Skip to main content

Fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings in metric spaces

Abstract

A notion of α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings is introduced. Some new fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings are established. An application to integral equations is given.

MSC:47H10, 54H25.

1 Introduction and preliminaries

Banach’s contraction principle [1] is one of the pivotal results in nonlinear analysis. Banach’s contraction principle and its generalizations have many applications in solving nonlinear functional equations. In a metric space setting, it can be stated as follows.

Theorem 1.1 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)kd(x,y)for all x,yX,

where 0k<1.

Then T has a unique fixed point in X.

Ćirić [2] introduced quasi contraction, which is one of the most general contraction conditions.

Theorem 1.2 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)kmax { d ( x , y ) , d ( x , T x ) , d ( y , T y ) , d ( x , T y ) , d ( y , T x ) }

for all x,yX, where 0k<1.

Then T has a unique fixed point in X.

In [3], Berinde generalized Ćirić’s result.

Theorem 1.3 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)ϕ ( max { d ( x , y ) , d ( x , T x ) , d ( y , T y ) , d ( x , T y ) , d ( y , T x ) } )

for all x,yX, where ϕ:[0,)[0,) is nondecreasing and continuous such that lim n ϕ n (t)=0 for all t>0.

If T has bounded orbits, then T has a unique fixed point in X.

Recently, Samet et al. [4] introduced the notion of α-ψ contractive mapping and gave some fixed point theorems for such mappings. Then, Asl et al. [5] gave generalizations of some of the results in [4], and Mohammadi et al. [6] generalized the results in [5].

The purpose of the paper is to introduce a concept of α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings and to give some new fixed point theorems for such mappings.

2 Fixed point theorems

Let Ψ be the family of all nondecreasing functions ψ:[0,)[0,) such that

lim n ψ n (t)=0

for all t>0.

Lemma 2.1 If ψΨ, then the following are satisfied.

  1. (a)

    ψ(t)<t for all t>0;

  2. (b)

    ψ(0)=0;

  3. (c)

    ψ is right continuous at t=0.

Remark 2.1

  1. (a)

    If ψ:[0,)[0,) is nondecreasing such that n = 1 ψ n (t)< for each t>0, then ψΨ.

  2. (b)

    If ψ:[0,)[0,) is upper semicontinuous such that ψ(t)<t for all t>0, then lim n ψ n (t)=0 for all t>0.

Let (X,d) be a metric space, and let α:X×X[0,) be a function.

A mapping T:XX is called α-ψ-quasi contractive if there exists ψΨ such that, for all x,yX,

α(x,y)d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( M ( x , y ) ) ,

where M(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty),d(y,Tx)}.

For AX, we denote by δ(A) the diameter of A.

Let Λ be the family of all functions α:X×X[0,).

Theorem 2.1 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that T:XX is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that there exists x 0 X such that

O( x 0 ,T;)= { T n x 0 : n = 0 , 1 , 2 , }  is bounded and α ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1
(2.1)

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous or

lim n infα ( T n x 0 , x ) 1
(2.2)

for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Let x 0 X be such that O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded and α( T i x 0 , T j x 0 )1 for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Define a sequence { x n }X by x n + 1 =T x n for nN{0}.

If x n = x n + 1 for some nN{0}, then x n is a fixed point.

Assume that x n x n + 1 for all nN{0}.

We now show that { x n } is a Cauchy sequence.

Let B n ={ x i :in}, for n=0,1,2, , and let δ( B 0 )=B.

We claim that for n=0,1,2, ,

δ( B n ) ψ n (B).
(2.3)

If n=0, then obviously, (2.3) holds.

Suppose that (2.3) holds when n=k, i.e., δ( B k ) ψ k (B).

