Open Access

On the strong convergence of a modified S-iteration process for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in a CAT ( 0 ) space

Fixed Point Theory and Applications20132013:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-12

Received: 27 August 2012

Accepted: 21 December 2012

Published: 16 January 2013

Abstract

In this paper, we give strong convergence theorems for the modified S-iteration process of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings on a CAT ( 0 ) space which extend and improve many results in the literature.

MSC: Primary 47H09; secondary 47H10.

Keywords

CAT ( 0 ) space asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping strong convergence iterative process fixed point

1 Introduction

A metric space X is a CAT ( 0 ) space if it is geodesically connected and if every geodesic triangle in X is at least as ‘thin’ as its comparison triangle in the Euclidean plane. The initials of the term ‘CAT’ are in honor of E. Cartan, A. D. Alexanderov and V. A. Toponogov. A  CAT ( 0 ) space is a generalization of the Hadamard manifold, which is a simply connected, complete Riemannian manifold such that the sectional curvature is non-positive. In fact, it is very well known that any complete simply connected Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature is a CAT ( 0 ) space. The complex Hilbert ball with a hyperbolic metric is a CAT ( 0 ) space (see [1]). Other examples include Pre-Hilbert spaces, R-trees (see [2]) and Euclidean buildings (see [3]). A CAT ( 0 ) space plays a fundamental role in various areas of mathematics (see Bridson and Haefliger [2], Burago, Burago and Ivanov [4], Gromov [5]). Moreover, there are applications in biology and computer science as well [6, 7].

Fixed point theory in a CAT ( 0 ) space has been first studied by Kirk (see [8, 9]). He showed that every nonexpansive mapping defined on a bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT ( 0 ) space always has a fixed point. Since then the fixed point theory in a CAT ( 0 ) space has been rapidly developed and many papers have appeared (see, e.g., [814]). It is worth mentioning that the results in a CAT ( 0 ) space can be applied to any CAT ( k ) space with k 0 since any CAT ( k ) space is a CAT ( k ) space for every k k (see [[2], p.165]). Throughout the paper, and denote the set of natural numbers and the set of real numbers, respectively.

The Mann iteration process is defined by the sequence { x n } ,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) x n + a n T x n , n N ,
(1.1)

where { a n } is a sequence in ( 0 , 1 ) .

Further, the Ishikawa iteration process is defined as the sequence { x n } ,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) x n + a n T y n , y n = ( 1 b n ) x n + b n T x n , n N ,
(1.2)

where { a n } and { b n } are the sequences in ( 0 , 1 ) . This iteration process reduces to the Mann iteration process when b n = 0 for all n N .

Agarwal, O’Regan and Sahu [15] introduced the S-iteration process in a Banach space,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) T x n + a n T y n , y n = ( 1 b n ) x n + b n T x n , n N ,
(1.3)

where { a n } and { b n } are the sequences in ( 0 , 1 ) . Note that (1.3) is independent of (1.2) (and hence of (1.1)). They showed that their process is independent of those of Mann and Ishikawa and converges faster than both of these (see [[15], Proposition 3.1]).

Schu [16], in 1991, considered the modified Mann iteration process which is a generalization of the Mann iteration process,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) x n + a n T n x n , n N ,
(1.4)

where { a n } is a sequence in ( 0 , 1 ) .

Tan and Xu [17], in 1994, studied the modified Ishikawa iteration process which is a generalization of the Ishikawa iteration process,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) x n + a n T n y n , y n = ( 1 b n ) x n + b n T n x n , n N ,
(1.5)

where the sequences { a n } and { b n } are in ( 0 , 1 ) . This iteration process reduces to the modified Mann iteration process when b n = 0 for all n N .

Recently, Agarwal, O’Regan and Sahu [15] introduced the modified S-iteration process in a Banach space,
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) T n x n + a n T n y n , y n = ( 1 b n ) x n + b n T n x n , n N ,
(1.6)

where the sequences { a n } and { b n } are in ( 0 , 1 ) . Note that (1.6) is independent of (1.5) (and hence of (1.4)). Also, (1.6) reduces to (1.3) when n = 1 .

We now modify (1.6) in a CAT ( 0 ) space as follows.

Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a complete CAT ( 0 ) space X and T : K K be an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with F ( T ) . Suppose that { x n } is a sequence generated iteratively by
{ x 1 K , x n + 1 = ( 1 a n ) T n x n a n T n y n , y n = ( 1 b n ) x n b n T n x n , n N ,
(1.7)

where and throughout the paper { a n } , { b n } are the sequences such that 0 a n , b n 1 for all n N .

