Fixed point iteration processes for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping in modular function spaces
© Dehaish and Kozlowski; licensee Springer 2012
Received: 4 April 2012
Accepted: 2 July 2012
Published: 20 July 2012
Let be a uniformly convex modular function space with a strong Opial property. Let be an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping, where C is a ρ-a.e. compact convex subset of . In this paper, we prove that the generalized Mann and Ishikawa processes converge almost everywhere to a fixed point of T. In addition, we prove that if C is compact in the strong sense, then both processes converge strongly to a fixed point.
Keywordsfixed point nonexpansive mapping fixed point iteration process Mann process Ishikawa process modular function space Orlicz space Opial property uniform convexity
where , for all . Their main result (Theorem 3.5) states that every asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive self-mapping of a nonempty, closed, bounded and convex subset C of a uniformly convex Banach space X has a fixed point. As pointed out by Kirk and Xu, asymptotic pointwise mappings seem to be a natural generalization of nonexpansive mappings. The conditions on can be for instance expressed in terms of the derivatives of iterations of T for differentiable T. In 2009 these results were generalized by Hussain and Khamsi to metric spaces, .
In 2011, Khamsi and Kozlowski  extended their result proving the existence of fixed points of asymptotic pointwise ρ-nonexpansive mappings acting in modular function spaces. The proof of this important theorem is of the existential nature and does not describe any algorithm for constructing a fixed point of an asymptotic pointwise ρ-nonexpansive mapping. This paper aims at filling this gap.
Let us recall that modular function spaces are natural generalization of both function and sequence variants of many important, from applications perspective, spaces like Lebesgue, Orlicz, Musielak-Orlicz, Lorentz, Orlicz-Lorentz, Calderon-Lozanovskii spaces and many others, see the book by Kozlowski  for an extensive list of examples and special cases. There exists an extensive literature on the topic of the fixed point theory in modular function spaces, see, e.g., [3–5, 8, 13, 14, 17–20, 24] and the papers referenced there.
It is well known that the fixed point construction iteration processes for generalized nonexpansive mappings have been successfully used to develop efficient and powerful numerical methods for solving various nonlinear equations and variational problems, often of great importance for applications in various areas of pure and applied science. There exists an extensive literature on the subject of iterative fixed point construction processes for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert, Banach and metric spaces, see, e.g., [1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 12, 16, 30–36, 38–42] and the works referred there. Kozlowski proved convergence to fixed point of some iterative algorithms of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces  and the existence of common fixed points of semigroups of pointwise Lipschitzian mappings in Banach spaces . Recently, weak and strong convergence of such processes to common fixed points of semigroups of mappings in Banach spaces has been demonstrated by Kozlowski and Sims .
We would like to emphasize that all convergence theorems proved in this paper define constructive algorithms that can be actually implemented. When dealing with specific applications of these theorems, one should take into consideration how additional properties of the mappings, sets and modulars involved can influence the actual implementation of the algorithms defined in this paper.
Section 2 provides necessary preliminary material on modular function spaces.
Section 3 introduces the asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings and related notions.
Section 4 deals with the Demiclosedness Principle which provides a critical stepping stone for proving almost everywhere convergence theorems.
Section 5 utilizes the Demiclosedness Principle to prove the almost everywhere convergence theorem for generalized Mann process.
Section 6 establishes the almost everywhere convergence theorem for generalized Ishikawa process.
Section 7 provides the strong convergence theorem for both generalized Mann and Ishikawa processes for the case of a strongly compact set C.
Let Ω be a nonempty set and Σ be a nontrivial σ-algebra of subsets of Ω. Let be a δ-ring of subsets of Ω such that for any and . Let us assume that there exists an increasing sequence of sets such that . By ℰ we denote the linear space of all simple functions with supports from . By we will denote the space of all extended measurable functions, i.e., all functions such that there exists a sequence , and for all . By we denote the characteristic function of the set A.
ρ is monotone, i.e., for all implies , where ;
ρ is orthogonally subadditive, i.e., for any such that , ;
ρ has the Fatou property, i.e., for all implies , where ;
ρ is order continuous in ℰ, i.e., and implies .
where each is actually an equivalence class of functions equal ρ-a.e. rather than an individual function. Where no confusion exists we will write ℳ instead of .
