- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Iterative approximation methods for mixed equilibrium problems for a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings in Banach spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 251 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, we prove the existence of a solution of the mixed equilibrium problem by using the KKM mapping in a Banach space setting. Then, by virtue of this result, we introduce a hybrid iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of solutions of and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings. Furthermore, we prove that the sequences generated by the hybrid iterative scheme converge strongly to a common element of the set of solutions of and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings.
1 Introduction
Let E be a Banach space with the norm and the dual . We denote by ℕ and ℝ the sets of positive integers and real numbers, respectively. Also, we denote the normalized duality mapping from E to by J defined by
where denotes the generalized duality pairing. Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of a Banach space E. The bifunction is said to be relaxed ξ-monotone if there exists a function positively homogeneous of degree p, that is, for all and , where is a constant such that
If , then f is monotone, i.e.,
Example 1.1 Let and . A bifunction is defined by
It is easy to see that . If we put for all , then f is relaxed ξ-monotone, but not monotone.
Let us consider the bifunction and a function . The mixed equilibrium problem (in short, ) is to find such that
Problem (1.2) was studied by Ceng and Yao [1], Cholamjiak and Suantai [2] in Hilbert spaces and Banach spaces, resp. By using the well-known KKM technique, they gave the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the when f is monotone.
In the case of , where and , problem (1.2) is reduced to the following variational-like inequality problem (in short, ), which is to find such that
Problem (1.3) was studied by Fang and Huang [3]. By using the KKM technique and η-ξ monotonicity of the mapping A, they obtained the existence of solutions of the variational-like inequality problem (1.3) in a real reflexive Banach space.
In particular, if , problem (1.2) is reduced to the well-known equilibrium problem (in short, ), which is to find such that
The includes fixed point problems, optimization problems, variational inequality problems and Nash equilibrium problems as special cases (see also [4–6]).
Let S be a mapping from C into itself. A mapping S is said to be Lipschitz if there exists a constant such that for all . S is said to be nonexpansive, when . A point is said to be a fixed point of S if . A point is said to be an asymptotic fixed point of S if there exists a sequence such that and . Denote the set of all fixed points of S and the set of all asymptotic fixed points of S by and , respectively.
Now, we assume that E is a smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space. The Lyapunov function is defined by
A mapping is said to be relatively nonexpansive (see also [7–9]) if the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
is nonempty;
-
(2)
for all , ;
-
(3)
.
Lemma 1.2 [8]
Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space E, and let T be a relatively nonexpansive mapping from C into itself. Then is closed and convex.
In 2008, Takahashi and Zembayashi [10] introduced the following iterative scheme which is called the shrinking projection method:
where J is the duality mapping on E, is the generalized projection from E onto C and S is relatively nonexpansive single-valued mapping. They proved that the sequence converges strongly to a common element of the set of fixed points of a relatively nonexpansive single-valued mapping and the set of solutions of an equilibrium problem under appropriate conditions in a uniformly smooth and uniformly convex Banach space.
In the case of single-valued mapping, many authors such as in references [8, 9, 11–19] studied the problem of finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive or relatively nonexpansive mapping and the set of solutions of an equilibrium problem in the framework of Hilbert spaces and Banach spaces.
Let and denote the family of nonempty subsets and nonempty closed bounded subsets of C, respectively. The Hausdorff metric on is defined by
for all , where . Homaeipour and Razani [20] have defined the relatively nonexpansive multivalued mapping as follows.
A multivalued mapping is said to be relatively nonexpansive if the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
is nonempty;
-
(2)
for all , , ;
-
(3)
.
It is obvious that the class of relatively nonexpansive multivalued mappings contains properly the class of relatively nonexpansive multivalued mappings (for example, see [20]). They introduced the following iterative sequence for finding a fixed point of the relatively nonexpansive multivalued mapping :
where . Moreover, they proved weak and strong convergence theorems for a single relatively nonexpansive multivalued mapping in a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space E.
A multivalued mapping is said to be quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive [21, 22] if and
is said to be quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive [21, 22] if and there exists a real sequence with such that
We remark from the above definitions that the class of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings contains properly the class of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive multivalued mappings as a subclass, and the class of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive multivalued mappings contains properly the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings as a subclass.
Recently, Yi [21] introduced the following modifying Halpern iterative sequence for a quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mapping S. Let be the sequence generated by
where and . Under suitable conditions, the author proved that converges strongly to .
