Research  Open  Published:
Hybrid methods for a mixed equilibrium problem and fixed points of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings
Fixed Point Theory and Applicationsvolume 2013, Article number: 236 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, we prove a strong convergence theorem for a new hybrid method, using shrinking projection method introduced by Takahashi and a fixed point method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of mixed equilibrium problem and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. We also apply our main result to the convex minimization problem and the fixed point problem of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
MSC:47H09, 47H10.
1 Introduction
The mixed equilibrium problem (MEP) includes several important problems arising in optimization, economics, physics, engineering, transportation, network, Nash equilibrium problems in noncooperative games, and others. Variational inequalities and mathematical programming problems are also viewed as the abstract equilibrium problems (EP) (e.g., [1, 2]). Many authors have proposed several methods to solve the EP and MEP, see, for instance, [1–9] and the references therein.
Fixed point problems for multivalued mappings are more difficult than those of singlevalued mappings and play very important role in applied science and economics. Recently, many authors have proposed their fixed point methods for finding a fixed point of both multivalued mapping and a family of multivalued mappings. All of those methods have only weak convergence.
It is known that Mann’s iterations have only weak convergence even in the Hilbert spaces. To overcome this problem, Takahashi [10] introduced a new method, known as shrinking projection method, which is a hybrid method of Mann’s iteration, and the projection method, and obtained strong convergence results of such method. In this paper, we use the shrinking projection method defined by Takahashi [10] and our new method to define a new hybrid method for MEP and a fixed point problem for a family of nonexpansive multivalued mappings.
An element $p\in K$ is called a fixed point of a singlevalued mapping T if $p=Tp$ and of a multivalued mapping T if $p\in Tp$. The set of fixed points of T is denoted by $F(T)$.
Let X be a real Banach space. A subset K of X is called proximinal if for each $x\in X$, there exists an element $k\in K$ such that
where $d(x,K)=inf\{\parallel xy\parallel :y\in K\}$ is the distance from the point x to the set K.
Let X be a uniformly convex real Banach space, and let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of X, and let $CB(K)$ be a family of nonempty closed bounded subsets of K, and let $P(K)$ be a nonempty proximinal bounded subsets of K.
For multivalued mappings $T:K\to P(K)$, define ${P}_{T}(x):=\{y\in T(x):\parallel xy\parallel =d(x,T(x))\}$ for all $x\in K$.
The Hausdorff metric on $CB(X)$ is defined by
for all $A,B\in CB(X)$.
A multivalued mapping $T:K\to CB(K)$ is said to be nonexpansive if $H(Tx,Ty)\le \parallel xy\parallel $ for all $x,y\in K$.
Let H be a real Hilbert space with the inner product $\u3008\cdot ,\cdot \u3009$ and the norm $\parallel \cdot \parallel $. Let D be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Let $F:D\times D\to \mathbb{R}$ be a bifunction, and let $\phi :D\to \mathbb{R}\cup \{+\mathrm{\infty}\}$ be a function such that $D\cap dom\phi \ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$, where ℝ is the set of real numbers and $dom\phi =\{x\in H:\phi (x)<+\mathrm{\infty}\}$.
FloresBazán [11] introduced the following mixed equilibrium problem:
The set of solutions of (1.1) is denoted by $MEP(F,\phi )$.
If $\phi \equiv 0$, then the mixed equilibrium problem (1.1) reduces to the following equilibrium problem:
The set of solutions of (1.2) is denoted by $EP(F)$ (see Combettes and Hirstoaga [12]).
If $F\equiv 0$, then the mixed equilibrium problem (1.1) reduces to the following convex minimization problem:
The set of solutions of (1.3) is denoted by $CMP(\phi )$.
In an infinitedimensional Hilbert space, the Mann iteration algorithms have only a weak convergence. In 2003, Nakajo and Takahashi [13] introduced the method, called CQ method, to modify Mann’s iteration to obtain the strong convergence theorem for nonexpansive mapping in a Hilbert space. The CQ method has been studied extensively by many authors, for instance, Marino and Xu [14]; Zhou [15]; Zhang and Cheng [16].
In 2008, Takahashi et al. [10] introduced the following iteration scheme, which is usually called the shrinking projection method. Let $\{{\alpha}_{n}\}$ be a sequence in $(0,1)$ and ${x}_{0}\in H$. For ${C}_{1}=C$ and ${x}_{1}={P}_{{C}_{1}}{x}_{0}$, define a sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ of D as follows:
where ${P}_{{C}_{n}}$ is the metric projection of H onto ${C}_{n}$ and $\{{T}_{n}\}$ is a family of nonexpansive mappings. They proved that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to $z={P}_{F(T)}{x}_{0}$, where $F(T)={\bigcap}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{n})$. The shrinking projection method has been studied widely by many authors, for example, Tada and Takahashi [17]; Aoyama et al. [18]; Yao et al. [19]; Kang et al. [20]; Cholamjiak and Suantai [21]; Ceng et al. [22]; Tang et al. [23]; Cai and Bu [24]; Kumam et al. [25]; Kimura et al. [26]; Shehu [27, 28]; Wang et al. [29].
In 2009, Wangkeeree and Wangkeeree [30] proved a strong convergence theorem of an iterative algorithm based on extragradient method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of a mixed equilibrium problem, the set of common fixed points of a family of infinitely nonexpansive mappings and the set of the variational inequality for a monotone Lipschitz continuous mapping in a Hilbert space.
In 2011, Rodjanadid [31] introduced another iterative method modified from an iterative scheme of Klineam and Suantai [32] for finding a common element of the set of solutions of mixed equilibrium problems and the set of common fixed points of countable family of nonexpansive mappings in real Hilbert spaces. The mixed equilibrium problems have been studied by many authors, for instance, Peng and Yao [33]; Zeng et al. [34]; Peng et al. [35]; Wangkeeree and Kamraksa [36]; Jaiboon and Kumam [37]; Chamnarnpan and Kumam [38]; Cholamjiak et al. [39].
Nadler [40] started to study fixed points of multivalued contractions and nonexpansive mapping by using the Hausdorff metric.
Sastry and Babu [41] defined Mann and Ishikawa iterates for a multivalued map T with a fixed point p, and proved that these iterates converge strongly to a fixed point q of T under the compact domain in a real Hilbert space. Moreover, they illustrated that fixed point q may be different from p.
Panyanak [42] generalized results of Sastry and Babu [41] to uniformly convex Banach spaces and proved a strong convergence theorem of Mann iterates for a mapping defined on a noncompact domain and satisfying some conditions. He also obtained a strong convergence result of Ishikawa iterates for a mapping defined on a compact domain.
Hussain and Khan [43], in 2003, introduced the best approximation operator ${P}_{T}$ to find fixed points of ∗nonexpansive multivalued mapping and proved strong convergence of its iterates on a closed convex unbounded subset of a Hilbert space, which is not necessarily compact.
Hu et al. [44] obtained common fixed point of two nonexpansive multivalued mappings satisfying certain contractive conditions.
Cholamjiak and Suantai [45] proved strong convergence theorems of two new iterative procedures with errors for two quasinonexpansive multivalued mappings by using the best approximation operator and the end point condition in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Later, Cholamjiak et al. [46] introduced a modified Mann iteration and obtained weak and strong convergence theorems for a countable family of nonexpansive multivalued mappings by using the best approximation operator in a Banach space. They also gave some examples of multivalued mappings T such that ${P}_{T}$ are nonexpansive.
Later, Eslamian and Abkar [47] generalized and modified the iteration of Abbas et al. [48] from two mappings to the infinite family of multivalued mappings $\{{T}_{i}\}$ such that each ${P}_{{T}_{i}}$ satisfies the condition (C).
In this paper, we introduce a new hybrid method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of a mixed equilibrium problem and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. We obtain a strong convergence theorem for the sequences generated by the proposed method without the assumption of compactness of the domain and other conditions imposing on the mappings.
In Section 2, we give some preliminaries and lemmas, which will be used in proving the main results. In Section 3, we introduce a new hybrid method and a fixed point method defined by (3.1) and prove strong convergence theorem for finding a common element of the set of solutions between mixed equilibrium problem and common fixed point problems of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. We also give examples of the control sequences satisfying the control conditions in main results. In Section 4, we summarize the main results of this paper.
2 Preliminaries
Let D be a closed convex subset of H. For every point $x\in H$, there exists a unique nearest point in D, denoted by ${P}_{D}x$, such that
${P}_{D}$ is called the metric projection of H onto D. It is known that ${P}_{D}$ is a nonexpansive mapping of H onto D. It is also know that ${P}_{D}$ satisfies $\u3008xy,{P}_{D}x{P}_{D}y\u3009\ge {\parallel {P}_{D}x{P}_{D}y\parallel}^{2}$ for every $x,y\in H$. Moreover, ${P}_{D}x$ is characterized by the properties: ${P}_{D}x\in D$ and $\u3008x{P}_{D}x,{P}_{D}xy\u3009\ge 0$ for all $y\in D$.
Lemma 2.1 [13]
Let D be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H and ${P}_{D}:H\to D$ be the metric projection from H onto D. Then the following inequality holds:
Lemma 2.2 [14]
Let H be a real Hilbert space. Then the following equations hold:

(i)
${\parallel xy\parallel}^{2}={\parallel x\parallel}^{2}{\parallel y\parallel}^{2}2\u3008xy,y\u3009$, $\mathrm{\forall}x,y\in H$;

(ii)
${\parallel tx+(1t)y\parallel}^{2}=t{\parallel x\parallel}^{2}+(1t){\parallel y\parallel}^{2}t(1t){\parallel xy\parallel}^{2}$, $\mathrm{\forall}t\in [0,1]$ and $x,y\in H$.
Lemma 2.3 [21]
Let H be a real Hilbert space. Then for each $m\in \mathbb{N}$
${x}_{i}\in H$ and ${t}_{i},{t}_{j}\in [0,1]$ for all $i,j=1,2,\dots ,m$ with ${\sum}_{i=1}^{m}{t}_{i}=1$.
Lemma 2.4 [49]
Let D be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Given $x,y,z\in H$ and also given $a\in \mathbb{R}$, the set
is convex and closed.
For solving the mixed equilibrium problem, we assume the bifunction F, φ and the set D satisfy the following conditions:

(A1)
$F(x,x)=0$ for all $x\in D$;

(A2)
F is monotone, that is, $F(x,y)+F(y,x)\le 0$ for all $x,y\in D$;

(A3)
for each $x,y,z\in D$, ${lim\hspace{0.17em}sup}_{t\downarrow 0}F(tz+(1t)x,y)\le F(x,y)$;

(A4)
$F(x,\cdot )$ is convex and lower semicontinuous for each $x\in D$;

(B1)
for each $x\in H$ and $r>0$, there exist a bounded subset ${D}_{x}\subseteq D$ and ${y}_{x}\in D\cap dom\phi $ such that for any $z\in D\setminus {D}_{x}$,
$$F(z,{y}_{x})+\phi ({y}_{x})+\frac{1}{r}\u3008{y}_{x}z,zx\u3009<\phi (z);$$ 
(B2)
D is a bounded set.
Lemma 2.5 [35]
Let D be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let $F:D\times D\to \mathbb{R}$ be a bifunction satisfying conditions (A1)(A4) and $\phi :D\to \mathbb{R}\cup \{+\mathrm{\infty}\}$ be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function such that $D\cap dom\phi \ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$. For $r>0$ and $x\in D$, define a mapping ${T}_{r}:H\to D$ as follows:
for all $x\in H$. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds. Then the following conclusions hold:

(1)
for each $x\in H$, ${T}_{r}(x)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$;

(2)
${T}_{r}$ is singlevalued;

(3)
${T}_{r}$ is firmly nonexpansive, that is, for any $x,y\in H$,
$${\parallel {T}_{r}(x){T}_{r}(y)\parallel}^{2}\le \u3008{T}_{r}(x){T}_{r}(y),xy\u3009;$$ 
(4)
$F({T}_{r})=MEP(F,\phi )$;