Let x i , x j B k + 1 for any i,jk+1. Then

d ( x i , x j ) = d ( T x i 1 , T x j 1 ) α ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) d ( T x i 1 , T x j 1 ) ψ ( max { d ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) , d ( x i 1 , T x i 1 ) , d ( x j 1 , T x j 1 ) , d ( x i 1 , T x j 1 ) , d ( x j 1 , T x i 1 ) } ) = ψ ( max { d ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) , d ( x i 1 , x i ) , d ( x j 1 , x j ) , d ( x i 1 , x j ) , d ( x j 1 , x i ) } ) ψ ( δ ( B k ) ) ψ ( ψ k ( B ) ) = ψ k + 1 ( B ) .

Therefore, (2.3) is true for n=0,1,2, .

Hence, from (2.3), we have lim n δ( B n )=0. Thus, { x n } is a Cauchy sequence in X. It follows from the completeness of X that there exists

x = lim n x n X.

If T is continuous, then lim n x n =T x , and so x =T x .

Assume that (2.2) is satisfied.

Then, lim n infα( x n , x )1, and so there exists NN such that α( x n , x )1 for all n>N. Thus, we have

d ( x n + 1 , T x ) = d ( T x n , T x ) 1 α ( x n , x ) ψ ( M ( x n , x ) ) ψ ( M ( x n , x ) )
(2.4)

for all n>N, where

M( x n , x )=max { d ( x n , x ) , d ( x n , x n + 1 ) , d ( x , T x ) , d ( x n , T x ) , d ( x , x n + 1 ) } .

Assume that d( x ,T x )>0.

We obtain lim n M( x n , x )=d( x ,T x ).

Using (2.4), and using upper semicontinuity of ψ, we have

d ( x , T x ) = lim n sup d ( x n + 1 , T x ) lim n sup ψ ( M ( x n , x ) ) ψ ( d ( x , T x ) ) .

Since d( x ,T x )>0,

d( x ,T x )ψ ( d ( x , T x ) ) <d( x ,T x ),

which is a contradiction. Hence, d( x ,T x )=0, and hence, x =T x . □

Example 2.1 Let X=[0,) and d(x,y)=|xy| for all x,yX, and let

ψ(t)={ 1 3 t , if  t [ 1 , 2 ] , t 1 + t , if otherwise .

Then ψΨ.

Note that ψ is not continuous at t=1, and n = 1 ψ n ( 1 2 )= n = 1 1 2 + n =.

Define a mapping T:XX by

Tx={ x + 1 , if  x [ 0 , 1 ) , 2 1 3 x , if  x [ 1 , 2 ] , 2 x 3 , if  x ( 2 , ) .

We define α:X×X[0,) by

α(x,y)={ 1 , if  x , y [ 1 , 2 ] , 0 , if  x [ 1 , 2 ]  or  y [ 1 , 2 ] .

Clearly, T is an α-ψ quasi contractive mapping. Condition (2.1) holds with x 0 = 3 2 , and O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded. Obviously, (2.2) is satisfied.

Applying Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point. Note that 3 2 and 3 are two fixed points of T.

The following example shows that if we do not have the condition of which O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded for some x 0 X, then Theorem 2.1 does not hold. Thus, we have to have the condition above.

Example 2.2 Let X=N, and let

d(x,y)={ i = 1 k 1 i 2 ( x = n , y = n + k , k 1 ) , 0 ( x = y )

for all x,yX.

Then (X,d) is a complete metric space.

Let T:XX be a mapping defined by T(n)=n+1, and let α(x,y)=1 for all x,yX.

Let t k = i = 1 k 1 i 2 for k=1,2,3, .

Define a function ψ:[0,)[0,) by

ψ(t)={ 4 5 t ( 0 t 5 4 ) , t k t k 1 t k + 1 t k ( t t k + 1 ) + t k ( t k t t k + 1 , k = 2 , 3 , 4 , ) .

Then, it easy to see that ψΨ.

We show that T is α-ψ-quasi contractive.

For x n , x n + k X (k1), we have

α ( n , n + k ) d ( T ( n ) , T ( n + k ) ) = d ( T ( n ) , T ( n + k ) ) = d ( n + 1 , n + k + 1 ) = t k = ψ ( t k + 1 ) = ψ ( d ( n , n + k + 1 ) ) = ψ ( n , T ( n + k ) ) ψ ( M ( n , n + k ) ) .

