# Hierarchical Convergence of a Double-Net Algorithm for Equilibrium Problems and Variational Inequality Problems

- Yonghong Yao
^{1}, - Yeong-Cheng Liou
^{2}and - Chia-Ping Chen
^{3}Email author

**2010**:642584

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/642584

© Yonghong Yao et al. 2010

**Received: **21 May 2010

**Accepted: **22 December 2010

**Published: **29 December 2010

## Abstract

We consider the following hierarchical equilibrium problem and variational inequality problem (abbreviated as HEVP): find a point such that , for all , where , are two monotone operators and is the solution of the equilibrium problem of finding such that , for all . We note that the problem (HEVP) includes some problems, for example, mathematical program and hierarchical minimization problems as special cases. For solving (HEVP), we propose a double-net algorithm which generates a net . We prove that the net hierarchically converges to the solution of (HEVP); that is, for each fixed , the net converges in norm, as , to a solution of the equilibrium problem, and as , the net converges in norm to the unique solution of (HEVP).

## 1. Introduction

for all . It is obvious that any -inverse strongly monotone mapping is monotone and -Lipschitz continuous.

Some algorithms for solving the hierarchical fixed point problem (1.3) have been introduced by many authors. For related works, please see, for instance, [1–9] and the references therein.

Remark 1.1.

At this point, we wish to point out the link with some monotone variational inequalities and convex programming problems as follows.

Example 1.2.

a variational inequality studied by Yamada and Ogura [10].

Example 1.3.

a problem considered by Luo et al. [11].

Example 1.4.

The solution set of equilibrium problems (1.10) and (1.11) are denoted by and , respectively. The equilibrium problem (1.10) is very general in the sense that it includes, as special cases, optimization problems, variational inequalities, fixed point problems, minimax problems, Nash equilibrium problem in noncooperative games, and others. We remind the readers to refer to [14–30] and the references therein.

where are two monotone operators. The solution set of (1.12) is denoted by .

Remark 1.5.

It is clear that the hierarchical variational inequality problem and equilibrium problem (1.12) includes the variational inequality problem studied by Yamada and Ogura [10], mathematical program studied by Luo et al. [11], hierarchical minimization problem considered by Cabot [12] and Solodov [13], as special cases.

For solving (1.12), we propose a double-net algorithm which generates a net . We prove that the net hierarchically converges to the solution of (1.12); that is, for each fixed , the net converges in norm, as , to a solution of the equilibrium problem, and as , the net converges in norm to the unique solution of (1.12).

## 2. Preliminaries

Let be a real Hilbert space. Throughout this paper, let us assume that a bifunction satisfies the following conditions:

(F2) is monotone, that is, for all ;

(F4) for each , is convex and lower semicontinuous.

On the equilibrium problems, we have the following important lemma. You can find it in [31].

Lemma 2.1.

Further, if , for all , then the following hold:

Below we gather some basic facts that are needed in the argument of the subsequent sections.

Lemma 2.2 (see [32]).

*α*-inverse strongly monotone, and let be a constant. Then, one has

In particular, if , then is nonexpansive.

Lemma 2.3 (demiclosedness principle for nonexpansive mappings, see [33]).

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and let be a nonexpansive mapping with . If is a sequence in weakly converging to , and if converges strongly to , then ; in particular, if , then .

Lemma 2.4.

*α*-inverse strongly monotone. Let , and . Then the variational inequality

Proof.

which is exactly (2.5).

## 3. Main Results

In this section, we first introduce our double-net algorithm.

**,**and let and be two constants. For , we define the following mapping:

Below is our main result of this paper which displays the behavior of the net as and successively.

Theorem 3.1.

*α*-inverse strongly monotone and

*β*-inverse strongly monotone, respectively. Let and be two constants. Let be a bifunction from satisfying (F1)–(F4). Suppose the solution set of (1.12) is nonempty. Let, for each , be defined implicitly by (3.3). Then, the net hierarchically converges to the unique solution of the hierarchical equilibrium problem and variational inequality problem (1.12). That is to say, for each fixed , the net converges in norm, as , to a solution of the equilibrium problem (1.10). Moreover, as , the net converges in norm to the unique solution . Furthermore, also solves the following variational inequality:

We divide our detailed proofs into several conclusions as follows. Throughout, we assume all assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied.

