 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Fixed point theorems for weakly Ccontractive mappings in partial metric spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 107 (2013)
Abstract
In this work, we establish some fixed point theorems for weakly Ccontractive mappings in partial metric spaces. Presented theorems extend and generalize some existence results in the literature. Also, an example is given to support our results.
MSC:47H10, 54H25.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Fixed point theory has fascinated many mathematicians since 1922 with the celebrated Banach’s fixed point theorem. Fixed point theory plays a major role within as well as outside mathematics, so the attraction of fixed point theory to large numbers of researchers is understandable, and the problem of fixed point has been studied in several directions; see for example, [1–4]. The study of metric fixed point theory has been researched extensively in the past decades. Recently, some generalizations of the notion of a metric space have been proposed by some authors. In 1992, Matthews introduced a new notion of generalized metric space called partial metric space (for short PMS) [5, 6], in which the distance of a point from itself may not be zero. After the appearance of partial metric spaces, some authors started to generalize Banach contraction mapping theorem to partial metric spaces and focus on fixed point theory on partial metric spaces (see, e.g., [7–24]). A new category of fixed point problems was addressed by Khan et al. [25]. In this study, they introduced the concept of altering distance function. In [26], Choudhury introduced the concept of weakly Ccontractive mapping as follows.
Definition 1.1 [26]
Let (X,d) be a metric space and T:X\to X be a mapping. Then T is said to be weakly Ccontractive (or a weakly Ccontraction) if for all x,y\in X, the following inequality holds:
where \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a continuous function such that \varphi (x,y)=0 if and only if x=y=0.
Shatanawi [27] investigated some fixed point theorems and coupled fixed point theorems for weakly Ccontractive mapping by using an altering distance function in metric and partially ordered metric spaces.
Recently, Haghi et al. [28] pointed that many fixed point generalizations to partial metric spaces can be obtained from the corresponding results in metric spaces and considered some cases to demonstrate this fact. The aim of this paper is to research fixed point and common fixed point theorems for weakly Ccontractive type mappings in partial metric spaces. Our results extend and generalize some results of [27] to partial metric spaces; all of our results cannot be obtained from the corresponding results in metric spaces. Moreover, even in metric spaces, our results are the generalizations of some results of [27]. Also, we give an example to illustrate our results.
Throughout this paper, the letters N and {N}^{+} denote the set of all nonnegative integer numbers and the set of all positive integer numbers, respectively. Let us recall some definitions and properties of partial metric spaces.
Definition 1.2 [6]
Let X be a nonempty set. The mapping p:X\times X\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is said to be a partial metric on X if the following conditions hold:
(P_{1}) x=y\iff p(x,y)=p(x,x)=p(y,y),
(P_{2}) p(x,x)\le p(x,y),
(P_{3}) p(x,y)=p(y,x),
(P_{4}) p(x,y)\le p(x,z)+p(z,y)p(z,z),
for any x,y,z\in X. The pair (X,p) is then called a partial metric space.
It is clear that, if p(x,y)=0, then from (P_{1}) and (P_{2}), x=y. But if x=y, p(x,y) may not be 0.
For a partial metric p on X, the function {d}_{p}:X\times X\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) given by
is a (usual) metric on X. Each partial metric p on X generates a {T}_{0}topology {\tau}_{p} on X with a base of the family of open pballs \{{B}_{p}(x,\epsilon ):x\in X,\epsilon >0\}, where {B}_{p}(x,\epsilon )=\{y\in X:p(x,y)<p(x,x)+\epsilon \} for all x\in X and \epsilon >0.
Let (X,p) be a partial metric space. Then:
A sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in a partial metric space (X,p) converges to a point x\in X if and only if p(x,x)={lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p(x,{x}_{n}).
A sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in a partial metric space (X,p) is called a Cauchy sequence if there exists (and is finite) {lim}_{n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{m},{x}_{n}).