Hence, T is α-ψ-quasi contractive. But the orbits are not bounded, and T has no fixed points.

Corollary 2.2 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that T:XX is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that there exists x 0 X such that

d( x 0 ,T x 0 )< lim ̲ t ( t ψ ( t ) ) andα ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous or lim n infα( T n x 0 ,x)1 for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Define a sequence { x n }X by x n = T n x 0 for n=1,2, .

By assumption, d( x 0 , x 1 )< lim ̲ t (tϕ(t)). Hence, there exists M>0 such that for all t>M,

d( x 0 , x 1 )<tϕ(t).
(2.5)

If 1i<jn, then we have

α ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) d ( x i , x j ) ψ ( max { d ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) , d ( x i 1 , x i ) , d ( x j 1 , x j ) , d ( x i 1 , x j ) , d ( x j 1 , x i ) } ) ψ ( v 1 ) ,

where v 1 =max{d( x i 1 , x j 1 ),d( x i 1 , x i ),d( x j 1 , x j ),d( x i 1 , x j ),d( x j 1 , x i )}δ(O( x i 1 ,T;ni+1)).

Thus, we have

d ( x i , x j ) α ( x i 1 , x j 1 ) d ( x i , x j ) ψ ( δ ( O ( x i 1 , T ; n i + 1 ) ) ) ψ ( δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) ) .
(2.6)

So we obtain

d( x i , x j )ψ ( δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) ) <δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) .

Hence, we have

δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) =max { d ( x 0 , x k ) : 1 k n } .

From (2.6), we obtain

δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) = d ( x 0 , x k ) d ( x 0 , x 1 ) + d ( x 1 , x k ) d ( x 0 , x 1 ) + ψ ( δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) ) .

Thus, we have

δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) ψ ( δ ( O ( x 0 , T ; n ) ) ) d( x 0 , x 1 ).
(2.7)

From (2.5) and (2.7), we have δ(O( x 0 ,T;n))M for all nN. Hence, O( x 0 ,T;n) is bounded. By Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point in X. □

Corollary 2.3 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that T:XX is α-ψ-quasi contractive. Assume that lim t (tψ(t))=, and there exists x 0 X such that

α ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous or lim n infα( T n x 0 ,x)1 for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 2.4 Let (X,,d) be a complete ordered metric space, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous.

Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( M ( x , y ) )

for all comparable elements x,yX. Assume that there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;n) is bounded, and T i x 0 and T j x 0 are comparable for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous, or T n x 0 and x are comparable for all nN{0} and for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Define α:X×X[0,) by

α(x,y)={ 1 ( x  and  y  are comparable ) , 0 ( otherwise ) .

Using Theorem 2.1, T has a fixed point in X. □

Remark 2.2 Let (X,d) be a metric space, and let αΛ.

Consider the following conditions:

  1. (1)

    for each x,y,zX, α(x,y)1 and α(y,z)1 implies α(x,z)1;

  2. (2)

    for each x,yX, α(x,y)1 implies α(Tx,Ty)1;

  3. (3)

    there exists x 0 X such that α( x 0 ,T x 0 )1;

  4. (4)

    if { x n } is a sequence with α( x n , x n + 1 )1 for all nN{0} and lim n x n =xX, then α( x n ,x)1 for all nN{0};

  5. (5)

    there exists x 0 X such that α( T i x 0 , T j x 0 )1 for all i,jN{0} with i<j;

  6. (6)

    liminfα( T n x 0 ,x)1 for all cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then conditions (1), (2) and (3) imply (5), and condition (4) implies (6).

Remark 2.3 If we replace condition (2.1) of Theorem 2.1 with the conditions (1), (2) and (3) above and replace condition (2.2) of Theorem 2.1 with the condition (4) above, then T has a fixed point.

