# Remarks on Cone Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theorems of Contractive Mappings

- MohamedA Khamsi
^{1, 2}Email author

**2010**:315398

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/315398

© Mohamed A. Khamsi. 2010

**Received: **20 March 2010

**Accepted: **4 May 2010

**Published: **6 June 2010

## Abstract

We discuss the newly introduced concept of cone metric spaces. We also discuss the fixed point existence results of contractive mappings defined on such metric spaces. In particular, we show that most of the new results are merely copies of the classical ones.

## 1. Introduction

Cone metric spaces were introduced in [1]. A similar notion was also considered by Rzepecki in [2]. After carefully defining convergence and completeness in cone metric spaces, the authors proved some fixed point theorems of contractive mappings. Recently, more fixed point results in cone metric spaces appeared in [3–8]. Topological questions in cone metric spaces were studied in [6] where it was proved that every cone metric space is first countable topological space. Hence, continuity is equivalent to sequential continuity and compactness is equivalent to sequential compactness. It is worth mentioning the pioneering work of Quilliot [9] who introduced the concept of generalized metric spaces. His approach was very successful and used by many (see references in [10]). It is our belief that cone metric spaces are a special case of generalized metric spaces. In this work, we introduce a metric type structure in cone metric spaces and show that classical proofs do carry almost identically in these metric spaces. This approach suggest that any extension of known fixed point result to cone metric spaces is redundant. Moreover the underlying Banach space and the associated cone subset are not necessary.

For more on metric fixed point theory, the reader may consult the book [11].

## 2. Basic Definitions and Results

First let us start by making some basic definitions.

Definition 2.1.

Let be a real Banach space with norm and a subset of . Then is called a cone if and only if

(1) is closed, nonempty, and , where is the zero vector in ;

The least positive number satisfying this inequality is called the normal constant of . The cone is called regular if every increasing sequence which is bounded from above is convergent. Equivalently the cone is called regular if every decreasing sequence which is bounded from below is convergent. Regular cones are normal and there exist normal cones which are not regular.

Throughout the Banach space and the cone will be omitted.

Definition 2.2.

A cone metric space is an ordered pair , where is any set and is a mapping satisfying

(1) , that is, , for all , and if and only if ;

Convergence is defined as follows.

Definition 2.3.

Let be a cone metric space, let be a sequence in and . If for any with , there is such that for all , , then is said to be convergent. We will say converges to and write .

It is easy to show that the limit of a convergent sequence is unique. Cauchy sequences and completeness are defined by

Definition 2.4.

Let be a cone metric space, be a sequence in . If for any with , there is such that for all , , then is called Cauchy sequence. If every Cauchy sequence is convergent in , then is called a complete cone metric space.

The basic properties of convergent and Cauchy sequences may be found at [1]. In fact the properties and their proofs are identical to the classical metric ones. Since this work concerns the fixed point property of mappings, we will need the following property.

Definition 2.5.

for all . The smallest constant which satisfies the above inequality is called the Lipschitz constant of , denoted . In particular is a contraction if .

As we mentioned earlier cone metric spaces have a metric type structure. Indeed we have the following result.

Theorem 2.6.

Let be a metric cone over the Banach space with the cone which is normal with the normal constant . The mapping defined by satisfies the following properties:

Proof.

This completes the proof of the theorem.

Note that the property (3) is discouraging since it does not give the classical triangle inequality satisfied by a distance. But there are many examples where the triangle inequality fails (see, e.g., [12]).

The above result suggest the following definition.

Definition 2.7.

Let be a set. Let be a function which satisfies

(3) , for any points , , for some constant .

The pair is called a metric type space.

Similarly we define convergence and completeness in metric type spaces.

Definition 2.8.

(1)The sequence converges to if and only if .

(2)The sequence is Cauchy if and only if .

is complete if and only if any Cauchy sequence in is convergent.

## 3. Some Fixed Point Results

for any . The smallest constant will be denoted .

Theorem 3.1.

Let be a complete metric type space. Let be a map such is Lipschitzian for all and that . Then has a unique fixed point . Moreover for any , the orbit converges to .

Proof.

for any . Since , we get , or . Therefore we have for any , which completes the proof of the theorem.

The condition is needed because of the condition (3) satisfied by . In fact a more natural condition should be

() , for any points , for some constant .

An example of such satisfying is given below.

Example 3.2.

Then satisfies the following properties:

In the next result we consider the case of metric type spaces when satisfies . Recall that a subset of is said to be bounded whenever .

Theorem 3.3.

Let be a complete metric type space, where satisfies instead of (3). Let be a map such that is Lipschitzian for any and . Then has a unique fixed point if and only if there exists a bounded orbit. Moreover if has a fixed point , then for any , the orbit converges to .

Proof.

Since , then is a Cauchy sequence. Hence converges to some point since is complete. The remaining part of the proof follows the same as in the previous theorem.

The connection between the above results and the main theorems of [1] are given in the following corollary.

Corollary 3.4.

for any and . Hence , for any . Therefore is convergent, which implies has a unique fixed point , and any orbit converges to .

From the definition of in the above Corollary, we easily see that -convergence and -convergence are identical.

Remark 3.5.

In [1] the authors gave an example of a map which is contraction for but not for the euclidian distance. From the above corollary, we see that . Since may not be less than 1, then may not be a contraction for . This is why the above theorems were stated in terms of .

Using the ideas described above one can prove fixed point results for mappings which contracts orbits and obtain similar results as Theorem for example in [1].

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Huang L-G, Zhang X:
**Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive mappings.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007,**332**(2):1468–1476. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.087MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Rzepecki B:
**On fixed point theorems of Maia type.***Publications de l'Institut Mathématique*1980,**28(42):**179–186.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Abbas M, Jungck G:
**Common fixed point results for noncommuting mappings without continuity in cone metric spaces.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**341**(1):416–420. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.070MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ilić D, Rakočević V:
**Common fixed points for maps on cone metric space.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**341**(2):876–882. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.10.065MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Rezapour S, Hamlbarani R:
**Some notes on the paper: "Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive mappings".***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**345**(2):719–724. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.049MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Turkoglu D, Abuloha M:
**Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems in diametrically contractive mappings.***Acta Mathematica Sinica*2010,**26**(3):489–496.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Turkoglu D, Abuloha M, Abdeljawad T:
**KKM mappings in cone metric spaces and some fixed point theorems.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(1):348–353. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.058MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Vetro P:
**Common fixed points in cone metric spaces.***Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo. Serie II*2007,**56**(3):464–468. 10.1007/BF03032097MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Quilliot A:
**An application of the Helly property to the partially ordered sets.***Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A*1983,**35**(2):185–198. 10.1016/0097-3165(83)90006-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Jawhari E, Misane D, Pouzet M:
**Retracts: graphs and ordered sets from the metric point of view.**In*Combinatorics and Ordered Sets (Arcata, Calif., 1985), Contemporary Mathematics*.*Volume 57*. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1986:175–226.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Khamsi MA, Kirk WA:
*An Introduction to Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics*. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA; 2001:x+302.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Khamsi MA, Kozłowski WM, Reich S:
**Fixed point theory in modular function spaces.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*1990,**14**(11):935–953. 10.1016/0362-546X(90)90111-SMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.