A partial metric space (X,p) is said to be complete if every Cauchy sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X converges, with respect to {\tau}_{p}, to a point x\in X such that p(x,x)={lim}_{n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{m},{x}_{n}).
The following lemmas play a major role in proving our main results.
Lemma 1.1 [29]
Let (X,p) be a partial metric space.

(A)
A sequence \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,p) if and only if \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}).

(B)
(X,p) is complete if and only if (X,{d}_{p}) is complete. Moreover,
\underset{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}{lim}{d}_{p}({x}_{n},x)=0\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\iff \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}p(x,x)=\underset{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}{lim}p({x}_{n},x)=\underset{n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}}{lim}p({x}_{n},{x}_{m}).(1.1)
Assume that {x}_{n}\to z as n\to +\mathrm{\infty} in a PMS (X,p) such that p(z,z)=0. Then {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{n},y)=p(z,y) for every y\in X.
Lemma 1.3 [31]
Let (X,p) be a partial metric space and let \{{x}_{n}\} be a sequence in X such that
If \{{x}_{2n}\} is not a Cauchy sequence in (X,p), then there exist \epsilon >0 and two sequences \{m(k)\} and \{n(k)\} of positive integers such that n(k)>m(k)>k and the following four sequences tend to ε when k\to +\mathrm{\infty}:
2 Main results
We start this section with the following definition, which can be seen in [9, 16, 17, 30].
Definition 2.1 Let (x,P) be a partial metric space. A mapping T:X\to X is said to be continuous at {x}_{0}\in X if for every \epsilon >0, there exists \delta >0 such that T({B}_{p}({x}_{0},\delta ))\subset {B}_{p}(T{x}_{0},\epsilon ).
Definition 2.2 [25]
The function \phi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is called an altering distance function, if the following properties are satisfied:

(1)
φ is continuous and nondecreasing;

(2)
\phi (t)=0 if and only if t=0.
Lemma 2.1 [31]
Let (X,p) be a partial metric space, T:X\to X be a given mapping. Suppose that T is continuous at {x}_{0}\in X. Then, for each sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X, {x}_{n}\to {x}_{0} in {\tau}_{p}\Rightarrow T{x}_{n}\to T{x}_{0} in {\tau}_{p} holds.
Theorem 2.1 Let (X,\u2aaf) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a partial metric p on X such that (X,p) is complete. Let f:X\to X be a continuous nondecreasing mapping. Suppose that for comparable x,y\in X, we have
where ψ and φ are altering distance functions with
for all t\ge 0, and \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a continuous function with \varphi (x,y)=0 if and only if x=y=0. If there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff{x}_{0}, then f has a fixed point.
Proof If {x}_{0}=f{x}_{0}, then {x}_{0} is a fixed point of f. Suppose that {x}_{0}\prec f{x}_{0}, we can choose {x}_{1}\in X such that f{x}_{0}={x}_{1}. Since f is a nondecreasing function, we have
Continuing this process, we can construct a sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X such that {x}_{n+1}=f{x}_{n} with
It is clear that if p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0 for some {n}_{0}\in N, then f has a fixed point. Taking p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})>0 for all n\in N, now let us prove the following inequality:
Suppose this is not true, then p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})>p({x}_{n1},{x}_{n}) for some {n}_{0}, that is,
From (2.1) and (2.4), we obtain that
this together with (2.2) shows that
Using the property of ϕ, we have
Since
applying (2.5), we get
From the property of ψ, we have p({x}_{{n}_{0}},{x}_{{n}_{0}+1})=0, which contradicts with p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})>0 for all n\in N; hence (2.3) holds. Therefore, \{p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})\} is a nonincreasing sequence, and thus there exists r\ge 0 such that
Using (2.1), we obtain
it means that
Letting n\to +\mathrm{\infty} in the above inequality, we get
the continuity of ϕ guarantees that
and the property of ϕ gives that
Since
on taking inferior limit in the above inequalities and using (2.8), we obtain that \psi (r)=0 and so r=0, therefore,
moreover, we have