(5)
$MEP(F,\phi )$ is closed and convex.
As in ([21], Lemma 2.7), the following lemma holds true for multivalued mapping. To avoid repetition, we omit the details of proof.
Lemma 2.6 Let D be a closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let $T:D\to P(D)$ be a multivalued nonexpansive mapping with $F(T)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ such that ${P}_{T}$ is nonexpansive. Then $F(T)$ is a closed and convex subset of D.
3 Main results
In the following theorem, we prove strong convergence of the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ defined by (3.1) to a common element of the set of solutions of a mixed equilibrium problem and the set of common fixed points of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
Theorem 3.1 Let D be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let F be a bifunction from $D\times D$ to ℝ satisfying (A1)(A4), and let φ be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function from D to $\mathbb{R}\cup \{+\mathrm{\infty}\}$ such that $D\cap dom\phi \ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$. Let ${T}_{i}:D\to P(D)$ be multivalued nonexpansive mappings for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$ with $\mathrm{\Omega}:={\bigcap}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{i})\cap MEP(F,\phi )\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ such that all ${P}_{{T}_{i}}$ are nonexpansive. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds and $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfies the condition ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,i}{\alpha}_{n,0}>0$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Define the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ as follows: ${x}_{1}\in D={C}_{1}$,
where the sequences ${r}_{n}\in (0,\mathrm{\infty})$ with ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{r}_{n}>0$ and $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfying ${\sum}_{i=0}^{n}{\alpha}_{n,i}=1$ and ${x}_{n,i}\in {P}_{{T}_{i}}{u}_{n}$ for $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Then the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to ${P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$.
Proof We split the proof into six steps.
Step 1. Show that ${P}_{{C}_{n+1}}{x}_{0}$ is well defined for every ${x}_{0}\in D$.
By Lemmas 2.52.6, we obtain that $MEP(F,\phi )$ and ${\bigcap}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{i})$ is a closed and convex subset of D. Hence Ω is a closed and convex subset of D. It follows from Lemma 2.4 that ${C}_{n+1}$ is a closed and convex for each $n\ge 0$. Let $v\in \mathrm{\Omega}$. Then ${P}_{{T}_{i}}(v)=\{v\}$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Since ${u}_{n}={T}_{{r}_{n}}{x}_{n}\in dom\phi $, we have
for every $n\ge 0$. Then
Hence $v\in {C}_{n+1}$, so that $\mathrm{\Omega}\subset {C}_{n+1}$. Therefore, ${P}_{{C}_{n+1}}{x}_{0}$ is well defined.
Step 2. Show that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}{x}_{0}\parallel $ exists.
Since Ω is a nonempty closed convex subset of H, there exists a unique $v\in \mathrm{\Omega}$ such that $v={P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$. Since ${x}_{n}={P}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0}$ and ${x}_{n+1}\in {C}_{n+1}\subset {C}_{n}$, $\mathrm{\forall}n\ge 0$, we have
On the other hand, as $v\in \mathrm{\Omega}\subset {C}_{n}$, we obtain
It follows that the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is bounded and nondecreasing. Therefore, ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}{x}_{0}\parallel $ exists.
Step 3. Show that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{n}=w\in D$.
For $m>n$, by the definition of ${C}_{n}$, we get ${x}_{m}={P}_{{C}_{m}}{x}_{0}\in {C}_{m}\subset {C}_{n}$. By applying Lemma 2.1, we have
Since ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}{x}_{0}\parallel $ exists, it follows that $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is Cauchy. Hence there exists $w\in D$ such that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{n}=w$.
Step 4. Show that $\parallel {x}_{n,i}{x}_{n}\parallel \to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$ for every $i\in \mathbb{N}$.
From ${x}_{n+1}\in {C}_{n+1}$, we have
For $v\in \mathrm{\Omega}$, by Lemma 2.3 and (3.2), we get
This implies that
where $M={sup}_{n\ge 0}\{\parallel {x}_{n}v\parallel +\parallel {y}_{n}v\parallel \}$. By the given control condition on $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}$ and (3.3), we obtain