Motivated and inspired by the above results, we investigate the problem of finding a common element of the set of solutions of and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings in Banach spaces.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide necessary concepts and lemmas. In Section 3, we derive the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the auxiliary problems for the when the bifunction f is relaxed ξ-monotone by using the well-known KKM technique. In Section 4, we prove that our proposed hybrid iterative scheme converges strongly to a common element of the set of and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings. In Section 5, we give an application for a system of mixed equilibrium problems. The last section is the conclusions.
2 Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, let E be a real Banach space and be its dual space. We write (respectively ) to indicate that the sequence weakly (respectively weak∗) converges to x; as usual will symbolize strong convergence. Let denote the unit sphere of a Banach space E.
A Banach space E is said to have a Gâteaux differentiable norm (we also say that E is smooth) if the limit
exists for each . A Banach space E is said to have a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm if for each y in , the limit (2.1) is uniformly attained for ; a Fréchet differentiable norm if for each , the limit (2.1) is attained uniformly for ; a uniformly Fréchet differentiable norm (we also say that E is uniformly smooth) if the limit (2.1) is attained uniformly for .
A Banach space E is said to strictly convex if for , ; uniformly convex if, for any , there exists such that for any , implies .
Remark 2.1 The following basic properties for the Banach space E and for the normalized duality mapping J can be found in Cioranescu [23].
-
(i)
E (, resp.) is uniformly convex if and only if E (, resp.) is uniformly smooth.
-
(ii)
If E is smooth, then J is single-valued and norm-to-weak continuous.
-
(iii)
If E is reflexive, then J is onto.
-
(iv)
If E is strictly convex, then for all .
-
(v)
Each uniformly convex Banach space E has the Kadec-Klee property, that is, for any sequence , if and , then .
-
(vi)
If E is a strictly convex reflexive Banach space, then is hemicontinuous, that is, is norm-to-weak∗-continuous.
Recall the Lyapunov function ϕ defined by
It follows from the definition of the function ϕ that
Following Alber [24], the generalized projection from E onto C is defined by
If E is a Hilbert space, then and is the metric projection of H onto C. We known the following lemma for generalized projection.
Lemma 2.2 [24]
Let E be a smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space, and let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E. Then the following conclusions hold:
-
(i)
if and only if for all ;
-
(ii)
for all , for all ;
-
(iii)
if and , then for all .
Now, let us recall the following useful concepts and results.
Definition 2.3 Let B be a subset of a topological vector space X. A mapping is called a KKM mapping if for and , where coA denotes the convex hull of the set A.
Lemma 2.4 [25]
Let B be a nonempty subset of a Hausdorff topological vector space X, and let be a KKM mapping. If is closed for all and is compact for at least one , then .
Definition 2.5 A multivalued mapping is said to be closed if for any sequence with and , .
The following lemmas can be found in [21].
Lemma 2.6 [[21], Lemma 2.8]
Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E. Let and be two sequences in C such that and , then .
Lemma 2.7 [[21], Lemma 2.9]
Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E. Let be a closed and quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mapping with nonnegative real sequences , if , then the fixed point set of S is a closed and convex subset of C.
3 Existence results of mixed equilibrium problem
In this chapter, we prove the existence theorem for by using the KKM technique.
Before solving mixed equilibrium problem (1.2), let us assume the following conditions for a bifunction :
-
(A1)
for all ;
-
(A2)
f is relaxed ξ-monotone, i.e.,
-
(A3)
for all , is upper hemicontinuous, i.e., for all ,
-
(A4)
for all , is convex and lower-semicontinuous.
Lemma 3.1 Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of a real smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space E, let f be a bifunction from to ℝ satisfying (A1)-(A4), and let φ be a lower semicontinuous and convex function from C to ℝ. Let . Then the following problems (3.1) and (3.2) are equivalent:
Proof Let be a solution of problem (3.1). It follows from (A2) that
Thus is a solution of problem (3.2).
Conversely, let be a solution of problem (3.2). For any , we put
Then , because of the convexity of C. Since is a solution of problem (3.2), it follows that
Using (A1) and (A4), we have
and so
The convexity of the function φ implies that
It follows from (3.5)-(3.7) and the convexity of that
This implies that
Taking the upper limit in (3.9), by (A3) and , we get that
Therefore, is also a solution of problem (3.1). This completes the proof. □
Lemma 3.2 Let C be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of a real smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space E, let f be a bifunction from to ℝ satisfying (A1) and (A4), and let φ be a lower semicontinuous and convex function from C to ℝ. Let . Assume that
-
(i)
is weakly upper semicontinuous; that is, for any net , converges to x in , which implies that .