We say that ρ is a regular convex function semimodular if for every implies ρ-a.e.;
We say that ρ is a regular convex function modular if implies ρ-a.e.;
The class of all nonzero regular convex function modulars defined on Ω will be denoted by ℜ.
Let us denote for , . It is easy to prove that is a function pseudomodular in the sense of Def.2.1.1 in  (more precisely, it is a function pseudomodular with the Fatou property). Therefore, we can use all results of the standard theory of modular function spaces as per the framework defined by Kozlowski in [22–24].
Remark 2.1 We limit ourselves to convex function modulars in this paper. However, omitting convexity in Definition 2.1 or replacing it by s-convexity would lead to the definition of nonconvex or s-convex regular function pseudomodulars, semimodulars and modulars as in .
- (a)A modular function space is the vector space , or briefly , defined by
- (b)The following formula defines a norm in (frequently called Luxemurg norm):
In the following theorem, we recall some of the properties of modular spaces that will be used later on in this paper.
, is complete and the norm is monotone w.r.t. the natural order in ℳ.
if and only if for every .
If for an then there exists a subsequence of such that ρ-a.e.
If converges uniformly to f on a set then for every .
Let ρ-a.e. There exists a nondecreasing sequence of sets such that and converges uniformly to f on every (Egoroff theorem).
whenever ρ-a.e. (Note: this property is equivalent to the Fatou property.)
Defining and we have:
has the Lebesgue property, i.e., for , and .
is the closure of ℰ (in the sense of ).
The following definition plays an important role in the theory of modular function spaces.
whenever and .
ρ has ,
is a linear subspace of ,
if , then ,
if for an , then , i.e., the modular convergence is equivalent to the norm convergence.
We will also use another type of convergence which is situated between norm and modular convergence. It is defined, among other important terms, in the following definition.
We say that is ρ-convergent to f and write if and only if .
A sequence where is called ρ-Cauchy if as .
A set is called ρ-closed if for any sequence of , the convergence implies that f belongs to B.
A set is called ρ-bounded if .
A set is called strongly ρ-bounded if there exists such that .
A set is called ρ-compact if for any in C there exists a subsequence and an such that .
A set is called ρ-a.e. closed if for any in C which ρ-a.e. converges to some f, then we must have .
A set is called ρ-a.e. compact if for any in C, there exists a subsequence which ρ-a.e. converges to some .
- (i)Let and . The ρ-distance between f and C is defined as
Let us note that ρ-convergence does not necessarily imply ρ-Cauchy condition. Also, does not imply in general , . Using Theorem 2.1, it is not difficult to prove the following:
ρ-balls are ρ-closed and ρ-a.e. closed.
Let us compare different types of compactness introduced in Definition 2.5.
If C is ρ-compact, then C is ρ-a.e. compact.
If C is -compact, then C is ρ-compact.
If ρ satisfies , then -compactness and ρ-compactness are equivalent in .
follows from Theorem 2.1 part (3).
follows from Theorem 2.1 part (2).
follows from (2.2) and from Theorem 2.2 part (e).
3 Asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings
Let us recall the modular definitions of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings and associated notions, .
If for every and every , then T is called ρ-nonexpansive or shortly nonexpansive.
If converges pointwise to , then T is called asymptotic pointwise contraction.
If for any , then T is called asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive.
If for any with , then T is called strongly asymptotic pointwise contraction.
The above notation will be consistently used throughout this paper.
By we will denote the class of all asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings .
In this paper, we will impose some restrictions on the behavior of and . This type of assumptions is typical for controlling the convergence of iterative processes for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, see, e.g., .
We recall the following concepts related to the modular uniform convexity introduced in :
and if . We will use the following notational convention: .
We will need the following result whose proof is elementary. Note that for , this result follows directly from Definition 3.4.
The notion of bounded away sequences of real numbers will be used extensively throughout this paper.