In this paper, we study the modified S-iteration process for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings on the CAT ( 0 ) space and generalize some results of Khan and Abbas [14] which studied the S-iteration process in a CAT ( 0 ) space for nonexpansive mappings. This paper contains three sections. In Section 2, we first collect some known preliminaries and lemmas that will be used in the proofs of our main theorems. We give the main results related to the strong convergence theorems of the modified S-iteration process in a CAT ( 0 ) space in Section 3. Under some suitable condition, we obtain the main theorems which state that { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T. Our results can be applied to an S-iteration process since the modified S-iteration process reduces to the S-iteration process when n = 1 .

2 Preliminaries and lemmas

Let us recall some definitions and known results in the existing literature on this concept.

Let ( X , d ) be a metric space and K its nonempty subset. Let T : K K be a mapping. A point x K is called a fixed point of T if T x = x . We will also denote by F ( T ) the set of fixed points of T, that is, F ( T ) = { x K : T x = x } .

The concept of quasi-nonexpansiveness was introduced by Diaz and Metcalf [18] in 1967, the concept of asymptotically nonexpansiveness was introduced by Goebel and Kirk [19] in 1972. The iterative approximation problems for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping were studied by Liu [20], Fukhar-ud-din et al. [21], Khan et al. [22] and Beg et al. [23] in a Banach space and a CAT ( 0 ) space.

Definition 1 Let ( X , d ) be a metric space and K be its nonempty subset. Then T : K K is said to be
  1. (1)

    nonexpansive if d ( T x , T y ) d ( x , y ) for all x , y K ,

     
  2. (2)

    asymptotically nonexpansive if there exists a sequence { u n } [ 0 , ) with the property lim n u n = 0 and such that d ( T n x , T n y ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x , y ) for all x , y K ,

     
  3. (3)

    quasi-nonexpansive if d ( T x , p ) d ( x , p ) for all x K , p F ( T ) ,

     
  4. (4)

    asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive if there exists a sequence { u n } [ 0 , ) with the property lim n u n = 0 and such that d ( T n x , p ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x , p ) for all x K , p F ( T ) ,

     
  5. (5)

    semi-compact if for a sequence { x n } in K with lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 , there exists a subsequence { x n k } of { x n } such that x n k p K .

     

Remark 1 From Definition 1, it is clear that the class of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings includes nonexpansive mappings, whereas the class of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings is larger than that of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. The reverse of these implications may not be true.

Let ( X , d ) be a metric space. A geodesic path joining x X to y X (or more briefly, a geodesic from x to y) is a map c from a closed interval [ 0 , l ] R to X such that c ( 0 ) = x , c ( l ) = y and d ( c ( t ) , c ( t ) ) = | t t | for all t , t [ 0 , l ] . In particular, c is an isometry and d ( x , y ) = l . The image of c is called a geodesic (or metric) segment joining x and y. When it is unique, this geodesic is denoted by [ x , y ] . The space ( X , d ) is said to be a geodesic space if every two points of X are joined by a geodesic, and X is said to be uniquely geodesic if there is exactly one geodesic joining x to y for each x , y X . A subset Y X is said to be convex if Y includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.

A geodesic triangle ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) in a geodesic metric space ( X , d ) consists of three points in X (the vertices of ) and a geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the edges of ). A comparison triangle for a geodesic triangle ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) in ( X , d ) is a triangle ¯ ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) = ( x ¯ 1 , x ¯ 2 , x ¯ 3 ) in the Euclidean plane R 2 such that
d R 2 ( x ¯ i , x ¯ j ) = d ( x i , x j )

for i , j { 1 , 2 , 3 } . Such a triangle always exists (see [2]).

A geodesic metric space is said to be a CAT ( 0 ) space [2] if all geodesic triangles of an appropriate size satisfy the following comparison axiom.

Let be a geodesic triangle in X and let ¯ be a comparison triangle for . Then is said to satisfy the CAT ( 0 ) inequality if for all x , y and all comparison points x ¯ , y ¯ ¯ ,
d ( x , y ) d R 2 ( x ¯ , y ¯ ) .

A complete CAT ( 0 ) space is often called Hadamard space (see [24]).