Corollary 2.5 Let (X,,d) be a complete ordered metric space, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that a nondecreasing mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( M ( x , y ) )

for all x,yX with xy.

Assume that there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;n) is bounded, and x 0 T x 0 . Suppose that either T is continuous or if { x n } is a sequence in X such that x n x n + 1 for all nN and lim n x n =x, then x n x for all nN.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Define α:X×X[0,) by

α(x,y)={ 1 ( x y ) , 0 ( x y ) .

Using Remark 2.3, T has a fixed point in X. □

In Theorem 2.1, if α(x,y)=1 for all x,yX, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 2.6 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, and let ψΨ be such that ψ is upper semicontinuous. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( M ( x , y ) )

for all x,yX. If there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;n) is bounded, then T has a fixed point in X.

Remark 2.4 Corollary 2.6 is a generalization of Theorem 2 in [3].

Theorem 2.7 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

α(x,y)d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( d ( x , y ) )

for all x,yX.

Assume that there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded and

α ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous, or

liminfα ( T n x 0 , x ) >0
(2.8)

for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Define a sequence { x n }X by x n + 1 =T x n for all nN{0}. As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, { x n } is a Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, there exists x X such that

lim n x n = x .

If T is continuous, then x is a fixed point of T.

Assume that (2.8) is satisfied.

Then, L:=liminfα( x n , x )>0.

Let ϵ>0 be given.

Then there exists NN such that d( x n , x )<Lϵ and α( x n , x )>0 for all n>N.

Since ψ is nondecreasing, ψ(d( x n , x ))ψ(Lϵ) for all n>N.

Thus, we have

d ( x n + 1 , T x ) = d ( T x n , T x ) 1 α ( x n , x ) ψ ( d ( x n , x ) ) 1 α ( x n , x ) ψ ( L ϵ )

for all n>N.

Hence, we obtain

d ( x , T x ) = lim sup d ( x n + 1 , T x ) 1 lim inf α ( x n , x ) ψ ( L ϵ ) = 1 L ψ ( L ϵ ) < ϵ ,

and so x =T x . □

Remark 2.5 Theorem 2.7 is a generalization of Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 in [4].

Corollary 2.8 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

α(x,y)d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( d ( x , y ) )

for all x,yX.

Assume that there exists x 0 X such that

d( x 0 ,T x 0 )< lim ̲ t ( t ψ ( t ) ) andα ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous, or lim n infα( T n x 0 ,x)>0 for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof Define a sequence { x n }X by x n = T n x 0 for n=1,2, .

As in the proof of Corollary 2.2, O( x 0 ,T;n) is bounded. By Theorem 2.7, T has a fixed point in X. □

Corollary 2.9 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, αΛ, and let ψΨ. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

α(x,y)d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( d ( x , y ) )

for all x,yX.

Assume that lim t (tψ(t))=, and there exists x 0 X such that

α ( T i x 0 , T j x 0 ) 1

for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous or lim n infα( T n x 0 ,x)>0 for any cluster point x of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 2.10 Let (X,,d) be a complete ordered metric space, and let ψΨ. Suppose that a mapping T:XX satisfies

d(Tx,Ty)ψ ( d ( x , y ) )

for all comparable elements x,yX.

Assume that there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded, and T i x 0 and T j x 0 are comparable for all i,jN{0} with i<j.

Suppose that either T is continuous or T n x 0 and x are comparable for all nN{0} and for any cluster point X of { T n x 0 }.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 2.11 Let (X,,d) be a complete ordered metric space, and let ψΨ. Suppose that a mapping T:XX is nondecreasing such that d(Tx,Ty)ψ(d(x,y)) for all x,yX with xy.

Assume that there exists x 0 X such that O( x 0 ,T;) is bounded, and x 0 T x 0 . Suppose that either T is continuous, or if { x n } is a sequence in X such that x n x n + 1 for all nN and lim n x n =x, then x n x for all nN.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Remark 2.6 Corollary 2.10 and Corollary 2.11 are generalizations of the results of [7].