By Lemma 2.5, we have
Hence ${\parallel {u}_{n}v\parallel}^{2}\le {\parallel {x}_{n}v\parallel}^{2}{\parallel {x}_{n}{u}_{n}\parallel}^{2}$. By Lemma 2.3, we get
This implies that
where $M={sup}_{n\ge 0}\{\parallel {x}_{n}v\parallel +\parallel {y}_{n}v\parallel \}$. From (3.3), we get ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}{u}_{n}\parallel =0$. It follows that
Step 5. Show that $w\in \mathrm{\Omega}$.
By ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{r}_{n}>0$, we have
From ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{n}=w$, we obtain ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{u}_{n}=w$.
We will show that $w\in MEP(F,\phi )$. Since ${u}_{n}={T}_{{r}_{n}}{x}_{n}\in dom\phi $, we have
It follows by (A2) that
Hence
It follows from (3.4), (A4) and the lower semicontinuous of φ that
For t with $0<t\le 1$ and $y\in D$, let ${y}_{t}=ty+(1t)w$. Since $y,w\in D$ and D is convex, then ${y}_{t}\in D$ and hence
This implies by (A1), (A4) and the convexity of φ, that
Dividing by t, we have
Letting $t\to 0$, it follows from the weakly semicontinuity of φ that
Hence $w\in MEP(F,\phi )$. Next, we will show that $w\in {\bigcap}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{i})$. For each $i=1,2,\dots ,n$, we have
By Steps 34, we have $d(w,{T}_{i}w)=0$. Hence $w\in {T}_{i}w$ for all $i=1,2,\dots ,n$.
Step 6. Show that $w={P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$.
Since ${x}_{n}={P}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0}$, we get
Since $w\in \mathrm{\Omega}\subset {C}_{n}$, we have
Now, we obtain that $w={P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$.
This completes the proof. □
Setting $\phi \equiv 0$ in Theorem 3.1, we have the following result.
Corollary 3.2 Let D be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let F be a bifunction from $D\times D$ to ℝ satisfying (A1)(A4). Let ${T}_{i}:D\to P(D)$ be multivalued nonexpansive mappings for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$ with $\mathrm{\Omega}:={\bigcap}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{i})\cap EP(F)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ such that all ${P}_{{T}_{i}}$ are nonexpansive. Assume that $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfies the condition ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,i}{\alpha}_{n,0}>0$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Define the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ as follows: ${x}_{1}\in D={C}_{1}$,
where the sequences ${r}_{n}\in (0,\mathrm{\infty})$ with ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{r}_{n}>0$ and $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfying ${\sum}_{i=0}^{n}{\alpha}_{n,i}=1$ and ${x}_{n,i}\in {P}_{{T}_{i}}{u}_{n}$ for $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Then the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to ${P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$.
Setting $F\equiv 0$ in Theorem 3.1, we have the following result.
Corollary 3.3 Let D be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let φ be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function from D to $\mathbb{R}\cup \{+\mathrm{\infty}\}$ such that $D\cap dom\phi \ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$. Let ${T}_{i}:D\to P(D)$ be multivalued nonexpansive mappings for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$ with $\mathrm{\Omega}:={\bigcap}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}F({T}_{i})\cap CMP(\phi )\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ such that all ${P}_{{T}_{i}}$ are nonexpansive. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds, and $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfies the condition ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,i}{\alpha}_{n,0}>0$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Define the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ as follows: ${x}_{1}\in D={C}_{1}$,
where the sequences ${r}_{n}\in (0,\mathrm{\infty})$ with ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{r}_{n}>0$ and $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}\subset [0,1)$ satisfying ${\sum}_{i=0}^{n}{\alpha}_{n,i}=1$ and ${x}_{n,i}\in {P}_{{T}_{i}}{u}_{n}$ for $i\in \mathbb{N}$. Then the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ converges strongly to ${P}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{x}_{0}$.
Remark 3.4