Then the solution set of problem (3.1) is nonempty; that is, there exists such that
Proof Let . Define two set-valued mappings as follows:
and
for every . It is easily seen that and , and hence and are nonempty.
(a) We claim that is a KKM mapping. If is not a KKM mapping, then there exist and , , such that
By the definition of , we have
for all . It follows from (A1), (A4), the convexity of φ and that
which is a contradiction. This implies that is a KKM mapping.
(b) We claim that is a KKM mapping. It is sufficient to show that
For any given , taking , then
It follows from the relaxed ξ-monotonicity of f that
It follows that and so
This implies that is also a KKM mapping.
(c) We show that is weakly closed for all . Let be a sequence in such that as . It then follows from that
By (A4), the weak lower semicontinuity of φ and , and the weak upper semicontinuity of ξ, we obtain from (3.15) that
This shows that and hence is weakly closed for all .
-
(d)
We prove that is weakly compact. Since C is a closed, bounded and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space E, it is weakly compact. Again, since is a weakly closed subset of C, we also have is weakly compact.
By using (a)-(d) and Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 3.1 that
Hence, there exists satisfying inequality (3.10). This completes the proof. □
Proposition 3.3 Let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of a real smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space E, be a convex function. The following two inequalities are equivalent:
and
Proof Let satisfy (3.16). It is well known that
Then
Let satisfy (3.17). For any , let . Then because of the convexity of C, and so
Notice that in a real smooth, strictly convex reflexive Banach space E, the duality mapping J is single-valued, 1-1, and onto. Since is continuous and Gâteaux differentiable, from the mean value theorem, there exists such that
where . Hence
Dividing t in the above inequality, we get
By the existence of , as . Since J is norm-to-weak∗ continuous, we have that
This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.4 If is a solution of (3.1), then
For any fixed , we put for all . Obviously, and is a convex function, since the linearity of a duality mapping and the convexity of and φ. Hence
It then follows from Proposition 3.3 that is a solution of the following problem:
The existence result relaxes the results of Ceng and Yao [1] and Cholamjiak and Suantai [2], because of the ξ-monotonicity of f.
Lemma 3.5 Let C be a closed, bounded and convex subset of a uniformly smooth, strictly convex Banach space E, let f be a bifunction from to ℝ satisfying (A1)-(A4), and let φ be a lower semicontinuous and convex function from C to ℝ. Suppose further that
-
(i)
is weakly upper semicontinuous;
-
(ii)
.
Define a mapping as follows:
Then
-
(1)
is single-valued;
-
(2)
is a firmly nonexpansive mapping, i.e., for all ,
-
(3)
;
-
(4)
is closed and convex;
-
(5)
.
Proof If satisfies (A1)-(A4) and is convex lower semicontinuous, then for any , we known that and rφ are also. We have from Lemma 3.2 and Remark 3.4 that is nonempty for all .
(1) For each , let . Then
and
Adding (3.19) and (3.20), we have
and so
By the relaxed ξ-monotonicity of f, we know that
In (3.21) exchanging the position of and , we get
and so
Now, adding inequalities (3.22) and (3.24), by using (ii), we have
Since J is monotone and E is strictly convex, we have , and so is single-valued.
(2) For , we have that
and
Adding the two inequalities above, we get that
From (A2), we obtain that
In (3.25), interchanging the position of and , we get
Again adding (3.24) and (3.25), we get
It follows from (ii) and that
(3) Indeed, we have the following:
(4) We claim that is closed and convex. Indeed, from (3) we have . From (2) we have, for all ,
Moreover, we have
and
Hence, we have
So, we have, for any ,
Next, we show that . Let . Then there exists such that and . Moreover, we get that . Since the duality mapping J is uniformly continuous on a bounded set, we get
From the definition of , we have
Since
By (A4), the convexity and lower semicontinuity of and the weak upper semicontinuity of ξ, we can obtain that
This implies that
Let and set for . It follows from (A1) and (A4) that
The convexity of the function φ implies that
It follows from (3.28)-(3.30) that
Dividing by t, we have
By (A3) and , taking the upper limit in (3.33), we get
Hence, , and so . Therefore, we have is a relatively nonexpansive mapping. From Lemma 1.2, is closed and convex.
