 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
A System of Generalized Mixed Equilibrium Problems and Fixed Point Problems for Pseudocontractive Mappings in Hilbert Spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2010, Article number: 361512 (2010)
Abstract
We introduce and analyze a new iterative algorithm for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions, the set of common solutions of a system of generalized mixed equilibrium problems, and the set of common solutions of the variational inequalities with inversestrongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces. Furthermore, we prove new strong convergence theorems for a new iterative algorithm under some mild conditions. Finally, we also apply our results for solving convex feasibility problems in Hilbert spaces. The results obtained in this paper improve and extend the corresponding results announced by Qin and Kang (2010) and the previously known results in this area.
1. Introduction
Let be a real Hilbert space with inner product and norm and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . We denote weak convergence and strong convergence by notations and , respectively. Let be a mapping. In the sequel, we will use to denote the set of fixed points of , that is, .
Definition 1.1.
Let be a mapping. Then is called
contraction if there exists a constant such that
nonexpansive if
Remark 1.2.
It is well known that if is nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex and is a nonexpansive mapping on then is nonempty; see, for example, [1].
strongly pseudocontractive with the coefficient if
strictly pseudocontractive with the coefficient if
for such a case, is also said to be a strict pseudocontraction, and if , then is a nonexpansive mapping,
pseudocontractive if
The class of strict pseudocontractions falls into the one between classes of nonexpansive mappings and pseudocontractions. Within the past several decades, many authors have been devoting to the studies on the existence and convergence of fixed points for strict pseudocontractions.
In 1967, Browder and Petryshyn [2] introduced a convex combination method to study strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. On the other hand, Marino and Xu [3] and Zhou [4] introduced and researched some iterative scheme for finding a fixed point of a strict pseudocontraction mapping. More precisely, take and define a mapping by
where is a strict pseudocontraction. Under appropriate restrictions on , it is proved the mapping is nonexpansive. Therefore, the techniques of studying nonexpansive mappings can be applied to study more general strict pseudocontractions.
The domain of the function is the set
Let be a proper extended realvalued function and let be a bifunction of into such that , where is the set of real numbers.
There exists the generalized mixed equilibrium problem for finding such that
The set of solutions of (1.8) is denoted by that is,
We see that is a solution of problem (1.8) implies that
Special Examples
(1)If , problem (1.8) is reduced into the mixed equilibrium problem for finding such that
Problem (1.10) was studied by Ceng and Yao [5]. The set of solutions of (1.10) is denoted by .

(2)
If , problem (1.8) is reduced into the generalized equilibrium problem for finding such that
(1.11)
Problem (1.11) was studied by Takahashi and Toyoda [6]. The set of solutions of (1.11) is denoted by .

(3)
If and , problem (1.8) is reduced into the equilibrium problem for finding such that
(1.12)
Problem (1.12) was studied by Blum and Oettli [7]. The set of solutions of (1.12) is denoted by .

(4)
If , problem (1.8) is reduced into the mixed variational inequality of Browder type for finding such that
(1.13)
Problem (1.13) was studied by Browder [8]. The set of solutions of (1.13) is denoted by .

(5)
If and , problem (1.8) is reduced into the variational inequality problem for finding such that
(1.14)
Problem (1.14) was studied by Hartman and Stampacchia [9]. The set of solutions of (1.14) is denoted by . The variational inequality has been extensively studied in the literature. See, for example, [7, 10, 11] and the references therein.

(6)
If and , problem (1.8) is reduced into the minimize problem for finding such that
(1.15)
The set of solutions of (1.15) is denoted by .
The generalized mixed equilibrium problems include fixed point problems, variational inequality problems, optimization problems, Nash equilibrium problems, and the equilibrium problem as special cases. Numerous problems in physics, optimization, and economics reduce to find a solution of (1.8). In 1997, Combettes and Hirstoaga [12] introduced an iterative scheme of finding the best approximation to initial data when is nonempty and proved a strong convergence theorem. Many authors have proposed some useful methods for solving the , and ; see, for instance, [5, 12–23].