(i)
Let $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}$ be double sequence in $(0,1]$. Let (a) and (b) be the following conditions:

(a)
${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,i}{\alpha}_{n,0}>0$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$,

(b)
${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,i}$ exist and lie in $(0,1]$ for all $i=0,1,2,\dots $ .
It is easy to see that if $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}$ satisfies the condition (a), then it satisfies the condition (b). So Theorem 3.1 and Corollaries 3.23.3 hold true when the control double sequence $\{{\alpha}_{n,i}\}$ satisfies the condition (a).

(a)

(ii)
The following double sequences are examples of the control sequences in Theorem 3.1 and Corollaries 3.23.3:

(1)
$${\alpha}_{n,k}=\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{1}{{2}^{k}}(\frac{n}{n+1}),& n\ge k;\\ 1\frac{n}{n+1}({\sum}_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{{2}^{k}}),& n=k1;\\ 0,& n<k1,\end{array}$$
that is,
$${\alpha}_{n,k}=\left(\begin{array}{ccccccccc}\frac{1}{4}& \frac{3}{4}& 0& 0& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{1}{3}& \frac{1}{6}& \frac{1}{2}& 0& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{3}{8}& \frac{3}{16}& \frac{3}{32}& \frac{11}{32}& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{2}{5}& \frac{1}{5}& \frac{1}{10}& \frac{1}{20}& \frac{1}{4}& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \frac{n}{2(n+1)}& \frac{n}{4(n+1)}& \frac{n}{8(n+1)}& \frac{n}{16(n+1)}& \frac{n}{32(n+1)}& \frac{n}{64(n+1)}& \cdots & \frac{n}{{2}^{k}(n+1)}& \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \end{array}\right).$$We see that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,k}=\frac{1}{{2}^{k}}$ and ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,0}{\alpha}_{n,k}=\frac{1}{{2}^{k+1}}$ for $k=1,2,3,\dots $ .

(2)
$${\alpha}_{n,k}=\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{1}{{2}^{k}}(\frac{n}{n+1}),& n\ge k\text{and}n\text{is odd};\\ \frac{1}{{2}^{k+1}}(\frac{n}{n+1}),& n\ge k\text{and}n\text{is even};\\ 1\frac{n}{n+1}({\sum}_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{{2}^{k}}),& n=k1\text{and}n\text{is odd};\\ 1\frac{n}{n+1}({\sum}_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{{2}^{k+1}}),& n=k1\text{and}n\text{is even};\\ 0,& nk1,\end{array}$$
that is,
$${\alpha}_{n,k}=\left(\begin{array}{ccccccccc}\frac{1}{4}& \frac{3}{4}& 0& 0& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{1}{6}& \frac{1}{12}& \frac{3}{4}& 0& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{3}{8}& \frac{3}{16}& \frac{3}{32}& \frac{11}{32}& 0& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \frac{1}{5}& \frac{1}{10}& \frac{1}{20}& \frac{1}{40}& \frac{5}{8}& 0& \cdots & 0& \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \frac{2n1}{2(2n)}& \frac{2n1}{4(2n)}& \frac{2n1}{8(2n)}& \frac{2n1}{16(2n)}& \frac{2n1}{32(2n)}& \frac{2n1}{64(2n)}& \cdots & \frac{2n1}{{2}^{k}(2n)}& \cdots \\ \frac{2n}{4(2n+1)}& \frac{2n}{8(2n+1)}& \frac{2n}{16(2n+1)}& \frac{2n}{32(2n+1)}& \frac{2n}{64(2n+1)}& \frac{2n}{128(2n+1)}& \cdots & \frac{2n}{{2}^{k+1}(2n+1)}& \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \end{array}\right).$$
We see that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,k}$ does not exist and ${lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\alpha}_{n,0}{\alpha}_{n,k}=\frac{1}{{2}^{k+3}}$ for $k=1,2,3,\dots $ .

