.2 in [38], therefore we omit it. □
Theorem 3.3 Let $(X,d)$ be a complete CAT(1) space with convex metric and $diam(X)<\pi /2$, E be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and $T:E\to \mathcal{C}(E)$ be a quasinonexpansive mapping with $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and $T(p)=\{p\}$ for each $p\in Fix(T)$. Assume that (i) $0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$; (ii) ${\beta}_{n}\to 0$; (iii) $\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$, and let $\{{x}_{n}\}$ be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by (A) (replacing + with ⊕). If T is hemicompact and continuous, then $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to a fixed point of T.
Proof Let $p\in Fix(T)$. By (1) we have
By Lemma 2.5, there exist subsequences $\{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\}$ and $\{{z}_{{n}_{k}}\}$ of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ and $\{{z}_{n}\}$ respectively such that ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{{n}_{k}},{z}_{{n}_{k}})=0$. Hence
Since T is hemicompact, by passing through a subsequence, we may assume that ${x}_{{n}_{k}}\to q$ for some $q\in E$. Since T is continuous,
This implies that $q\in Fix(T)$ since $T(q)$ is closed. Thus ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},q)$ exists by Lemma 3.1 and hence q is the limit of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ itself. □
To avoid the restriction of T, that is, $T(p)=\{p\}$ for $p\in Fix(T)$, we use the iteration process defined by (B).
Theorem 3.4 Let $(X,d)$ be a complete CAT(1) space with convex metric and $diam(X)<\pi /2$, E be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and $T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$ be a multivalued mapping with $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and ${P}_{T}$ is quasinonexpansive. Let ${\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}\in [a,b]\subset (0,1)$ and $\{{x}_{n}\}$ be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by (B) (replacing + with ⊕). If T satisfies condition (I), then $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to a fixed point of T.
Proof It follows from Lemma 2.2 that $dist(x,{P}_{T}(x))=dist(x,T(x))$ for all $x\in E$,
Since T satisfies condition (I), for each $x\in E$ we have
That is, ${P}_{T}$ satisfies condition (I). Next, we show that ${P}_{T}(x)$ is closed for any $x\in E$. Let $\{{y}_{n}\}\subset {P}_{T}(x)$ and ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{y}_{n}=y$ for some $y\in E$. Then
It follows that $d(x,y)=dist(x,T(x))$ and this implies $y\in {P}_{T}(x)$. Applying Theorem 3.2 to the map ${P}_{T}$, we can conclude that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ defined by (B) converges to a point $z\in Fix({P}_{T})=Fix(T)$. This completes the proof. □
The following theorem is an analogue of Theorem 3 in [39].
Theorem 3.5 Let $(X,d)$ be a complete CAT(1) space with convex metric and $diam(X)<\pi /2$, E be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and $T:E\to \mathcal{P}(E)$ be a hemicompact mapping with $Fix(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and ${P}_{T}$ is quasinonexpansive and continuous. Assume that (i) $0\le {\alpha}_{n},{\beta}_{n}<1$; (ii) ${\beta}_{n}\to 0$; (iii) $\sum {\alpha}_{n}{\beta}_{n}=\mathrm{\infty}$, and let $\{{x}_{n}\}$ be the sequence of Ishikawa iterates defined by (B) (replacing + with ⊕). Then $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to a fixed point of T.
Proof As in the proof of Theorem 3.4, we have
The hemicompactness of ${P}_{T}$ follows from that of T. The conclusion follows from Theorem 3.3. □
References
 1.
Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. Colecc. Abierta 64. In Seminar of Mathematical Analysis(Malaga/Seville, 2002/2003). Univ. Sevilla Secr. Publ., Seville; 2003:195–225.
 2.
Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory II. In International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Applications. Yokohama Publ., Yokohama; 2004:113–142.
 3.
Dhompongsa S, Kaewkhao A, Panyanak B: Lim’s theorems for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 312: 478–487. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.055
 4.
Chaoha P, Phonon A: A note on fixed point sets in CAT(0) spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 320: 983–987. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.08.006
 5.
Leustean L: A quadratic rate of asymptotic regularity for CAT(0)spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 325: 386–399. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.081
 6.
Shahzad N, Markin J: Invariant approximations for commuting mappings in CAT(0) and hyperconvex spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 337: 1457–1464. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.04.041
 7.
Espinola R, FernandezLeon A:$CAT(\kappa )$spaces, weak convergence and fixed points. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 353: 410–427. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.12.015
 8.
Khan AR, Khamsi MA, Fukharuddin H: Strong convergence of a general iteration scheme in CAT(0) spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 783–791. 10.1016/j.na.2010.09.029
 9.
Abkar A, Eslamian M: Common fixed point results in CAT(0) spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 1835–1840. 10.1016/j.na.2010.10.056
 10.