Definition 1.3.
Let be a nonlinear mapping. Then is called
(1)monotone if
(2)strongly monotone if there exists a constant such that

(3)
Lipschitz continuous if there exists a positive real number such that
(1.18)
(4)inversestrongly monotone if there exists a constant such that
Remark 1.4.
It is obvious that any inversestrongly monotone mappings are monotone and Lipschitz continuous.
For finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping and the set of solution of variational inequalities for a inversestrongly monotone mapping, Takahashi and Toyoda [6] introduced the following iterative scheme:
where is the metric projection of onto , is a inversestrongly monotone mapping, is a sequence in , and is a sequence in . They showed that if is nonempty, then the sequence generated by (1.20) converges weakly to some .
On the other hand, Y. Yao and J.C Yao [24] introduced the following iterative process defined recursively by
where is a inversestrongly monotone mapping, and are sequences in the interval , and is a sequence in . They showed that if is nonempty, then the sequence generated by (1.21) converges strongly to some .
Let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on if there is a constant with property
A typical problem is to minimize a quadratic function over the set of the fixed points a nonexpansive mapping on a real Hilbert space :
where is a linear bounded operator, is the fixed point set of a nonexpansive mapping on and is a given point in Moreover, it is shown in [25] that the sequence defined by the scheme
converges strongly to Recently, Plubtieng and Punpaeng [26] proposed the following iterative algorithm:
They proved that if the sequences and of parameters satisfy appropriate condition, then the sequences and both converge to the unique solution of the variational inequality:
which is the optimality condition for the minimization problem:
where is a potential function for (i.e., for ).
Very recently, Ceng et al. [27] introduced iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of solutions of equilibrium problems and the of fixed points of a strict pseudocontraction mapping defined in the setting of real Hilbert space : and let
where for some and satisfies . Further, they proved that and converge weakly to , where .
On the other hand, for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a strict pseudocontraction mapping and the set of solutions of an equilibrium problems in a real Hilbert space, Liu [28] introduced the following iterative scheme:
where is a strict pseudocontraction mapping and and are sequences in They proved that under certain appropriate conditions over , , and , the sequences and both converge strongly to some , which solves some variational inequality problems (1.26).
In 2008, Ceng and Yao [5] introduced an iterative scheme for finding a common fixed point of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings and the set of solutions of a problem (1.8) in Hilbert spaces and obtained the strong convergence theorem which used the following condition.
: is strongly convex with constant and its derivative is sequentially continuous from the weak topology to the strong topology. We note that the condition for the function : is a very strong condition. We also note that the condition does not cover the case and for each . Very recently, Wangkeeree and Wangkeeree [29] introduced a general iterative method for finding a common element of the set of solutions of the mixed equilibrium problems, the set of fixed point of a strict pseudocontraction mapping, and the set of solutions of the variational inequality for an inversestrongly monotone mapping in Hilbert spaces. They obtained a strong convergence theorem except the condition for the sequences generated by these processes.
In 2009, Qin and Kang [30] introduced an explicit viscosity approximation method for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontraction and the set of solutions of variational inequalities with inversestrongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces. Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
Then, they proved that under certain appropriate conditions imposed on , , , , , and , the sequence generated by (1.30) converges strongly to , where .
In the present paper, motivated and inspired by Qin and Kang [30], Peng and Yao [21], Plubtieng and Punpaeng [26], and Liu [28], we introduce a new general iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions, the set of common solutions of the system of generalized mixed equilibrium problems, and the set of common solutions of the variational inequalities for inversestrongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces. We obtain a strong convergence theorem for the sequences generated by these processes under some parameter controlling conditions. The results in this paper extend and improve the corresponding recent results of Qin and Kang [30], Peng and Yao [21], Plubtieng and Punpaeng [26], and Liu [28] and many others.