Finally, we observe that if x, y 1 , y 2 are points of a CAT ( 0 ) space and if y 0 is the midpoint of the segment [ y 1 , y 2 ] , which we will denote by y 1 y 2 2 , then the CAT ( 0 ) inequality implies
d ( x , y 1 y 2 2 ) 2 1 2 d ( x , y 1 ) 2 + 1 2 d ( x , y 2 ) 2 1 4 d ( y 1 , y 2 ) 2 .
(2.1)

The equality holds for the Euclidean metric. In fact (see [[2], p.163]), a geodesic metric space is a CAT ( 0 ) space if and only if it satisfies inequality (2.1) (which is known as the CN inequality of Bruhat and Tits [25]).

Let x , y X , by [[12], Lemma 2.1(iv)] for each t [ 0 , 1 ] , then there exists a unique point z [ x , y ] such that
d ( x , z ) = t d ( x , y ) , d ( y , z ) = ( 1 t ) d ( x , y ) .
(2.2)

From now on, we will use the notation ( 1 t ) x t y for the unique point z satisfying (2.2). By using this notation, Dhompongsa and Panyanak [12] obtained the following lemma which will be used frequently in the proof of our main results.

Lemma 1 Let X be a CAT ( 0 ) space. Then
d ( ( 1 t ) x t y , z ) ( 1 t ) d ( x , z ) + t d ( y , z )

for all t [ 0 , 1 ] and x , y , z X .

The following lemma can be found in [26].

Lemma 2 Let { a n } and { u n } be two sequences of positive real numbers satisfying
a n + 1 ( 1 + u n ) a n

for all n N . If n = 1 u n < , then lim n a n exists.

3 Main results

In this section we prove the strong convergence theorems of the modified S-iteration process in a CAT ( 0 ) space.

Theorem 1 Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a complete CAT ( 0 ) space X, T : K K be asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with F ( T ) and { u n } be a nonnegative real sequence with n = 1 u n < . Suppose that { x n } is defined by the iteration process (1.7). If
lim inf n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 or lim sup n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 ,

where d ( x , F ( T ) ) = inf z F ( T ) d ( x , z ) , then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Proof Let p F ( T ) . Since T is an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping, there exists a sequence { u n } [ 0 , ) with the property lim n u n = 0 and such that
d ( T n x , p ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x , p )
for all x K and p F ( T ) . By combining this inequality and Lemma 1, we get
d ( y n , p ) = d ( ( 1 b n ) x n b n T n x n , p ) ( 1 b n ) d ( x n , p ) + b n d ( T n x n , p ) ( 1 b n ) d ( x n , p ) + b n ( 1 + u n ) d ( x n , p ) = ( 1 + b n u n ) d ( x n , p ) .
(3.1)
Also,
d ( x n + 1 , p ) = d ( ( 1 a n ) T n x n a n T n y n , p ) ( 1 a n ) d ( T n x n , p ) + a n d ( T n y n , p ) ( 1 a n ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x n , p ) + a n ( 1 + u n ) d ( y n , p ) ( 1 a n ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x n , p ) + a n ( 1 + u n ) ( 1 + b n u n ) d ( x n , p ) ( 1 a n ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x n , p ) + a n ( 1 + u n ) 2 d ( x n , p ) = ( 1 + u n ) ( 1 a n + a n + a n u n ) d ( x n , p ) ( 1 + u n ) ( 1 + u n ) d ( x n , p ) = ( 1 + u n ) 2 d ( x n , p ) .
(3.2)
When x 0 and 1 + x e x , we have ( 1 + x ) 2 e 2 x . Thus,
d ( x n + m , p ) ( 1 + u n + m 1 ) 2 d ( x n + m 1 , p ) e 2 u n + m 1 d ( x n + m 1 , p ) e 2 k = n n + m 1 u k d ( x n , p ) .
Let e 2 k = n n + m 1 u k = M . Thus, there exits a constant M > 0 such that
d ( x n + m , p ) M d ( x n , p )
for all n , m N and p F ( T ) . By (3.2),
d ( x n + 1 , p ) ( 1 + u n ) 2 d ( x n , p ) .
This gives
d ( x n + 1 , F ( T ) ) ( 1 + u n ) 2 d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = ( 1 + 2 u n + u n 2 ) d ( x n , F ( T ) ) .
Since n = 1 u n < , we have n = 1 ( 2 u n + u n 2 ) < . Lemma 2 and lim inf n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 or lim sup n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 gives that
lim n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 .
(3.3)
Now, we show that { x n } is a Cauchy sequence in K. Since lim n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 , for each ϵ > 0 , there exists n 1 N such that
d ( x n , F ( T ) ) < ϵ M + 1
for all n > n 1 . Thus, there exists p 1 F ( T ) such that
d ( x n , p 1 ) < ϵ M + 1 for all n > n 1
and we obtain that
d ( x n + m , x n ) d ( x n + m , p 1 ) + d ( p 1 , x n ) M d ( x n , p 1 ) + d ( x n , p 1 ) = ( M + 1 ) d ( x n , p 1 ) < ( M + 1 ) ϵ M + 1 = ϵ
for all m , n > n 1 . Therefore, { x n } is a Cauchy sequence in K. Since the set K is complete, the sequence { x n } must be convergence to a point in K. Let lim n x n = p K . Here after, we show that p is a fixed point. By lim n x n = p , for all ϵ 1 > 0 , there exists n 2 N such that
d ( x n , p ) < ϵ 1 2 ( 2 + u 1 )
(3.4)
for all n > n 2 . From (3.3), for each ϵ 1 > 0 , there exists n 3 N such that
d ( x n , F ( T ) ) < ϵ 1 2 ( 4 + 3 u 1 )
for all n > n 3 . In particular, inf { d ( x n 3 , p ) : p F ( T ) } < ϵ 1 2 ( 4 + 3 u 1 ) . Thus, there must exist p F ( T ) such that
d ( x n 3 , p ) < ϵ 1 2 ( 4 + 3 u 1 ) for all  n > n 3 .
(3.5)
From (3.4) and (3.5),
d ( T p , p ) d ( T p , p ) + d ( p , T x n 3 ) + d ( T x n 3 , p ) + d ( p , x n 3 ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) d ( T p , p ) + 2 d ( T x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) ( 1 + u 1 ) d ( p , p ) + 2 ( 1 + u 1 ) d ( x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) ( 1 + u 1 ) d ( p , x n 3 ) + ( 1 + u 1 ) d ( x n 3 , p ) + 2 ( 1 + u 1 ) d ( x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) + d ( x n 3 , p ) = ( 2 + u 1 ) d ( x n 3 , p ) + ( 4 + 3 u 1 ) d ( x n 3 , p ) < ( 2 + u 1 ) ϵ 1 2 ( 2 + u 1 ) + ( 4 + 3 u 1 ) ϵ 1 2 ( 4 + 3 u 1 ) = ϵ 1 .