Now, we claim that \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in the metric space (X,{d}_{p}) (and so also in the space (X,p) by Lemma 1.1). For this, it is sufficient to show that \{{x}_{2n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}). Suppose that this is not the case, then using Lemma 1.1 we have that \{{x}_{2n}\} is not a Cauchy sequence in (X,p). By Lemma 1.3, we obtain that there exist \epsilon >0 and two sequences \{m(k)\} and \{n(k)\} of positive integers such that n(k)>m(k)>k and sequences in (1.2) tend to ε when k\to +\mathrm{\infty}. For two comparable elements y={x}_{2n(k)+1} and x={x}_{2m(k)}, we can obtain, from (2.1), that
Taking k\to +\mathrm{\infty} in (2.9), we get
which implies that \varphi (\epsilon ,\epsilon )=0, hence \epsilon =0, a contradiction. Thus, \{{x}_{2n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}) and so \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence both in (X,{d}_{p}) and in (X,p). Since (X,p) is complete then the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} converges to some z\in X, that is
Moreover, since \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}), we have {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}{d}_{p}({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=0. By {d}_{p}({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=2p({x}_{n},{x}_{m})p({x}_{n},{x}_{n})p({x}_{m},{x}_{m}) and {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{n},{x}_{n})=0, we have {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=0. Then (2.10) yields that
Applying the triangular inequality, we have
taking n\to +\mathrm{\infty} in the above inequalities, then the continuity of f and Lemma 2.1 give that
hence
By combining (2.1) and (2.12), we have
which yields that \varphi (p(z,fz),p(fz,z))=0, and thus p(z,fz)=0, that is z=fz. Therefore, z is a fixed point of f. □
Theorem 2.2 Suppose that X, f, ψ, φ, and ϕ are the same as in Theorem 2.1 except the continuity of f. Suppose that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X with {x}_{n}\to x\in X, we have {x}_{n}\u2aafx for all n\in N. If there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff{x}_{0}, then f has a fixed point.
Proof As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we have a Cauchy sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X. Since (X,p) is complete, there exists z\in X such that {x}_{n}\to z, that is,
due to the hypothesis, we get {x}_{n}\u2aafz. Similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we have that
From (2.1), we obtain that
Letting n\to +\mathrm{\infty} in the above inequalities, and by Lemma 1.2, we have
which implies, from (2.2), that \varphi (p(z,fz),0)=0, hence p(z,fz)=0, and thus z=fz. Therefore, f has a fixed point. □
Theorem 2.3 Let (X,p) be a complete partial metric space, f and g be selfmappings on X. Suppose that for all x,y\in X
where ψ and φ are altering distance functions with
for all t\ge 0, and \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a continuous function with \varphi (x,y)=0 if and only if x=y=0.
Then f and g have a unique common fixed point.
Proof Let {x}_{0} be an arbitrary point in X. One can choose {x}_{1}\in X such that f{x}_{0}={x}_{1}. Also, one can choose {x}_{2}\in X such that g{x}_{1}={x}_{2}. Continuing this process, one can construct a sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X such that
Now, we discuss the following two cases.
Case 1. If p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0 for some {n}_{0}\in N, then f and g have at least one common fixed point. In fact, if p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0 for some {n}_{0}\in N, that is p({x}_{{n}_{0}},{x}_{{n}_{0}+1})=0, which implies that {x}_{{n}_{0}}={x}_{{n}_{0}+1}. If {n}_{0}=2k (k\in N), then {x}_{2k}={x}_{2k+1}. Using (2.13), we have
With the help of (2.14) and (2.16), we conclude that \varphi (p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+2}),p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+1}))=0, hence, using the property of ϕ, we get p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+2})=0, that is {x}_{2k+1}={x}_{2k+2}. By similar arguments, we obtain {x}_{2k+2}={x}_{2k+3}, {x}_{2k+3}={x}_{2k+4} and so on. Thus, \{{x}_{n}\} becomes a constant from n=2k, that is,
Equations (2.15) and (2.17) yield that
which implies that {x}_{2k} is the common fixed point of f and g. Similarly, one can show that if {n}_{0}=2k+1 (k\in N), then f and g have at least one common fixed point. Therefore, we have proved that if p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0 for some {n}_{0}\in N, then f and g have at least one common fixed point.