(5) From (3.27) we have, for all ,
Letting , we have
This completes the proof. □
4 Strong convergence theorems
Before proving the convergence theorem, we recall some definitions of a countable family of multivalued mappings .
Definition 4.1 is said to be a family of uniformly quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings [15] if and there exists a sequence with such that for each ,
Definition 4.2 A mapping is said to be uniformly L-Lipschitz continuous [15] if there exists a constant such that for all , , .
Theorem 4.3 Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of E. Let f be a bifunction from to ℝ satisfying (A1)-(A4), and let φ be a lower semicontinuous and convex function from C to ℝ. Let be a family of closed and uniformly quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings with a sequence , . Suppose that for each , is uniformly -Lipschitz continuous and .
Let be a sequence in C generated by
where for each for some , , and . If , , , then converges strongly as to , where .
Proof We divide the proof into five steps. Firstly, we rewrite algorithm (4.1) as follows:
where is the mapping defined by (3.18) for all .
Step 1. We first show that the sequence is well defined. It suffices to prove that is closed and convex and that for all . Suppose that is closed and convex for some . By the definition of ϕ, we have
This shows that is closed and convex. The conclusions are proved.
Step 2. Next, we prove that for all . In fact, it is obvious that . Suppose for some . Hence, for any , it follows from Lemma 3.5(5) that
This shows that . Hence for all .
Step 3. We show that converges strongly to some point . Since , from Lemma 2.2(iii), we have that
Also, since , we have
It follows from Lemma 2.2(ii) that for each and for each ,
Therefore, is bounded, and so is . Since and , we have
That is, is a nondecreasing sequence, and so exists. Since E is reflexive, there exists a subsequence such that . Since is closed, convex and , we get that is weakly closed and for all . Since , we have
By the weak lower semicontinuity of , we have
and so
Therefore , and so . Since E has the Kadec-Klee property and , we obtain that . Since the limit of exists, this together with implies that . If there exists a subsequence such that . Then by Lemma 2.2(ii) we have that
Hence , and so
This implies that
Step 4. We prove that . Since , by Lemma 2.2(ii) we get that
Since , we get that
Since , we get that
Since , we have from (4.1) that
By , (4.5) and (4.6), it implies that
which together with (4.4) and Lemma 2.6 give that
Recall from (4.3) that
It follows from , (4.4), (4.5) and (4.9) that
By Lemma 3.5, we get that
It follows from Lemma 2.6 and that
From (4.1), we get that
Since and the boundedness of ,
Since , we have from the uniform continuity of J that for all . Remark 2.1(vi) gives that
Again, since
it follows from (4.13), (4.14) and the Kadec-Klee property of E that
For all , we consider
From (4.4) and (4.15), we get that as for all . By (4.15) and the closedness of , we have for all , and so .
Step 5. We show that . Since , we derive
From relaxed ξ-monotonicity of f, we have
Since and . By (A4), the lower semicontinuity of φ and the upper semicontinuity of ξ, we have
For all and , let . Since C is convex, we have , and then
Using (A1) and (A4), we have
The convexity of the function φ implies that
This implies that
This implies that
By (A3) and , taking the upper limit in (4.18), we get
Therefore, .
Step 6. Finally, we prove that . Let . Then .
Since , for all and , we have
Since , we get that
Hence . □
In the case of and in Theorem 4.3, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.4 Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of E. Let be a family of closed and uniformly quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings with a sequence , . Suppose that for each , is uniformly -Lipschitz continuous and . Let be a sequence in C generated by
where , and . If , then converges strongly as to , where .
If , for all , then the following corollary follows from Theorem 4.3.
Corollary 4.5 Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of E. Let f be a bifunction from to ℝ satisfying (A1)-(A4), and let φ be a lower semicontinuous and convex function from C to ℝ. Let be a closed and uniformly L-Lipschitz continuous quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mapping with a sequence , with . Let be a sequence in C generated by
where for each for some , , and . If , then converges strongly as to , where .
In the case of and in Corollary 4.4, we can omit the boundedness of C (necessary for the existence of a mapping ), so we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.6 [[21], Theorem 3.1]
Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, let C be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E, and let be a closed and uniformly L-Lipschitz continuous quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mapping with nonnegative real sequences and with being a nonempty bounded subset. Let be a sequence in . Let be the sequence generated by
where . If , then converges strongly to .
5 Application
We utilize Theorem 4.3 to study a modified Halpern iterative algorithm for a system of mixed equilibrium problems.
