Skip to main content

A note on Caristi-type cyclic maps: related results and applications

Abstract

In this note, we first introduce the concept of Caristi-type cyclic map and present a new convergence theorem and a best proximity point theorem for Caristi-type cyclic maps. It should be mentioned that in our results, the dominated functions need not possess the lower semicontinuity property. Some best proximity point results and convergence theorems in the literature have been derived from our main results. Consequently, the presented results improve, extend and generalize some of the existence results on the topic.

MSC:37C25, 47H09, 45H10, 54H25.

1 Introduction and preliminaries

Cyclic maps were introduced by Kirk, Srinavasan and Veeramani [1] in 2003 to extend the celebrated Banach contraction principle [2]: In a complete metric space (X,d), every contraction T:XX has a unique fixed point. In this principle, the mapping T is necessarily continuous. In the context of cyclic mapping, the authors [1] observed the analog of Banach contraction principle for discontinuous mapping. Cyclic maps and related fixed point theorems have been investigated densely by a number of authors who have been interested in nonlinear analysis.

Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a nonempty set S. A map T:ABAB is called a cyclic map if T(A)B and T(B)A. Let (X,d) be a metric space and T:ABAB be a cyclic map. We denote the distance of the nonempty subsets A and B of X by

dist(A,B)=inf { d ( x , y ) : x A , y B } .

A point xAB is said to be a best proximity point for T if d(x,Tx)=dist(A,B). A map T:ABAB is called a cyclic contraction if the following conditions hold:

  1. (i)

    T(A)B and T(B)A;

  2. (ii)

    There exists k(0,1) such that d(Tx,Ty)kd(x,y)+(1k)dist(A,B) for all xA,yB.

In the last decade, a number of generalizations in various directions on the existence and uniqueness of a best proximity point were investigated by several authors (see, e.g., [1, 313] and references therein). In particular, Eldred and Veeramani [3] obtained the following interesting best proximity point result.

Theorem 1.1 ([[3], Proposition 3.2])

Let A and B be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X. Let T:ABAB be a cyclic contraction map, x 1 A and define x n + 1 =T x n , nN. Suppose that { x 2 n 1 } has a convergent subsequence in A. Then there exists xA such that d(x,Tx)=dist(A,B).

In 1976, Caristi [14] proved the following remarkable result that is one of the most valuable and applicable generalizations of the Banach contraction principle.

Theorem 1.2 (Caristi’s fixed point theorem [14])

Let (X,d) be a complete metric space and f:XR be a lower semicontinuous and bounded below function. Suppose that T is a Caristi-type map on X dominated by f; that is, T satisfies

d(x,Tx)f(x)f(Tx)for each xX.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Caristi’s fixed point theorem has various applications in nonlinear sciences since it is an important diversity and equivalence of Ekeland’s variational principle [15, 16] and Takahashi’s nonconvex minimization theorem [17, 18]. Due to its application potential, Caristi’s fixed point theorem has been investigated, extended, generalized and improved in various ways by several authors; see, e.g., [1726] and references therein. Very recently, in [25], the first author established some new fixed point theorems for Caristi-type maps. Indeed, the author [25] considered some suitable generalized distances without assuming that the dominated functions possess the lower semicontinuity property. More precisely, he utilized the new versions of Caristi-type fixed point theorem to deal with the existence results for any map T satisfying

d(Tx,Ty)α ( d ( x , y ) ) d(x,y)for all x,yX,

where α:[0,)[0,1) is a function satisfying lim sup s t + α(s)<1 for all t[0,); for more detail, one can refer to [25].

In this note, we first introduce the concept of Caristi-type cyclic map and present a new convergence theorem to achieve a best proximity point theorem for Caristi-type cyclic maps. It should be mentioned that in this paper we remove the lower semicontinuity property of the dominated functions in Caristi-type cyclic maps. As interesting applications of our results, we show that some results in the literature, such as [3, 12] and others, are concluded from both the new convergence theorem and the best proximity point theorem. The results of this paper extend, improve and generalize some well-known results on the topic in the literature.