Case 2. If p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+2})=0 for some {n}_{0}\in N, then f and g have at least one common fixed point. Indeed, if {n}_{0}=2k (k\in N), then p({x}_{2k},{x}_{2k+2})=0. Hence, {x}_{2k}={x}_{2k+2}, due to (2.13), we have
Applying (2.14) and (2.19), we obtain \varphi (p({x}_{2k},{x}_{2k+2}),p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+1}))=0. Using the property of ϕ, we have
From (2.20) and using p({x}_{2k},{x}_{2k+2})=0, we get that
which implies that \psi (p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+2}))=0, and thus p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k+2})=0. Hence we obtain that f and g have at least one common fixed point from case 1. Similarly, it is easy to show that if p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+2})=0 for some n=2k+1 (k\in N), then f and g have at least one common fixed point, this completes the proof of case 2.
Taking p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})>0 and p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+2})>0 for all n\in N. Now we prove that for every k\in N, we have
Suppose this is not true, then p({x}_{2k+2},{x}_{2k+1})>p({x}_{2k+1},{x}_{2k}) for some k={k}_{0}, that is,
Using (2.13) and (2.15), we obtain that
Equations (2.14) and (2.23) give that \varphi (p({x}_{2{k}_{0}},{x}_{2{k}_{0}+2}),p({x}_{2{k}_{0}+1},{x}_{2{k}_{0}+1}))=0. Using the property of ϕ, we get p({x}_{2{k}_{0}},{x}_{2{k}_{0}+2})=0, which contradicts with p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+2})>0 for n\in N, hence (2.22) holds.
Similarly, one can show that for every k\in {N}^{+}, the following inequality holds.
Equations (2.22) and (2.24) imply that the sequence \{p({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})\} is nonincreasing, and consequently there exists some r\ge 0 such that
By (2.25) and the following inequalities,
we get that \{p({x}_{2n},{x}_{2n+2})\} is bounded, and hence it has some subsequence \{p({x}_{2n(k)},{x}_{2n(k)+2})\} converging to some {r}_{0}, that is,
Taking (P_{2}) into account, we have
which combining with (2.25) shows that p({x}_{2n(k)+1},{x}_{2n(k)+1}) is bounded, and hence there exists subsequence p({x}_{2n({k}_{i})+1},{x}_{2n({k}_{i})+1}) of p({x}_{2n(k)+1},{x}_{2n(k)+1}) such that p({x}_{2n({k}_{i})+1},{x}_{2n({k}_{i})+1}) converges to some {r}_{1}, that is,
By (2.13), we have
Letting i\to +\mathrm{\infty} in (2.28), and using (2.25)(2.27), we obtain that
which means that \varphi ({r}_{0},{r}_{1})=0, hence {r}_{0}=0 and {r}_{1}=0.
Since
taking the limit as i\to +\mathrm{\infty}, we have \psi (r)=0, which implies that r=0, that is,
Now, we claim that \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in the metric space (X,{d}_{p}) (and so also in the space (X,p) by Lemma 1.1). For this, it is sufficient to show that \{{x}_{2n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}). Suppose that this is not the case, then using Lemma 1.1, we have that \{{x}_{2n}\} is not a Cauchy sequence in (X,p). By Lemma 1.3, we obtain that there exist \epsilon >0 and two sequences \{m(k)\} and \{n(k)\} of positive integers such that n(k)>m(k)>k and sequences in (1.2) tend to ε when k\to +\mathrm{\infty}.