Conclusion.

For each fixed , the net is bounded.

Proof.

It follows that for each fixed , is bounded, so are the nets , and . Note that we use as a positive constant which bounds all bounded terms appearing in the following.

Conclusion.

Proof.

Since is bounded, without loss of generality, we may assume that as , converges weakly to a point . Note that also converges weakly to a point .

Consequently, the weak convergence of to actually implies that strongly. This has proved the relative norm-compactness of the net as .

Notice that (3.31) is equivalent to the fact that . That is, is the unique element in of the contraction . Clearly, this is sufficient to conclude that the entire net converges in norm to as .

Conclusion.

Proof.

which implies that is bounded.

Conclusion.

The net which solves the variational inequality VI (3.4).

Proof.

First, we note that the solution of the variational inequality VI (3.4) is unique.

Namely, is a solution of VI (1.12); hence, .

It turns out that solves VI (3.4). By uniqueness, we have . This is sufficient to guarantee that in norm, as . The proof is complete.

Proof.

By Conclusions 1–4, the proof of Theorem 3.1 is completed.

The solution of (3.45) is denoted by .

Corollary 3.2.

*α*-inverse strongly monotone. Let be a constant. Let be a bifunction from satisfying (F1)–(F4). Suppose the solution set is nonempty. Let, for each , be defined implicitly by

Taking in Theorem 3.1, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 3.3.

*β*-inverse strongly monotone. Let be a constant. Let be a bifunction from satisfying (F1)–(F4). Suppose that the solution set of (1.10) is nonempty. Let, for each , be defined implicitly by

Taking in Theorem 3.1, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 3.4.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