(1)
4 Conclusions
We use the shrinking projection method defined by Takahashi [10] together with our method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of mixed equilibrium problem and common fixed points of a countable family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. The main results of paper can be applied for solving convex minimization problems and fixed point problems.
References
 1.
Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. Math. Stud. 1994, 63(14):123–145.
 2.
Noor MA, Oettli W: On general nonlinear complementarity problems and quasiequilibria. Matematiche 1994, 49(2):313–331.
 3.
Moudafi A, Thera M: Proximal and dynamical approaches to equilibrium problems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 477. In IllPosed Variational Problems and Regularization Techniques(Trier, 1998). Springer, Berlin; 1999:187–201.
 4.
Peng JW, Yao JC: Two extragradient methods for generalized mixed equilibrium problems, nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58(7):1287–1301. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.040
 5.
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: A hybrid extragradient viscosity approximation method for solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 374815
 6.
Liu QY, Zeng WY, Huang NJ: An iterative method for generalized equilibrium problems, fixed point problems and variational inequality problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 531308
 7.
Peng JW, Yao J: A viscosity approximation scheme for system of equilibrium problems, nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71(12):6001–6010. 10.1016/j.na.2009.05.028
 8.
Kumam P, Jaiboon C: A new hybrid iterative method for mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problem for relaxed cocoercive mappings with application to optimization problems. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2009, 3(4):510–530. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.04.001
 9.
Chang SS, Chan CK, Lee HWJ, Yang L: A system of mixed equilibrium problems, fixed point problems of strictly pseudocontractive mappings and nonexpansive semigroups. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 216(1):51–60. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.12.060
 10.
Takahashi W, Takeuchi Y, Kubota R: Strong convergence theorems by hybrid methods for families of nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 341: 276–286. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.062
 11.
FloresBazán F: Existence theorems for generalized noncoercive equilibrium problems: the quasiconvex case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 2000, 11(3):675–690.
 12.
Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA: Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2005, 6(1):117–136.
 13.
Nakajo K, Takahashi W: Strongly convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and nonexpansive semigroups. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2003, 279: 372–379. 10.1016/S0022247X(02)004584
 14.
Marino G, Xu HK: Weak and strong convergence theorems for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 329: 336–346. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.055
 15.
Zhou HY: Convergence theorems of fixed points for Lipschitz pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 343: 546–556. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.045
 16.
Zhang QB, Cheng CZ: Strong convergence theorem for a family of Lipschitz pseudocontractive mappings in a Hilbert space. Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 48: 480–485. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.09.014
 17.
Tada A, Takahashi W: Weak and strong convergence theorems for a nonexpansive mapping and equilibrium problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2007, 133: 359–370. 10.1007/s109570079187z
 18.
Aoyama K, Kohsaka F, Takahashi W: Shrinking projection methods for firmly nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 1626–1632. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.001
 19.
Yao YH, Liou YC, Marino G: A hybrid algorithm for pseudocontractive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 4997–5002. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.075
 20.
Kang JL, Su YF, Zhang X: Shrinking projection algorithm for fixed points of firmly nonexpansive mappings and its applications. Fixed Point Theory 2010, 11(2):301–310.
 21.
Cholamjiak W, Suantai S: A hybrid method for a countable family of multivalued maps, equilibrium problems, and variational inequality problems. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2010., 2010: Article ID 349158 10.1155/2010/349158
 22.
Ceng LC, Ansari QH, Yao JC: Hybrid proximaltype and hybrid shrinking projection algorithms for equilibrium problems, maximal monotone operators, and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2010, 31(7):763–797. 10.1080/01630563.2010.496697
 23.
Tang YC, Peng JG, Liu LW: Strong convergence theorem for pseudocontractive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 380–385. 10.1016/j.na.2010.08.048
 24.
Cai G, Bu S: Hybrid algorithm for generalized mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems and fixed point problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62: 4772–4782. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.068
 25.
Kumam P, Hamphries U, Katchang P: Common solutions of generalized mixed equilibrium problems, variational inclusions, and common fixed points for nonexpansive semigroups and strictly pseudocontractive mappings. J. Appl. Math. 2011., 2011: Article ID 953903 10.1155/2011/953903
 26.
