- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings in metric spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 268 (2013)
Abstract
A notion of α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings is introduced. Some new fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings are established. An application to integral equations is given.
MSC:47H10, 54H25.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Banach’s contraction principle [1] is one of the pivotal results in nonlinear analysis. Banach’s contraction principle and its generalizations have many applications in solving nonlinear functional equations. In a metric space setting, it can be stated as follows.
Theorem 1.1 Let be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping satisfies
where .
Then T has a unique fixed point in X.
Ćirić [2] introduced quasi contraction, which is one of the most general contraction conditions.
Theorem 1.2 Let be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all , where .
Then T has a unique fixed point in X.
In [3], Berinde generalized Ćirić’s result.
Theorem 1.3 Let be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all , where is nondecreasing and continuous such that for all .
If T has bounded orbits, then T has a unique fixed point in X.
Recently, Samet et al. [4] introduced the notion of α-ψ contractive mapping and gave some fixed point theorems for such mappings. Then, Asl et al. [5] gave generalizations of some of the results in [4], and Mohammadi et al. [6] generalized the results in [5].
The purpose of the paper is to introduce a concept of α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings and to give some new fixed point theorems for such mappings.
2 Fixed point theorems
Let Ψ be the family of all nondecreasing functions such that
for all .
Lemma 2.1 If , then the following are satisfied.
-
(a)
for all ;
-
(b)
;
-
(c)
ψ is right continuous at .
Remark 2.1
-
(a)
If is nondecreasing such that for each , then .
-
(b)
If is upper semicontinuous such that for all , then for all .
Let be a metric space, and let be a function.
A mapping is called α-ψ-quasi contractive if there exists such that, for all ,
where .
For , we denote by the diameter of A.
Let Λ be the family of all functions .
Theorem 2.1 Let be a complete metric space, , and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that there exists such that
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous or
for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Let be such that is bounded and for all with .
Define a sequence by for .
If for some , then is a fixed point.
Assume that for all .
We now show that is a Cauchy sequence.
Let , for , and let .
We claim that for ,
If , then obviously, (2.3) holds.
Suppose that (2.3) holds when , i.e., .
Let for any . Then
Therefore, (2.3) is true for .
Hence, from (2.3), we have . Thus, is a Cauchy sequence in X. It follows from the completeness of X that there exists
If T is continuous, then , and so .
Assume that (2.2) is satisfied.
Then, , and so there exists such that for all . Thus, we have
for all , where
Assume that .
We obtain .
Using (2.4), and using upper semicontinuity of ψ, we have
Since ,
which is a contradiction. Hence, , and hence, . □
Example 2.1 Let and for all , and let
Then .
Note that ψ is not continuous at , and .
Define a mapping by
We define by
Clearly, T is an α-ψ quasi contractive mapping. Condition (2.1) holds with , and is bounded. Obviously, (2.2) is satisfied.
Applying Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point. Note that and 3 are two fixed points of T.
The following example shows that if we do not have the condition of which is bounded for some , then Theorem 2.1 does not hold. Thus, we have to have the condition above.
Example 2.2 Let , and let
for all .
Then is a complete metric space.
Let be a mapping defined by , and let for all .
Let for .
Define a function by
Then, it easy to see that .
We show that T is α-ψ-quasi contractive.
For (), we have
Hence, T is α-ψ-quasi contractive. But the orbits are not bounded, and T has no fixed points.
Corollary 2.2 Let be a complete metric space, , and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that there exists such that
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous or for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Define a sequence by for .
By assumption, . Hence, there exists such that for all ,
If , then we have
where .
Thus, we have
So we obtain
Hence, we have
From (2.6), we obtain
Thus, we have
From (2.5) and (2.7), we have for all . Hence, is bounded. By Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point in X. □
Corollary 2.3 Let be a complete metric space, , and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that , and there exists such that
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous or for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Corollary 2.4 Let be a complete ordered metric space, and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous.
Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all comparable elements . Assume that there exists such that is bounded, and and are comparable for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous, or and x are comparable for all and for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Define by
Using Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point in X. □
Remark 2.2 Let be a metric space, and let .