2. Preliminaries
Let be a real Hilbert space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . In a real Hilbert space , it is well known that
For any , there exists a unique nearest point in , denoted by , such that
The mapping is called the metric projection of onto
It is well known that is a firmly nonexpansive mapping of onto , that is,
Moreover, is characterized by the following properties: and
for all .
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Given and then,
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a Hilbert space, let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and let be a mapping of into Let . Then for ,
where is the metric projection of onto .
A setvalued mapping is called amonotone if for all , and imply . A monotone mapping is called maximal if the graph of is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone mapping. It is known that a monotone mapping is maximal if and only if for , for every implies . Let be a monotone map of into , Lipschitz continuous mappings and let be the normal cone to when , that is,
and define a mapping on by
Then is the maximal monotone and if and only if see [31].
Lemma 2.3.
Let be a Hilbert space, let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and let be inversestrongly monotone. It , then is a nonexpansive mapping in
Proof.
For all and , we have
So, is a nonexpansive mapping of into .
Lemma 2.4 (see [32]).
Let be an inner product space. Then, for all and with one has
Lemma 2.5 (see [25]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of let be a contraction of into itself with , and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient . Then, for
That is, is strongly monotone with coefficient .
Lemma 2.6 (see [25]).
Assume that is a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Then .
Lemma 2.7 (see [4]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and let be a strict pseudocontraction mapping with a fixed point. Then is closed and convex. Define by for each . Then is nonexpansive such that .
Lemma 2.8 (see [33]).
Let be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space and let : be a nonexpansive mapping. Then is demiclosed at zero, that is,
Lemma 2.9 (see [34]).
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a strictly convex Banach space . Let be a sequence of nonexpansive mappings on . Suppose that is nonempty. Let be a sequence of positive number with . Then a mapping on defined by
for is well defined and nonexpansive and holds.
For solving the mixed equilibrium problem, let us give the following assumptions for the bifunction , the function and the set :
for all
is monotone, that is, for all
for each
for each is convex and lower semicontinuous;
for each is weakly upper semicontinuous;
for each and , there exists a bounded subset and such that for any ,
is a bounded set.
By similar argument as in the proof of Lemma in [35], we have the following lemma appearing.
Lemma 2.10.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a bifunction satisfies (A1)–(A5) and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function. Assume that either (B1) or (B2) holds. For and , define a mapping as follows:
for all . Then, the following holds:
(i)for each ;
(ii) is singlevalued;
(iii) is firmly nonexpansive, that is, for any
(iv)
(v) is closed and convex.
Remark 2.11.
We remark that Lemma 2.10 is not a consequence of Lemma in [5], because the condition of the sequential continuity from the weak topology to the strong topology for the derivative of the function does not cover the case .
Lemma 2.12 (see [36]).
Let and be bounded sequences in a Banach space and let be a sequence in with Suppose for all integers and Then,
Lemma 2.13 (see [37]).
Assume that is a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that
where is a sequence in and is a sequence in such that
(1)
(2) or
Then
Lemma 2.14.
Let be a real Hilbert space. Then for all ,
3. Main Results
In this section, we will use the new approximation iterative method to prove a strong convergence theorem for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of strict pseudocontractions, the set of common solutions of the system of generalized mixed equilibrium problems, and the set of a common solutions of the variational inequalities for inversestrongly monotone mappings in a real Hilbert space.
Theorem 3.1.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let and be two bifunctions from to satisfying and let be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function with either (B1) or (B2). Let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping, let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping, let : be an inversestrongly monotone mapping, and let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping. Let : be an contraction with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let : be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping : by for all . Suppose that
Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where , , , and are sequences in , where , , , and and are positive sequences. Assume that the control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:
,
and
and , where are two positive constants,
, where .
Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality:
Equivalently, one has
Proof.
Since , as , we may assume, without loss of generality, that for all . By Lemma 2.6, we know that if , then . We will assume that . Since is a strongly positive bounded linear operator on we have
Observe that
and so this shows that is positive. It follows that
Since is a contraction of into itself with , then, we have
Since , it follows that is a contraction of into itself. Therefore the Banach Contraction Mapping Principle implies that there exists a unique element such that
Next, we will divide the proof into five steps.