Since ϵ 1 is arbitrary, so d ( T p , p ) = 0 , i.e., T p = p . Therefore, p F ( T ) . This completes the proof. □

Remark 2 Let the hypothesis of Theorem 1 be satisfied and T : K K be an asymptotically nonexpansive or quasi-nonexpansive mapping. From Remark 1, the class of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings includes quasi-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Now, we give the following corollaries which have been proved by Theorem 1.

Corollary 1 Under the hypothesis of Theorem  1, T satisfies the following conditions:
  1. (1)

    lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 .

     
  2. (2)
    If the sequence { z n } in K satisfies lim n d ( z n , T z n ) = 0 , then
    lim inf n d ( z n , F ( T ) ) = 0 or lim sup n d ( z n , F ( T ) ) = 0 .
     

Then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Proof It follows from the hypothesis that lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 . From (2),
lim inf n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 or lim sup n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 .

Therefore, the sequence { x n } must converge to a fixed point of T by Theorem 1. □

Corollary 2 Under the hypothesis of Theorem  1, T satisfies the following conditions:
  1. (1)

    lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 .

     
  2. (2)
    There exists a function f : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) which is right-continuous at 0, f ( 0 ) = 0 and f ( r ) > 0 for all r > 0 such that
    d ( x , T x ) f ( d ( x , F ( T ) ) ) for all x K ,
     

where d ( x , F ( T ) ) = inf z F ( T ) d ( x , z ) .

Then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Proof It follows from the hypothesis that
lim n f ( d ( x n , F ( T ) ) lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 .
That is,
lim n f ( d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 .
Since f : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) is right-continuous at 0 and f ( 0 ) = 0 , therefore we have
lim n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 .

Thus, lim inf n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = lim sup n d ( x n , F ( T ) ) = 0 . By Theorem 1, the sequence { x n } converges strongly to q, a fixed point of T. This completes the proof. □

Finally, we give the following theorem which has a different hypothesis from Theorem 1.