The work of the second author was partially supported by the Grant NSC 98-2923-E-110-003-MY3 and the work of the third author was partially supported by the Grant NSC 98-2221-E-110-064.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Maingé P-E, Moudafi A:
**Strong convergence of an iterative method for hierarchical fixed-point problems.***Pacific Journal of Optimization*2007,**3**(3):529–538.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Ceng LC, Petruşel A:
**Krasnoselski-Mann iterations for hierarchical fixed point problems for a finite family of nonself mappings in Banach spaces.***Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2010,**146**(3):617–639. 10.1007/s10957-010-9679-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Moudafi A:
**Krasnoselski-Mann iteration for hierarchical fixed-point problems.***Inverse Problems*2007,**23**(4):1635–1640. 10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/015MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Moudafi A, Maingé P-E:
**Towards viscosity approximations of hierarchical fixed-point problems.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2006,**2006:**-10.Google Scholar - Yao Y, Liou Y-C:
**Weak and strong convergence of Krasnoselski-Mann iteration for hierarchical fixed point problems.***Inverse Problems*2008,**24**(1):-8.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Cianciaruso F, Marino G, Muglia L, Yao Y:
**On a two-step algorithm for hierarchical fixed point problems and variational inequalities.***Journal of Inequalities and Applications*2009,**2009:**-13.Google Scholar - Cianciaruso F, Colao V, Muglia L, Xu H-K:
**On an implicit hierarchical fixed point approach to variational inequalities.***Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society*2009,**80**(1):117–124. 10.1017/S0004972709000082MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Lu X, Xu H-K, Yin X:
**Hybrid methods for a class of monotone variational inequalities.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(3–4):1032–1041. 10.1016/j.na.2008.11.067MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yao Y, Chen R, Xu H-K:
**Schemes for finding minimum-norm solutions of variational inequalities.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(7–8):3447–3456. 10.1016/j.na.2009.12.029MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yamada I, Ogura N:
**Hybrid steepest descent method for variational inequality problem over the fixed point set of certain quasi-nonexpansive mappings.***Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization*2004,**25**(7–8):619–655.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Luo Z-Q, Pang J-S, Ralph D:
*Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1996:xxiv+401.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Cabot A:
**Proximal point algorithm controlled by a slowly vanishing term: applications to hierarchical minimization.***SIAM Journal on Optimization*2005,**15**(2):555–572. 10.1137/S105262340343467XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Solodov M:
**An explicit descent method for bilevel convex optimization.***Journal of Convex Analysis*2007,**14**(2):227–237.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Ceng L-C, Al-Homidan S, Ansari QH, Yao J-C:
**An iterative scheme for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of strict pseudo-contraction mappings.***Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*2009,**223**(2):967–974. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.032MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ceng L-C, Yao J-C:
**A hybrid iterative scheme for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems.***Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*2008,**214**(1):186–201. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.02.022MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yao Y, Noor MA, Liou Y-C:
**On iterative methods for equilibrium problems.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**70**(1):497–509. 10.1016/j.na.2007.12.021MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Peng J-W, Yao J-C:
**A new hybrid-extragradient method for generalized mixed equilibrium problems, fixed point problems and variational inequality problems.***Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics*2008,**12**(6):1401–1432.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Peng J-W, Yao J-C:
**Some new iterative algorithms for generalized mixed equilibrium problems with strict pseudo-contractions and monotone mappings.***Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics*2009,**13**(5):1537–1582.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Ceng LC, Petruşel A, Yao JC:
**Iterative approaches to solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings.***Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2009,**143**(1):37–58. 10.1007/s10957-009-9549-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yao Y, Liou Y-C, Yao J-C:
**A new hybrid iterative algorithm for fixed-point problems, variational inequality problems, and mixed equilibrium problems.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2008,**2008:**-15.Google Scholar - Peng J-W, Liou Y-C, Yao J-C:
**An iterative algorithm combining viscosity method with parallel method for a generalized equilibrium problem and strict pseudocontractions.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2009,**2009:**-21.Google Scholar - Ceng LC, Mastroeni G, Yao JC:
**Hybrid proximal-point methods for common solutions of equilibrium problems and zeros of maximal monotone operators.***Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2009,**142**(3):431–449. 10.1007/s10957-009-9538-zMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yao Y, Liou Y-C, Yao J-C:
**Convergence theorem for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinite family of nonexpansive mappings.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2007,**2007:**-12.Google Scholar - Yao Y, Noor MA, Zainab S, Liou Y-C:
**Mixed equilibrium problems and optimization problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2009,**354**(1):319–329. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.12.055MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yao Y, Cho YJ, Chen R:
**An iterative algorithm for solving fixed point problems, variational inequality problems and mixed equilibrium problems.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(7–8):3363–3373. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.236MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Marino G, Colao V, Muglia L, Yao Y:
**Krasnoselski-Mann iteration for hierarchical fixed points and equilibrium problem.***Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society*2009,**79**(2):187–200. 10.1017/S000497270800107XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ceng L-C, Yao J-C:
**A relaxed extragradient-like method for a generalized mixed equilibrium problem, a general system of generalized equilibria and a fixed point problem.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(3–4):1922–1937. 10.1016/j.na.2009.09.033MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Zeng LC, Lin YC, Yao JC:
**Iterative schemes for generalized equilibrium problem and two maximal monotone operators.***Journal of Inequalities and Applications*2009,**2009:**-34.Google Scholar - Honda T, Takahashi W, Yao J-C:
**Nonexpansive retractions onto closed convex cones in Banach spaces.***Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics*2010,**14**(3B):1023–1046.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Zeng L-C, Ansari QH, Shyu DS, Yao J-C:
**Strong and weak convergence theorems for common solutions of generalized equilibrium problems and zeros of maximal monotone operators.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2010,**2010:**-33.Google Scholar - Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA:
**Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces.***Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis*2005,**6**(1):117–136.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Takahashi W, Toyoda M:
**Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings.***Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2003,**118**(2):417–428. 10.1023/A:1025407607560MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Goebel K, Kirk WA:
*Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics*.*Volume 28*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1990:viii+244.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.