 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Approximation of Common Solutions to System of Mixed Equilibrium Problems, Variational Inequality Problem, and Strict PseudoContractive Mappings
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2011, Article number: 347204 (2011)
Abstract
We introduce an iterative algorithm for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions mapping, the set of common solutions of a system of two mixed equilibrium problems and the set of common solutions of the variational inequalities with inverse strongly monotone mappings. Strong convergence theorems are established in the framework of Hilbert spaces. Finally, we apply our results for solving convex feasibility problems in Hilbert spaces. Our results improve and extend the corresponding results announced by many others recently.
1. Introduction
Throughout this paper, we denote by and the sets of positive integers and real numbers, respectively. Let be a real Hilbert space with inner product and norm , and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . We denote weak convergence and strong convergence by notations and , respectively. Recall that a mapping is an contraction on if there exists a constant such that for all . Let be a mapping. In the sequel, we will use to denote the set of fixed points of ; that is, . In addition, let a mapping be callednonexpansive, if , for all . It is well known that if is nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex and is a nonexpansive selfmapping on , then is nonempty; see, for example, [1]. Recall that a mapping is called strictly pseudocontraction if there exists a constant such that
where denotes the identity operator on . Note that if , then is a nonexpansive mapping. The class of strict pseudocontractions is one of the most important classes of mappings among nonlinear mappings. Within the past several decades, many authors have been devoted to the studies on the existence and convergence of fixed points for strict pseudocontractions. In 1967, Browder and Petryshyn [2] introduced a convex combination method to study strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. On the other hand, Marino and Xu [3] and Zhou [4] developed some iterative scheme for finding a fixed point of a strict pseudocontraction mapping. More precisely, take and define a mapping by
where is a strict pseudocontraction. Under appropriate restrictions on , it is proved that the mapping is nonexpansive. Therefore, the techniques of studying nonexpansive mappings can be applied to study more general strict pseudocontractions.
Let be a proper extended realvalued function and let be a bifunction of into such that , where is the set of real numbers and . Ceng and Yao [5] considered the following mixed equilibrium problems for finding such that
The set of solutions of (1.3) is denoted by , that is,
We see that is a solution of a problem (1.3) that implies that .
Special Examples

(1)
If , then the mixed equilibrium problem (1.3) becomes to be the equilibrium problem which is to find such that
(1.5)
The set of solutions of (1.5) is denoted by .

(2)
If and for all , where is a nonlinear mapping, then problem (1.5) becomes to be the variational inequality problems which is to find such that
(1.6)
The set of solutions of (1.6) is denoted by . The variational inequality has been extensively studied in the literature. See, for example, [6–8] and the references therein.
The mixed equilibrium problems include fixed point problems, variational inequality problems, optimization problems, Nash equilibrium problems, and the equilibrium problem as special cases. Numerous problems in physics, optimization, and economics reduce to find a solution of (1.3). Some authors have proposed some useful methods for solving the and ; see, for instance [5, 9–27]. In 1997, Combettes and Hirstoaga [10] introduced an iterative scheme of finding the best approximation to initial data when is nonempty and proved a strong convergence theorem. Next, we recall some definitions.
Definition 1.1.
Let be nonlinear mappings. Then is called
(1)monotone if
(2)strongly monotone if there exists a constant such that
(3)Lipschitz continuous if there exists a constant such that
(4)inverse strongly monotone if there exists a constant such that
Remark 1.2.
It is obvious that any inverse strongly monotone mappings is monotone and Lipschitz continuous.

(5)
A setvalued mapping is called amonotone if, for all , and imply .

(6)
A monotone mapping is a maximal if the graph of of is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone mapping. It is known that a monotone mapping is maximal if and only if for , for every implies .
Let be a monotone map of into , Lipschitz continuous mapping and let be the normal cone to when , that is,
and define a mapping on by
Then is the maximal monotone and if and only if ; see [28].
For finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping and the set of solution of variational inequalities for inverse strongly monotone, Takahashi and Toyoda [29] first introduced the following iterative scheme:
where is an inverse strongly monotone, is a sequence in (0, 1), and is a sequence in . They showed that if is nonempty, then the sequence generated by (1.13) converges weakly to some .
Further, Y. Yao and J.C. Yao [30] introduced the following iterative scheme:
where is an inverse strongly monotone, , , are three sequences in [0, 1], and is a sequence in . They showed that if is nonempty, then the sequence generated by (1.14) converges strongly to some .