Theorem 5.1 Let E be a real uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subset of E. Let , , be a countable family of bifunctions satisfying conditions (A1)-(A4), and let , , be a countable family of lower semicontinuous and convex functions satisfying conditions (i)-(ii) as in Lemma 3.5 with . Let be a sequence in C generated by
where , and . If , then converges strongly as to , which is a common solution of the system of mixed equilibrium problems.
Proof For any , we define a mapping as follows:
From Lemma 3.5, we get that and for all , and is a countable family of closed quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings. Thus, (5.1) can be written as follows:
Therefore, the result can be obtained from Corollary 4.4. □
6 Conclusion
In this paper, we establish the existence of a solution of the mixed equilibrium problem by using the KKM mapping in a Banach space setting, when f is relaxed ξ-monotone. Then, by virtue of this result, we introduce a hybrid iterative scheme and prove that our proposed iterative scheme converges strongly to a common element of the set of solutions of and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings.
References
Ceng L-C, Yao J-C: A hybrid iterative scheme for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2008, 214: 186–201. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.02.022
Cholamjiak P, Suantai S: Existence and iteration for a mixed equilibrium problem and a countable family of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 2725–2733. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.029
Fang YP, Huang NJ: Variational-like inequalities with generalized monotone mappings in Banach spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2003, 118(2):327–338. 10.1023/A:1025499305742
Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. Math. Stud. 1994, 63(1–4):123–145.
Chadli O, Schaible S, Yao JC: Regularized equilibrium problems with an application to noncoercive hemivariational inequalities. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2004, 121: 571–596.
Chadli O, Wong NC, Yao JC: Equilibrium problems with applications to eigenvalue problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2003, 117(2):245–266. 10.1023/A:1023627606067
Reich S: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1979, 67: 274–276. 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90024-6
Matsushita S, Takahashi W: Weak and strong convergence theorems for relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2004, 2004: 37–47.
Matsushita S, Takahashi W: A strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space. J. Approx. Theory 2005, 134: 257–266. 10.1016/j.jat.2005.02.007
Takahashi W, Zembayashi K: Strong convergence theorem by a new hybrid method for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2008., 2008: Article ID 528476
Aleyner A, Reich S: Block-iterative algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems in Hilbert and in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 343(1):427–435. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.087
Plubtieng S, Ungchittrakool K: Hybrid iterative methods for convex feasibility problems and fixed point problems of relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2008., 2008: Article ID 583082
Plubtieng S, Ungchittrakool K: Strong convergence theorems of block iterative methods for a finite family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2007, 8(3):431–450.
Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Convergence theorems for a common point of solutions of equilibrium and fixed point of relatively nonexpansive multivalued mapping problems. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 859598 10.1155/2012/859598
Chang SS, Kim JK, Wang XR: Modified block iterative algorithm for solving convex feasibility problems in Banach spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 869684
Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA: Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2005, 6(1):117–136.
Takahashi W, Zembayashi K: Strong and weak convergence theorems for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 45–57. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.031
Tada A, Takahashi W: Strong convergence theorem for an equilibrium problem and a nonexpansive mapping. In Nonlinear Analysis and Convex Analysis. Edited by: Takahashi W, Tanaka T. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama; 2007:609–617.
Tada A, Takahashi W: Weak and strong convergence theorems for a nonexpansive mapping and an equilibrium problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2007, 133(3):359–370. 10.1007/s10957-007-9187-z
Homaeipour S, Razani A: Weak and strong convergence theorems for relatively nonexpansive multi-valued mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 73
Yi L: Strong convergence theorems for modifying Halpern iterations for quasi- ϕ -asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mapping in Banach spaces with applications. J. Appl. Math. 2012., 2012: Article ID 912545 10.1155/2012/912545
Tan JF, Chang SS: Strong convergence theorems for a generalized mixed equilibrium problem and a family of total quasi- ϕ -asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings in Banach spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 147915 10.1155/2012/147915
Cioranescu I Mathematics and Its Applications 62. In Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1990.
Alber YI: Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and applications. In Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type. Edited by: Kartsatos AG. Dekker, New York; 1996:15–50.
Fan K: A generalization of Tychonoffs fixed point theorem. Math. Ann. 1961, 142: 305–310. 10.1007/BF01353421
Acknowledgements
The first author is supported by Naresuan University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wangkeeree, R., Preechasilp, P. Iterative approximation methods for mixed equilibrium problems for a countable family of quasi-ϕ-asymptotically nonexpansive multivalued mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-251
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-251