Theorem 2 Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a complete CAT ( 0 ) space X, T : K K be an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with F ( T ) and { u n } be a nonnegative real sequence with n = 1 u n < . Suppose that { x n } is defined by the iteration process (1.7). If T is semi-compact and lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 , then the sequence { x n } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Proof From the hypothesis, we have lim n d ( x n , T x n ) = 0 . Also, since T is semi-compact, there exists a subsequence { x n k } of { x n } such that x n k p K . Hence,
d ( p , T p ) = lim n d ( x n k , T x n k ) = 0 .
Thus, p F ( T ) . By (3.2),
d ( x n + 1 , p ) ( 1 + u n ) 2 d ( x n , p ) = ( 1 + 2 u n + u n 2 ) d ( x n , p ) .

Since n = 1 u n < , we have n = 1 ( 2 u n + u n 2 ) < . By Lemma 2, lim n d ( x n , p ) exists and x n k p F ( T ) gives that x n p F ( T ) . This completes the proof. □

4 Conclusions

The class of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings includes nonexpansive mappings, where as the class of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings is larger than that of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Then these results presented in this paper extend and generalize some works for a CAT ( 0 ) space in the literature.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This paper has been presented in The ‘International Conference on Applied Analysis and Algebra (ICAAA2012)’ in Yıldız Technical University, 20-24 June 2012, Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Sakarya University

References

  1. Goebel K, Reich S: Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry and Nonexpansive Mappings. Dekker, New York; 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Bridson M, Haefliger A: Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature. Springer, Berlin; 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown KS: Buildings. Springer, New York; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Burago D, Burago Y, Ivanov S Graduate Studies in Math. 33. In A Course in Metric Geometry. Am. Math. Soc., Providence; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gromov M Progress in Math. 152. In Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces. Birkhäuser, Boston; 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Bartolini I, Ciaccia P, Patella M SPIR Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2476. In String Matching with Metric Trees Using an Approximate Distance. Springer, Berlin; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Semple C Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and Its Application. In Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. Colecc. Abierta 64. In Seminar of Math. Anal.. Univ. Seville Secr. Publ., Seville; 2003:195–225. Malaga/Seville, 2002/2003Google Scholar
  9. Kirk WA: Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory II. In International Conference on Fixed Point Theo. Appl.. Yokohama Publ., Yokohama; 2004:113–142.Google Scholar
  10. Dhompongsa S, Kirk WA, Sims B: Fixed point of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2006, 65: 762–772. 10.1016/j.na.2005.09.044MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhompongsa S, Kirk WA, Panyanak B: Nonexpansive set-valued mappings in metric and Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear and Convex Anal. 2007, 8: 35–45.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhompongsa S, Panyanak B:On -convergence theorems in CAT ( 0 ) spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2008, 56: 2572–2579. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.05.036MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Razani A, Salahifard H:Invariant approximation for CAT ( 0 ) spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72: 2421–2425. 10.1016/j.na.2009.10.039MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan SH, Abbas M:Strong and -convergence of some iterative schemes in CAT ( 0 ) spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 109–116. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.10.037MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Agarwal RP, O’Regan D, Sahu DR: Iterative construction of fixed points of nearly asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. J. Nonlinear Convex. Anal. 2007, 8(1):61–79.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Schu J: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1991, 43: 153–159. 10.1017/S0004972700028884MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tan KK, Xu HK: Fixed point iteration process for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1994, 122(3):733–739. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1203993-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Diaz JB, Metcalf FT: On the structure of the set of subsequential limit points of successive approximations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 1967, 73: 516–519. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11725-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Goebel K, Kirk WA: A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1972, 35(1):171–174. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0298500-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Q: Iterative sequences for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2001, 259: 1–7. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.6980MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukhar-ud-din H, Khan SH: Convergence of iterates with errors of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings and applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 328: 821–829. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.068MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan AR, Khamsi MA, Fukhar-ud-din H:Strong convergence of a general iteration scheme in CAT ( 0 ) spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 783–791. 10.1016/j.na.2010.09.029MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Beg I, Abbas M:An iterative process for a family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in CAT ( 0 ) spaces. Novi Sad J. Math. 2011, 41(2):149–157.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirk WA: A fixed point theorem in CAT ( 0 ) spaces and R -trees. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2004, 4: 309–316.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Bruhat F, Tits J: Groupes r éductifs sur un corps local. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 1972, 41: 5–251. 10.1007/BF02715544MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou H, Agarwal RP, Cho YJ, Kim YS: Nonexpansive mappings and iterative methods in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Georgian Math. J. 2002, 9: 591–600.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Şahin and Başarır; licensee Springer 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.