A map is said to be strongly positive if there exists a constant such that
A typical problem is to minimize a quadratic function over the set of the fixed points of some nonexpansive mapping on a real Hilbert space :
where is some linear, is the fixed point set of a nonexpansive mapping on and is a point in . Let be a strongly positive linear bounded map on with coefficient . In 2006, Marino and Xu [31] studied the following general iterative method:
They proved that if the sequence of parameters appropriate conditions, then the sequence generated by (1.17) converges strongly to . Recently, Plubtieng and Punpaeng [32] proposed the following iterative algorithm:
They proved that if the sequences and of parameters satisfy appropriate condition, then both sequences and converge to the unique solution of the variational inequality
which is the optimality condition for the minimization problem
where is a potential function for (i.e., for ).
On the other hand, for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a strict pseudocontraction mapping and the set of solutions of an equilibrium problem in a real Hilbert space, Liu [33] introduced the following iterative scheme:
where is a strict pseudocontraction mapping and , are sequences in [0, 1]. They proved that under certain appropriate conditions over , , and , the sequences and converge strongly to some , which solves some variational inequality problems.
In 2008, Ceng and Yao [5] introduced an iterative scheme for finding a common fixed point of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings and the set of solutions of a problem (1.3) in Hilbert spaces and obtained the strong convergence theorem which used the following condition:

(H)
is strongly convex with constant and its derivative is sequentially continuous from weak topology to strong topology. We note that the condition (H) for the function is a very strong condition. We also note that the condition (H) does not cover the case and for each . Very recently, R. Wangkeeree and R. Wangkeeree [34] introduced a general iterative method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of the mixed equilibrium problems, the set of fixed point of a strict pseudocontraction mapping, and the set of solutions of the variational inequality for an inverse strongly monotone mapping in Hilbert spaces. They obtained a strong convergence theorem except the condition (H) for the sequences generated by these processes.
In 2009, Qin et al. [35] introduced a general iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of common solution of generalized equilibrium problems, the set of a common fixed point of a family of infinite nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Let be the sequence generated iterative by the following algorithm:
They proved that under certain appropriate conditions imposed on , , and , the sequence generated by (1.22) converges strongly to , where .
In the present paper, motivated and inspired by Qin et al. [35], Plubtieng and Punpaeng [32], Peng and Yao [17], R. Wangkeeree and R. Wangkeeree [34], and Y. Yao and J.C. Yao [30], we introduce a new approximation iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions, the set of common solutions of the system of a mixed equilibrium problem, and the set of common solutions of the variational inequalities with inverse strongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces. We obtain a strong convergence theorem for the sequences generated by these processes under some parameter controlling conditions. Moreover, we apply our results for solving convex feasibility problems in Hilbert spaces. The results in this paper extend and improve some wellknown results in [17, 30, 32, 34, 35].
2. Preliminaries
Let be a real Hilbert space and be a closed convex subset of . In a real Hilbert space , it is well known that
for all and .
For any , there exists a unique nearest point in , denoted by , such that
The mapping is called the metric projection of onto .
It is well known that is a firmly nonexpansive mapping of onto , that is,
Further, for any and , if and only if , for all .
Moreover, is characterized by the following properties: and
for all .
It is easy to see that the following is true:
The following lemmas will be useful for proving the convergence result of this paper.
Lemma 2.1 (see [36]).
Let be an inner product space. Then, for all and with , one has
Lemma 2.2 (see [31]).
Assume that is a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Then .
Lemma 2.3 (see [4]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and let be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Then is closed and convex. Define by for each . Then is nonexpansive such that .
Lemma 2.4 (see [37]).
Let be a uniformly convex Banach spaces, be a nonempty closed convex subset of and be a nonexpansive mapping. Then is demiclosed at zero.
Lemma 2.5 (see [38]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of strictly convex Banach space . Let be a sequence of nonexpansive mappings on . Suppose is nonempty. Let be a sequence of positive numbers with . Then a mapping on can be defined by
for is well defined, nonexpansive and holds.
In order to solve the mixed equilibrium problem, the following assumptions are given for the bifunction , and the set :
(A1) for all ;
(A2) is monotone, that is, for all ;
(A3) for each , ;
(A4) for each is convex and lower semicontinuous;
(A5) for each is weakly upper semicontinuous;
(B1) for each and , there exist abounded subset and such that for any ,
(B2) is a bounded set.
Lemma 2.6 (see [39]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a bifunction satisfies (A1)–(A5) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds. For and , define a mapping as follows:
for all . Then, the following holds:
(i)for each , ;
(ii) is singlevalued;
(iii) is firmly nonexpansive, that is, for any ,
(iv);
(v) is closed and convex.
Remark 2.7.
If , then is rewritten as .
Remark 2.8.