2 New results for Caristi-type cyclic maps

Throughout this paper, we denote by and the sets of positive integers and real numbers, respectively. Let (X,d) be a metric space. An extended real-valued function ϕ:X(,+] is said to be lower semicontinuous (l.s.c. for short) at wX if for any sequence { x n } in X with x n w as n, we have ϕ(w) lim inf n ϕ( x n ). The function ϕ is called to be l.s.c. on X if ϕ is l.s.c. at every point of X. The function ϕ is said to be proper if ϕ+.

In this paper, we first introduce the concept of Caristi-type cyclic map.

Definition 2.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and f:AB(,+] and φ:R(0,+) be functions. A self-map T:ABAB is called a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ on AB if the following conditions are satisfied :

  1. (CC1)

    T(A)B and T(B)A,

  2. (CC2)

    d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)φ(f(x))(f(x)f(Tx)) for all xAB.

In particular, if condition (CC2) is replaced with the following condition:

(CC3) d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)f(x)f(Tx) for all xAB (that is, φ(t)=1 for all tR in (CC2)),

then T is called a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f on AB.

Example 2.1 Let X=(10,10) with the usual metric d(x,y)=|xy|. Then (X,d) is a metric space. Let A=[1,5] and B=[5,1] be nonempty subsets of (X,d). Clearly, dist(A,B)=2. Let f:ABR and φ:R(0,+) be defined by

f(x)= { 1 2 x 12 if  x [ 1 , 3 ) , 50 8 x if  x [ 3 , 5 ] , 1 4 x 12 if  x ( 3 , 1 ] , 48 15 x if  x [ 5 , 3 ] ,

and

φ(t)=10for all tR,

respectively. Let T:ABAB be defined by

Tx=xfor all xAB.

Then T(A)B and T(B)A (i.e., (CC1) holds). We claim that T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ, but not a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f. We consider the following four possible cases.

Case 1. For x[1,3), we have

d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) = 2 x 2 < 10 ( 1 4 x ) = φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) .

Case 2. For x[3,5], we have

d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) = 2 x 2 < 10 ( 7 x + 2 ) = φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) .

Case 3. For x(3,1], we have

d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) = 2 x 2 < 10 ( 1 4 x ) = φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) .

Case 4. For x[5,3], we have

d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) = 2 x 2 < 10 ( 7 x 2 ) = φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) .

By Cases 1-4, we verify that

d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) for all xAB,

that is, (CC2) holds. So, T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Notice that

d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)=2x2> 1 4 x=f(x)f(Tx)for all x[2,3),

which means that (CC3) does not hold. Therefore T is not a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f.

The following convergence theorem is one of the main results of this paper.

Theorem 2.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). Assume that φ:R(0,+) is a nondecreasing function and f:AB(,+] is a proper function which is bounded below. If T:ABAB is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ, then for any uAB with f(u)<+, the sequence { x n } n N in AB defined by x 1 =u and x n + 1 =T x n for nN satisfies the following conditions:

  1. (a)

    f( x n + 1 )f( x n )<+ for each nN,

  2. (b)

    d( x n , x n + 1 )dist(A,B)φ(f( x n ))(f( x n )f( x n + 1 )) for all nN,

  3. (c)

    lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=dist(A,B).

Proof Let S={xAB:f(x)<+}. Since f is proper, S. Let uS. Define x 1 =u and x n + 1 =T x n = T n u for each nN. Clearly, we have f( x 1 )<+ for x 1 =u. Without loss of generality, we may assume x 1 A. By (CC1), we have x 2 n 1 A and x 2 n B for all nN. Clearly,

dist(A,B)d( x n , x n + 1 )for all nN.
(2.1)

From (CC2) we have

d ( x 1 , x 2 ) dist ( A , B ) = d ( x 1 , T x 1 ) dist ( A , B ) φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) ( f ( x 1 ) f ( T x 1 ) ) = φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) ( f ( x 1 ) f ( x 2 ) ) ,

which implies

f( x 2 )f( x 1 )<+.