Definition 3.5 A sequence is called bounded away from 0 if there exists such that for every . Similarly, is called bounded away from 1 if there exists such that for every .
Letting we get a contradiction which completes the proof. □
Let us introduce a notion of a ρ-type, a powerful technical tool which will be used in the proofs of our fixed point results.
Note that τ is convex provided ρ is convex. A typical method of proof for the fixed point theorems in Banach and metric spaces is to construct a fixed point by finding an element on which a specific type function attains its minimum. To be able to proceed with this method, one has to know that such an element indeed exists. This will be the subject of Lemma 3.3 below. First, let us recall the definition of the Opial property and the strong Opial property in modular function spaces, [15, 17].
Remark 3.1 Note that the ρ-a.e. Strong Opial property implies ρ-a.e. Opial property .
Remark 3.2 Also, note that, by virtue of Theorem 2.1 in , every convex, orthogonally additive function modular ρ has the ρ-a.e. strong Opial property. Let us recall that ρ is called orthogonally additive if whenever . Therefore, all Orlicz and Musielak-Orlicz spaces must have the strong Opial property.
Note that the Opial property in the norm sense does not necessarily hold for several classical Banach function spaces. For instance, the norm Opial property does not hold for spaces for while the modular strong Opial property holds in for all .
Let. Assume thathas the ρ-a.e. strong Opial property. Letbe a nonempty, strongly ρ-bounded and ρ-a.e. compact convex set. Then any ρ-type defined in C attains its minimum in C.
Let us finish this section with the fundamental fixed point existence theorem which will be used in many places in the current paper.
Assumeis. Let C be a ρ-closed ρ-bounded convex nonempty subset. Then anyasymptotically pointwise nonexpansive has a fixed point. Moreover, the set of all fixed pointsis ρ-closed.
4 Demiclosedness Principle
The following modular version of the Demiclosedness Principle will be used in the proof of our convergence Theorem 5.1. Our proof the Demiclosedness Principle uses the parallelogram inequality valid in the modular spaces with the property (see Lemma 4.2 in ). We start with a technical result which will be used in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
as . □
Corollary 4.1 If, under the hypothesis of Lemma 4.1, ρ satisfies additionally thecondition, thenas.
The version of the Demiclosedness Principle used in this paper (Theorem 4.1) requires the uniform continuity of the function modular ρ in the sense of the following definition (see, e.g., ).
provided and .
Let us mention that the uniform continuity holds for a large class of function modulars. For instance, it can be proved that in Orlicz spaces over a finite atomless measure  or in sequence Orlicz spaces  the uniform continuity of the Orlicz modular is equivalent to the -type condition.
ρ is ,
ρ has strong Opial property,
ρ has property and is uniformly continuous.
Letbe a nonempty, convex, strongly ρ-bounded and ρ-closed, and let. Let, and. Ifρ-a.e. and, then.
Using the properties of Ψ, we conclude that tends to zero itself, which contradicts our assumption (4.17). Hence, as . Clearly, then as , that is, while by ρ-continuity of T. By the uniqueness of the ρ-limit, we obtain , that is, . □
5 Convergence of generalized Mann iteration process
The following elementary, easy to prove, lemma will be used in this paper.
for each. Thenconverges to an.
Following Mann , let us start with the definition of the generalized Mann iteration process.
Remark 5.1 Observe that by the definition of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansiveness, for every . Hence we can always select a subsequence such that (5.2) holds. In other words, by a suitable choice of , we can always make well defined.
The following result provides an important technique which will be used in this paper.
Denote for every and . Observe that since , it follows that . By Lemma 5.1, there exists an such that as claimed. □
The next result will be essential for proving the convergence theorems for iterative process.
as claimed. □
In the next lemma, we prove that under suitable assumption the sequence becomes an approximate fixed point sequence, which will provide an important step in the proof of the generalized Mann iteration process convergence. First, we need to recall the following notions.
Definition 5.3 A strictly increasing sequence is called quasi-periodic if the sequence is bounded, or equivalently, if there exists a number such that any block of p consecutive natural numbers must contain a term of the sequence . The smallest of such numbers p will be called a quasi-period of .
as . By again, we get .
which tends to zero in view of (5.5), (5.6) and (5.2). □
The next theorem is the main result of this section.