3 An application to integral equations

We consider the following integral equation:

x(t)= a t K ( t , s , x ( s ) ) ds+g(t),tI,
(3.1)

where K:I×I× R n R n and g:I R n are continuous.

Recall that the Bielecki-type norm on X,

x B = max t I | x ( t ) | e τ ( t a ) for all xX,

where τ>0, is arbitrarily chosen.

Let d B (x,y)= x y B = max t [ a , b ] |x(t)y(t)| e τ ( t a ) for all x,yX.

Then it is well known that (X, d B ) is a complete metric space.

Theorem 3.1 Let ξ: R n × R n R be a function. Suppose that the following conditions (1)-(5) are satisfied:

  1. (1)

    for all u,v,w R n , ξ(u,v)0 and ξ(v,w)0 implies ξ(u,w)0;

  2. (2)

    for all s,tI and for all u,v R n with ξ(u,v)0

    | K ( t , s , u ) K ( t , s , v ) | ψ ( | u v | ) ,

    where ψΨ such that lim t (tψ(t))= and ψ(λt)λψ(t) for all t0 and for all λ1;

  3. (3)

    there exists x 0 X such that for all tI,

    ξ ( x 0 ( t ) , a t K ( t , s , x 0 ( s ) ) d s + g ( t ) d s ) 0;
  4. (4)

    for all x,yX and for all tI,

    ξ ( x ( t ) , y ( t ) ) 0impliesξ ( a t K ( t , s , x ( s ) ) d s + g ( t ) , a t K ( t , s , y ( s ) ) d s + g ( t ) ) 0;
  5. (5)

    if { x n } is a sequence in X such that lim n x n =xX and ξ( x n , x n + 1 )0 for all nN, then ξ( x n ,x)0 for all nN.

Then the integral equation (3.1) has at least one solution x X.

Proof

Tx(t)= a t K ( t , s , x ( s ) ) ds+g(t)for all tI.

Let x,yX such that ξ(x(t),y(t))0 for all tI.

From (2), we have

| T x ( t ) T y ( t ) | = | a t [ K ( t , s , x ( s ) ) K ( t , s , y ( s ) ) ] d s | a t | K ( t , s , x ( s ) ) K ( t , s , y ( s ) ) | d s a t ψ ( | x ( s ) y ( s ) | ) d s = a t ψ ( | x ( s ) y ( s ) | e τ ( s a ) e τ ( s a ) ) d s a t e τ ( s a ) ψ ( | x ( s ) y ( s ) | e τ ( s a ) ) d s ψ ( x y B ) a t e τ ( s a ) d s 1 τ ψ ( x y B ) e τ ( s a ) for all  s I .

Hence, for τ1, we obtain d B (Tx,Ty)ψ( d B (x,y)) for all x,yX with ξ(x,y)0.

We define α:X×X[0,) by

α(x,y)={ 1 , if  ξ ( x ( t ) , y ( t ) ) 0 , t I , 0 , otherwise .

Then, for all x,yX, we have

α(x,y) d B (Tx,Ty)ψ ( d B ( x , y ) ) .

It is easy to see that conditions (1)-(4) of Remark 2.2 are satisfied. By Corollary 2.9, T has a fixed point in X. □

References

  1. Banach S: Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ćirić LB: A generalization of Banach’s contraction principle. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974, 45: 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berinde V: A common fixed point theorem for quasi contractive type mappings. Ann. Univ. Sci. Bp. Rolando Eötvös Nomin., Sect. Math. 2003, 46: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Samet B, Vetro C, Vetro P: Fixed point theorems for α - ψ -contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 2154–2165. 10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Asl JH, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: On fixed points of α - ψ -contractive multifunctions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammadi B, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some results on fixed points of α - ψ -Ćirić generalized multifunction. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 24 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005, 22: 223–239. 10.1007/s11083-005-9018-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Hoon Cho.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, SH., Bae, JS. Fixed point theorems for α-ψ-quasi contractive mappings in metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-268

Keywords