Step 1.
We claim that is bounded.
Indeed, let and by Lemma 2.10, we obtain
Note that dom and dom ; we have
Put and . For each and by Lemma 2.3, we get that and are nonexpansive. Thus, we have
From Lemma 2.7, we have that is nonexpansive with . It follows that
which yields that
Hence, is bounded, and so are , , , , , , and .
Step 2.
We claim that and
Observing that and dom , by the nonexpansiveness of , we get
Similarly, let dom and dom ; we have
From and ; thus, we compute
Similarly, we have
Also noticing that
we compute
Substitution of (3.13), (3.14), (3.15), and (3.16) into (3.18) yields that
where is an appropriate constant such that
Putting for all , we have
Then, we compute
It follows from (3.19) and (3.22) that
This together with (C2), (C3), (C4), and (C6) implies that
Hence, by Lemma 2.12, we obtain as . It follows that
Moreover, we also get
Observe that
By conditions (C2), (C3), and (3.25), we have
Step 3.
We claim that the following statements hold:
;
;
;
.
For , we compute
By the same way, we can get
We note that
Similarly, we have
Observe that
Substituting (3.29), (3.30), (3.31), and (3.32) into (3.33), we obtain
It follows from (3.2) and (3.34) that
It follows from (C5) that
From (C2), (C6), and (3.25), we have
Since , we also have
From (C2), (C6), and (3.25), we obtain
Similarly, from (3.37) and (3.39), we can prove that
On the other hand, let for each we get . By Lemma 2.10(iii), that is, is firmly nonexpansive, we obtain
So, we obtain
Observe that
and hence
By using the same argument in (3.42) and (3.44), we can prove that
Substituting (3.42), (3.44), and (3.45) into (3.33), we obtain
From Lemma 2.4, (3.2), and (3.46), we obtain
It follows that
From (C2), (C6), (3.37), (3.39), (3.40), and as , we also have
From (3.47) and by using the same argument above, we can prove that
Applying (3.28), (3.49), and (3.50), we obtain
Step 4.
We claim that where is the unique solution of the variational inequality for all
To show the above inequality, we choose a subsequence of such that
Since is bounded, there exists a subsequence of which converges weakly to . Without loss of generality, we can assume that We claim that .
That is, we will prove that
Assume also that and .
Define a mapping by
where , where . Since and by Lemma 2.9, we have that is nonexpansive and
Notice that
where is an appropriate constant such that
From (C4), (C6), and (3.28), we obtain
Since is a contraction with the coefficient , we have that there exists a unique fixed point. We use to denote the unique fixed point to the mapping . That is, . Since is bounded, there exists a subsequence of which converges weakly to . Without loss of generality, we may assume that . It follows from (3.58), that
It follows from Lemma 2.8 that . By (3.55), we have .
Hence from (3.52) and (2.4), we arrive at
On the other hand, we have
From (3.25) and (3.60), we obtain that
Step 5.
We claim that .
Indeed, by (3.2) and using Lemmas 2.6 and 2.14, we observe that
which implies that
Taking
then, we can rewrite (3.64) as
and we can see that and . Applying Lemma 2.13 to (3.66), we conclude that converges strongly to in norm. This completes the proof.
If the mapping is nonexpansive, then . We can obtain the following result from Theorem 3.1 immediately.
Corollary 3.2.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let and be two bifunctions from to satisfying (A1)–(A5) and let : be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function with either (B1) or (B2). Let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping, let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping, let : be an inversestrongly monotone mapping and let : be a inversestrongly monotone mapping. Let be an contraction with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let be a nonexpansive mapping with a fixed point. Suppose that
Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm (3.2), where , , , and are sequences in , where , , , and and are positive sequences. Assume that the control sequences satisfy (C1)–(C6) in Theorem 3.1. Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality:
Equivalently, one has
If and in Theorem 3.1, then we can obtain the following result immediately.