ρ is ,
ρ has Strong Opial Property,
ρ has property and is uniformly continuous.
Letbe nonempty, ρ-a.e. compact, convex, strongly ρ-bounded and ρ-closed, and let. Assume that a sequenceis bounded away from 0 and 1. Letandbe a well-defined generalized Mann iteration process. Assume, in addition, that the set of indicesis quasi-periodic. Then there existssuch thatρ-a.e.
The contradiction implies that . Therefore, has at most one ρ-a.e. cluster point. Since, C is ρ-a.e. compact it follows that the sequence has exactly one ρ-a.e. cluster point, which means that ρ-a.e. Using Theorem 4.1 again, we get as claimed. □
Remark 5.2 It is easy to see that we can always construct a sequence with the quasi-periodic properties specified in the assumptions of Theorem 5.1. When constructing concrete implementations of this algorithm, the difficulty will be to ensure that the constructed sequence is not “too sparse” in the sense that the generalized Mann process remains well defined. The similar quasi-periodic type assumptions are common in the asymptotic fixed point theory, see, e.g., [2, 25, 28].
6 Convergence of generalized Ishikawa iteration process
The two-step Ishikawa iteration process is a generalization of the one-step Mann process. The Ishikawa iteration process, , provides more flexibility in defining the algorithm parameters, which is important from the numerical implementation perspective.
Remark 6.1 Observe that, by the definition of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansiveness, for every . Hence we can always select a subsequence such that (6.2) holds. In other words, by a suitable choice of , we can always make well defined.
Lemma 6.1 Letbe. Letbe a ρ-closed, ρ-bounded and convex set. Letand let. Letbe bounded away from 0 and 1, andbe bounded away from 1. Letandbe a generalized Ishikawa process. There exists then ansuch that.
Arguing like in the proof of Lemma 5.2, we conclude that there exists an such that . □
Applying Lemma 3.2 with and , we obtain the desired equality , while (6.11) follows from (6.10) via the construction formulas for and . □
The right-hand side of this inequality tends to zero because by Lemma 6.2 and ρ satisfies . □
Proof The proof is analogous to that of Lemma 5.4 with (6.11) used instead of (5.6) and (6.14) replacing (5.5). □
ρ is ,
ρ has Strong Opial Property,
ρ has property and is uniformly continuous.
Letbe nonempty, ρ-a.e. compact, convex, strongly ρ-bounded and ρ-closed, and let. Let. Letbe bounded away from 0 and 1, andbe bounded away from 1. Letbe such that the generalized Ishikawa processis well defined. If, in addition, the setis quasi-periodic, thengenerated byconverges ρ-a.e. to a fixed point.
Proof The proof is analogous to that of Theorem 5.1 with Lemma 5.4 replaced by Lemma 6.4, and Lemma 5.2 replaced by Lemma 6.1. □
7 Strong convergence
It is interesting that, provided C is ρ-compact, both generalized Mann and Ishikawa processes converge strongly to a fixed point of T even without assuming the Opial property.
Remark 7.1 Observe that in view of the assumption, the ρ-compactness of the set C assumed in Theorem 7.1 is equivalent to the compactness in the sense of the norm defined by ρ.
The authors would like to thank MA Khamsi for his valuable suggestions to improve the presentation of the paper.