From (2.13), we get that
Letting k\to +\mathrm{\infty} in the above inequalities and using the continuity of ψ, φ and ϕ, we get that
therefore, we get that \varphi (\epsilon ,\epsilon )=0. Hence, \epsilon =0 which is a contradiction. Thus, \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}), and \{{x}_{n}\} is also a Cauchy sequence in (X,p). Since (X,p) is complete, then the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} converges to some z\in X, that is,
Moreover, the sequence \{{x}_{2n}\} and \{{x}_{2n+1}\} converge to z\in X, that is,
and
Using the fact that \{{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in (X,{d}_{p}), we have {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}{d}_{p}({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=0, which together with {d}_{p}({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=2p({x}_{n},{x}_{m})p({x}_{n},{x}_{n})p({x}_{m},{x}_{m}) yields that {lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}p({x}_{n},{x}_{m})=0. Hence, we have
By substituting x={x}_{2n(k)+1}, y=z in (2.13), we get that
letting k\to +\mathrm{\infty} and applying Lemma 1.2, we conclude that
which yields that \varphi (p(z,gz),0)=0; hence, p(z,gz)=0, and thus z=gz. Similarly, one can easily show that z=fz, therefore, z is the common fixed point of f and g.
Now we prove the uniqueness of common fixed point. Let us suppose that u is also the common fixed point of f and g. Since
which means that \varphi (p(u,z),p(u,z))=0; hence, p(u,z)=0, and so u=z. Thus, the uniqueness of the common fixed point is proved. □
By taking \phi =\psi in Theorems 2.12.3, respectively, we have the following results.
Corollary 2.1 Let (X,\u2aaf) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a partial metric p on X such that (X,p) is complete. Let f:X\to X be a continuous nondecreasing mapping. Suppose that for comparable x,y\in X, we have
where ψ is an altering distance function and \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a continuous function with \varphi (x,y)=0 if and only if x=y=0. If there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff{x}_{0}, then f has a fixed point.
Corollary 2.2 Suppose that X, f, ψ, and ϕ are the same as in Corollary 2.1 except the continuity of f. Suppose that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X with {x}_{n}\to x\in X, we have {x}_{n}\u2aafx for all n\in N. If there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff{x}_{0}, then f has a fixed point.
Corollary 2.3 Let (X,p) be a complete partial metric space, f and g be selfmappings on X. Suppose that there exist functions ψ and ϕ such that for all x,y\in X
where ψ is an altering distance function and \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a continuous function with \varphi (x,y)=0 if and only if x=y=0.
Then f and g have a unique common fixed point.
Remark 2.1 If we replace the partial metric p by (usual) metric d in Corollaries 2.12.3, then we get Theorems 2.12.3 of [27].
Now, we introduce an example to support the usability of our results.
Example 2.1 Let X=[0,1] be endowed with the usual partial metric p:X\times X\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) defined by p(x,y)=max\{x,y\}. It is easy to show that the partial metric space (X,p) is complete. Also, define the mappings f,g:X\to X by fx=\frac{{x}^{2}}{4} and gx=\frac{{x}^{2}}{5}, respectively. Let us take \psi ,\phi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) such that \psi (t)={t}^{2} and \phi (t)=\frac{{t}^{2}}{2}, respectively, and take \varphi :[0,+\mathrm{\infty})\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) such that \varphi (t,s)=\frac{{(t+s)}^{2}}{16}. If x\ge y, then
and
So, we have
If x\le y, then
and
So, we have
From the above arguments, we conclude that (2.13) holds; hence, all the required hypotheses of Theorem 2.3 are satisfied. Thus, we deduce the existence and uniqueness of a common fixed point of f and g. Here, 0 is the unique common fixed point.