Corollary 3.3.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let and be two bifunctions from to satisfying (A1)–(A4). Let be a inversestrongly monotone mapping and let be a inversestrongly monotone mapping. Let be an contraction with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping by for all . Suppose that
Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where , , , and are sequences in , where , , , and and are positive sequences. Assume that the control sequences satisfy the condition (C1)–(C6) in Theorem 3.1 and . Then, converges strongly to a point , where
If and in Corollary 3.3, then and we get and ; hence we can obtain the following result immediately.
Corollary 3.4.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping by for all . Suppose that Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where , , , and are sequences in . Assume that the control sequences satisfy the conditions (C2) and (C3), in Theorem 3.1, and . Then, converges strongly to a point , where .
Finally, we consider the following Convex Feasibility Problem:
where is an integer and each is assumed to be the of solutions of equilibrium problem with the bifunction and the solution set of the variational inequality problem. There is a considerable investigation on in the setting of Hilbert spaces which captures applications in various disciplines such as image restoration [38, 39], computer tomography [40], and radiation therapy treatment planning [41].
The following result can be obtained from Theorem 3.1. We, therefore, omit the proof.
Theorem 3.5.
Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)–(A5) and let : be a proper lower semicontinuous and convex function with either (B1) or (B2). Let : be an inversestrongly monotone mapping for each . Let : be a contraction mapping with coefficient and let be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on with coefficient and . Let : be a strict pseudocontraction with a fixed point. Define a mapping : by for all . Suppose that
Let be a sequence generated by the following iterative algorithm:
where such that , are positive sequences, and and are sequences in . Assume that the control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:
and
for each ,
, where is some positive constant for each ,
, for each .
Then, converges strongly to a point which is the unique solution of the variational inequality:
Equivalently, one has
References
Takahashi W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan; 2000:iv+276.
Browder FE, Petryshyn WV: Construction of fixed points of nonlinear mappings in Hilbert space. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1967, 20: 197–228. 10.1016/0022247X(67)900856
Marino G, Xu HK: Weak and strong convergence theorems for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,329(1):336–346. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.055
Zhou H: Convergence theorems of fixed points for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis 2008,69(2):456–462. 10.1016/j.na.2007.05.032
Ceng LC, Yao JC: A hybrid iterative scheme for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2008,214(1):186–201. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.02.022
Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2003,118(2):417–428. 10.1023/A:1025407607560
Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. The Mathematics Student 1994,63(1–4):123–145.
Browder FE: Existence and approximation of solutions of nonlinear variational inequalities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1966, 56: 1080–1086. 10.1073/pnas.56.4.1080
Hartman P, Stampacchia G: On some nonlinear elliptic differentialfunctional equations. Acta Mathematica 1966, 115: 271–310. 10.1007/BF02392210
Yao JC, Chadli O: Pseudomonotone complementarity problems and variational inequalities. In Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Generalized Monotonicity. Volume 76. Edited by: Haddjissas N, Schaible S. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2005:501–558. 10.1007/0387233938_12
Zeng LC, Schaible S, Yao JC: Iterative algorithm for generalized setvalued strongly nonlinear mixed variationallike inequalities. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2005,124(3):725–738. 10.1007/s109570041182z
Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA: Equilibrium programming using proximallike algorithms. Mathematical Programming 1997,78(1):29–41.
Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Viscosity approximation methods for generalized equilibrium problems and fixed point problems with applications. Nonlinear Analysis 2010,72(1):99–112. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.042
Gao X, Guo Y: Strong convergence of a modified iterative algorithm for mixedequilibrium problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2008, 2008:23.
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: A hybrid extragradient viscosity approximation method for solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinitely many nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:32.
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: Strong convergence for generalized equilibrium problems, fixed point problems and relaxed cocoercive variational inequalities. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2010, 2010:43.