Similarly, we have

d( x 2 , x 3 )dist(A,B)φ ( f ( x 2 ) ) ( f ( x 2 ) f ( x 3 ) )

and

f( x 3 )f( x 2 )f( x 1 )<+.

Hence, by induction, we can obtain the following inequalities:

d( x n , x n + 1 )dist(A,B)φ ( f ( x n ) ) ( f ( x n ) f ( x n + 1 ) )
(2.2)

and

f( x n + 1 )f( x n )<+for each nN.
(2.3)

Consequently, we have that (a) and (b) hold. Finally, let us prove (c). Since f is bounded below,

γ:= lim n f( x n )= inf n N f( x n ) exists.
(2.4)

Since φ is nondecreasing, by (2.3), we have

φ ( f ( x n ) ) φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) for all nN.
(2.5)

Taking into account (2.1), (2.2), (2.4) and (2.5), we get

dist(A,B)d( x n , x n + 1 )φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) ( f ( x n ) γ ) +dist(A,B).

Since lim n f( x n )=γ, the last inequality implies

lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=dist(A,B).

So, we conclude that (c) holds. The proof is completed. □

Applying Theorem 2.1, we establish the following new best proximity point theorem for Caristi-type cyclic maps.

Theorem 2.2 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). Suppose that φ:R(0,+) is a nondecreasing function and f:AB(,+] is a proper function that is bounded below. Let uA with f(u)<+ and T:ABAB be a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Define a sequence { x n } n N in AB by x 1 =u and x n + 1 =T x n for nN. Suppose that one of the following conditions is satisfied:

  1. (H1)

    T is continuous on AB;

  2. (H2)

    d(Tx,Ty)d(x,y) for any xA and yB;

  3. (H3)

    The map g:X[0,) defined by g(x)=d(x,Tx) is l.s.c.

Then the following statements hold.

  1. (a)

    If { x 2 n 1 } has a convergent subsequence in A, then there exists vA such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

  2. (b)

    If { x 2 n } has a convergent subsequence in B, then there exists vB such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

Proof Applying Theorem 2.1, we have

lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=dist(A,B).
(2.6)

Since x 1 =uA, we have x 2 n 1 A and x 2 n B for all nN. Let us prove the conclusion (a). Assume that { x 2 n 1 } has a convergent subsequence { x 2 n k 1 } in A. Hence there exists vA such that x 2 n k 1 v as k or

lim k d(v, x 2 n k 1 )=0.
(2.7)

Clearly, we have

dist(A,B)d(v, x 2 n k )d(v, x 2 n k 1 )+d( x 2 n k 1 , x 2 n k )for all kN.
(2.8)

Taking into account (2.6), (2.7) and (2.8), we get

lim n d(v, x 2 n k )=dist(A,B).
(2.9)

Now, we verify d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B). Suppose that (H1) holds. By the continuity of T, we derive

x 2 n k =T x 2 n k 1 Tvas k.
(2.10)

By (2.9) and (2.10), we get d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

If (H2) holds, since

dist(A,B)d(Tv, x 2 n k + 1 )d(v, x 2 n k )for all kN

and (2.9), we find that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

Finally, assume that (H3) holds. By the lower semicontinuity of g, x 2 n k 1 v as k and (2.6), we obtain

dist ( A , B ) d ( v , T v ) = g ( v ) lim inf k g ( x 2 n k 1 ) = lim k d ( x 2 n k 1 , x 2 n k ) = dist ( A , B ) ,

which implies d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

Following a similar argument as in the proof of (a), one can also show the desired conclusion (b). □

Here, we give an example illustrating Theorem 2.2.

