- Research Article
- Open Access

# A Generalization of Kannan's Fixed Point Theorem

- Yusuke Enjouji
^{1}, - Masato Nakanishi
^{1}and - Tomonari Suzuki
^{1}Email author

**2009**:192872

https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/192872

© Yusuke Enjouji et al. 2009

**Received:**22 December 2008**Accepted:**23 March 2009**Published:**31 March 2009

## Abstract

In order to observe the condition of Kannan mappings, we prove a generalization of Kannan's fixed point theorem. Our theorem involves constants and we obtain the best constants to ensure a fixed point.

## Keywords

- Banach Space
- Euclidean Space
- Point Theorem
- Differential Geometry
- Fixed Point Theorem

## 1. Introduction

for all . Kannan [1] proved that if is complete, then every Kannan mapping has a fixed point. It is interesting that Kannan's theorem is independent of the Banach contraction principle [2]. Also, Kannan's fixed point theorem is very important because Subrahmanyam [3] proved that Kannan's theorem characterizes the metric completeness. That is, a metric space is complete if and only if every Kannan mapping on has a fixed point. Recently, Kikkawa and Suzuki proved a generalization of Kannan's fixed point theorem. See also [4–8].

Theorem 1.1 (see [9]).

for all . Then has a unique fixed point . Moreover holds for every .

Remark 1.2.

is the best constant for every .

From this theorem, we can tell that a Kannan mapping with is much stronger than a Kannan mapping with .

While and play the same role in (1.1), and do not play the same role in (1.3). So we can consider " '' instead of " .'' And it is a quite natural question of what is the best constant for each pair . In this paper, we give the complete answer to this question.

## 2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper we denote by the set of all positive integers and by the set of all real numbers.

We use two lemmas. The first lemma is essentially proved in [5].

holds.

The second lemma is obvious. We use this lemma several times in the proof of Theorem 4.1.

Lemma 2.2.

Let , , , and be four real numbers such that and . Then holds.

## 3. Fixed Point Theorem

In this section, we prove a fixed point theorem.

Theorem 3.1.

for all . Then has a unique fixed point . Moreover holds for every .

Proof.

So is a Cauchy sequence in . Since is complete, converges to some point .

which is a contradiction. Therefore we obtain .

which is a contradiction. Therefore holds.

In the case where , we consider the following two cases.

(i)There exist at least two natural numbers satisfying

Since , we obtain . Therefore we have shown in all cases.

From (3.11), the fixed point is unique.

Remark 3.2.

## 4. The Best Constants

In this section, we prove the following theorem, which informs that is the best constant for every .

Theorem 4.1.

Proof.

This completes the proof.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

T. Suzuki is supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Kannan R:
**Some results on fixed points. II.***American Mathematical Monthly*1969,**76:**405–408. 10.2307/2316437MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Banach S:
**Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales.***Fundamenta Mathematicae*1922,**3:**133–181.MATHGoogle Scholar - Subrahmanyam PV:
**Completeness and fixed-points.***Monatshefte für Mathematik*1975,**80**(4):325–330. 10.1007/BF01472580MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kikkawa M, Suzuki T:
**Three fixed point theorems for generalized contractions with constants in complete metric spaces.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2008,**69**(9):2942–2949. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.064MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Suzuki T:
**A generalized Banach contraction principle that characterizes metric completeness.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*2008,**136**(5):1861–1869.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Suzuki T:
**Fixed point theorems and convergence theorems for some generalized nonexpansive mappings.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**340**(2):1088–1095. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.023MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Suzuki T, Kikkawa M: Some remarks on a recent generalization of the Banach contraction principle. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications (ICFPTA '08), July 2008, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Edited by: Dhompongsa S, Goebel K, Kirk WA, Plubtieng S, Sims B, Suantai S. Yokohama; 151–161.Google Scholar
- Suzuki T, Vetro C:
**Three existence theorems for weak contractions of Matkowski type.***International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics*2010,**6**(supplement 10):110–120.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kikkawa M, Suzuki T:
**Some similarity between contractions and Kannan mappings.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2008, Article ID 649749,**2008:**-8.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.