Jaiboon C, Kumam P: A general iterative method for addressing mixed equilibrium problems and optimization problems. Nonlinear Analysis 2010,73(5):1180–1202. 10.1016/j.na.2010.04.041
Jaiboon C, Kumam P, Humphries UW: Weak convergence theorem by an extragradient method for variational inequality, equilibrium and fixed point problems. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society 2009,32(2):173–185.
Jung JS: Strong convergence of composite iterative methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2009,213(2):498–505. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.048
Kumam P, Jaiboon C: A new hybrid iterative method for mixed equilibrium problems and variational inequality problem for relaxed cocoercive mappings with application to optimization problems. Nonlinear Anal: Hybrid Systems 2009,3(4):510–530. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.04.001
Peng JW, Yao JC: Strong convergence theorems of iterative scheme based on the extragradient method for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2009,49(9–10):1816–1828. 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.11.014
Takahashi S, Takahashi W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,331(1):506–515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.036
Yao Y, Liou YC, Yao JC: A new hybrid iterative algorithm for fixedpoint problems, variational inequality problems, and mixed equilibrium problems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008:15.
Yao Y, Yao JC: On modified iterative method for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2007,186(2):1551–1558. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.062
Marino G, Xu HK: A general iterative method for nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006,318(1):43–52. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.028
Plubtieng S, Punpaeng R: A general iterative method for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,336(1):455–469. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.02.044
Ceng LC, AlHomidan SA, Ansari QH, Yao JC: An iterative scheme for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of strict pseudocontraction mappings. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2009,223(2):967–974. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.032
Liu Y: A general iterative method for equilibrium problems and strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis 2009,71(10):4852–4861. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.060
Wangkeeree R, Wangkeeree R: A general iterative method for variational inequality problems, mixed equilibrium problems, and fixed point problems of strictly pseudocontractive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:32.
Qin X, Kang SM: Convergence theorems on an iterative method for variational inequality problems and fixed point problems. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society 2010,33(1):155–167.
Rockafellar RT: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1970, 149: 75–88. 10.1090/S00029947197002822725
Osilike MO, Igbokwe DI: Weak and strong convergence theorems for fixed points of pseudocontractions and solutions of monotone type operator equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2000,40(4–5):559–567. 10.1016/S08981221(00)001796
Browder FE: Nonlinear operators and nonlinear equations of evolution in Banach spaces. In Nonlinear functional analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XVIII, Part 2, Chicago, Ill, 1968). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1976:1–308.
Bruck RE Jr.: Properties of fixedpoint sets of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1973, 179: 251–262.
Peng JW, Yao JC: A new hybridextragradient method for generalized mixed equilibrium problems, fixed point problems and variational inequality problems. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 2008,12(6):1401–1432.
Suzuki T: Strong convergence of Krasnoselskii and Mann's type sequences for oneparameter nonexpansive semigroups without Bochner integrals. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005,305(1):227–239. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.017
Xu HK: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2004,298(1):279–291. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.04.059
Combettes PL: The convex feasibility problem: in image recovery. In Advances Imaging and Electron Physics. Volume 95. Edited by: Hawkes P. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA; 1996:155–270.
Kotzer T, Cohen N, Shamir J: Images to ration by a novel method of parallel projection onto constraint sets. Optics Letters 1995, 20: 1172–1174. 10.1364/OL.20.001172
Sezan MI, Stark H: Application of convex projection theory to image recovery in tomograph and related areas. In Image Recovery: Theory and Application. Edited by: Stark H. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA; 1987:155–270.
Censor Y, Zenios SA: Parallel Optimization, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA; 1997:xxviii+539.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments which improved the presentation of the original version of this paper. The first author was supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the Commission on Higher Education under Grant No. MRG5380044. The second author was supported by Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin Research and Development Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumam, P., Jaiboon, C. A System of Generalized Mixed Equilibrium Problems and Fixed Point Problems for Pseudocontractive Mappings in Hilbert Spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2010, 361512 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/361512
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/361512
Keywords
 Hilbert Space
 Variational Inequality
 Iterative Algorithm
 Equilibrium Problem
 Nonexpansive Mapping