Kimura Y, Takahashi W, Yao JC: Strong convergence of an iterative scheme by a new type of projection method for a family of quasinonexpansive mappings. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2011, 149: 239–253. 10.1007/s1095701097889
 27.
Shehu Y: Strong convergence theorems for countable families of multivalued nonexpansive mappings and systems of equilibrium and variational inequality problems. Ann. Univ. Ferrara 2012. 10.1007/s1156501201566
 28.
Shehu Y: Iterative methods for family of strictly pseudocontractive mappings and system of generalized mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 852789 10.1155/2011/852789
 29.
Wang ZM, Kang MK, Cho YJ: Convergence theorems based on the shrinking projection method for hemirelatively nonexpansive mappings, variational inequalities and equilibrium problems. Banach J. Math. Anal. 2012, 6(1):11–34.
 30.
Wangkeeree R, Wangkeeree R: Strong convergence of the iterative scheme based on the extragradient method for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of an infinite family of nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2009, 3: 719–733. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.06.009
 31.
Rodjanadid B: Iterative algorithms for finding common solutions of generalized mixed equilibrium problems and common fixed point problems for a countable family of nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2011, 5(39):1943–1960.
 32.
Klineam C, Suantai S: Strong convergence of composite iterative schemes for a countable family of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73: 431–439. 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.034
 33.
Peng JW, Yao JC: A new hybridextragradient method for generalized mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems. Taiwan. J. Math. 2008, 12(6):1401–1432.
 34.
Zeng WY, Huang NJ, Zhao CW: Viscosity approximation methods for generalized mixed equilibrium problems and fixed points of a sequence of nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2008., 2008: Article ID 714939 10.1155/2008/714939
 35.
Peng JW, Liou YC, Yao JC: An iterative algorithm combining viscosity method with parallel method for a generalized equilibrium problem and strict pseudocontractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 794178 10.1155/2009/794178
 36.
Wangkeeree R, Kamraksa U: An iterative approximation method for solving a general system of variational inequality problems and mixed equilibrium problems. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2009, 3(4):615–630. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.05.005
 37.
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: A general iterative method for addressing mixed equilibrium problems and optimization problems. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2010, 73(5):1180–1202. 10.1016/j.na.2010.04.041
 38.
Chamnarnpan T, Kumam P: Iterative algorithms for solving the system of mixed equilibrium problems, fixedpoint problems, and variational inclusions with application to minimization problem. J. Appl. Math. 2012., 2012: Article ID 538912 10.1155/2012/538912
 39.
Cholamjiak P, Suantai S, Cho YJ: Strong convergence to solutions of generalized mixed equilibrium problems with applications. J. Appl. Math. 2012., 2012: Article ID 308791 10.1155/2012/308791
 40.
Nadler SB Jr.: Multivalued contraction mappings. Pac. J. Math. 1969, 30: 475–488. 10.2140/pjm.1969.30.475
 41.
Sastry KPR, Babu GVR: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates for a multivalued mapping with a fixed point. Czechoslov. Math. J. 2005, 55: 817–826. 10.1007/s105870050068z
 42.
Panyanak B: Mann and Ishikawa iterative processes for multivalued mappings in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2007, 54: 872–877. 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.03.012
 43.
Hussain N, Khan AR: Applications of the best approximation operator to ∗nonexpansive maps in Hilbert spaces. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2003, 24: 327–338. 10.1081/NFA120022926
 44.
Hu T, Huang JC, Rhoades BE: A general principle for Ishikawa iterations for multivalued mappings. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1997, 28: 1091–1098.
 45.
Cholamjiak W, Suantai S: Approximation of common fixed points of two quasinonexpansive multivalued maps in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 941–949. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.042
 46.
Cholamjiak P, Cholamjiak W, Cho YJ, Suantai S: Weak and strong convergence to common fixed points of a countable family of multivalued mappings in Banach spaces. Thai J. Math. 2011, 9: 505–520.
 47.
Eslamian M, Abkar A: Onestep iterative process for a finite family of multivalued mappings. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54: 105–111. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.01.040
 48.
Abbas M, Khan SH, Khan AR, Agarwal RP: Common fixed points of two multivalued nonexpansive mappings by onestep iterative scheme. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 97–102. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.025
 49.
Kim TH, Xu HK: Strongly convergence of modified Mann iterations for with asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and semigroups. Nonlinear Anal. 2006, 64: 1140–1152. 10.1016/j.na.2005.05.059
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand for the financial support of this paper.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
AB studied and researched a nonlinear analysis and also wrote this article. SS participated in the process of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 multivalued nonexpansive mappings
 mixed equilibrium problem
 shrinking projection method