References
Berinde V: Generalized coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 7347–7355. 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.053
Qiu ZY: Existence and uniqueness of common fixed points for two multivalued operators in ordered metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63: 1279–1286. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.021
Zhu CX, Yin JD: Calculations of a random fixed point index of a random semiclosed 1setcontractive operator. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 51: 1135–1139. 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.12.023
Zhu CX, Chen CF: Calculations of random fixed point index. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 339: 839–844. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.040
Matthews, SG: Partial metric topology. Research Report 212, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Warwick (1992)
Matthews SG: Partial metric topology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 728. General Topology and Its Applications 1994, 183–197.
Abbas M, Nazir T: Fixed point of generalize weakly contractive mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 1
Abdeljawad T: Fixed points for generalized weakly contractive mappings in partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54: 2923–2927. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.013
Abdeljawad T, Karapınar E, Tas K: Existence and uniqueness of a commmon fixed point on partial metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1900–1904. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.014
Abdeljawad T, Karapınar E, Tas K: A generalized contraction principle with control functions on partial metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63: 716–719. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.035
Abdeljawad T, Aydi H, Karapınar E: Coupled fixed points for MeirKeeler contractions in ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012., 2012: Article ID 327273
Agarwal RP, Alghamdi MA, Shahzad N: Fixed point theory for cyclic generalized contractions in partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 40
Aydi H, Karapınar E: New MeirKeeler type tripled fixed point theorems on ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012., 2012: Article ID 409872
Aydi H, Karapınar E: A MeirKeeler common type fixed point theorem on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 26
Aydi H, HadjAmor S, Karapınar E: Berinde type generalized contractions on partial metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 312479
Chi KP, Karapınar E, Thanh TD: A generalized contraction principle in partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55: 1673–1681. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.11.005
Karapınar E, Shatanawi W:On weakly (C,\psi ,\varphi )contractive mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 495892
Karapınar E, Erhan İM: Fixed point theorems for operators on partial metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1894–1899. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.013
Karapınar E: A note on common fixed point theorems in partial metric spaces. Miskolc Math. Notes 2011, 12(2):185–191.
Karapınar E: Generalizations of Caristi Kirk’s theorem on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 4
Karapınar E, Yuce IS: Fixed point theory for cyclic generalized weak ϕ contraction on partial metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 491542
Karapınar E, Shobkolaei N, Sedghi S, Vaezpour SM: A common fixed point theorem for cyclic operators on partial metric spaces. Filomat 2012, 26(2):407–414. 10.2298/FIL1202407K
Romaguera S: Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions on partial metric spaces. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159: 194–199. 10.1016/j.topol.2011.08.026
Shatanawi W, Samet B, Abbas M: Coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55: 680–687. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.042
Khan MS, Swaleh M, Sessa S: Fixed point theorems by altering distances between the points. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1984, 30: 1–9. 10.1017/S0004972700001659
Choudhury BS: Unique fixed point theorem for weak Ccontractive mappings. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2009, 5: 6–13.
Shatanawi W: Fixed point theorems for nonlinear weakly Ccontractive mappings in metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54: 2816–2826. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.069
Haghi RH, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Be careful on partial metric fixed point results. Topol. Appl. 2013, 160: 450–454. 10.1016/j.topol.2012.11.004
Abdeljawad T, Karapınar E, Tas K: Existence and uniqueness of common fixed point on partial spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1894–1899. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.013
Ilić D, Pavlović V, Rakocević V: Some new extensions of Banach’s contraction principle to partial metric space. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1326–1330. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.02.025
Nashine HK, Kadelburg Z, Radenović S: Common fixed points theorems for weakly istone increasing mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57: 2355–2365. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.019
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve this paper. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11071108) and supported by the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China (20114BAB201007, 2010GZS0147).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C., Zhu, C. Fixed point theorems for weakly Ccontractive mappings in partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013107
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013107
Keywords
 fixed point
 common fixed point
 partial metric space
 weakly Ccontraction