We remark that Lemma 2.6 is not a consequence of Lemma 3.1 in [5], because the condition of the sequential continuity from the weak topology to the strong topology for the derivative of the function does not cover the case .
Lemma 2.9 (see [40]).
Let and be bounded sequences in a Banach space and let be a sequence in with . Suppose for all integers and . Then, .
Lemma 2.10 (see [41]).
Assume that is a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that
where is a sequence in and is a sequence in such that
(1),
(2) or .
Then .
Lemma 2.11.
Let be a real Hilbert space. Then for all ,
3. Main Results
In this section, we will use the new approximation iterative method to prove a strong convergence theorem for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions, the set of common solutions of the system of a mixed equilibrium problem and the set of a common solutions of the variational inequalities with inverse strongly monotone mappings in a real Hilbert space.
Theorem 3.1.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let and be two bifunctions from to satisfying (A1)–(A5) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Let be an inverse strongly monotone mapping and be an inverse strongly monotone mapping. Let be a contraction mapping with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping by , for all . Assume that
Assume that either (B1) or (B2). Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where , , , , and are sequences in and , are positive sequences. Assume that the control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:
(C1),
(C2) and ,
(C3),
(C4),
(C5), , where are two positive constants,
(C6), and , for some .
Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality
or equivalent , where is a metric projection mapping form onto .
Proof.
Since , as , we may assume, without loss of generality, that for all . By Lemma 2.2, we know that if , then . We will assume that . Since is a strongly positive bounded linear operator on , we have
Observe that
so this shows that is positive. It follows that
We divide the proof into seven steps.
Step 1.
We claim that the mapping where has a unique fixed point.
Since be a contraction of into itself with . Then, we have
Since , it follows that is a contraction of into itself. Therefore the Banach Contraction Mapping Principle implies that there exists a unique element such that .
Step 2.
We claim that is nonexpansive.
Indeed, from the inverse strongly monotone mapping definition on and condition (C5), we have
where , for all implies that the mapping is nonexpansive and so is, .
Step 3.
We claim that is bounded.
Indeed, let and Lemma 2.6, we obtain
Note that and , we have
Since and are nonexpansive and from (2.6), we have
From Lemma 2.3, we have that is nonexpansive with . It follows that
It follows that
By simple induction, we have
Hence, is bounded, so are , , , , , , , and .
Step 4.
We claim that .
Observing that and , by the nonexpansiveness of , we get
Similarly, let and , we have
From and , we compute
Similarly, we have
Observing that
we obtain
Substituting (3.17) and (3.18) into (3.20), we have
where is an appropriate constant such that ,,, ,.
Putting , for all , we have
Then, we compute
It follows from (3.21) and (3.23), that
This together with (C2), (C3), (C4), and (C6) imply that
Hence, by Lemma 2.9, we obtain as . It follows that
So, we also get
Observe that
By condition (C2) and (3.26), we have
Step 5.
We claim that the following statements hold:
(s1);
(s2);
(s3);
(s4).
Indeed, pick any , to obtain
Therefore,
Similarly, we have
Note that
Substituting (3.31) and (3.32) into (3.33), we obtain
From Lemma 2.1, (3.2) and (3.34), we obtain
It follows that
From (C2), (C6), and (3.26), we also have
Similarly, using (3.35) again, we have
From (C2), (C6), and (3.26), we also have
From (3.37) and (3.39), we have
For , we compute
Similarly, we have
Substituting (3.41) and (3.42) into (3.33), we also have
On the other hand, we note that
It follows that
From (C2), (C5), (C6), and (3.26), we have
Thanks to (3.44), we also have
From (C2), (C5), (C6), and (3.26), we obtain
Observe that
and hence
Similarly, we can obtain that
Substituting (3.50) and (3.51) into (3.33), we also have
On the other hand, we have
and hence
From (C2), (C6), (3.26), (3.46), and (3.48), we also have
Similarly, using (3.53) again, we can prove
From (3.39) and (3.55), we also have
From (3.37) and (3.56), we have
Step 6.
We claim that , where is the unique solution of the variational inequality , for all .
To show this inequality, we choose a subsequence of such that
Since is bounded, there exists a subsequence of which converges weakly to . Without loss of generality, we can assume that . We claim that .
(a1) First, we prove that .
Assume also that and .
Define a mapping by
where , , and , for some . From Lemma 2.5, we have that is nonexpansive with
Notice that
where is an appropriate constant such that
From (C6), (3.37), (3.39), and (3.29), we obtain
By Lemma 2.4, we have , that is, .
(a2) Now, we prove that .