Consider the following conditions:
-
(1)
for each , and implies ;
-
(2)
for each , implies ;
-
(3)
there exists such that ;
-
(4)
if is a sequence with for all and , then for all ;
-
(5)
there exists such that for all with ;
-
(6)
for all cluster point x of .
Then conditions (1), (2) and (3) imply (5), and condition (4) implies (6).
Remark 2.3 If we replace condition (2.1) of Theorem 2.1 with the conditions (1), (2) and (3) above and replace condition (2.2) of Theorem 2.1 with the condition (4) above, then T has a fixed point.
Corollary 2.5 Let be a complete ordered metric space, and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that a nondecreasing mapping satisfies
for all with .
Assume that there exists such that is bounded, and . Suppose that either T is continuous or if is a sequence in X such that for all and , then for all .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Define by
Using Remark 2.3, T has a fixed point in X. □
In Theorem 2.1, if for all , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.6 Let be a complete metric space, and let be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all . If there exists such that is bounded, then T has a fixed point in X.
Remark 2.4 Corollary 2.6 is a generalization of Theorem 2 in [3].
Theorem 2.7 Let be a complete metric space, , and let . Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all .
Assume that there exists such that is bounded and
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous, or
for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Define a sequence by for all . As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, is a Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, there exists such that
If T is continuous, then is a fixed point of T.
Assume that (2.8) is satisfied.
Then, .
Let be given.
Then there exists such that and for all .
Since ψ is nondecreasing, for all .
Thus, we have
for all .
Hence, we obtain
and so . □
Remark 2.5 Theorem 2.7 is a generalization of Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 in [4].
Corollary 2.8 Let be a complete metric space, , and let . Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all .
Assume that there exists such that
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous, or for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof Define a sequence by for .
As in the proof of Corollary 2.2, is bounded. By Theorem 2.7, T has a fixed point in X. □
Corollary 2.9 Let be a complete metric space, , and let . Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all .
Assume that , and there exists such that
for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous or for any cluster point x of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Corollary 2.10 Let be a complete ordered metric space, and let . Suppose that a mapping satisfies
for all comparable elements .
Assume that there exists such that is bounded, and and are comparable for all with .
Suppose that either T is continuous or and x are comparable for all and for any cluster point X of .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Corollary 2.11 Let be a complete ordered metric space, and let . Suppose that a mapping is nondecreasing such that for all with .
Assume that there exists such that is bounded, and . Suppose that either T is continuous, or if is a sequence in X such that for all and , then for all .
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Remark 2.6 Corollary 2.10 and Corollary 2.11 are generalizations of the results of [7].
3 An application to integral equations
We consider the following integral equation:
where and are continuous.
Recall that the Bielecki-type norm on X,
where , is arbitrarily chosen.
Let for all .
Then it is well known that is a complete metric space.
Theorem 3.1 Let be a function. Suppose that the following conditions (1)-(5) are satisfied:
-
(1)
for all , and implies ;
-
(2)
for all and for all with
where such that and for all and for all ;
-
(3)
there exists such that for all ,
-
(4)
for all and for all ,
-
(5)
if is a sequence in X such that and for all , then for all .
Then the integral equation (3.1) has at least one solution .
Proof
Let such that for all .
From (2), we have
Hence, for , we obtain for all with .
We define by
Then, for all , we have
It is easy to see that conditions (1)-(4) of Remark 2.2 are satisfied. By Corollary 2.9, T has a fixed point in X. □
References
Banach S: Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.
Ćirić LB: A generalization of Banach’s contraction principle. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974, 45: 267–273.
Berinde V: A common fixed point theorem for quasi contractive type mappings. Ann. Univ. Sci. Bp. Rolando Eötvös Nomin., Sect. Math. 2003, 46: 81–90.
Samet B, Vetro C, Vetro P: Fixed point theorems for α - ψ -contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 2154–2165. 10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014
Asl JH, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: On fixed points of α - ψ -contractive multifunctions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 212
Mohammadi B, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some results on fixed points of α - ψ -Ćirić generalized multifunction. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 24 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-24
Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005, 22: 223–239. 10.1007/s11083-005-9018-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, SH., Bae, JS. Fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings in metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-268
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-268