Piatek B:Halpern iteration in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2011, 27: 635–646. 10.1007/s1011401193127
 11.
He JS, Fang DH, Lopez G, Li C:Mann’s algorithm for nonexpansive mappings in $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 445–452. 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.070
 12.
Kimura Y, Sato K: Convergence of subsets of a complete geodesic space with curvature bounded above. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 5079–5085. 10.1016/j.na.2012.04.024
 13.
Bridson M, Haefliger A: Metric Spaces of Nonpositive Curvature. Springer, Berlin; 1999.
 14.
Espinola R, Lorenzo P, Nicolae A: Fixed points, selections and common fixed points for nonexpansivetype mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 382: 503–515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.039
 15.
Ishikawa S: Fixed points by a new iteration method. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974, 44: 147–150. 10.1090/S00029939197403364695
 16.
Ishikawa S: Fixed points and iteration of a nonexpansive mapping in a Banach space. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1976, 59: 65–71. 10.1090/S0002993919760412909X
 17.
Chidume CE: On the Ishikawa fixed points iterations for quasicontractive mappings. J. Niger. Math. Soc. 1985, 4: 1–11.
 18.
Kalinde AK, Rhoades BE: Fixed point Ishikawa iterations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1992, 170: 600–606. 10.1016/0022247X(92)90040K
 19.
Tan KK, Xu HK: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iteration process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 178: 301–308. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1309
 20.
Ghosh MK, Debnath L: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates of quasinonexpansive mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 207: 96–103. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5268
 21.
Takahashi W, Kim GE: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Math. Jpn. 1998, 48: 1–9.
 22.
Osilike MO: Strong and weak convergence of the Ishikawa iteration method for a class of nonlinear equations. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2000, 37: 153–169.
 23.
Liu Z, Kim JK, Ume JS: Characterizations for the convergence of Ishikawa iterative processes with errors in normed linear spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2002, 3: 59–66.
 24.
Sahu DR: On generalized Ishikawa iteration process and nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Demonstr. Math. 2003, 36: 721–734.
 25.
Kim GE, Kiuchi H, Takahashi W: Weak and strong convergences of Ishikawa iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2004, 60: 95–106.
 26.
Cho YJ, Li J, Huang NJ: Random Ishikawa iterative sequence with errors for approximating random fixed points. Taiwan. J. Math. 2008, 12: 51–61.
 27.
Peng JW, Yao JC: Ishikawa iterative algorithms for a generalized equilibrium problem and fixed point problems of a pseudocontraction mapping. J. Glob. Optim. 2010, 46: 331–345. 10.1007/s1089800994289
 28.
Zegeye H, Shahzad N, Alghamdi MA: Convergence of Ishikawa’s iteration method for pseudocontractive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 7304–7311. 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.048
 29.
Sastry KPR, Babu GVR: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates for a multivalued mapping with a fixed point. Czechoslov. Math. J. 2005, 55: 817–826. 10.1007/s105870050068z
 30.
Panyanak B: Mann and Ishikawa iterative processes for multivalued mappings in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2007, 54: 872–877. 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.03.012
 31.
Song Y, Wang H: Erratum to “Mann and Ishikawa iterative processes for multivalued mappings in Banach spaces”. Comput. Math. Appl. 2008, 52: 2999–3002.
 32.
Shahzad N, Zegeye H: Strong convergence results for nonself multimaps in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2008, 136: 539–548.
 33.
Laowang W, Panyanak B: Strong and Δ convergence theorems for multivalued mapping in CAT(0) spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 730132
 34.
Sokhuma K, Kaewkhao A: Ishikawa iterative process for a pair of singlevalued and multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 618767
 35.
Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive multimaps in Banach spaces. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2010, 26: 1165–1176. 10.1007/s1011401075210
 36.
Cholamjiak W, Suantai S: Approximation of common fixed points of two quasinonexpansive multivalued maps in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 941–949. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.042
 37.
Shahzad N, Zegeye H: On Mann and Ishikawa iteration schemes for multivalued maps in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 838–844. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.112
 38.
Puttasontiphot T: Mann and Ishikawa iteration schemes for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces. Appl. Math. Sci. 2010, 4: 3005–3018.
 39.
Song Y, Cho YJ: Some notes on Ishikawa iteration for multivalued mappings. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2011, 48: 575–584. 10.4134/BKMS.2011.48.3.575
 40.
Ohta S: Convexities of metric spaces. Geom. Dedic. 2007, 125: 225–250. 10.1007/s1071100791593
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Chiang Mai University for financial support.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The author completed the paper himself. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Panyanak, B. On the Ishikawa iteration processes for multivalued mappings in some $CAT(\kappa )$ spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014, 1 (2014) doi:10.1186/1687181220141
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 fixed point
 multivalued mapping
 strong convergence
 Ishikawa iteration
 $CAT(\kappa )$ space