Define a mapping by
where , , and , for some . From Lemma 2.5, we have that is nonexpansive with
On the other hand, we have
where is an appropriate constant such that
From (C6) and (3.29), we obtain
Since is a contraction with the coefficient , there exists a unique fixed point. We use to denote the unique fixed point to the mapping , that is, . Since is bounded, There exists a subsequence of which converges weakly to . Without loss of generality, we may assume that . It follows from (3.69), that
It follows from Lemma 2.4, we obtain that . Hence , where . From (3.59) and (2.4), we arrive at
On the other hand, we have
From (3.26) and (3.71), we obtain that
Step 7.
We claim that .
Indeed, by (3.2) and using Lemmas 2.2 and 2.11, we observe that
which implies that
Taking
Then we can rewrite (3.75) as
We have . Applying Lemma 2.10 to (3.77), we conclude that converges strongly to in norm. This completes the proof.
If the mapping is nonexpansive, then . We can obtain the following result from Theorem 3.1 immediately.
Corollary 3.2.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let and be two bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Let be an inverse strongly monotone mapping and be an inverse strongly monotone mapping. Let be a contraction mapping with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let a nonexpansive mapping with a fixed point. Assume that
Assume that either or . Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where , , , , and are sequences in and , are positive sequences. Assume that the control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:
(C1),
(C2) and ,
(C3),
(C4),
(C5), , where are two positive constants,
(C6), and , for some .
Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality
or equivalent , where is a metric projection mapping form onto .
Finally, we consider the following convex feasibility problem :
where is an integer and each is assumed to be the of solutions of equilibrium problem with the bifunction and the solution set of the variational inequality problem. There is a considerable investigation on in the setting of Hilbert spaces which captures applications in various disciplines such as image restoration [42, 43], computer tomography [44], and radiation therapy treatment planning [45].
The following result can be concluded from Theorem 3.1 easily.
Theorem 3.3.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A4) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Let be an inverse strongly monotone mapping for each . Let be a contraction mapping with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping by , for all . Assume that
Assume that either or . Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where such that , are positive sequences and , are sequences in . Assume that the control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:
(C1) and ,
(C2),
(C3), for each ,
(C4), where is some positive constant for each ,
(C5), for each .
Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality
or equivalent , where is a metric projection mapping form onto .
References
 [1]
Takahashi W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan; 2000:iv+276.
 [2]
Browder FE, Petryshyn WV: Construction of fixed points of nonlinear mappings in Hilbert space. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1967, 20: 197–228. 10.1016/0022247X(67)900856
 [3]
Marino G, Xu HK: Weak and strong convergence theorems for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,329(1):336–346. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.055
 [4]
Zhou H: Convergence theorems of fixed points for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications. Series A 2008,69(2):456–462. 10.1016/j.na.2007.05.032
 [5]
Ceng LC, Yao JC: A hybrid iterative scheme for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2008,214(1):186–201. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.02.022
 [6]
Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. The Mathematics Student 1994,63(1–4):123–145.
 [7]
Yao JC, Chadli O: Pseudomonotone complementarity problems and variational inequalities. In Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Monotonicity Edited by: Crouzeix JP, Haddjissas N, Schaible S. 2005, 501–558.
 [8]
Zeng LC, Schaible S, Yao JC: Iterative algorithm for generalized setvalued strongly nonlinear mixed variationallike inequalities. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2005,124(3):725–738. 10.1007/s109570041182z
 [9]
Aoyama K, Kimura Y, Takahashi W: Maximal monotone operators and maximal monotone functions for equilibrium problems. Journal of Convex Analysis 2008,15(2):395–409.
 [10]
Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA: Equilibrium programming using proximallike algorithms. Mathematical Programming 1997,78(1):29–41.
 [11]
Gao X, Guo Y: Strong convergence of a modified iterative algorithm for mixedequilibrium problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2008, 2008:23.
 [12]
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: A hybrid extragradient viscosity approximation method for solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:32.
 [13]
Kumam P, Jaiboon C: A new hybrid iterative method for mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problem for relaxed cocoercive mappings with application to optimization problems. Nonlinear Analysis. Hybrid Systems 2009,3(4):510–530. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.04.001
 [14]
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: Strong convergence theorems for solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of strict pseudocontraction mappings by two hybrid projection methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2010,234(3):722–732. 10.1016/j.cam.2010.01.012
 [15]
Jaiboon C, Kumam P, Humphries UW: Weak convergence theorem by an extragradient method for variational inequality, equilibrium and fixed point problems. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society. Second Series 2009,32(2):173–185.
 [16]
Kumam P, Jaiboon C: A system of generalized mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems for pseudocontractive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2010, 2010:33.