Example 2.2 Let X, A, B, f, φ and T be the same as in Example 2.1. Hence T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Note that f is not lower semicontinuous at x=3 and −3, so f is not lower semicontinuous on AB. Since f(x)100 for all xAB, f is a bounded below function on AB. By the definition of T, we know that T is continuous on AB. Hence (H1) as in Theorem 2.2 holds. It is obvious that

d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) =d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) =2=dist(A,B).

On the other hand, let x 1 =1A and x n + 1 =T x n for nN. Then we have x 2 n 1 =1A and x 2 n =1B for all nN. So { x 2 n 1 } and { x 2 n } have convergent subsequences in A and B, respectively. Therefore, all the assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied. Applying Theorem 2.2, we also prove that there exist vA and wB (precisely speaking, v=1 and w=1) such that d(v,Tv)=d(w,Tw)=dist(A,B).

3 Some applications

A function α: [0,)[0,1) is said to be an MT-function (or -function) [12, 2530] if lim sup s t + α(s)<1 for all t[0,). It is obvious that if α: [0,)[0,1) is a nondecreasing function or a nonincreasing function, then α is an MT-function. So the set of MT-functions is a rich class.

Recently, Du [28] first proved the following characterizations of MT-functions which are quite useful for proving our main results.

Theorem D ([[28], Theorem 2.1])

Let α:[0,)[0,1) be a function. Then the following statements are equivalent.

  1. (a)

    α is an MT-function.

  2. (b)

    For each t[0,), there exist r t ( 1 ) [0,1) and ε t ( 1 ) >0 such that α(s) r t ( 1 ) for all s(t,t+ ε t ( 1 ) ).

  3. (c)

    For each t[0,), there exist r t ( 2 ) [0,1) and ε t ( 2 ) >0 such that α(s) r t ( 2 ) for all s[t,t+ ε t ( 2 ) ].

  4. (d)

    For each t[0,), there exist r t ( 3 ) [0,1) and ε t ( 3 ) >0 such that α(s) r t ( 3 ) for all s(t,t+ ε t ( 3 ) ].

  5. (e)

    For each t[0,), there exist r t ( 4 ) [0,1) and ε t ( 4 ) >0 such that α(s) r t ( 4 ) for all s[t,t+ ε t ( 4 ) ).

  6. (f)

    For any nonincreasing sequence { x n } n N in [0,), we have 0 sup n N α( x n )<1.

  7. (g)

    α is a function of contractive factor; that is, for any strictly decreasing sequence { x n } n N in [0,), we have 0 sup n N α( x n )<1.

Let us recall the concept of MT-cyclic contractions introduced first by Du and Lakzian [12].

Definition 3.1 [12]

Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). If a map T:ABAB satisfies

  1. (MT1)

    T(A)B and T(B)A;

  2. (MT2)

    there exists an MT-function α: [0,)[0,1) such that

    d(Tx,Ty)α ( d ( x , y ) ) d(x,y)+ ( 1 α ( d ( x , y ) ) ) dist(A,B)for any xA and yB,

then T is called an MT-cyclic contraction with respect to α on AB.

The following example shows that there exists an MT-cyclic contraction which is not a cyclic contraction.

Example 3.1 [12]

Let X={ v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ,} be a countable set and { τ n } be a strictly increasing convergent sequence of positive real numbers. Denote by τ := lim n τ n . Then τ 2 < τ . Let d:X×X[0,) be defined by d( v n , v n )=0 for all nN and d( v n , v m )=d( v m , v n )= τ m if m>n. Then d is a metric on X. Set A={ v 1 , v 3 , v 5 ,}, B={ v 2 , v 4 , v 6 ,}. Define a map T:ABAB by

T v n = def { v 2 if  n = 1 , v n 1 if  n > 1

for nN and define α:[0,)[0,1) by

α(t) = def { τ n 1 τ n if  t = τ n  for some  n N  with  n > 2 , 0 otherwise .

