- Research Article
- Open Access

# Fixed Point Properties Related to Multivalued Mappings

- Hidetoshi Komiya
^{1}Email author

**2010**:581728

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/581728

© Hidetoshi Komiya. 2010

**Received:**12 January 2010**Accepted:**2 April 2010**Published:**23 May 2010

## Abstract

We discuss fixed point properties of convex subsets of locally convex linear topological spaces. We derive equivalence among fixed point properties concerning several types of multivalued mappings.

## Keywords

- Topological Space
- Convex Subset
- Point Theory
- Open Cover
- Multivalued Mapping

## 1. Introduction

We present fundamental definitions related to multivalued mappings in order to fix our terminology. We assume Hausdorff separation axiom for all of the topological spaces which appear hereafter. Let
and
be topological spaces. A multivalued mapping
from
to
is a function which attains a nonempty subset of
for each point
of
and the subset is denoted by
. For any subset
of
, the *upper inverse*
and the *lower inverse*
are defined by
and
, respectively. A multivalued mapping
is said to be *upper semicontinuous* (*lower semicontinuous*, resp.) if
(
, resp.) is open in
for any open subset
of
. Moreover,
is said to be *upper demicontinuous* if
is open in
for any open half-space
of
in case
is a linear topological space.

We are interested in fixed point properties of convex subsets of locally convex linear topological spaces. A topological space is said to have a *fixed point property* if every continuous functions from the topological space to itself has a fixed point. Following to this terminology, we define several fixed point properties depending on types of multivalued mappings we concern.

We always deal with convex-valued multivalued mappings defined on a convex subset of a locally convex topological linear space in this paper. Such situations appear often in arguments on fixed point theory for multivalued mappings, for example, Kakutani fixed point theorem [1], Browder fixed point theorem [2], and so forth. Let
be a convex subset of a locally convex topological linear space and let
be a convex-valued multivalued mapping from
to
. We call
*Kakutani-type* if
is closed-valued and upper semicontinuous and *weak Kakutani-type* if
is closed-valued and demicontinuous. Similarly
is said to be *Browder-type* if
has open lower sections; that is,
is open for all
. We call
*open graph-type* if it has an open graph.

A convex subset
of a locally convex linear topological space is said to have a *Kakutani-type fixed point property* if every Kakutani-type multivalued mapping from
to
has a fixed point. Similarly, we define *weak Kakutani-type fixed point property*, *Browder-type fixed point property,* and *open graph-type fixed point property*.

## 2. Result

Our main result is the following.

Theorem 2.1.

Let be a paracompact convex subset of a locally convex linear topological space . Then each of the following statements is mutually equivalent.

(1) has a fixed point property.

(2) has a Browder-type fixed point property.

(3) has an open graph-type fixed point property.

(4) has a weak Kakutani-type fixed point property.

(5) has a Kakutani-type fixed point property.

Proof.

The proofs of and are obvious.

*(1)*

*⇒*

*(2)*. The method of the proof is similar to that of [2, Theorem ]. Let be Browder-type. The family is an open cover of because any point of belongs to an open set with . Therefore, there is a partition of unity subordinated to . That is, each function is continuous, the family of open sets is a locally finite refinement of , and for all . For each , take such that , and we denote it by . Then define a function by

It follows that for each with , and hence we have . Since is convex, we have , and it is proved that is a fixed point of .

*(3)*

*⇒*

*(4)*. The method of this proof is inspired by the discussions found in [3, 4]. Suppose that is weak Kakutani-type but it has no fixed point; that is, for any . Since is closed and convex, there is a continuous linear functional on which separates and strictly. Thus there is a real number such that

Since for any with , we have . Thus we have . Therefore, we have for all , and the definition of above defines a multivalued mapping . It is easily seen that is open and convex valued.

That is, . Therefore, has an open graph.

On the other hand, take any . There is such that . Since , we have , and hence . Thus has no fixed point and this contradicts the assumption that has open graph-type fixed point property.

Klee [5] proved that a convex subset of a locally convex metrizable linear topological space is compact if and only if it has a fixed point property. Since any metrizable topological space is paracompact, we have the following corollary of Theorem 2.1.

Corollary 2.2.

Let be a convex subset of a locally convex metrizable linear topological space. Then the following statements are mutually equivalent.

(1) is compact.

(2) has a fixed point property.

(3) has a Browder-type fixed point property.

(4) has an open graph-type fixed point property.

(5) has a weak Kakutani-type fixed point property.

(6) has a Kakutani-type fixed point property.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

This paper is written with support from Research Center of Nonlinear Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, National Sun Yat-Sen University.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Kakutani S:
**A generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem.***Duke Mathematical Journal*1941,**8:**457–459. 10.1215/S0012-7094-41-00838-4MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Browder FE:
**The fixed point theory of multi-valued mappings in topological vector spaces.***Mathematische Annalen*1968,**177:**283–301. 10.1007/BF01350721MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Komiya H:
**Inverse of the Berge maximum theorem.***Economic Theory*1997,**9**(2):371–375.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yamauchi T:
**An inverse of the Berge maximum theorem for infinite dimensional spaces.***Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis*2008,**9**(2):161–167.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Klee VL Jr.:
**Some topological properties of convex sets.***Transactions of the American Mathematical Society*1955,**78:**30–45. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1955-0069388-5MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.