# The Methods of Hilbert Spaces and Structure of the Fixed-Point Set of Lipschitzian Mapping

- Jarosław Górnicki
^{1}Email author

**2009**:586487

**DOI: **10.1155/2009/586487

© Jarosław Górnicki. 2009

**Received: **16 May 2009

**Accepted: **25 August 2009

**Published: **28 September 2009

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to prove, by asymptotic center techniques and the methods of Hilbert spaces, the following theorem. Let be a Hilbert space, let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of and let be a strongly ergodic matrix. If is a lipschitzian mapping such that , then the set of fixed points is a retract of . This result extends and improves the corresponding results of [7, Corollary 9] and [8, Corollary 1].

## 1. Introduction

Let be a Banach space and let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of . We say that a mapping is nonexpansive if

The result of Bruck [1] asserts that if a nonexpansive mapping has a fixed point in every nonempty closed convex subset of which is invariant under and if is convex and weakly compact, then , the set of fixed points, is nonexpansive retract of (i.e., there exists a nonexpansive mapping such that ). A few years ago, the Bruck results were extended by Domínguez Benavides and Lorenzo Ramírez [2] to the case of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings if the space was sufficiently regular.

On the other hand it is known that, the set of fixed points of -lipschitzian mapping can be very irregular for any .

It is not difficult to see that and the Lipschitz constant of tends to if .

For more information on the structure of fixed point sets see [4, 5] and references therein.

In 1973, Goebel and Kirk [3] introduced the class of uniformly
-lipschitzian mappings, recall that a mapping
is *uniformly*
*-lipschitzian*,
, if

and proved the following theorem.

Theorem 1.2.

Then has a fixed point in . Note that in a Hilbert space, .

Recently Sęd
ak and Wiśnicki [6] proved that *under the assumptions of Theorem 1.2 ,*
*is not only connected but even a retract of*
, and next the author proved the following theorem [7, Corollary 9].

Theorem 1.3.

Let be a Hilbert space, a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of and a uniformly - lipschitzian mapping with . Then has a fixed point in and is a retract of .

In this paper we shall continue this work. Precisely, by means of techniques of asymptotic centers and the methods of Hilbert spaces, we establish some result on the structure of fixed point sets for mappings with lipschitzian iterates in a Hilbert space. The class of mappings with lipschitzian iterates is importantly greater than the class of uniformly lipschitzian mappings; see [8, Example 1].

## 2. Asymptotic Center

Denote by the Lipschitz norm of :

Lifshitz [9] significantly extended Goebel and Kirk's result and found an example of a fixed point free uniformly lipschitzian mapping which leaves invariant a bounded closed convex subset of . The validity of Lifshitz's Theorem in a Hilbert space for remains open.

A more general approach was proposed by the present author using the methods of Hilbert spaces, asymptotic techniques, and strongly ergodic matrix. We recall that a matrix
is called *strongly ergodic* if

(i)for all ,

(ii)for all ,

(iii)for all ,

(iv) .

Then we have the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1 (see [8]).

then has a fixed point in .

This result generalizes Lifshitz's Theorem (in case of a Hilbert space) and shows that the theorem admits certain perturbations in the behavior of the norm of successive iterations in infinite sets; see [8, Example 1].

Let
be a Banach space. Recall that *the modulus of convexity*
is the function
defined by

and *uniform convexity* means
for
. A Hilbert space
is uniformly convex. This fact is a direct consequence of parallelogram identity.

Now we prove some version of Sęd ak and Wiśnicki's result [6, Lemma 2.1]. Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space , let be a strongly ergodix matrix, and let be a mapping such that for all , and

Let we use

to denote the asymptotic radius of at and the asymptotic radius of in , respectively. It is well known in a Hilbert space [8] that the asymptotic center of in :

is a singleton.

Let denote a mapping which associates with a given a unique , that is, . The following Lemma is a crucial tool to prove Theorem 4.1.

Lemma 2.2.

Let be a Hilbert space and let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of . Then the mapping is continuous.

Proof.

On the contrary, suppose that there exists and such that for all there exists such that and , where .

for all but finitely many .

which is contradiction.

This contradiction proves the continuity of mapping .

## 3. The Methods of Hilbert Spaces

Let , be as above. We define functionals

where . Let in be an asymptotic center of with respect to and , which minimizes the functional over in (for fix ).

Lemma 3.1.

One has .

Proof.

It is consequence of the above definitions.

Lemma 3.2.

One has

Proof.

Lemma 3.3.

One has for all .

Proof.

as , we get thesis.

Lemma 3.4.

One has for every .

Proof.

Taking , we get, .

## 4. Main Result

We are now in position to prove our main result.

Theorem 4.1.

then is a retract of .

Proof.

over in .

Thus, . This implies that see [8] for details. Thus for every and is a retraction of onto .

If is the Cesaro matrix, that is, for

then we have the following corollary.

Corollary 4.2.

then is a retract of .

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Bruck RE Jr.:
**Properties of fixed-point sets of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.***Transactions of the American Mathematical Society*1973,**179:**251–262.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Domínguez-Benavides T, Lorenzo Ramírez P:
**Structure of the fixed point set and common fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*2001,**129**(12):3549–3557. 10.1090/S0002-9939-01-06141-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Goebel K, Kirk WA:
**A fixed point theorem for transformations whose iterates have uniform Lipschitz constant.***Studia Mathematica*1973,**47:**135–140.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Goebel K, Kirk WA:
**Classical theory of nonexpansive mappings.**In*Handbook of Metric Fixed Point Theory*. Edited by: Kirk WA, Sims B. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2001:49–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bruck RE:
**Asymptotic behavior of nonexpansive mappings.**In*Fixed Points and Nonexpansive Mappings, Contemp. Math.*.*Volume 18*. Edited by: Sine RC. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1983:1–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sędłak E, Wiśnicki A:
**On the structure of fixed-point sets of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings.***Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis*2007,**30**(2):345–350.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Górnicki J:
**Remarks on the structure of the fixed-point sets of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in uniformly convex Banach spaces.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2009,**355**(1):303–310. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.02.003MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Górnicki J:
**A remark on fixed point theorems for Lipschitzian mappings.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1994,**183**(3):495–508. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1156MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Lifshitz EA:
**A fixed point theorem for operators in strongly convex spaces.***Voronezhskĭ Gosudarstvennyĭ Universitet imeni Leninskogo Komsomola. Trudy Matematicheskogo Fakul'teta*1975,**16:**23–28.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.