Then T is an MT-cyclic contraction with respect to α, but not a cyclic contraction on AB.

The following result tells us the relation between an MT-cyclic contraction and a Caristi-type cyclic map.

Theorem 3.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:ABAB be an MT-cyclic contraction with respect to α. Then there exist a bounded below function f:ABR and a nondecreasing function φ:R(0,+) such that T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ.

Proof Denote T 0 =I (the identity mapping). Let xAB be given. Define a sequence { w n } n N in AB by w 1 =x and w n =T w n = T n 1 x for nN. Clearly, the condition (MT2) implies that T satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)d(x,y)for any xA and yB.

So from the last inequality we deduce

d( w n + 1 , w n + 2 )d( w n , w n + 1 )for all nN.

Hence the sequence {d( w n , w n + 1 )} is nonincreasing in [0,). Since α is an MT-function, by (g) of Theorem D, we obtain

0 sup n N α ( d ( w n , w n + 1 ) ) <1.

Since xAB is arbitrary, we can define a new function β:AB[0,1) by

β(x):= sup n N α ( d ( w n , w n + 1 ) ) = sup n N α ( d ( T n 1 x , T n x ) ) for xAB.

Clearly, for each xAB, we have

β(Tx)β(x)
(3.1)

and

α ( d ( T n 1 x , T n x ) ) β(x)for all nN.
(3.2)

Let xAB be given. Without loss of generality, we may assume xA. Then TxB. By (MT2), we get

d ( T x , T 2 x ) dist(A,B)α ( d ( x , T x ) ) ( d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) )

and hence

d(x,Tx)α ( d ( x , T x ) ) ( d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) ) d(x,Tx)d ( T x , T 2 x ) +dist(A,B).
(3.3)

By exploiting inequalities (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), we obtain

d ( x , T x ) dist ( A , B ) 1 1 α ( d ( x , T x ) ) d ( x , T x ) 1 1 α ( d ( x , T x ) ) d ( T x , T 2 x ) 1 1 β ( x ) d ( x , T x ) 1 1 β ( T x ) d ( T x , T 2 x ) .

Let φ:R[0,+) and f:ABR be defined by

φ(t)=1for tR

and

f(x)= 1 1 β ( x ) d(x,Tx)for xAB,

respectively. Then φ is a nondecreasing function and f is a bounded below function. Clearly, f(x)<+ for all xAB. From (3.3), we obtain

d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) for all xAB,

which means that T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. □

Theorem 3.2 [12]

Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:ABAB be an MT-cyclic contraction with respect to α. Then there exists a sequence { x n } n N such that

lim n d( x n ,T x n )= inf n N d( x n ,T x n )=dist(A,B).

Proof Applying Theorem 3.1, there exist a bounded below function f:ABR and a nondecreasing function φ:R(0,+) such that T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Let uAB be given. Let { x n } n N AB be defined by x 1 =u and x n + 1 =T x n for nN. Applying Theorem 2.1, we have

lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=dist(A,B).
(3.4)

Since the condition (MT2) implies that T satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)d(x,y)for any xA and yB,

we know that the sequence {d( x n , x n + 1 )} is nonincreasing in [0,). By (3.4), we get

dist(A,B)= lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )= inf n N d( x n , x n + 1 )0.

The proof is completed. □

Theorem 3.3 [12]

Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:ABAB be an MT-cyclic contraction with respect to α. For a given x 1 A, define an iterative sequence { x n } n N by x n + 1 =T x n for nN. Suppose that { x 2 n 1 } has a convergent subsequence in A, then there exists vA such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

Proof Applying Theorem 3.1, there exist a bounded below function f:ABR and a nondecreasing function φ:R(0,+) such that T is a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Let u= x 1 A be given. Let { x n } n N AB be defined by x n + 1 =T x n for nN. Since the condition (MT2) implies the condition (H2) as in Theorem 2.2, all the assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied. By applying (a) of Theorem 2.2, there exists vA such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B). □

Remark 3.1 ([[3], Proposition 3.2])

(i.e., Theorem 1.1) is a special case of Theorem 3.3.