 [17]
Peng JW, Yao JC: Strong convergence theorems of iterative scheme based on the extragradient method for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2009,49(9–10):1816–1828. 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.11.014
 [18]
Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Convergence analysis on hybrid projection algorithms for equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis 2009,14(3):335–351. 10.3846/13926292.2009.14.335351
 [19]
Takahashi S, Takahashi W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,331(1):506–515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.036
 [20]
Takahashi S, Takahashi W: Strong convergence theorem for a generalized equilibrium problem and a nonexpansive mapping in a Hilbert space. Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,69(3):1025–1033. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.042
 [21]
Takahashi W, Zembayashi K: Strong convergence theorem by a new hybrid method for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008:11.
 [22]
Takahashi W, Zembayashi K: Strong and weak convergence theorems for equilibrium problems and relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,70(1):45–57. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.031
 [23]
Yao Y, Liou YC, Yao JC: A new hybrid iterative algorithm for fixedpoint problems, variational inequality problems, and mixed equilibrium problems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2007:15.
 [24]
Yao Y, Liou YC, Wu YJ: An extragradient method for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:15.
 [25]
Gao X, Guo Y: Strong convergence of a modified iterative algorithm for mixedequilibrium problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2008, 2008:23.
 [26]
Zeng WY, Huang NJ, Zhao CW: Viscosity approximation methods for generalized mixed equilibrium problems and fixed points of a sequence of nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008:15.
 [27]
Yao Y, Liou YC, Yao JC: A new hybrid iterative algorithm for fixedpoint problems, variational inequality problems, and mixed equilibrium problems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008:15.
 [28]
Rockafellar RT: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1970, 149: 75–88. 10.1090/S00029947197002822725
 [29]
Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2003,118(2):417–428. 10.1023/A:1025407607560
 [30]
Yao Y, Yao JC: On modified iterative method for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2007,186(2):1551–1558. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.062
 [31]
Marino G, Xu HK: A general iterative method for nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006,318(1):43–52. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.028
 [32]
Plubtieng S, Punpaeng R: A general iterative method for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,336(1):455–469. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.02.044
 [33]
Liu Y: A general iterative method for equilibrium problems and strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications. Series A 2009,71(10):4852–4861. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.060
 [34]
Wangkeeree R, Wangkeeree R: A general iterative method for variational inequality problems, mixed equilibrium problems, and fixed point problems of strictly pseudocontractive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:32.
 [35]
Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Viscosity approximation methods for generalized equilibrium problems and fixed point problems with applications. Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications 2010,72(1):99–112. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.042
 [36]
Osilike MO, Igbokwe DI: Weak and strong convergence theorems for fixed points of pseudocontractions and solutions of monotone type operator equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2000,40(4–5):559–567. 10.1016/S08981221(00)001796
 [37]
Browder FE: Nonlinear operators and nonlinear equations of evolution in Banach spaces. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 1976, 18: 78–81.
 [38]
Bruck RE Jr.: Properties of fixedpoint sets of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1973, 179: 251–262.
 [39]
Peng JW, Yao JC: A new hybridextragradient method for generalized mixed equilibrium problems, fixed point problems and variational inequality problems. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 2008,12(6):1401–1432.
 [40]
Suzuki T: Strong convergence of Krasnoselskii and Mann's type sequences for oneparameter nonexpansive semigroups without Bochner integrals. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005,305(1):227–239. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.017
 [41]
Xu HK: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2004,298(1):279–291. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.04.059
 [42]
Combettes PL: The convex feasibility problemml: in image recovery. In Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics. Volume 95. Edited by: Hawkes P. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA; 1996:155–270.
 [43]
Kotzer T, Cohen N, Shamir J: Images to ration by a novel method of parallel projection onto constraint sets. Optics Letters 1995, 20: 1172–1174. 10.1364/OL.20.001172
 [44]
Sezan MI, Stark H: Application of convex projection theory to image recovery in tomograph and related areas. In Image Recovery: Theory and Application. Edited by: Stark H. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA; 1987:155–270.
 [45]
Censor Y, Zenios SA: Parallel Optimization, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA; 1997:xxviii+539.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable suggestions to improve this paper. This work was supported by the Center of Excellence in Mathematics, the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand.
Author information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumam, P., Jaiboon, C. Approximation of Common Solutions to System of Mixed Equilibrium Problems, Variational Inequality Problem, and Strict PseudoContractive Mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2011, 347204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/347204
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Variational Inequality
 Equilibrium Problem
 Monotone Mapping
 Nonexpansive Mapping
 Iterative Scheme