- Bose SC: Weak convergence to the fixed point of an asymptotically nonexpansive. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1978, 68: 305–308. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0493543-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruck R, Kuczumow T, Reich S: Convergence of iterates of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property. Colloq. Math. 1993, 65(2):169–179.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez-Benavides T, Khamsi MA, Samadi S: Uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in modular function spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 46: 267–278. 10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00117-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez-Benavides T, Khamsi MA, Samadi S: Asymptotically regular mappings in modular function spaces. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2001, 53: 295–304.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez-Benavides T, Khamsi MA, Samadi S: Asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in modular function spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 265(2):249–263. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7275MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukhar-ud-din H, Khan AR: Approximating common fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive maps in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 53: 1349–1360.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gornicki J: Weak convergence theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Comment. Math. Univ. Carol. 1989, 30: 249–252.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Hajji A, Hanebaly E: Perturbed integral equations in modular function spaces. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2003, 20: 1–7. http://www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hussain N, Khamsi MA: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71(10):4423–4429. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.126MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishikawa S: Fixed points by a new iteration method. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974, 44: 147–150. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaminska A: On uniform convexity of Orlicz spaces. Indag. Math. 1982, 44(1):27–36.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan AR: On modified Noor iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2010, 17: 127–140.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA: Nonlinear semigroups in modular function spaces. Math. Jpn. 1992, 37(2):1–9.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA: Fixed point theory in modular function spaces. Proceedings of the Workshop on Recent Advances on Metric Fixed Point Theory Held in Sevilla, September, 1995 1995, 31–35.Google Scholar
- Khamsi MA: A convexity property in Modular function spaces. Math. Jpn. 1996, 44(2):269–279.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA: On asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in hyperconvex metric spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 365–373. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07172-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA, Kozlowski WM: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in modular function spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73: 2957–2967. 10.1016/j.na.2010.06.061MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA, Kozlowski WM: On asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in modular function spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 380(2):697–708. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.03.031MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA, Kozlowski WM, Reich S: Fixed point theory in modular function spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 1990, 14: 935–953. 10.1016/0362-546X(90)90111-SMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khamsi MA, Kozlowski WM, Shutao C: Some geometrical properties and fixed point theorems in Orlicz spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1991, 155(2):393–412. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90009-OMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirk WA, Xu HK: Asymptotic pointwise contractions. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 4706–4712. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.023MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski WM: Notes on modular function spaces I. Ann. Soc. Math. Pol., 1 Comment. Math. 1988, 28: 91–104.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski WM: Notes on modular function spaces II. Ann. Soc. Math. Pol., 1 Comment. Math. 1988, 28: 105–120.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski WM Series of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics 122. In Modular Function Spaces. Dekker, New York; 1988.Google Scholar
- Kozlowski WM: Fixed point iteration processes for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 377: 43–52. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.10.026MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski WM: Common fixed points for semigroups of pointwise Lipschitzian mappings in Banach spaces. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2011, 84: 353–361. 10.1017/S0004972711002668MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski WM: On the existence of common fixed points for semigroups of nonlinear mappings in modular function spaces. Ann. Soc. Math. Pol., 1 Comment. Math. 2011, 51(1):81–98.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski, WM, Sims, B: On the convergence of iteration processes for semigroups of nonlinear mappings in Banach spaces (to appear)Google Scholar
- Mann WR: Mean value methods in iteration. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1953, 4: 506–510. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1953-0054846-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nanjaras B, Panyanak B: Demiclosed principle for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 268780Google Scholar
- Noor MA, Xu B: Fixed point iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 267: 444–453. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7649MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Passty GB: Construction of fixed points for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1982, 84: 212–216. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1982-0637171-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rhoades BE: Fixed point iterations for certain nonlinear mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1994, 183: 118–120. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1135MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Samanta SK: Fixed point theorems in a Banach space satisfying Opial’s condition. J. Indian Math. Soc. 1981, 45: 251–258.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Schu J: Iterative construction of fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1991, 158: 407–413. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90245-UMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schu J: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1991, 43: 153–159. 10.1017/S0004972700028884MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shutao C Dissertationes Mathematicae 356. Geometry of Orlicz Spaces 1996.Google Scholar
- Tan K-K, Xu H-K: The nonlinear ergodic theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1992, 114: 399–404. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1992-1068133-2MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan K-K, Xu H-K: A nonlinear ergodic theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1992, 45: 25–36. 10.1017/S0004972700036972MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan K-K, Xu H-K: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iteration process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 178: 301–308. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1309MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan K-K, Xu H-K: Fixed point iteration processes for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1994, 122: 733–739. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1203993-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu H-K: Existence and convergence for fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive type. Nonlinear Anal. 1991, 16: 1139–1146. 10.1016/0362-546X(91)90201-BMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.