Finally, applying Theorem 2.1, we can establish a new Caristi-type fixed point theorem without assuming that the dominated functions possess the lower semicontinuity property.

Theorem 3.4 Let M be a nonempty subset of a metric space (X,d), f:M(,+] be a proper and bounded below function, φ:R(0,+) be a nondecreasing function and T:MM be a selfmap on X. Suppose that T is of Caristi type on M dominated by φ and f, that is,

d(x,Tx)φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) for each xM.
(3.5)

Then there exists a sequence { x n } n N in M such that { x n } n N is Cauchy.

Moreover, if (X,d) is complete and M is closed in X, and one of the following conditions is satisfied:

  1. (D1)

    T is continuous on M;

  2. (D2)

    T is closed, that is, GrT={(x,y)M×M:y=Tx}, the graph of T, is closed in M×M;

  3. (D3)

    T he map g:X[0,) defined by g(x)=d(x,Tx) is l.s.c.

Then the mapping T admits a fixed point in X, and for any uX with f(u)<+, the sequence { T n u } n N converges to a fixed point of T.

Proof Let A=B=M. Then we have AB=M, T(A)B, T(B)A and dist(A,B)=0. So (3.5) implies

d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)φ ( f ( x ) ) ( f ( x ) f ( T x ) ) for all xAB=M.

Hence T a Caristi-type cyclic map dominated by f and φ on AB. Since f is proper, there exists uM=AB such that f(u)<+. Let { x n } n N M be defined by x 1 =u and x n + 1 =T x n for nN. By applying Theorem 2.1, we have

  1. (a)

    f( x n + 1 )f( x n )<+ for each nN,

  2. (b)

    d( x n , x n + 1 )φ(f( x n ))(f( x n )f( x n + 1 )) for all nN,

  3. (c)

    lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=0.

Since φ is nondecreasing, by (a), we have

φ ( f ( x n ) ) φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) for all nN.
(3.6)

Since f is bounded below and the sequence { f ( x n ) } n N is nonincreasing in [0,+),

γ:= lim n f( x n )= inf n N f( x n ) exists.
(3.7)

For m>n with m,nN, taking into account (3.5), (3.6) and (3.7), we get

d( x n , x m ) j = n m 1 d( x j , x j + 1 )φ ( f ( x 1 ) ) ( f ( x n ) γ ) .

Let λ n =φ(f( x 1 ))(f( x n )γ), nN. Then

sup { d ( x n , x m ) : m > n } λ n for each nN.
(3.8)

Since lim n f( x n )=γ, lim n λ n =0. From (3.8) we obtain

lim n sup { d ( x n , x m ) : m > n } =0,

which proves that { x n } n N is a Cauchy sequence in M.

Moreover, assume that (X,d) is complete and M is closed in X. So (M,d) is a complete metric space. By the completeness of M, there exists v u M such that x n v u as n. We claim v u F(T). If (D1) holds, since T is continuous on M, x n + 1 =T x n for each nN and x n v u as n, we get

v u = lim n x n = lim n x n + 1 = lim n T x n =T ( lim n x n ) =T v u ,

If (D2) holds, since T is closed, x n + 1 =T x n for each nN and x n v u as n, we have T v u = v u . Finally, assume that (D3) holds. Since lim n d( x n , x n + 1 )=0, we obtain

d ( v u , T v u ) = g ( v u ) lim inf n g ( x n ) = lim n d ( x n , x n + 1 ) = 0 ,

we obtain d( v u ,T v u )=0 and hence T v u = v u . This completes the proof. □

References

  1. 1.

    Kirk WA, Srinivasan PS, Veeramani P: Fixed points for mappings satisfying cyclical contractive conditions. Fixed Point Theory 2003, 4: 79–89.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Banach S: Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux equations itegrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anthony Eldred A, Veeramani P: Existence and convergence of best proximity points. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 323: 1001–1006. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.10.081

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Anthony Eldred A, Anuradha J, Veeramani P: On the equivalence of the Mizoguchi-Takahashi fixed point theorem to Nadler’s theorem. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 1539–1542. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.03.022

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Al-Thagafi MA, Shahzad N: Convergence and existence results for best proximity points. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 3665–3671. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.022

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Suzuki T, Kikkawa M, Vetro C: The existence of the best proximity points in metric spaces with the property UC. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 2918–2926. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.173

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jleli M, Karapinar E, Samet B: On best proximity points under the P -property on partially ordered metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 150970 10.1155/2013/150970

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Karapinar E: On best proximity point of ψ -Geraghty contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 200 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-200

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jleli M, Karapinar E, Samet B: Best proximity points for generalized α - ψ -proximal contractive type mappings. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 534127 10.1155/2013/534127

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Karapinar E, Petruşel G, Tas K: Best proximity point theorems for KT-types cyclic orbital contraction mappings. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 13(2):537–546.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Karapinar E: Best proximity points of cyclic mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 1761–1766. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.02.008

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Du W-S, Lakzian H: Nonlinear conditions for the existence of best proximity points. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 206 10.1186/1029-242X-2012-206

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gabeleh M, Shahzad N: Existence and convergence theorems of best proximity points. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 101439 10.1155/2013/101439

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Caristi J: Fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying inwardness conditions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1976, 215: 241–251.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ekeland I: On the variational principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1974, 47: 324–353. 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90025-0

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ekeland I: Nonconvex minimization problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1979, 1: 443–474. 10.1090/S0273-0979-1979-14595-6

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Takahashi W: Existence theorems generalizing fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings. Pitmam Research Notes in Mathematics Series 252. In Fixed Point Theory and Applications. Edited by: Théra MA, Baillon JB. Longman, Harlow; 1991:397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Takahashi W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Khamsi MA: Remarks on Caristi’s fixed point theorem. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 227–231. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.042

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jachymski JR: Caristi’s fixed point theorem and selections of set-valued contractions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 227: 55–67. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.6074

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kirk WA, Saliga LM: The Brézis-Browder order principle and extensions of Caristi’s theorem. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 47: 2765–2778. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00395-9

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Petrusşel A, Sîntămărian A: Single-valued and multi-valued Caristi type operators. Publ. Math. (Debr.) 2002, 60: 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Feng Y, Liu S: Fixed point theorems for multi-valued contractive mappings and multi-valued Caristi type mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 317: 103–112. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.004

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Karapinar E: Generalizations of Caristi Kirk’s theorem on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 4

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Du W-S: On Caristi type maps and generalized distances with applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 407219 10.1155/2013/407219

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Du W-S: On generalized weakly directional contractions and approximate fixed point property with applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 6 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-6

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Du W-S: Some new results and generalizations in metric fixed point theory. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73: 1439–1446. 10.1016/j.na.2010.05.007

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Du W-S: On coincidence point and fixed point theorems for nonlinear multivalued maps. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159: 49–56. 10.1016/j.topol.2011.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Du W-S: New existence results and generalizations for coincidence points and fixed points without global completeness. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 214230 10.1155/2013/214230

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lin I-J, Chen T-H: New existence theorems of coincidence points approach to generalizations of Mizoguchi-Takahashi’s fixed point theorem. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 124156 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author was supported by Grant No. NSC 102-2115-M-017-001 of the National Science Council of the Republic of China.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Shih Du.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, WS., Karapinar, E. A note on Caristi-type cyclic maps: related results and applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-344

Download citation

Keywords

  • best proximity point
  • Caristi-type cyclic map
  • MT-function (-function)
  • MT-cyclic contraction
  • Caristi-type fixed point theorem
\